Impact of a medication reconciliation care bundle at hospital discharge on continuity of care: A randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of a care bundle including medication reconciliation at discharge by a pharmacist versus standard of care, on continuity of therapeutic changes between hospital and primary care and outcome of patients, within 1 month after discharge. METHODS: Randomised controlled trial in 120 adult patients with at least one chronic disease and three current medications before admission, hospitalised in an infectious disease department of a tertiary hospital and discharged home. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a discharge care bundle including medication reconciliation, counselling session and documentation transfer to primary care physician (PCP) (intervention group) or standard of care (control group). Primary outcome was the proportion of in-hospital prescription changes, not maintained by the PCP, 1 month after discharge. Secondary outcome measures included the proportion of patients experiencing early PCP's consultation, hospital readmissions or adverse reactions within 1-month postdischarge and cost of discharge prescriptions. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. One month after discharge, the proportion of in-hospital prescription changes, not maintained by the PCP, was 11% in the intervention group versus 24% in the control group (P = .007). The median delay before PCP's consultation was longer in the intervention group (30.5 vs 19.5 days, P = .013), there were fewer patients readmitted to hospital (3.4% vs 20.7%, P = .009, odds ratio (OR) = 0.13 [0.02-0.53]) and fewer patients who suffered from adverse drug reaction (7.0% vs 22.8%, P = .04, OR = 0.26 [0.07-0.78]). CONCLUSION: This care bundle resulted in the reduction of treatment changes between hospital discharge and primary care.

Criterion validity of the spatial exploration test of upper limb mobility to evaluate the active horizontal workspace of children with spinal muscular atrophy.

PURPOSE: To determine the criterion validity of the SET-ULM (Spatial Exploration Test of Upper Limb Mobility), a functional workspace test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study from July 2017 to November 2018 in 30 children with SMA type 1 or 2. All children underwent assessment with the SET-ULM and the Motor Function Measure (MFM). RESULTS: We included 30 children. Median (Q1; Q3) MFM D1 (standing ability, ambulation and transfers), D2 (axial and proximal motor function), D3 (distal motor function) scores, Total MFM and Total SET-ULM active score were respectively 2.6% (2.6-3.8); 45.8% (19.9-65.3); 57.7% (36.9-80.9); 35.4% (16.7-43.2) and 70.2% (49.7-97.9). Total SET-ULM active score was strongly correlated with the MFM D2 dimension score (rho 0.82; p < 001), with the D3 dimension (rho 0.86; p < 0.001) and with the Total MFM score (rho 0.89; p < 0.005). Total SET-ULM active score differed between SMA types (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The SET-ULM has good criterion validity for the evaluation of available horizontal active upper limb workspace in children with SMA1 and SMA2. Future studies should evaluate reliability and sensitivity to change during a longitudinal follow-up study, as well as in a longitudinal trial of therapeutic effectiveness. CLINICAL TRIALS: NCT03223051IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Spatial Exploration Test for Upper Limb Mobility is a useful adjunct to the Motor Function Measure.It provides a precise evaluation of horizontal reaching ability.The Spatial Exploration Test for Upper Limb Mobility will be of great clinical utility for the evaluation of the effects of treatments for spinal muscular atrophy.