Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(Suppl 2): S225-S230, 2022 10 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35724112

RESUMO

The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant has been hypothesized to exhibit faster clearance (time from peak viral concentration to clearance of acute infection), decreased sensitivity of antigen tests, and increased immune escape (the ability of the variant to evade immunity conferred by past infection or vaccination) compared to prior variants. These factors necessitate reevaluation of prevention and control strategies, particularly in high-risk, congregate settings like nursing homes that have been heavily impacted by other coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) variants. We used a simple model representing individual-level viral shedding dynamics to estimate the optimal strategy for testing nursing home healthcare personnel and quantify potential reduction in transmission of COVID-19. This provides a framework for prospectively evaluating testing strategies in emerging variant scenarios when data are limited. We find that case-initiated testing prevents 38% of transmission within a facility if implemented within a day of an index case testing positive, and screening testing strategies could prevent 30% to 78% of transmission within a facility if implemented daily, depending on test sensitivity.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Casas de Saúde
2.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(11): 1554-1562, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34487450

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Candida auris, a multidrug-resistant yeast, can spread rapidly in ventilator-capable skilled-nursing facilities (vSNFs) and long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs). In 2018, a laboratory serving LTACHs in southern California began identifying species of Candida that were detected in urine specimens to enhance surveillance of C auris, and C auris was identified in February 2019 in a patient in an Orange County (OC), California, LTACH. Further investigation identified C auris at 3 associated facilities. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of C auris and infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in LTACHs and vSNFs in OC. DESIGN: Point prevalence surveys (PPSs), postdischarge testing for C auris detection, and assessments of IPC were done from March to October 2019. SETTING: All LTACHs (n = 3) and vSNFs (n = 14) serving adult patients in OC. PARTICIPANTS: Current or recent patients in LTACHs and vSNFs in OC. INTERVENTION: In facilities where C auris was detected, PPSs were repeated every 2 weeks. Ongoing IPC support was provided. MEASUREMENTS: Antifungal susceptibility testing and whole-genome sequencing to assess isolate relatedness. RESULTS: Initial PPSs at 17 facilities identified 44 additional patients with C auris in 3 (100%) LTACHs and 6 (43%) vSNFs, with the first bloodstream infection reported in May 2019. By October 2019, a total of 182 patients with C auris were identified by serial PPSs and discharge testing. Of 81 isolates that were sequenced, all were clade III and highly related. Assessments of IPC identified gaps in hand hygiene, transmission-based precautions, and environmental cleaning. The outbreak was contained to 2 facilities by October 2019. LIMITATION: Acute care hospitals were not assessed, and IPC improvements over time could not be rigorously evaluated. CONCLUSION: Enhanced laboratory surveillance and prompt investigation with IPC support enabled swift identification and containment of C auris. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Assuntos
Candidíase/diagnóstico , Candidíase/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Semi-Intensivos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , California/epidemiologia , Candida auris/genética , Candidíase/transmissão , Feminino , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , Assistência de Longa Duração , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(11): e753-e760, 2021 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32984882

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Candida auris is an emerging, multidrug-resistant yeast that spreads in healthcare settings. People colonized with C. auris can transmit this pathogen and are at risk for invasive infections. New York State (NYS) has the largest US burden (>500 colonized and infected people); many colonized individuals are mechanically ventilated or have tracheostomy, and are residents of ventilator-capable skilled nursing facilities (vSNF). We evaluated the factors associated with C. auris colonization among vSNF residents to inform prevention interventions. METHODS: During 2016-2018, the NYS Department of Health conducted point prevalence surveys (PPS) to detect C. auris colonization among residents of vSNFs. In a case-control investigation, we defined a case as C. auris colonization in a resident, and identified up to 4 residents with negative swabs during the same PPS as controls. We abstracted data from medical records on patient facility transfers, antimicrobial use, and medical history. RESULTS: We included 60 cases and 218 controls identified from 6 vSNFs. After controlling for potential confounders, the following characteristics were associated with C. auris colonization: being on a ventilator (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-15.4), receiving carbapenem antibiotics in the prior 90 days (aOR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.6-7.6), having ≥1 acute care hospital visit in the prior 6 months (aOR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.9-9.6), and receiving systemic fluconazole in the prior 90 days (aOR, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.6-22.6). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted screening of patients in vSNFs with the above risk factors for C. auris can help identify colonized patients and facilitate the implementation of infection control measures. Antimicrobial stewardship may be an important factor in the prevention of C. auris colonization.


