Preemptive middle glenohumeral ligament release in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair does not reduce the postoperative stiffness: a retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive middle glenohumeral ligament (MGHL) release in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) to reduce postoperative stiffness. METHODS: Patients who underwent ARCR were enrolled and allocated into two groups retrospectively: the preemptive MGHL release group (n = 44) and the preemptive MGHL non-release group (n = 42). Clinical outcomes were assessed and compared between the two groups, including the range of motion, Japanese Orthopedic Association Shoulder Score, Constant Shoulder Score, and the University of California, Los Angeles Score preoperatively and 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively and complications. The integrity of the repaired tendon was assessed at the 12-month follow-up using magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in all range of motion and all functional scores at any of the assessed time points. There was also no significant difference in the healing failure rate 2.3% in the preemptive MGHL group and 2.4% in the preemptive MGHL non-release group (p = .97), and postoperative stiffness was 2.3% in the preemptive MGHL group and 7.1% in the preemptive MGHL non-release group (p = .28). There was no postoperative instability in both group. CONCLUSION: ARCR effectively facilitates the recovery of range of motion and function in patients with a rotator cuff tear. However, preemptive MGHL release could not be an effective method to reduce postoperative stiffness.

Return to sports after arthroscopic Bankart repair in teenage athletes: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Anterior shoulder instability is frequent among young athletes. Surgical treatment for this injury aims to facilitate an early return to sports (RTS). However, the rate of recurrent instability after surgery is reportedly high among young patients, and it is unclear whether surgery ensures satisfactory RTS. The purpose of this study was to verify the clinical outcomes and RTS after arthroscopic Bankart repair in competitive teenage athletes without critical bone loss in the glenoid. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed competitive teenage athletes who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair. Patients with large bony defects in the glenoid, larger than 20% of the healthy side, were excluded. Clinical outcomes, recurrent instability, the final level of RTS, and the time needed for RTS were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 50 patients with a mean follow-up period of 44.5 ± 19.6 (range, 24-85 months) months were included. The mean age at surgery was 16.8 ± 1.7 (range, 13-19 years) years. Two patients (4.0%) experienced recurrent instability. All patients returned to sports, 96% of patients participated competitively, and 76% achieved a complete return to the pre-injury level without any complaints. The time for RTS was 6.6 ± 2.7 months (range, 3-18 months), to competitions was 9.3 ± 4.0 (range, 6-24 months) months, and to complete return was 10.6 ± 4.3 (range, 8-24 months) months. The complete return rates varied by sports type, with 82% in contact athletes, 59% in dominant-hand overhead athletes, and 100% in other athletes (P = 0.026). Other preoperative factors or concomitant lesion such as bony Bankart, superior labrum tear, or humeral avulsion of glenohumeral ligament lesion did not affect the complete RTS. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic Bankart repair is an effective surgical procedure for anterior shoulder instability, even among competitive teenage athletes. Sports type was the only factor associated with complete RTS after surgery.

Arthroscopic Bankart repair with peeling osteotomy of the anterior glenoid rim preserves glenoid morphology.

