Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline Part III: Salvage Therapy After Radiotherapy or Focal Therapy, Pelvic Nodal Recurrence and Oligometastasis, and Future Directions.

PURPOSE: The summary presented herein covers recommendations on salvage therapy for recurrent prostate cancer intended to facilitate care decisions and aid clinicians in caring for patients who have experienced a recurrence following prior treatment with curative intent. This is Part III of a three-part series focusing on evaluation and management of suspected non-metastatic recurrence after radiotherapy (RT) and focal therapy, evaluation and management of regional recurrence, management for molecular imaging metastatic recurrence, and future directions. Please refer to Part I for discussion of treatment decision-making and Part II for discussion of treatment delivery for non-metastatic biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The systematic review that informs this Guideline was based on searches in Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to July 21, 2022), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (through August 2022), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through August 2022). Update searches were conducted on July 26, 2023. Searches were supplemented by reviewing electronic database reference lists of relevant articles. RESULTS: In a collaborative effort between AUA, ASTRO, and SUO, the Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer Guideline Panel developed evidence- and consensus-based guideline statements to provide guidance for the care of patients who experience BCR after initial definitive local therapy for clinically localized disease. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous and deliberate efforts for multidisciplinary care in prostate cancer will be required to optimize and improve the oncologic and functional outcomes of patients treated with salvage therapies in the future.

Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline Part I: Introduction and Treatment Decision-Making at the Time of Suspected Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: The summary presented herein covers recommendations on salvage therapy for recurrent prostate cancer intended to facilitate care decisions and aid clinicians in caring for patients who have experienced a recurrence following prior treatment with curative intent. This is Part I of a three-part series focusing on treatment decision-making at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Please refer to Part II for discussion of treatment delivery for non-metastatic BCR after RP and Part III for discussion of evaluation and management of recurrence after radiotherapy (RT) and focal therapy, regional recurrence, and oligometastasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The systematic review that informs this Guideline was based on searches in Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to July 21, 2022), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (through August 2022), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through August 2022). Update searches were conducted on July 26, 2023. Searches were supplemented by reviewing electronic database reference lists of relevant articles. RESULTS: In a collaborative effort between AUA, ASTRO, and SUO, the Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer Panel developed evidence- and consensus-based statements to provide guidance for the care of patients who experience BCR after initial definitive local therapy for clinically localized disease. CONCLUSIONS: Advancing work in the area of diagnostic tools (particularly imaging), biomarkers, radiation delivery, and biological manipulation with the evolving armamentarium of therapeutic agents will undoubtedly present new opportunities for patients to experience long-term control of their cancer while minimizing toxicity.

Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline Part II: Treatment Delivery for Non-metastatic Biochemical Recurrence After Primary Radical Prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: The summary presented herein covers recommendations on salvage therapy for recurrent prostate cancer intended to facilitate care decisions and aid clinicians in caring for patients who have experienced a recurrence following prior treatment with curative intent. This is Part II of a three-part series focusing on treatment delivery for non-metastatic biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary radical prostatectomy (RP). Please refer to Part I for discussion of treatment decision-making and Part III for discussion of evaluation and management of recurrence after radiotherapy (RT) and focal therapy, regional recurrence, and oligometastasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The systematic review that informs this Guideline was based on searches in Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to July 21, 2022), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (through August 2022), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through August 2022). Update searches were conducted on July 26, 2023. Searches were supplemented by reviewing electronic database reference lists of relevant articles. RESULTS: In a collaborative effort between AUA, ASTRO, and SUO, the Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer Panel developed evidence- and consensus-based guideline statements to provide guidance for the care of patients who experience BCR after initial definitive local therapy for clinically localized disease. CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing and personalizing the approach to salvage therapy remains an ongoing area of work in the field of genitourinary oncology and represents an area of research and clinical care that requires well-coordinated, multi-disciplinary efforts.

Neuroendocrine Tumors: Diagnostics.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells. NEN are ideally suited for a theragnostic approach due to their specific expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTR). SSTR imaging of NEN dates back to the 1980s, but has evolved recently due to the introduction of more sensitive SSTR PET radiotracers. SSTR PET is a primary imaging modality for identifying NEN and characterizing SSTR expression. SSTR PET is complementary to anatomic imaging for assessing tumor response to treatment. SSTR PET is mandated to determine eligibility for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Here, the role of imaging to aid management of NEN is reviewed.

