Risk factors and post-operative complications after gastrectomy for cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric resections due to carcinoma belong to the most demanding procedures in visceral surgery. This is due to the requirements for the extent of resection and lymphadenectomy, coupled with the need for functional reconstruction of the digestive tract. The procedure is associated with 18-46% morbidity, which delays administration of adjuvant therapy and worsens oncological results. Identification of risk factors for potential complications may play an important role in the indication and perioperative care. The aim of our study is to (i) evaluate the morbidity a mortality of a patient group with post-gastrectomy complications and to (ii) identify associated risk factors. METHOD: This retrospective analysis comprises patients treated in 2005-2016. Gastric resection was performed in 266 adenocarcinoma patients, 172 men and 94 women (median age 66 years). Early post-operative complications following gastrectomy were observed within 60 days. Complications and their severity were evaluated according to the extended form of the Accordion Severity Grading System. Selected demographic risk factors, operative factors and malignancy-related factors were analyzed. Multivariate regression (orthogonal projections to latent structure) was used for statistical processing. RESULTS: Overall morbidity and mortality was 34.6% and 3.4%. Serious complications occurred in 51 operated patients (19.2%). 24 patients had two or three complications (9%). The most common grades of severity were grade 2 in 31 patients (11.7%) and grade 4 in 20 patients (10.9%). The duration of hospital stay correlated with the severity of the complication. Most common surgical complications were: intra-abdominal abscess (16.4%, 17 cases), wound complications (5.3%, 14 cases), pancreatitis (4.9%, 13 cases), anastomotic leakage (3.4%, 9 cases), postoperative ileus (3.4%, 9 cases). Respiratory and cardiac complications were the most common non-surgical complications (8.6%, 23 cases and 3.8%, 20 cases, respectively). In the derived statistical model, BMI, the presence of more comorbidities, lesser surgical experience, the length of hospital stay and hospitalization at ICU were identified as risk factors associated with the grade of complication, morbidity, presence of serious complication and multiple complications. CONCLUSION: Gastrectomy plays a fundamental role in the curative treatment of gastric carcinoma; it is, however, associated with substantial morbi-dity and mortality. The best management of complications is their prevention. Preoperatively, the greatest attention should be paid to patients with several comorbidities and higher BMI. Resections should be performed by experienced surgeons. During resection, consideration should be given to the extent of resection and lymphadenectomy. In the postoperative period, the length of hospital stay, especially at ICU, should be reduced to minimum. Analyses of these risk factors may decrease the incidence of complications. Key words: gastric cancer - gastrectomy - risk factors - complications.

Hybrid thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer - retrospective analysis and comparison with transhiatal resection.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive methods for esophagectomy have been introduced to reduce postoperative complications. This paper compares open transhiatal esophagectomy and minimally invasive hybrid esophagectomy. Both methods have different extents of lymphadenectomy, transhiatal esophagectomy being considered less radical. METHOD: A single-centre retrospective study comprised 39 patients subjected to transhiatal esophagectomy and 25 patients subjected to hybrid esophagectomy combining thoracoscopy with laparotomy and cervical anastomosis. All patients were operated for middle and distal third carcinoma of the esophagus, including cardia (Siewert II), in the period of 2006-2016 at the Surgery department of Nový Jicín hospital. The data of both groups, in particular the incidence of early postoperative complications and the number of dissected lymph nodes, were statistically compared. Complications are reported according to the International Consensus on Standardization of Data Collection for Complications Associated with Esophagectomy. RESULTS: The duration of operation was significantly longer in the group that underwent hybrid resections (345 vs. 240 min, p<0.001). The number of dissected lymph nodes was comparable in both groups (15 vs. 16, p=0.072). Postoperative pulmonary complications were lower for hybrid operations (16% vs. 30.8%, p=0.243). The most common complication of transhiatal esophagectomy was pleural effusion requiring drainage, which occurred in 7 patients. The most common pulmonary complication of hybrid procedures was respiratory failure, which occurred in 3 patients. Anastomotic leak occurred in 5 patients after transhiatal esophagectomy and in one after thoracoscopic resection (12.8% vs. 4%, p=0.391). 30-day and 90-day mortality was nonsignificantly lower for hybrid resections (0% vs. 5.1%, p=0.516 and 4% vs. 10.3%, p=0.64). Following transhiatal esophagectomy, two patients died as a result of respiratory complications, one died from necrosis of the gastric tube and one from acute myocardial infarction. In the hybrid group, one patient died from respiratory failure. Hybrid resection exhibited lower morbidity (36% vs. 59%, p=0.123). The number of overall complications, irrespective of their severity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, was statistically in favor of hybrid resection (11 vs. 30, p=0.015). CONCLUSION: In our study, we found that thoracoscopic hybrid resection was a feasible and well-executable method, with a statistically lower incidence of postoperative complications. Thoracoscopy allows lymphadenectomy to be performed to sufficient extent. The large number and various combinations of esophagectomy techniques make it difficult to evaluate and compare the outcomes of individual methods. Preference for a specific resection technique within a given surgical department remains an important factor as clear recommendations for esophageal resections do not yet exist. However, the use of minimally invasive techniques in esophageal resections is gradually becoming a standard. Key words: minimally invasive esophagectomy - thoracoscopy - postoperative complications - lymphadenectomy.