BACKGROUND: A decrease in the glenoid size after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) was common in shoulders without osseous fragments compared with those with osseous fragments. For cases of chronic recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability without osseous fragments, we have performed ABR with peeling osteotomy of the anterior glenoid rim (ABRPO) to make an intentional osseous Bankart lesion. The aim of this study was to compare the glenoid morphology after ABRPO with it after simple ABR. METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent arthroscopic stabilization for chronic recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with an osseous fragment, with revision surgery and without complete data were excluded. Patients were assigned to 1 of 2 groups: Group A, ABR without peeling osteotomy procedure or Group B, with ABRPO procedure. Computed tomography was performed preoperatively and 1 year after surgery. The size of the glenoid bone loss was investigated by the assumed circle method. The following formula was used to calculate the decreased size of the glenoid: (Δ) = (postoperative size of the glenoid bone loss) - (preoperative size of the glenoid bone loss). The size of the glenoid 1 year after surgery was assessed to determine if it had decreased (Δ > 0%) or not decreased (Δ ≤ 0%) relative to the preoperative size. RESULTS: This study evaluated 39 shoulders divided into 2 groups: 27 shoulders in Group A and 12 shoulders in Group B. In Group A, postoperative glenoid bone loss was significantly greater than preoperative glenoid bone loss (7.8 ± 6.2 vs. 5.5 ± 5.3, respectively, P = .02). In Group B, postoperative glenoid bone loss was significantly lower than preoperative glenoid bone loss (5.6 ± 5.4 vs. 8.7 ± 4.0, respectively, P = .02). The P value for the interaction of group (A or B) × time (preoperative or postoperative) was 0.001. The decreased size of the glenoid was significantly larger in Group A than in Group B (2.1 ± 4.2 vs. -3.1 ± 4.5, respectively, P = .001). The rate of shoulders in which the size of the glenoid decreased 1 year after surgery relative to the preoperative size was significantly higher in Group A than in Group B (63% [17/27] vs. 25% [3/2], respectively, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that ABRPO preserved the glenoid size better than simple ABR without a peeling osteotomy procedure.

Tranexamic acid administration for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of tranexamic acid versus placebo after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: This prospective, double-blind, and randomized study involved 66 patients who consecutively underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from 2020 to 2021 at our hospital. Thirty-three shoulders each were randomly assigned to the tranexamic acid and control groups. In the former group, 1000 mg of tranexamic acid (20 mL) was administered intravenously 10 min before surgery and the same volume of normal saline (20 mL) was administered intravenously in the control group. We evaluated visual clarity; visual analog scale pain scores at rest, during activity, and at night; the circumference and diameter of the shoulder joint in the groups before and after the surgery at 1, 2, and 3 days, and 1 week; estimated perioperative blood loss; and operative time. Visual clarity was rated using a numeric rating scale from grade 1 (poor) to grade 3 (clear) every 15 min throughout the surgery. We compared and analyzed the results between the groups. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of <0.05. RESULTS: Visual clarity was found to be significantly better in the tranexamic acid group, with a greater percentage of grade 3 visual clarity (75.6 ± 11.2% vs 68.1 ± 13.4%, p = 0.045). The visual analog scale scores at rest and at night in the control group were significantly lower than those in the tranexamic acid group for 1 week postoperatively (13.8 ± 14.8 vs 5 ± 9.3, p = 0.008, 36.1 ± 23.3 vs 19.3 ± 24, p = 0.012). The circumference and diameter of the shoulder joint, estimated perioperative blood loss, and operative time were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Intravenous administration of tranexamic acid is an alternative way to improve visual clarity in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; however, there are no other significant differences compared to the administration of placebo.

Clinical outcome and repair integrity after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: Triple-row versus suture-bridge techniques.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and cuff integrity of the triple-row technique and suture-bridge technique in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: Among patients with more than two years of follow-up (mean 27.4 ± 7.2 months), 71 shoulders that underwent the triple-row technique (46 male and 25 female; mean age, 62.7 ± 10.1 years; small-to-medium tears, 42 shoulders; large-to-massive tears, 29 shoulders) and 64 shoulders that underwent the suture-bridge technique (43 male and 21 female; mean age, 65.5 ± 8.4 years; small-to-medium tears, 46 shoulders; large-to-massive tears, 18 shoulders) were examined. The patient background, operation time, number of anchors used during the operation, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Active range of motion, and retear rate were evaluated and compared between the two techniques. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the patient background between the two techniques. The JOA score and Active range of motion were significantly improved compared to preoperative scores; however, there were no difference between the two techniques. The number of anchors used during the operation was 5.4 ± 1.6 for the triple-row technique and 4.1 ± 1.9 for the suture-bridge technique. Although significantly more anchors were used for the triple-row technique, there was no significant difference in the operation time between the two techniques. The retear rate was 7.1% for small-to-medium tears and 3.4% for large-to-massive tears using the triple-row technique, and 10.9% for small-to-medium tears and 33.3% for large-to-massive tears using the suture-bridge technique. The retear rate was significantly lower in large-to-massive tears when using the triple-row technique. CONCLUSION: The triple-row technique was an effective method compared to the suture-bridge technique in cases with large-to-massive tears.

