A comparative evaluation of radical prostatectomy using laparoscopic and open method in view of surgical margins.

Introduction: A positive surgical margin (PSM) in the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen is associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and the need for adjuvant radiation therapy, and is an analysis of surgical procedure quality. We present data describing the identification, anatomy, and management of PSM after RP performed via an open operation and laparoscopically. The aim of the study was to compare assessment of RP (open vs. laparoscopic) in terms of analysis of PSM in postoperative histopathological tissue. Material and methods: Patients with pT1 to pT3b prostate cancer with detailed surgical margin parameters and BCR status were analysed. The patients were divided into groups depending on the stage of neoplastic disease and the choice of operative procedure. Results: In total, we obtained data from 140 PC patients. Positive surgical margins were confirmed in 11 cases treated with open surgery and in 7 cases treated with laparoscopic procedure. There was no statistically significant (p >0.05) relationship between the frequency of positive margins and the type of procedure. There was no statistically significant (p >0.05) relationship between the frequency of positive margins and the type of procedure in subgroups according to the Gleason score. There was a statistically significant (p <0.05) relationship between the clinical stage of the tumor and the type of margin. This particularly refers to tumours with stage T3b (more numerous in the group of open surgeries) and T2c (more numerous in the laparoscopic group). Conclusions: There was no statistically significant correlation between the type of surgery and the incidence of a positive surgical margin.

Comparison of the Results of Therapy for cT1 Renal Carcinoma with Nephron-Sparing Surgery (NSS) vs. Percutaneous Thermal Ablation (TA).

Implementation of ultrasonography (USG), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into abdominal cavity diagnostics enabled early detection of cT1 graded renal cancers. According to European Association of Urology (EAU) and Polish urological Association (PUA) recommended method of treatment is sparing resection of renal parenchyma with tumour-nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). In selected cases other methods such as thermal ablation (TA) or cryoablation can be introduced /1/. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results of treatment of cT1 renal tumours with the use of NSS and TA methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 140 patients with cT1 renal carcinoma were treated in 2nd Department of Urology of Medical University of Lodz between 2014 and 2017. Neuron-sparing surgery was performed in 56 cases (40%), while percutane-ous thermal ablation (TA) in 84 cases (60%). Demographic data, clinical data (lab results, Charlson index), nephrometry data (tumour size, location, R.E.N.A.L. score) post-operative data (Clavien-Dindo classifica-tion) were investigated. Histopathology results, Fuhrman malignancy grading, as total three-year survival of patients were evaluated. The following methods were used for statistical evaluation: Chi2, Fisher, W Shapiro-Wilk, U Mann-Whitney tests, Kaplan-Meier's curve and Cox model. The results were displayed in a form of median and upper and lower quartile values (25-75%). RESULTS: No statistical differences in gender nor left/right kidney location were observed. Patients, who underwent TA were at average 10 years older and had multiple comorbidities (median age for TA was 79, for NSS 68; median Charlson index for TA was 5 and for NSS was 3). TA patients had lesser haematological values (Hb, Ht). R.E.N.A.L. scoring demonstrated comparable nephrometry in both groups. NSS procedure was open laparotomy without temporary clamping of renal vessels. Surgical margins of resected tumours were negative. TA was performed with Cool-Tip Covidienequipment with the use of Cluster electrode and was ultraso-nography-guided. Post-treatment complications evaluated with the use of Clavien-Dindo classification were slightly more frequent for NSS method. Patients after NSS were discharged at average after 8.5 days and after TA after 3 days. Histopathological type and Fuhrman malignancy grading were comparable in both groups. TA treated patients' death risk was 9-fold of that observed in NSS treated patients. There was 1 death for each group in perioperative period. CONCLUSION: 1. NSS was associated with slightly higher side effect rate but resulted in prolonged survival. 2. TA was applied to elderly patients with comorbidities. Despite less invasive treatment this group had poorer/reduced survival. 3. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the treatment method were relevant survival factors in patients treated due to cT1 renal cancer tumours.

Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: An initial report following the first 30 cases.

INTRODUCTION: To present initial observations after the first 30 cases of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy carried out at our department, which so far has had no experience with this surgical procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the period of 15 months a group of 30 patients with organ confined prostate cancer, underwent endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy using Montsouris technique. All procedures were performed by the same team of two urologists and one resident. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 65.3 years (43-73 years), the mean preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 7.2 ng/ml (4-9.8 ng/ml), the mean prostate volume measured in TRUS was 41 cm³ (25-80 cm³). The mean operative time was 3 h 55 min (3 h 15 min - 5 h 30 min). The negative margin was achieved in 26 patients (86%). In seven patients (23%) blood transfusion was required. Three patients had intraoperative rectal injury. In two cases trauma was supplied laparoscopically, and in one case it was decided to perform diverting colostomy. The majority of patients (65%) were discharged home on the fifth day after surgery. Two months postoperatively 13 patients (43%) were continent, 16 (35%) presented moderate stress incontinence with occasional urine leakage during normal activity and 1 patient (3%) presented severe stress incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy during the early phase of learning is technically difficult, requiring from the operator the laparoscopic skills, determination and a thorough knowledge of the theoretical basis of the subsequent stages of the procedure. Urologists who start performing this procedures must be aware of possible intra as well as postoperative complications.