Prophylactic ligation of the thoracic duct in the prevention of chylothorax after esophagectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Chylothorax after esophageal resection is an uncommon but serious complication with a reported incidence of 1-10%. It occurs after the injury of the thoracic duct or its tributaries. Chylothorax may cause an overall loss of several liters per day and may lead to dehydration, malnutrition and immunosuppression. Therapeutic approach has not been standardized. Prophylactic ligation of the thoracic duct during primary resection has been introduced to decrease the overall incidence of chylothorax. Its oncological benefit is unknown. METHOD: A retrospective single-center study of patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy from 2008-2016 for esophageal carcinoma at the Department of Surgery, Hospital Nový Jicín. 58 patients underwent transthoracic esophagectomy (Ivor-Lewis and McKeown). Prophylactic ligation of the thoracic duct was performed in 31 patients (53%). The incidence of chylothorax and the amount of harvested lymph nodes was analysed in the group with thoracic duct ligation (A PTDL 31 patients) and in the non-ligation group (B 27 patients). RESULTS: Overall incidence of chylothorax after transthoracic esophagectomy was 3.4%. Chylothorax occurred in two men (type 3B) in the prophylactic group (6.5%) and it was not observed in the non-ligation group. Statistically significant difference was not confirmed (p=0,494). Chylous leak was successfully treated thoracoscopically and by thoracotomy with repeat ligation of the thoracic duct. Non-significantly more lymph nodes were harvested in the prophylactic group (18 A PTDL vs. 15 B, p=1). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic ligation of the thoracic duct in our study did not reduce the incidence of chylothorax. Redo thoracotomy and redo thoracoscopy for chylothorax is feasible. In patients with high-output and long lasting leaks the indication for redo surgery should be early. Key words: chylothorax - esophageal resection - prophylactic thoracic duct ligation.

Current state of surgical treatment of cancer of the stomach and gastro-esophageal junction in the Czech Republic.