Comparison of clinical outcome and repair integrity after arthroscopic suture-bridge and triple-row rotator cuff repairs of Fosbury flop tears.

BACKGROUND: The Fosbury flop tear (FFT) has recently been described as a rotator cuff tear that has flipped upon itself and adhered medially. FFT is known to have a high retear rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The cause of the high postoperative retear rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is believed to be due to the inability to achieve anatomical reduction because of difficulties in reducing the torn tendon stump. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs using the triple-row technique may allow better anatomical reduction of the cuff tear when compared with the suture-bridge technique. We compared the clinical outcomes and cuff integrity of the triple-row and suture-bridge techniques in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for FFT. METHODS: Patients with small-to-medium sized cuff tears of the supraspinatus tendon alone who were diagnosed with FFT, underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, and had 2 or more years of follow-up were included. A total of 34 shoulders underwent the triple-row technique and 22 shoulders underwent the suture-bridge technique. The following were compared between the two techniques: patient background, operation time, number of anchors used during the operation, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, active range of motion, and retear rate. RESULTS: No significant difference in patient background was found between the two techniques. Although active range of motion was significantly improved compared with preoperative scores, no significant difference was observed between techniques. The triple-row technique demonstrated a significantly higher 24-month postoperative JOA score, significantly shorter surgery time, significantly lower retear rate, and significantly larger number of anchors used during the operation. CONCLUSIONS: The triple-row technique was an effective method compared with the suture-bridge technique in cases with FFT.

Bone marrow edema in the acromioclavicular joint after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow edema (BME) in the acromioclavicular joint (ACj) may occur after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), resulting in persistent postoperative ACj pain. We investigated the incidence and clinical characteristics of BME in ACj after ARCR. METHODS: Patients exhibiting ACj-related symptoms prior to ARCR surgery, no BME in the ACj on MRI, and an ability to undergo 2-year postoperative physical and MRI examinations of the ACj were included. Patients who underwent distal clavicle resection or osteophyte resection below the ACj and those unable to achieve primary repair of the rotator cuff were excluded. MRI evaluation was performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients who showed BME in ACj on fat-suppressed T2 MRI at 24 months postoperatively were classified into the BME + group, and those with no BME were classified into the BME- group. Patient background, operation time, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, re-tear rate, ACj tenderness, and cross-body adduction test were compared between groups. In addition, we examined the time of occurrence of BME. RESULTS: A total of 345 ARCRs were performed during the study period. After the exclusion of 114 shoulders, the remaining 231 shoulders were included in this study. There were 208 cases in the BME- group and 23 cases in the BME + group. The incidence of BME was 9.96 %. Although the JOA scores of both groups showed a significant improvement postoperatively compared to preoperatively, there was no significant difference between the two groups. In terms of re-tear, there was 1 case in the BME + group and 7 in the BME- group. Positive ACj tenderness and cross-body adduction test were significantly higher in the BME + group (P < 0.001). BME occurred in 6 cases at 3 months, 9 cases at 6 months, and 8 cases at 1 year postoperatively. None of the patients developed BME at more than 1 year postoperatively. BME was observed on MRI in all cases at 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of occurrence of BME in the ACj after ARCR was 9.96 %. Patients with BME were significantly more likely to have ACj tenderness and positive cross-body adduction test. BME in the ACj often occurs within 6 months to 1 year after ARCR of small-to-medium rotator cuff tears, suggesting a relationship with postoperative functional improvement of the shoulder joint. The ACj should be considered as a potential site of persistent pain after ARCR for small-to-medium rotator cuff tears.