Alpha-emitter Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has become mainstream therapy of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors not controlled by somatostatin analog therapy. Currently, beta particle-emitting radiopharmaceuticals are the mainstay of PRRT. Alpha particle-emitting radiopharmaceuticals have a theoretic advantage over beta emitters in terms of improved therapeutic efficacy due to higher cancer cell death and lower nontarget tissue radiation-induced adverse events due to shorter path length of alpha particles. We discuss the available evidence for and the role of alpha particle PRRT.

Late Subacute Cerebral Hematoma Mimicking a Metastasis on PSMA PET/CT.

ABSTRACT: A 64-year-old man with history of prostate cancer was found to have rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy. 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT demonstrated a prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid brain lesion in the left frontal lobe and no other findings to account for rising prostate-specific antigen. Brain MRI demonstrated a small intraparenchymal hematoma with late subacute features in this location. The patient reported a seizure 3 weeks before but was otherwise asymptomatic, and neurologic examination was normal. Follow-up MRI demonstrated gradual decrease in size of the hematoma without treatment.

Evaluating the added value of concurrent contrast-enhanced diagnostic CT for PSMA-PET/CT Interpretation.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine whether concurrent contrast-enhanced diagnostic CT (DxCT) confers added diagnostic certainty compared to PSMA-PET/CT alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multi-reader study analyzed imaging comprising combined F-18-piflufolastat PSMA-PET/CT with diagnostic chest/abdominopelvic CT from prostate cancer patients within the first 6 months of FDA-approval of the PET agent. Six nuclear radiology readers were randomly presented with PSMA-PET/CT studies with or without DxCT and asked to report their diagnostic certainty for PSMA-avid lesions found on PET. Subsequently, readers re-reviewed the same study after an interlude (with the CT if not previously presented and vice-versa) to determine if DxCT altered their diagnostic assessment. Inter-rater concordance was assessed on a subset of images read by all readers. Diagnostic certainties for PSMA-PET/CT with and without DxCT were compared, and the variables for which DxCT may add value were examined. RESULTS: Good inter-rater concordance across readers was noted for both PET/CT (Finn's coefficient of reliability for overall scan certainty: 0.85,p < 0.01) and combined DxCT-PET/CT (0.59,p < 0.01). Overall certainty and concordance between PET/CT and combined DxCT-PET/CT datasets were similar (overall scan certainty: 92% ± 16 vs. 92% ± 17,p = 0.43), with no significant advantage for adding DxCT across different anatomic locations or clinical parameters. A slight predilection for combined DxCT-PET/CT was noted when interpreting images acquired for the initial staging of prostate cancer (89% ± 16 vs. 93% ± 17,p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Good inter-reader concordance can be achieved across different training levels with PSMA-PET/CT. Furthermore, using DxCT concurrent with PSMA-PET/CT does not significantly improve diagnostic certainty for most indications but may be useful for initial staging.

Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating the Addition of Pembrolizumab to Radium-223 in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

The checkpoint immunotherapeutic pembrolizumab induces responses in a small minority of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Radium-223 (R223) may increase immunogenicity of bone metastases and increase pembrolizumab (P) activity. In a randomized phase II study, we assessed the effect of R223+P compared with R223 on tumor immune infiltration, safety, and clinical outcomes in patients with mCRPC. The primary endpoint was differences in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell infiltrate in 8-week versus baseline bone metastasis biopsies; secondary endpoints were safety, radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and overall survival (OS). Of the 42 treated patients (29 R223+P, 13 R223), 18 R223+P and 8 R223 patients had evaluable paired tumor biopsies. Median fold-change of CD4+ T cells was -0.7 (range: -9.3 to 4.7) with R223+P and 0.1 (-11.1 to 3.7) with R223 (P = 0.66); for CD8+ T cells, median fold-change was -0.6 (-7.4 to 5.3) with R223+P and -1.3 (-3.1 to 4.8) with R223 (P = 0.66). Median rPFS and OS was 6.1 (95% confidence interval: 2.7-11.0) and 16.9 months [12.7-not reached (NR)], respectively, with R223+P and 5.7 (2.6-NR) and 16.0 (9.0-NR), respectively, with R223. Although R223+P was well tolerated with no unexpected toxicity, the combination did not improve efficacy. High-dimensional flow cytometry demonstrated minimal immune modulation with R223, whereas R223+P induced CTLA-4 expression on circulating CD4+ T cells. Clinical responders possessed lower circulating frequencies of Ki67+ T and myeloid cells at baseline and higher circulating frequencies of TIM-3+ T and myeloid cells by week 9. Although R223+P did not induce T-cell infiltration into the tumor microenvironment, exhaustion of induced peripheral T-cell immune responses may dampen the combination's clinical activity.