INTRODUCTION: Analysis of the epidemiology and treatment of cancer of the stomach (CS) and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) in the Czech Republic (CR). METHOD: Analysis from the National Cancer Registry (NCR) of the CR examined data up to the year 2013. RESULTS: In CS and GEJ, the incidence is 14.3, mortality is 10.5 and prevalence is 51.1 per 100,000 population. The Karlovy Vary, Olomouc and Moravian-Silesian regions had the highest incidences. The median age at diagnosis is 69 years for men and 72 years for women. Location in the stomach prevails in 85% of the patients, cancer of the gastric cardia occurring in 15%. In men, this ratio is 81 to 19%, in women 90 to 10%. The disease is usually diagnosed late; in 2013, 36% of CS and 32% of GEJ tumors were stage I and II. 53% of CS and 56% of tumors of the GEJ were diagnosed as stage III and IV, and in 11% and 12%, the stage was not determined. In the years 2009-2013 (1,580 patients with CS and GEJ), only 22% were treated surgically, surgery and oncological treatment was given to 21.3%, only non-surgical treatment was received by 15.7% and 41% of patients received no oncological treatment. Overall five-year survival in patients treated between 2010 and 2013 was 32%. At stage I it was 69%, at stage II 41%, at stage III 23% and at stage IV it was 6%. Five-year survival rates according to disease stage and type of treatment given and median of survival were analysed on 8,348 patients with CS and GEJ between 2004 and 2013. Surgery only was performed in 4,116 patients, surgery and radiotherapy was administered to 113 patients, surgery and chemotherapy to 1,855 patients, and 1,125 patients received chemotherapy alone. In 98% of the treated patients, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy was administered adjuvantly after the surgery. Primary operations were performed at a total of 175 surgical centers, only 22 of them performing more than 10 operations annually. The median of survival differed depending on the number of operations performed: at enters performing more than 20 operations, the median was 24.8 months (m); at enters performing 10-19 operations, the median was 18.2 m; at centers performing 6-9 operations the median was 18.1 m; and at centers performing less than 6 operations, the median was 13.1 m. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis is key for five-year survival. Treatment is based on surgery; greatest improvement is seen when surgery is combined with chemoradiotherapy, which is usually administered adjuvantly in the CR. At stage I in CS +9.5%, GEJ cancer +26.5%, at stage II in CS +14.7%, GEJ cancer +16.4% and at stage III in CS +13.3%, GEJ cancer +2.6%. Palliative chemo and/or radiotherapy does not prolong five-year survival and must be selected on an individual basis with regard to the expected benefit for the patient. Facilities performing a greater number of surgical procedures have better long-term results. Key words: malignant esophageal tumors - epidemiology - treatment - results.

[Sternal resection for metachronous metastasis from renal carcinoma]. / Resekce sterna pro metachronní metastázu karcinomu ledviny.

In this report, the authors describe a rare case of complete sternal resection for a metachronous metastasis from renal carcinoma in a 59-year-old female patient 12 years after primary left nephrectomy. Due to the large extent of resection, a polyester double layer mesh with bone cement was used for chest wall reconstruction. The postoperative course was uneventful without any indication for adjuvant treatment. The patient has been followed up for 20 months without any signs of complications and recurrence of her malignancy.Key words: sternum resection bone metastases renal carcinoma.

[Gastric stump cancer--unicentric analysis of 7 patients]. / Karcinom zaludecního pahýlu--unicentrická analýza 7 pacientu.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric stump cancer accounts for 14% of all gastric carcinomas. Originally this term included patients who previously underwent surgery due to peptic ulcer disease but today gastric stump cancer also includes patients diagnosed some time after primary gastric resection due to gastric cancer. The incidence is increasing. Gastric stump cancer is associated with poor prognosis and its reported resecability is around 40%. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 7 patients with a preoperatively histologically confirmed stump cancer who had been operated at the Department of Surgery at Nový Jicín Hospital during 2006-2014. RESULTS: We operated 5 men and 2 women with the median age of 70 years (5580). The primary surgical resection in all our patients was BII gastric resection due to peptic ulcer disease, and GSC had evolved within a median of 38 years (3246) after primary intervention. None of the patients had been regularly screened by endoscopy following primary surgery. We performed five curative resections (four total gastrectomies, one subtotal gastrectomy). Our resecability rate was 71%. In two cases, only explorative laparotomy was performed due to generalisation of the malignancy. Two patients from the resected group died after 30 and 34 months due to progression of their disease; the other three patients are still alive after 17, 19 and 88 months. CONCLUSION: Gastric stump cancer is a malignancy often diagnosed in its late stages. Regural endoscopic screening after primary gastric resection for benign disease can lead to diagnosis at an earlier stage, thereby improving the resection rate and overall survival. This also applies to long-term follow-up of patients with primary subtotal gastrectomy for cancer. Lymphatic metastasizing of the carcinoma can often be different due to the previous surgical intervention and altered anatomy. This must be taken into account during operations.