Does the timing of shoulder manipulation under ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block for frozen shoulder affect the clinical outcome?

BACKGROUND: Although the clinical outcomes of manipulation under ultrasound-guided fifth and sixth cervical nerve root block for frozen shoulder have been reported, few studies have focused on the timing of manipulation. This study aimed to determine whether the timing of manipulation impacts the clinical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 103 frozen shoulder patients (mean age 51.5 years) who underwent manipulation in one shoulder (n = 103 shoulders) between January 2012 and April 2019. Stiff shoulder was defined as limited range of motion in at least three directions, i.e., passive forward flexion of ≤100°, passive external rotation at the side of ≤10°, and internal rotation of ≤L5. The patients were categorized into two groups: those mobilized within 6 months after symptom onset (early group, 44 shoulders) and those mobilized >6 months after symptom onset (late group, 59 shoulders). The range of motion (forward flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation), Japanese Orthopaedic Association shoulder scores, Constant Shoulder Score, and University of California, Los Angeles scores before and 3, 6, and 12 months after manipulation were compared between groups. RESULTS: The late group exhibited significant improvement in forward flexion, external rotation, internal rotation, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, Constant Shoulder Score, and University of California, Los Angeles scores at 3 months; forward flexion at 6 months; and forward flexion and University of California, Los Angeles scores at 12 months after manipulation compared to the early group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that timing has a significant influence on the outcome of manipulation for frozen shoulders. The optimal time for manipulation may be >6 months after symptom onset. These findings can be applied in counselling for frozen shoulder patients and for improved outcomes after manipulation.

Return to sports after arthroscopic bankart repair on the dominant shoulder in overhead athletes.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) yields good results in young athletes with anterior shoulder instability. However, the treatment for overhead athletes is challenging because recovery of range of motion is necessary for return to play and repeated shoulder motion may lead to recurrent instability. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes and return to sports after ABR on the dominant shoulder in overhead athletes. METHODS: This study included 24 competitive level overhead athletes who underwent ABR on their dominant shoulders. The mean age at surgery was 17.6 years, and the mean follow-up was 39.7 months. The range of bilateral shoulder motion, the Rowe score, the Japanese Shoulder Society Shoulder Instability Score (JSS-SIS), and the Japanese Shoulder Society Shoulder Sports Score (JSS-SSS) were evaluated before the surgery and at the final visit. Recurrent instability, the final level of return to sports, and the duration before returning to sports were confirmed, as well as the pre-, intra- and postoperative factors, which prohibited complete return to play. RESULTS: There were no cases of recurrent instability. The Rowe score, JSS-SIS, JSS-SSS, and the range of flexion, abduction, internal rotation significantly improved postoperatively. Fifteen athletes (62.5%) returned to the same or superior levels without any complaint in their shoulders. The mean duration needed for a complete return was 13.3 months. The postoperative external rotation deficit in abduction was larger in the athletes who returned incompletely than those who returned completely, 7.8° and 2.3°, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ABR is a reliable surgery for preventing recurrent instability in overhead athletes, however the rate of a complete return to preinjury level was low and a long duration was needed for complete return to play. The postoperative external rotation may be necessary for a complete return to overhead sports. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: Retrospective Case Series.

Prevalence of Rotator Cuff Tears Among Older Tennis Players and Its Impact on Clinical Findings and Shoulder Function.