Assuntos
Candida , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Fluconazol , Humanos , New York , Ventiladores Mecânicos
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(11): 396-401, 2021 Mar 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33735160

RESUMO

Residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs), particularly those in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), have experienced disproportionately high levels of COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality and were prioritized for early COVID-19 vaccination (1,2). However, this group was not included in COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, and limited postauthorization vaccine effectiveness (VE) data are available for this critical population (3). It is not known how well COVID-19 vaccines protect SNF residents, who typically are more medically frail, are older, and have more underlying medical conditions than the general population (1). In addition, immunogenicity of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was found to be lower in adults aged 65-85 years than in younger adults (4). Through the CDC Pharmacy Partnership for Long-Term Care Program, SNF residents and staff members in Connecticut began receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine on December 18, 2020 (5). Administration of the vaccine was conducted during several on-site pharmacy clinics. In late January 2021, the Connecticut Department of Public Health (CT DPH) identified two SNFs experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks among residents and staff members that occurred after each facility's first vaccination clinic. CT DPH, in partnership with CDC, performed electronic chart review in these facilities to obtain information on resident vaccination status and infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Partial vaccination, defined as the period from >14 days after the first dose through 7 days after the second dose, had an estimated effectiveness of 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 33%-79%) against SARS-CoV-2 infection (regardless of symptoms) among residents within these SNFs. This is similar to estimated effectiveness for a single dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in adults across a range of age groups in noncongregate settings (6) and suggests that to optimize vaccine impact among this population, high coverage with the complete 2-dose series should be recommended for SNF residents and staff members.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Connecticut/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(11): e718-e725, 2020 12 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32291441

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since the identification of the first 2 Candida auris cases in Chicago, Illinois, in 2016, ongoing spread has been documented in the Chicago area. We describe C. auris emergence in high-acuity, long-term healthcare facilities and present a case study of public health response to C. auris and carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) at one ventilator-capable skilled nursing facility (vSNF-A). METHODS: We performed point prevalence surveys (PPSs) to identify patients colonized with C. auris and infection-control (IC) assessments and provided ongoing support for IC improvements in Illinois acute- and long-term care facilities during August 2016-December 2018. During 2018, we initiated a focused effort at vSNF-A and conducted 7 C. auris PPSs; during 4 PPSs, we also performed CPO screening and environmental sampling. RESULTS: During August 2016-December 2018 in Illinois, 490 individuals were found to be colonized or infected with C. auris. PPSs identified the highest prevalence of C. auris colonization in vSNF settings (prevalence, 23-71%). IC assessments in multiple vSNFs identified common challenges in core IC practices. Repeat PPSs at vSNF-A in 2018 identified increasing C. auris prevalence from 43% to 71%. Most residents screened during multiple PPSs remained persistently colonized with C. auris. Among 191 environmental samples collected, 39% were positive for C. auris, including samples from bedrails, windowsills, and shared patient-care items. CONCLUSIONS: High burden in vSNFs along with persistent colonization of residents and environmental contamination point to the need for prioritizing IC interventions to control the spread of C. auris and CPOs.


Assuntos
Candida , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem , Chicago/epidemiologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiologia , Ventiladores Mecânicos
6.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(32): 1089-1094, 2020 Aug 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32790661

RESUMO

SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), can spread rapidly in nursing homes once it is introduced (1,2). To prevent outbreaks, more data are needed to identify sources of introduction and means of transmission within nursing homes. Nursing home residents who receive hemodialysis (dialysis) might be at higher risk for SARS-CoV-2 infections because of their frequent exposures outside the nursing home to both community dialysis patients and staff members at dialysis centers (3). Investigation of a COVID-19 outbreak in a Maryland nursing home (facility A) identified a higher prevalence of infection among residents undergoing dialysis (47%; 15 of 32) than among those not receiving dialysis (16%; 22 of 138) (p<0.001). Among residents with COVID-19, the 30-day hospitalization rate among those receiving dialysis (53%) was higher than that among residents not receiving dialysis (18%) (p = 0.03); the proportion of dialysis patients who died was 40% compared with those who did not receive dialysis (27%) (p = 0.42).Careful consideration of infection control practices throughout the dialysis process (e.g., transportation, time spent in waiting areas, spacing of machines, and cohorting), clear communication between nursing homes and dialysis centers, and coordination of testing practices between these sites are critical to preventing COVID-19 outbreaks in this medically vulnerable population.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Diálise/efeitos adversos , Surtos de Doenças , Casas de Saúde , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Idoso , COVID-19 , Humanos , Maryland/epidemiologia , Pandemias
7.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 17(10): 628-630, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32735492