[Complications and risks of the surgery of tumors of the upper digestive tract (Foregut) Part I: Esophagus]. / Komplikace a rizika chirurgie nádoru horní cásti zazívacího traktu (Foregut) I. cást: Jícen.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the work is to evaluate acceptable mortality and morbidity associated with the esophageal resections for carcinoma. METHOD: The work analyses the data of patients with esophageal cancer from the Czech National Cancer Registry and it compares personal experience with complications and risks associated with the esophagectomy for carcinoma with the data from specialized literature published in recent years. RESULTS: Despite improvements in the surgical technique and the perioperative intensive care, the esophagectomy maintains a relatively high morbidity and mortality. Published studies present mortality up to 10% and total morbidity between 40-60%. Respiratory complications are most frequent and significant and they reach up to 40% and the anastomotic dehiscence ranges from 0 to 25%. At the authors workplace in Nový Jicín, a total of 193 patients with the esophageal carcinoma were examined since 2007; 38% of these patients were indicated for operation and 62 esophageal resections with replacement were performed. The postoperative mortality within 30 days was 3.2% and the total morbidity was approximately 50%. Respiratory and cardiac complications were 28% and 18% respectively, fistula in the cervical anastomosis was seen in 5% and in the gastric tube in 3%, only one patient died from this surgical complication. The paralysis of the recurrent nerve occurred in 10%, and chylothorax in 3%. In almost all patients, the operation began with a laparoscopic revision to confirm operability and in 37% of the operated patients a video-assisted approach was used, most often the thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus. CONCLUSION: The surgical treatment of tumors of the esophagus is a highly specialized domain of thoracic surgeons specialized in the issuesof the esophagus. General trends for improving the morbidity and mortality include the use of minimally-invasive approaches, fast-track programs after the esophagectomy, and the application of principles of High-volume centres. The long-term prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer is principally dependent on the degree of advancement of the disease.

[Complications and risks in the surgery of tumors of the upper digestive tract (Foregut) Part II : Stomach]. / Komplikace a rizika chirurgie nádoru horní cásti zazívacího traktu (Foregut) II. cást: Zaludek.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the work is to evaluate acceptable mortality and morbidity associated with stomach resections for carcinoma. METHOD: The work analyzes data of patients with gastric cancer from the Czech National Cancer Registry and compares personal experience with complications and risks associated with stomach resections for carcinoma with the data from specialized literature from recent years. RESULTS: The incidence of gastric cancer in the Czech Republic is presently 15.1/100 000 inhabitants, the mortality 11.6 and the prevalence 48.3. Stomach resections for carcinoma are complicated operations. Despite improving surgical techniques and tactics, as well as the perioperative intensive care, this procedure remains associated with significant morbidity and mortality. At the Department of Surgery of the Oncological Center and Hospital Nový Jicín, 286 patients with gastric cancer were operated between the years 2005 and 2012. In the group of 172 radical R0 resections, the mortality was 3.5% and the total morbidity was 33.7%. The most frequent and significant postoperative surgical complications were the pancreatitis (4.7%) and the anastomotic dehiscence (3.5%). The most frequent non-surgical ones were respiratory complications (4.7%). The mortality and morbidity frequency is comparable with the data published in specialized literature. Surgical treatment also utilized laparoscopy. All operations began with a diagnostic laparoscopy to specify the stage of the disease and to select the laparoscopic approach, most often a laparoscopically-assisted resection, which was used in 60 patients (30%). Laparoscopy was preferred even for the palliative anastomoses. No significant differences in morbidity and mortality were seen between open and laparoscopic procedures and statistical analysis is planned to gain greater experience. CONCLUSION: In the Czech Republic, surgical treatment of tumors of the stomach is currently performed at a large number of workplaces with a low frequency. General trends for improving the morbidity and mortality include the use of minimally-invasive approaches, a fast-track program, and the application of principles of High-volume centres. The long-term prognosis of patients with gastric cancer is principally dependent on the degree of advancement of the disease.