CONTEXT: Tennis is a noncontact sport playable at an individual's own pace. Thus, it is popular among the older adults. It is known that older adults often suffer from rotator cuff tears (RCTs), which may affect tennis activity. However, the prevalence and influence of RCTs on tennis play among older players are not well-known. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of RCTs in older tennis players and its impact on physical findings and shoulder function. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. METHODS: Fifty-three tennis players (mean age: 70.7 y; range: 60-83 y) participating in a recreational-level tennis tournament were examined in this study. An ultrasonographic examination of both shoulders was performed to detect RCTs. Relationships between RCTs of the dominant shoulder and clinical findings, shoulder pain, and shoulder function including range of motion, shoulder strength, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand-Sports Module score were assessed. RESULTS: RCTs were detected in 19 (36%) dominant shoulders and 6 (11%) nondominant shoulders. Asymptomatic RCTs were detected in 11 (58%) dominant shoulders and 5 (83%) nondominant shoulders. Increased crepitus and more positive results in the empty can test, and infraspinatus test were observed in the dominant shoulders with RCTs than in those without; however, there was no difference in shoulder pain, range of motion; strength; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score; and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand-Sports Module score between the players with and without RCTs. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of the older tennis players in this study had RCTs in the dominant shoulder with some positive physical sign of an RCT. However, shoulder pain and shoulder function did not differ between the players with and without RCTs, suggesting that RCTs had a minor impact on the tennis performance in the participants of this study.

Clinical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND: Although the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) have been reported, few studies have focused on diabetic patients. We investigated and compared the clinical results of ARCR in patients with and without diabetes. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 195 consecutive patients who underwent ARCR from 2015 to 2018 in our hospital. Twenty-seven and 168 shoulders were assigned to diabetes and non-diabetes groups, respectively. Diabetic patients with poor control were preoperatively hospitalized for perioperative diabetic control. We evaluated range of motion (ROM), Japanese Orthopaedic Association shoulder (JOA) score, Constant Shoulder Score, and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score preoperatively and at 6 months and 1 year post-ARCR. Rates of rotator cuff retear 1 year post-ARCR and preoperative and postoperative stiff shoulder were also evaluated. We compared the results between groups and analyzed them statistically. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Preoperative ROM, JOA score, Constant Shoulder Score and UCLA scores showed significant improvement at post-ARCR in both groups (p < 0.05). On comparing the groups, although preoperative JOA score and Constant Shoulder Score were significantly lower in diabetes group than in non-diabetes group (diabetic/non-diabetic group; 60.0/65.3 for JOA score; p = 0.003, 59.7/64.2 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.003), there was no significant difference postoperatively (6 months post-ARCR; 88.0/89.7 for JOA score; p = 0.783, 88.1/88.6 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.597, 1 year post-ARCR; 96.7/95.4 for JOA score; p = 0.238, 96.6/95.4 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.248). Furthermore, preoperative and postoperative stiff shoulder and retear rates were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.152, p = 0.344, p = 0.347, and p = 0.563, respectively). CONCLUSION: Diabetic patients showed comparable clinical results with non-diabetic patients post-ARCR. Perioperative diabetic control may be recommended for preoperatively uncontrolled diabetic patients.

Factors affecting the outcome of septic arthritis of the shoulder joint with arthroscopic management.

BACKGROUND: Good results have been reported with arthroscopic therapy of septic arthritis of the shoulder; however, few studies have focused on the risk factors for failure of arthroscopic surgery. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors affecting the recurrence or death post-surgery in cases of septic arthritis of the shoulder. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the records of patients who underwent surgical treatment for septic arthritis of the shoulder between 2009 and 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on complete recovery, recurrence, or death after a single arthroscopic surgery: the eradicated group and the recurred/death group. To identify risk factors for the failure of arthroscopic surgery for septic arthritis of the shoulder, the following parameters were considered: age, sex, presentation of a rotator cuff tear, the arthroscopic staging of the infection, diabetes mellitus, the causative organism, preoperative white blood cell count, and C-reactive protein level in blood. We compared two groups with respect to the presence of potential risk factors. RESULTS: This study included 22 patients with a mean age of 67.9 years. Septic arthritis of the shoulder was eradicated completely with a single arthroscopic surgery in 17 patients (77.3%). However, failure of the surgery resulting in recurrence or death was observed in 5 patients (22.7%). No significant differences were observed in other parameters between the two groups except for the causative organism. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was found in 1 patient (5.9%) in the eradicated group. On the other hand, Methicillin-resistant S. aureus was found in 3 patients (60%) in the recurred/death group (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: Most patients with septic arthritis of the shoulder are effectively treated with a single arthroscopic surgery. This study suggests that Methicillin-resistant S. aureus as the causative organism may be the most important prognostic factor in these cases.