RESUMO

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common and may occur in foodborne Salmonella outbreaks. Using data from PulseNet, the U.S. national molecular subtyping network for foodborne disease surveillance, we analyzed the 9781 Salmonella isolates associated with the 110 outbreaks from 2004 to 2013 that included at least one urine isolate. Within each outbreak, we calculated standardized isolation dates, using these dates in a linear mixed model to estimate the difference in incubation period for infections yielding stool versus urine isolates. We estimate that the incubation period for Salmonella UTIs is on average 10.6 (95% confidence interval 6.0-15.2) days longer than for gastrointestinal illness, suggesting that outbreak investigators should interview UTI patients about a longer time period before illness onset to identify sources of infection.


Assuntos
Período de Incubação de Doenças Infecciosas , Intoxicação Alimentar por Salmonella/epidemiologia , Intoxicação Alimentar por Salmonella/microbiologia , Infecções por Salmonella/epidemiologia , Infecções por Salmonella/microbiologia , Salmonella/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Fezes/microbiologia , Microbiologia de Alimentos , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Urina/microbiologia
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 66(suppl_1): S95-S98, 2017 12 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29293932

RESUMO

We describe a rare presentation of botulism originally presenting with exclusively unilateral cranial nerve deficits following a puncture wound to the face. Cephalic tetanus was initially suspected but laboratory testing confirmed botulism. Botulism caused by local diffusion of toxin from a contaminated head wound can be confused with cephalic tetanus.


Assuntos
Botulismo/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Faciais , Tétano/diagnóstico , Infecção dos Ferimentos , Adolescente , Botulismo/etiologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Traumatismos Faciais/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Tétano/etiologia , Infecção dos Ferimentos/complicações
9.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 22(11): 1915-1920, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27767011

RESUMO

Healthcare settings can amplify transmission of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), but knowledge gaps about the epidemiology of transmission remain. We conducted a retrospective cohort study among healthcare personnel in hospital units that treated MERS-CoV patients. Participants were interviewed about exposures to MERS-CoV patients, use of personal protective equipment, and signs and symptoms of illness after exposure. Infection status was determined by the presence of antibodies against MERS-CoV. To assess risk factors, we compared infected and uninfected participants. Healthcare personnel caring for MERS-CoV patients were at high risk for infection, but infection most often resulted in a relatively mild illness that might be unrecognized. In the healthcare personnel cohort reported here, infections occurred exclusively among those who had close contact with MERS-CoV patients.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Pessoal de Saúde , Coronavírus da Síndrome Respiratória do Oriente Médio , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Coronavírus da Síndrome Respiratória do Oriente Médio/imunologia , Fatores de Risco , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Adulto Jovem
10.
BMC Infect Dis ; 13: 291, 2013 Jun 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23806063

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During a Legionnaires' disease (LD) outbreak, combined epidemiological and environmental investigations were conducted to identify prevention recommendations for facilities where elderly residents live independently but have an increased risk of legionellosis. METHODS: Survey responses (n = 143) were used to calculate attack rates and describe transmission routes by estimating relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Potable water collected from five apartments of LD patients and three randomly-selected apartments of residents without LD (n = 103 samples) was cultured for Legionella. RESULTS: Eight confirmed LD cases occurred among 171 residents (attack rate = 4.7%); two visitors also developed LD. One case was fatal. The average age of patients was 70 years (range: 62-77). LD risk was lower among residents who reported tub bathing instead of showering (RR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-1.09, P = 0.03). Two respiratory cultures were characterized as L. pneumophila serogroup 1, monoclonal antibody type Knoxville (1,2,3), sequence type 222. An indistinguishable strain was detected in 31 (74%) of 42 potable water samples. CONCLUSIONS: Managers of elderly-housing facilities and local public health officials should consider developing a Legionella prevention plan. When Legionella colonization of potable water is detected in these facilities, remediation is indicated to protect residents at higher risk. If LD occurs among residents, exposure reduction, heightened awareness, and clinical surveillance activities should be coordinated among stakeholders. For prompt diagnosis and effective treatment, clinicians should recognize the increased risk and atypical presentation of LD in older adults.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Água Potável/microbiologia , Legionella pneumophila/isolamento & purificação , Doença dos Legionários/diagnóstico , Doença dos Legionários/epidemiologia , Idoso , Algoritmos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Doença dos Legionários/microbiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco
11.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0260055, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34780563