[Malignant tumors of the esophagus in the Czech Republic]. / Zhoubné nádory jícnu v Ceské republice.

INTRODUCTION: Data analysis of the incidence, mortality and basic data regarding therapy of esophageal cancer in the Czech Republic and determining possible ways to improve the current situation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analysis was performed using data obtained from the Czech National Cancer Registry and from the Registry of Thoracic Procedures from the Section of Thoracic Surgery of the Czech Surgical Society. Analysis of specialized literature provided generally accepted risk factors for the development of esophageal cancer. RESULTS: Esophageal cancer represents 0.7% of all solid malignant tumours in the Czech Republic (1.1% in males and 0.2% in females). During 1977 to 2008, the incidence increased from 2 to 5.4 cases per 100.000 inhabitants and mortality from 1.9 to 4.1 cases per 100.000 inhabitants. In absolute numbers, the incidence was 561 cases (5.4 per 100.000 inhabitants) in 2008. Absolute mortality rate was 452 deaths (4.3 per 100.000 inhabitants) and absolute prevalence (number of patients living with cancer or with its medical history) was 791 subjects(7.6 per 100.000 inhabitants). When compared to international data, the incidence in the Czech Republic is the 84th highest in the world and 17th highest in Europe (mortality rates are at the 85th place in the world and the 18th place in Europe). In the Czech Republic, the highest incidence is in the Moravian-Silesian and Zlin regions (6.1 per 100.000), the lowest in the Plzen (4.2) and Vysocina (4.1) regions. The average age at the time of diagnosis is 62 years in males and 68 years in females, the maximum incidence is between 55 and 69 years in males and between 58 and 79 years in females. Upon diagnosis, advanced stages of the disease predominate. In 2008, 28% of the detected esophageal cancer cases were stage I and II disorders, 60 % were stage III and IV disorders, and in 12% of the cases the stage was not determined. In the treated patient group, the five-year survival rate was 15.5% in total, based on an analysis of data from 2004 - 2007. The five-year survival was 30% in stage I and II diosease cases, 12% in stage III disorders and 2% in stage IV cases. When comparing the analysis of data from 2004 to 2007 with the analysis of data from 2000 to 2003, there is a 10% improvement in stages I and II and a 4% improvement in stage III disorders. According to the Thoracic Surgery Registry of Thoracic Procedures data covering the period 2007 to 2010, thoracic procedures are performed at 19 to 22 surgical departments, esophageal resections are performed at 13 to 14 surgical departments, but only in 8 to 9 of these departments is the frequency of such procedures more than 10 operations per year. At the authors' department, 53 esophageal resections have been performed in the past five years with a 3.8% postoperative mortality rate and a 23 % total postoperative morbidity rate. Forty-nine percent of the cases were adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSION: Based on its incidence in our population, esophageal cancer can be considered an unfrequent tumour. This analysis shows regions of the Czech Republic with higher incidence and the most at-risk age group in males. Significant risk factors for squamous cell cancer such as smoking and alcohol consumption have already been previously identified; in adenocarcinoma it is primarily Barrett's esophagus. Other risk groups include patients with achalasia and with strictures after corrosion injury to the esophagus. Acceptable treatment results may only be achieved in patients with less severe stages of the disease and it would therefore be appropriate to actively search for such patients in at-risk regions and among the risk groups as part of the preventive programs. To date, universally accepted guidelines for monitoring of such patients have not been defined. Surgical treatment is a highly specialized domain of thoracic surgeons focused on esophageal surgery and patients should be concentrated in specialized centres.