Detection of Cutibacterium acnes in arthroscopic rotator cuff and bankart repair.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the detection rate for Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) in patients who underwent arthroscopic cuff repair and Bankart repair. METHODS: Arthroscopic cuff repair was performed in 105 patients (R group) and arthroscopic Bankart repair was performed in 29 patients (B group). Skin swabs prior to antisepsis, intraoperative synovial swabs of the glenohumeral joint (immediately after incision and prior to wound closure), suture of suture anchor, and postoperative swabs from the tip of arthroscope were cultured. Evaluation criteria were compared between groups and included the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus, operation time, frequency of preoperative injections, deep infections, and detection rate of C. acnes in multiple regions of the body. RESULTS: There were 14 patients (12.2%) in the R group and one patient in the B group (3.6%) with diabetes mellitus, and no significant difference was found between the two groups. The frequency of injections to the shoulder was significantly greater in the R group at 3.6 ± 4.2 times compared to the B group at 1.6 ± 2.0 times. There were no deep infections in either groups. The detection rate for C. acnes was significantly greater in the synovial swabs alone (skin swabs for R and B groups, 42.3% and 47.6%, respectively; synovial swabs, 10.4% and 1.8%; suture, 8.7% and 0%; tip of arthroscope, 4.3% and 0%). CONCLUSIONS: A significantly greater number of C. acnes samples were detected from synovial swabs of cuff tears, suggesting that its presence may be due to preoperative injections to the shoulder.

Ultrasonographic analysis of the extensor carpi radialis brevis in asymptomatic individuals.

BACKGROUND: Tennis elbow is characteristically seen as damage at the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) on ultrasonography. In this study, damage at the origin of the ECRB was investigated using ultrasonography in elbows without complaints pertaining to the joint. METHODS: We investigated 282 elbows on the dominant side in volunteers who consented to participate in the study and had no complaints or history of trauma to either elbow, no tenderness in the lateral epicondylar region on physical examination, and no pain upon resisted extension of the wrist and/or middle finger with the elbow extended (162 men, 120 women; mean age 62 years, range 21-84 years). On ultrasonography, damage at the origin of the ECRB was defined as low echo or disruption in fiber orientation. Comparison between groups with and without damage was performed based on age, sex, history of sports activity involving the upper extremity, and history of work involving loading of the upper extremity. RESULTS: Of the 282 elbows, damage was noted in 60 (21.3%). Comparing the groups with and without damage, mean ages were 66.2 (40-80) years and 60.9 (21-84) years. The group with damage included 31 of 162 (18.1%) male elbows and 29 of 110 (26.4%) female elbows; 10 of 64 elbows (15.6%) had a positive history of sports involving the upper extremity and 50 of 218 elbows (22.9%) had no history; 16 of the 64 elbows (25.0%) had a positive history of work involving loading the upper extremity and 44 of the 218 elbows (20.2%) had no history. Age was significantly higher in the group with damage. The group with damage showed no significant differences in other categories. CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic damage at the ECRB origin was noted in 21.3% of elbows at higher ages, but there was no association with sports or work.