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A large portion of COVID-19 cases and deaths in the United States have occurred in nursing homes; however, current literature including the frontline perspective of staff working in nursing homes is limited. The objective of this qualitative assessment was to better understand what individual and facility level factors may have contributed to the impact of COVID-19 on Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and Environmental Services (EVS) staff working in nursing homes. METHODS: Based on a simple random sample from the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), 7,520 facilities were emailed invitations requesting one CNA and/or one EVS staff member for participation in a voluntary focus group over Zoom. Facility characteristics were obtained via NHSN and publicly available sources; participant demographics were collected via SurveyMonkey during registration and polling during focus groups. Qualitative information was coded using NVIVO and Excel. RESULTS: Throughout April 2021, 23 focus groups including 110 participants from 84 facilities were conducted homogenous by participant role. Staffing problems were a recurring theme reported. Participants often cited the toll the pandemic took on their emotional well-being, describing increased stress, responsibilities, and time needed to complete their jobs. The lack of consistent and systematic guidance resulting in frequently changing infection prevention protocols was also reported across focus groups. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing concerns of low wages and lack of financial incentives may have the potential to attract and retain employees to help alleviate nursing home staff shortages. Additionally, access to mental health resources could help nursing home staff cope with the emotional burden of the COVID-19 pandemic. These frontline staff members provided invaluable insight and should be included in improvement efforts to support nursing homes recovering from the impact of COVID-19 as well as future pandemic planning.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Cuidadores , Casas de Saúde , Pandemias , Adulto , Feminino , Instalações de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
12.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 22(10): 2016-2020.e2, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34508695

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In December 2020, CDC launched the Pharmacy Partnership for Long-Term Care Program to facilitate COVID-19 vaccination of residents and staff in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), including assisted living (AL) and other residential care (RC) communities. We aimed to assess vaccine uptake in these communities and identify characteristics that might impact uptake. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: AL/RC communities in the Pharmacy Partnership for Long-Term Care Program that had ≥1 on-site vaccination clinic during December 18, 2020-April 21, 2021. METHODS: We estimated uptake using the cumulative number of doses of COVID-19 vaccine administered and normalizing by the number of AL/RC community beds. We estimated the percentage of residents vaccinated in 3 states using AL census counts. We linked community vaccine administration data with county-level social vulnerability index (SVI) measures to calculate median vaccine uptake by SVI tertile. RESULTS: In AL communities, a median of 67 residents [interquartile range (IQR): 48-90] and 32 staff members (IQR: 15-60) per 100 beds received a first dose of COVID-19 vaccine at the first on-site clinic; in RC, a median of 8 residents (IQR: 5-10) and 5 staff members (IQR: 2-12) per 10 beds received a first dose. Among 3 states with available AL resident census data, median resident first-dose uptake at the first clinic was 93% (IQR: 85-108) in Connecticut, 85% in Georgia (IQR: 70-102), and 78% (IQR: 56-91) in Tennessee. Among both residents and staff, cumulative first-dose vaccine uptake increased with increasing social vulnerability related to housing type and transportation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: COVID-19 vaccination of residents and staff in LTCFs is a public health priority. On-site clinics may help to increase vaccine uptake, particularly when transportation may be a barrier. Ensuring steady access to COVID-19 vaccine in LTCFs following the conclusion of the Pharmacy Partnership is critical to maintaining high vaccination coverage among residents and staff.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Farmácia , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração , SARS-CoV-2
13.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(4): 448-454, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33077004

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of targeted gown and glove use by healthcare personnel caring for high-risk nursing-home residents to prevent Staphylococcus aureus acquisition in short-stay residents. DESIGN: Uncontrolled clinical trial. SETTING: This study was conducted in 2 community-based nursing homes in Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 322 residents on mixed short- and long-stay units. METHODS: During a 2-month baseline period, all residents had nose and inguinal fold swabs taken to estimate S. aureus acquisition. The intervention was iteratively developed using a participatory human factors engineering approach. During a 2-month intervention period, healthcare personnel wore gowns and gloves for high-risk care activities while caring for residents with wounds or medical devices, and S. aureus acquisition was measured again. Whole-genome sequencing was used to assess whether the acquisition represented resident-to-resident transmission. RESULTS: Among short-stay residents, the methicillin-resistant S. aureus acquisition rate decreased from 11.9% during the baseline period to 3.6% during the intervention period (odds ratio [OR], 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.92; P = .026). The methicillin-susceptible S. aureus acquisition rate went from 9.1% during the baseline period to 4.0% during the intervention period (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.12-1.42; P = .15). The S. aureus resident-to-resident transmission rate decreased from 5.9% during the baseline period to 0.8% during the intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted gown and glove use by healthcare personnel for high-risk care activities while caring for residents with wounds or medical devices, regardless of their S. aureus colonization status, is feasible and potentially decreases S. aureus acquisition and transmission in short-stay community-based nursing-home residents.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Casas de Saúde , Projetos Piloto , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Staphylococcus aureus
14.
Case Rep Infect Dis ; 2019: 5369707, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30915246

