A prospective audit of the 10-year outcomes from low dose-rate brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancer.

AIM: New Zealand men diagnosed with early stage prostate cancer need to know what outcomes to expect from management options. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2016, 951 men were treated with low dose-rate brachytherapy (permanent iodine-125 seed implantation) by the Wellington Prostate Brachytherapy Group based at Southern Cross Hospital, Wellington. At follow up after treatment, men had their PSA measured and were scored for urinary, bowel and sexual side effects. RESULTS: Median follow-up of men was 7.9 years (range 2.0-16.3 years). Ten-year PSA control was 95% for the 551 men with low-risk prostate cancer and 82% for the 400 men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Adverse effects were generally minor and short-term only. Temporary urinary obstruction developed soon after the implant in 2.6% men, and the 10-year cumulative risk of urethral stricture was 2.6%. Erectile dysfunction developed in 29% men, two-thirds of whom had a good response to a PDE5 inhibitor. Most men returned to a normal routine within four days of the implant. CONCLUSION: LDR brachytherapy is a highly effective low-impact treatment option for New Zealand men with early stage prostate cancer.

Patterns of failure after iodine-125 seed implantation for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the site of relapse when biochemical failure (BF) occurs after iodine-125 seed implantation for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2001-2009, 500 men underwent implantation in Wellington, New Zealand. Men who sustained BF were placed on relapse guidelines that delayed restaging and intervention until the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was ⩾20 ng/mL. RESULTS: Most implants (86%) had a prostate D90 of ⩾90%, and multivariate analysis showed that this parameter was not a variable that affected the risk of BF. Of 21 BFs that occurred, the site of failure was discovered to be local in one case and distant in nine cases. Restaging failed to identify the site of relapse in two cases. In nine cases the trigger for restaging had not been reached. CONCLUSIONS: If post-implant dosimetry is generally within the optimal range, distant rather than local failure appears to be the main cause of BF. Hormone treatment is therefore the most commonly indicated secondary treatment intervention (STI). Delaying the start of STI prevents the unnecessary treatment of men who undergo PSA 'bounce' and have PSA dynamics initially mimicking those of BF.