Incidence of Propionibacterium acnes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: Recently, Propionibacterium acnes was reported to be involved in postsurgical outcomes. We investigated the detection rate of P. acnes and clinical features of P. acnes infection following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: Samples were collected from skin swabs before preparation, swabs of the synovium, sutures, and swabs from the arthroscope tip. We evaluated age, sex, presence of diabetes mellitus, preoperative contracture, operation time, blood test, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, cuff integrity, deep infection, and positive inoculation rate. RESULTS: We studied 90 patients (59 men and 31 women). Mean age was 60.6 years. Cultures of P. acnes showed a 65.5% positive superficial colonization rate (78.0%, male; 41.9%, female). Among the synovium swabs, P. acnes was detected in 13.6% and 0% of patients positive and negative for skin colonization with P. acnes, respectively. Positive culture was not correlated with age, sex, presence of diabetes mellitus, preoperative contracture, blood test, JOA score, cuff integrity, deep infection, operation time, and blood test date. CONCLUSIONS: P. acnes was detected at a higher rate in the skin of male patients. Patients with P. acnes detected on the skin showed higher rates of detection in the synovium. These findings suggest that the route of infection is via contamination. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic level III; Case-control study.

Can arthroscopic Bankart repairs using suture anchors restore equivalent stability to open repairs in the management of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation? A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recently, arthroscopic Bankart repairs have become much more popular than open repairs for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability. However, it is unclear whether the modern arthroscopic Bankart repairs using suture anchors could restore equivalent stability to open repairs. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare arthroscopic Bankart repairs using suture anchors and open repairs in regard to clinical outcomes. METHODS: A literature review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed was searched from January 1966 to January 2017. Studies were identified using the terms 'anterior shoulder dislocation' or 'recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation' and 'Bankart repair'. The search yielded 36 publications. After reading the full-text articles, we included four randomized controlled trials and five retrospective studies that compared arthroscopic and open repairs using suture anchors. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the two procedures in frank re-dislocation and revision surgery due to recurrence. However, the overall recurrent instability including not only re-dislocation but also subluxation and apprehension was significantly higher in arthroscopic repairs than in open repairs, while a significantly higher Rowe score and lower loss of external rotation at 90° of abduction were observed following arthroscopic repairs compared to open repairs. CONCLUSIONS: Modern arthroscopic Bankart repairs using suture anchors provide an equivalent outcome compared to open repairs in terms of apparent re-dislocation, but overall recurrent instability including subluxation or apprehension was still significantly higher in arthroscopic repairs than in open repairs.

Tranexamic acid has no effect on postoperative pain control after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacies of tranexamic acid (TXA) versus placebo after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Methods: This prospective, double-blind, and randomized study was conducted in 70 patients who underwent ARCR from 2021 to 2022 at our hospital. Thirty-four shoulders were randomly assigned to the TXA group, and 36 to the control group; TXA (10 mL) and normal saline (10 mL) were administered locally after surgery and in the control group, respectively. We evaluated visual analog scale pain scores at rest, during activity, and at night and the circumference and diameter of the shoulder joint in both groups preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 3 days, and 1 week after the surgery. We compared and analyzed the results between the groups. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of <0.05. Results: There was no significant difference in the visual analog scale scores at rest, during activity, and at night between the groups (p > 0.05). The circumference and diameter of the shoulder joint were not also significantly different between both groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Local TXA administration in patients who undergo ARCR does not significantly impact postoperative pain levels and the circumference and diameter of the shoulder joint.

The relationship between clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and hemoglobin A1c.

Background: The clinical outcomes of diabetic patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair have been reported. However, few studies have focused on the relationship between these clinical outcomes and postoperative hemoglobin A1c. This study compared clinical outcomes of diabetic patients with a hemoglobin A1c < 7% to those with a hemoglobin A1c ≥ 7% at 12 months post-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: This retrospective study involved 51 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from 2015 to 2020. Approximately 26 and 25 shoulders were assigned to a Low group (hemoglobin A1c < 7%) and High group (hemoglobin A1c ≥ 7%) at 12 months postoperatively, respectively. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes were preoperatively hospitalized for perioperative diabetic control. Clinical outcomes were shoulder range-of-motion, Constant Shoulder Score, and University of California, Los Angeles Score preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. Complications were also evaluated. Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in their range-of-motion, Constant Shoulder Score, and University of California, Los Angeles score at 12 months post-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (p < 0.05) except external rotation in High group. These improvements were significantly inferior in the High group compared to the Low group (Low/High group; 167.3 ± 7.7°/159.5 ± 16.3° for forward flexion; p = 0.013, 94.9 ± 7.6/90.1 ± 9.9 points for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.033, 32.6 ± 3.6/30.6 ± 4.1 points for University of California, Los Angeles score, p = 0.037). Hemoglobin A1c at 12 months postoperatively was also significantly inferior in the High group (Low/High group; 6.5 ± 0.3%/7.6 ± 0.8%; p < 0.05). The rate of rotator cuff retear was not significantly different between groups (Sugaya type4; p = 0.49, type5; p = 0.322) and there were no cases of infection or shoulder stiffness in either group. Conclusion: Diabetic patients showed improvement of their range-of-motion and function after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; however, patients with poorly controlled diabetes had significantly inferior improvement.