RESUMO

Q fever is a zoonotic bacterial infection caused by Coxiella burnetii. Chronic Q fever comprises less than five percent of all Q fever cases and, of those, endocarditis is the most common presentation (up to 78% of cases), followed by vascular involvement. Risk factors for chronic Q fever with vascular involvement include previous vascular surgery, preexisting valvular defects, aneurysms, and vascular prostheses. The most common symptoms of chronic Q fever with vascular involvement are nonspecific, including weight loss, fatigue, and abdominal pain. Criteria for diagnosis of chronic Q fever include clinical evidence of infection and laboratory criteria (antibody detection, detection of Coxiella burnetii DNA, or growth in culture). Treatment of chronic Q fever with vascular involvement includes a prolonged course of doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine (≥18 months) as well as early surgical intervention, which has been shown to improve survival. Mortality is high in untreated chronic Q fever. We report a case of chronic Q fever with vascular involvement in a 77-year-old man with prior infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair, who lived near a livestock farm in the southeastern United States.

15.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 95(1): 221-8, 2016 07 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27139438

RESUMO

In south Asia, where diarrhea is common and antibiotics are accessible without prescription, antimicrobial resistance is an emerging and serious problem. However, beliefs and behaviors related to antimicrobial resistance are poorly understood. We explored laypersons' and health-care providers' (HCP) awareness and perceptions of antimicrobial resistance in the context of treatment of adult diarrheal disease in Karachi, Pakistan. In-depth, open-ended interviews were conducted with 40 laypersons and 45 HCPs in a lower-middle-class urban neighborhood. Interviews conducted in Urdu were audiotaped, transcribed, translated, and coded using applied thematic analysis. Slightly over half of laypersons and two-thirds of HCPs were aware that antimicrobial medication could lose effectiveness, but misperceptions were common. Laypersons and HCPs often believed that "the body becomes immune" or "bacteria attack more strongly" if medications are taken "improperly." Another prevalent theme was that causes and effects of antimicrobial resistance are limited to the individual taking the antimicrobial medication and to the specific diarrheal episode. Participants often attributed antimicrobial resistance to patient behaviors; HCP behavior was rarely discussed. Less than half of the HCPs were aware of treatment guidelines. To combat antimicrobial resistance in urban Pakistan, a health systems strategy and community-supported outreach campaigns on appropriate antimicrobial use are needed.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Diarreia/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Adolescente , Adulto , Diarreia/microbiologia , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paquistão , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
16.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 94(3): 525-31, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26811433

RESUMO

Coxiella burnetii is a zoonotic pathogen that causes Q fever in humans and is transmitted primarily from infected goats, sheep, or cows. Q fever typically presents as an acute febrile illness; however, individuals with certain predisposing conditions, including cardiac valvulopathy, are at risk for chronic Q fever, a serious manifestation that may present as endocarditis. In response to a cluster of Q fever cases detected by public health surveillance, we evaluated C. burnetii infection in a community that operates a large-scale cow and goat dairy. A case was defined as an individual linked to the community with a C. burnetii phase II IgG titer ≥ 128. Of 135 participants, 47 (35%) cases were identified. Contact with or close proximity to cows, goats, and their excreta was associated with being a case (relative risk 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.3-5.3). Cases were also identified among individuals without cow or goat contact and could be related to windborne spread or tracking of C. burnetii on fomites within the community. A history of injection drug use was reported by 26/130 (20%) participants; follow-up for the presence of valvulopathy and monitoring for development of chronic Q fever may be especially important among this population.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Bovinos/microbiologia , Coxiella burnetii/isolamento & purificação , Doenças das Cabras/microbiologia , Febre Q/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Animais , Bovinos , Doenças dos Bovinos/epidemiologia , Criança , Feminino , Doenças das Cabras/epidemiologia , Cabras , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Missouri/epidemiologia , Febre Q/microbiologia , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem , Zoonoses
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa