Safety, efficacy, and biological data of T cell-enabling oncolytic adenovirus TILT-123 in advanced solid cancers from the TUNIMO monotherapy phase I trial.

PURPOSE: TILT-123 (igrelimogene litadenorepvec) is an oncolytic adenovirus armed with tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-2, designed to induce T-cell infiltration and cytotoxicity in solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TUNIMO (NCT04695327) was a single-arm, multicenter phase I dose escalation trial designed to assess safety of TILT-123 in advanced solid cancers refractory to standard therapy. Patients received intravenous and intratumoral TILT-123. The primary endpoint was safety by adverse events (AEs), laboratory values, vital signs, and electrocardiograms. Secondary endpoints included tumor response, pharmacokinetics, and predictive biomarkers. RESULTS: 20 patients were enrolled, with median age of 58 years. Most prevalent cancer types included sarcomas (35%), melanomas (15%) and ovarian cancers (15%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The most frequent treatment related AEs included fever (16.7%), chills (13.0%) and fatigue (9.3%). 10 patients were evaluable for response on day 78 with RECIST 1.1, iRECIST or PET-based evaluation. The disease control rate by PET was 6/10 (60% of evaluable patients) and 2/10 by RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST (20% of evaluable patients). Tumor size reductions occurred in both injected and non-injected lesions. TILT-123 was detected in injected and non-injected tumors, and virus was observed in blood after intravenous and intratumoral injections. Treatment resulted in reduction of lymphocytes in blood, with concurrent lymphocyte increases in tumors, findings compatible with trafficking. CONCLUSIONS: TILT-123 was safe and able to produce anti-tumor effects in local and distant lesions in heavily pre-treated patients. Good tolerability of TILT-123 facilitates combination studies, several of which are ongoing (NCT04217473, NCT05271318, NCT05222932, NCT06125197).

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, endocrine adverse events, and outcomes of melanoma.

Objective: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can cause endocrine adverse events. However, endocrine adverse events (AEs). However, endocrine AEs could be related to better treatment outcomes. Our aim was to investigate whether this holds true in a real-world setting of metastatic melanoma patients. Design: A retrospective single-institution study. Methods: We included 140 consecutive metastatic melanoma patients treated with ICI between January 2012 and May 2019. We assessed the endocrine toxicity and the best possible treatment outcomes from electronic patient records, including laboratory parameters and radiological images. Results: Of the treated patients, 21 patients (15%) were treated with ipilimumab, 46 (33%) with nivolumab, 67 (48%) with pembrolizumab, and 6 (4%) with combination therapy (ipilimumab + nivolumab). Endocrine AEs appeared in 29% (41/140) patients. Three patients had two different endocrine AEs. Thyroid disorders were the most common: 26% (36/140), followed by hypophysitis: 4% (5/140). Three subjects (2%, 3/140) were diagnosed with autoimmune diabetes. Three patients had to terminate treatment due to endocrine toxicity. Radiological manifestations of endocrine AEs were found in 16 patients (39%, 16/41). Endocrine toxicity was associated with significantly better treatment outcomes. Median progression-free survival (8.1 months, range 5.1-11.1 months vs 2.7 months, range 2.4-3.0 months, P < 0.001), and median overall survival (47.5 months, range 15.5-79.5 months vs 23.7 months, range 15.3-32.1 months, P = 0.035) were longer for patients experiencing endocrine AEs. Conclusions: The higher number of endocrine AEs suggest that regular laboratory monitoring aids in AE detection. Endocrine AEs in metastatic melanoma may correlate with better treatment outcomes.

BRAF inhibitor treatment is feasible in the oldest-old advanced melanoma patients.

Although new compounds have improved the treatment landscape of metastatic melanoma, very limited data exist on the efficacy and safety of treating older patients with novel agents. Here, we provide results of BRAF (BRAFi) ± MEK (MEKi) inhibitor treatment in patients over 75 years (oldest-old patients) with metastatic melanoma. Between 2011 and 2020, 34 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma over 75 years of age (range 75-89) were treated with BRAFi ± MEKi at the Comprehensive Cancer Center of Helsinki University Hospital. Data on clinical and histopathological features, toxicity, response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were collected. Patients were treated with BRAFi (n = 22) or BRAFi in combination with MEK inhibitor (MEKi) (n = 12). Grade 1-2 adverse events occurred in 68% of the patients, 32% had grade 3 adverse effects, dose reductions were made for 41% of patients and 29% terminated treatment due to toxicity. Overall, the RR was 62%. Complete responses were achieved in 27% of the patients, and 35% had partial responses. The median PFS was 8 months (range 0-57), and the median OS was 15 months (range 0-71). Tailored BRAFi ± MEKi treatment for older patients is feasible. Adverse effects occur frequently but are manageable by dose adjustment. The occurrence of toxicity of monotherapy was similar to that of combination therapy. The RR and median OS from our retrospective study are comparable with those reported in clinical trials and combination therapy produced somewhat more and longer-lasting responses. Hence, it seems that older patients may benefit from BRAFi treatment.