Arthroscopic treatment of massive acromioclavicular joint ganglion cysts with color-aided visualization: a case series of 4 patients.

Background: Acromioclavicular joint ganglion cysts are rare lesions that mainly arise from the degeneration of the acromioclavicular joint in elderly patients. Although surgical management may be required because of their high recurrence rate after aspiration, few reports have described arthroscopic surgical procedures to treat acromioclavicular ganglion cysts. We report the surgical results of arthroscopic ganglionectomy with color-aided visualization for massive acromioclavicular ganglion joint cysts. Methods: This retrospective case series examined patients identified with massive ganglion cysts that were localized above the acromioclavicular joint. All patients underwent an arthroscopic removal of subacromial synovium and subsequent injection of indigo carmine into the ganglion. The distal end of the clavicle was excised arthroscopically from the inferior surface, and the ganglion stalk was confirmed using indigo carmine for enhanced visualization and magnification. A ganglion portal was created, and the ganglion cyst was resected with the aid of the dye. Results: Four female patients, aged 78-90 years, were identified with a massive acromioclavicular joint ganglion cyst. Plain radiography showed joint degeneration in the acromioclavicular joint, and magnetic resonance imaging scans showed fluid-filled mass formation. Although all patients initially underwent multiple aspirations of the ganglion cyst, we opted for surgical intervention because of its persistent recurrence. Three patients exhibited concurrent rotator cuff tears, and one patient had a prior history of cuff repair with no retear. After arthroscopic ganglionectomy with color-aided visualization for massive acromioclavicular ganglion joint cysts, none of the patients have shown recurrences at 2 years postoperatively. Conclusion: Novel aspects of this case series include the use of indigo carmine to provide a better visualization and identification of the ganglion stalk under arthroscopy. Furthermore, a ganglion portal is useful for achieving complete resection of the indigo carmine-stained ganglion cyst. Color-aided visualization using indigo carmine and the construction of a ganglion portal were useful techniques for performing arthroscopic ganglionectomy in patients with a massive acromioclavicular joint ganglion cyst.

Post-operative pain control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Intravenous acetaminophen versus interscalene brachial plexus block; A prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: With the increasing number of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), postoperative pain control in these patients has become an important issue. We investigated and compared post-operative pain relief with intravenous acetaminophen (IA) and interscalene brachial plexus block (IBPB) after ARCR. METHODS: This prospective study involved 66 consecutive patients who underwent ARCR in 2019-2020 at our hospital. Overall, 23 and 43 shoulders were assigned to the IA and IBPB groups, respectively. We evaluated the visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at rest, during activity, and at night for the first 72 h postoperatively. We compared the results statistically between the groups. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: VAS scores for night pain in the IBPB group were significantly lower than those in the IA group for the first 24 h postoperatively (p = 0.017). In contrast, the same scores were significantly lower in the IA group than in the IBPB group at 72 h postoperatively (p = 0.024). Other scores were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: IBPB provides superior night pain control during the first 24 h postoperatively, and IA provides superior night pain control at 72 h postoperatively. However, there were no significant differences in other pain scores between the two groups.