Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 11: CD009753, 2016 11 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27849333

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fibrates are effective for modifying atherogenic dyslipidaemia, and particularly for lowering serum triglycerides. However, evidence that fibrates reduce mortality and morbidity associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD), or overall mortality and morbidity, in the primary prevention of CVD is lacking. OBJECTIVES: This Cochrane Review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits and harms of fibrates versus placebo or usual care or fibrates plus other lipid-modifying drugs versus other lipid-modifying drugs alone for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Web of Science (all from inception to 19 May 2016). We searched four clinical trial registers (last searched on 3 August 2016) with the help of an experienced professional librarian. We searched the databases to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical effects of fibrate therapy in the primary prevention of CVD events. We did not impose any language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We aimed to include all RCTs comparing the effects of fibrate monotherapy versus placebo or usual care, or fibrates plus other lipid-modifying drugs versus other lipid-modifying drugs alone. Included studies had a follow-up of at least six months for the primary prevention of CVD events. We excluded trials with clofibrate, because it was withdrawn from the market in 2002. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts for potential study inclusion. Two review authors independently retrieved the full-text papers and extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for aggregate data on primary and secondary outcomes. We tested for heterogeneity with the Cochrane Q-test and used the I2 statistic to measure inconsistency of treatment effects across studies. Using the GRADE approach, we assessed the quality of the evidence and used the GRADE profiler software (GRADEpro GDT) to import data from Review Manager 5 to create 'Summary of findings' tables. MAIN RESULTS: We identified six eligible trials including 16,135 individuals. The mean age of trial populations varied across trials; between 47.3 and 62.3 years. Four trials included individuals with diabetes mellitus type 2 only. The mean treatment duration and follow-up of participants across trials was 4.8 years. We judged the risks of selection and performance bias to be low; risks of detection bias, attrition bias, and reporting bias were unclear. Reporting of adverse effects by included trials was very limited; that is why we used discontinuation of therapy due to adverse effects as a proxy for adverse effects. Patients treated with fibrates had a reduced risk for the combined primary outcome of CVD death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke compared to patients on placebo (risk ratio (RR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 0.96; participants = 16,135; studies = 6; moderate-quality of evidence). For secondary outcomes we found RRs for fibrate therapy compared with placebo of 0.79 for combined coronary heart disease death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (95% CI 0.68 to 0.92; participants = 16,135; studies = 6; moderate-quality of evidence); 1.01 for overall mortality (95% CI 0.81 to 1.26; participants = 8471; studies = 5; low-quality of evidence); 1.01 for non-CVD mortality (95% CI 0.76 to 1.35; participants = 8471; studies = 5; low-quality of evidence); and 1.38 for discontinuation of therapy due to adverse effects (95% CI 0.71 to 2.68; participants = 4805; studies = 3; I2 = 74%; very low-quality of evidence). Data on quality of life were not available from any trial. Trials that evaluated fibrates in the background of statins (2 studies) showed no benefits in preventing cardiovascular events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-quality evidence suggests that fibrates lower the risk for cardiovascular and coronary events in primary prevention, but the absolute treatment effects in the primary prevention setting are modest (absolute risk reductions < 1%). There is low-quality evidence that fibrates have no effect on overall or non-CVD mortality. Very low-quality evidence suggests that fibrates are not associated with increased risk for adverse effects.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapêutico , Prevenção Primária , Atorvastatina/uso terapêutico , Bezafibrato/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Ácido Clofíbrico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Clofíbrico/uso terapêutico , Fenofibrato/uso terapêutico , Genfibrozila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hipolipemiantes/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Prevenção Primária/normas , Sinvastatina/uso terapêutico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade
2.
Eur J Pharm Sci ; 184: 106417, 2023 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36870578

RESUMO

As numerous new drug candidates are poorly water soluble, enabling formulations are needed to increase their bioavailability for oral administration. Nanoparticles are a conceptually simple, yet resource consuming strategy for increasing drug dissolution rate, as predicting in vivo oral absorption using in vitro dissolution remains difficult. The objective of this study was to obtain insight into nanoparticle characteristics and performance utilizing an in vitro combined dissolution/permeation setup. Two examples of poorly soluble drugs were examined (cinnarizine and fenofibrate). Nanosuspensions were produced by top-down wet bead milling using dual asymmetric centrifugation, obtaining particle diameters of approx. 300 nm. DSC and XRPD studies indicated that nanocrystals of both drugs were present with retained crystallinity, however with some disturbances. Equilibrium solubility studies showed no significant increase in drug solubility over the nanoparticles, as compared to the raw APIs. Combined dissolution/permeation experiments revealed significantly increased dissolution rates for both compounds compared to the raw APIs. However, there were substantial differences between the dissolution curves of the nanoparticles as fenofibrate exhibited supersaturation followed by precipitation, whereas cinnarizine did not exhibit any supersaturation, but instead a shift towards faster dissolution rate. Permeation rates were found significantly increased for both nanosuspensions when compared to the raw APIs, indicating a direct implication that formulation strategies are needed, be it stabilization of supersaturation by precipitation inhibition and/or dissolution rate enhancement. This study indicates that in vitro dissolution/permeation studies can be employed to better understand the oral absorption enhancement of nanocrystal formulations.


Assuntos
Cinarizina , Fenofibrato , Nanopartículas , Administração Oral , Disponibilidade Biológica , Cinarizina/administração & dosagem , Cinarizina/química , Fenofibrato/administração & dosagem , Fenofibrato/química , Nanopartículas/administração & dosagem , Nanopartículas/química , Tamanho da Partícula , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Solubilidade
3.
Inform Prim Care ; 13(4): 239-48, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16510020

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Communication media commonly used in medicine today no longer meet the needs brought on by the present knowledge explosion. The Heidelberg medrapid project has been developed to quickly communicate high-quality clinical knowledge to physicians. METHODS: In this paper, medrapid is introduced as an online clinical knowledge resource, and the methods used by the 'knowledge entry' function for the minimalist representation of clinical knowledge in the knowledge base are discussed. RESULTS: On average, fewer than 1.4 problems per disease arose during the input of the formal representation of clinical knowledge using the 'knowledge entry' function. However, representation of disease time processes, descriptions, warnings and graphics with the 'knowledge entry' function remains problematic. CONCLUSIONS: The 'knowledge entry' function allows fast formal representation of clinical knowledge (<14 minutes per disease) and testing using the integrated quality management system. In the near future, new measures must be found to improve the problematic representation of disease time processes, descriptions, warnings and graphics to formally represent clinical knowledge using the medrapid 'knowledge entry' function.


Assuntos
Internet , Informática Médica/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Alemanha , Humanos , Disseminação de Informação , Pesquisa Qualitativa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa