RESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases undergo hepatic resection with curative intent. Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) could help avoid noncurative surgery by identifying patients with occult metastases. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of preoperative PET-CT vs no PET-CT (control) on the surgical management of patients with resectable metastases and to investigate the effect of PET-CT on survival and the association between the standardized uptake value (ratio of tissue radioactivity to injected radioactivity adjusted by weight) and survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized trial of patients older than 18 years with colorectal cancer treated by surgery, with resectable metastases based on CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis within the previous 30 days, and with a clear colonoscopy within the previous 18 months was conducted between 2005 and 2013, involving 21 surgeons at 9 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, with PET-CT scanners at 5 academic institutions. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized using a 2 to 1 ratio to PET-CT or control. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was a change in surgical management defined as canceled hepatic surgery, more extensive hepatic surgery, or additional organ surgery based on the PET-CT. Survival was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Of the 263 patients who underwent PET-CT, 21 had a change in surgical management (8.0%; 95% CI, 5.0%-11.9%). Specifically, 7 patients (2.7%) did not undergo laparotomy, 4 (1.5%) had more extensive hepatic surgery, 9 (3.4%) had additional organ surgery (8 of whom had hepatic resection), and the abdominal cavity was opened in 1 patient but hepatic surgery was not performed and the cavity was closed. Liver resection was performed in 91% of patients in the PET-CT group and 92% of the control group. After a median follow-up of 36 months, the estimated mortality rate was 11.13 (95% CI, 8.95-13.68) events/1000 person-months for the PET-CT group and 12.71 (95% CI, 9.40-16.80) events/1000 person-months for the control group. Survival did not differ between the 2 groups (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.60-1.21]; P = .38). The standardized uptake value was associated with survival (hazard ratio, 1.11 [90% CI, 1.07-1.15] per unit increase; P < .001). The C statistic for the model including the standardized uptake value was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.56-0.68) and without it was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.44-0.56). The difference in C statistics is 0.12 (95% CI, 0.04-0.21). The low C statistic suggests that the standard uptake value is not a strong predictor of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with potentially resectable hepatic metastases of colorectal adenocarcinoma, the use of PET-CT compared with CT alone did not result in frequent change in surgical management. These findings raise questions about the value of PET-CT scans in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00265356.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hepatectomia/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Análise de Sobrevida , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Importance: Infection transmission following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can occur due to persistent contamination of duodenoscopes despite high-level disinfection to completely eliminate microorganisms on the instrument. Objective: To determine (1) contamination rates after high-level disinfection and (2) technical performance of duodenoscopes with disposable elevator caps compared with those with standard designs. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this parallel-arm multicenter randomized clinical trial at 2 tertiary ERCP centers in Canada, all patients 18 years and older and undergoing ERCP for any indication were eligible. Intervention: The intervention was use of duodenoscopes with disposable elevator caps compared with duodenoscopes with a standard design. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary outcomes were persistent microbial contamination of the duodenoscope elevator or channel, defined as growth of at least 10 colony-forming units of any organism or any growth of gram-negative bacteria following high-level disinfection (superiority outcome), and technical success of ERCP according to a priori criteria (noninferiority outcome with an a priori noninferiority margin of 7%), assessed by blinded reviewers. Results: From December 2019 to February 2022, 518 patients were enrolled (259 disposable elevator cap duodenoscopes, 259 standard duodenoscopes). Patients had a mean (SD) age of 60.7 (17.0) years and 258 (49.8%) were female. No significant differences were observed between study groups, including in ERCP difficulty. Persistent microbial contamination was detected in 11.2% (24 of 214) of standard duodenoscopes and 3.8% (8 of 208) of disposable elevator cap duodenoscopes (P = .004), corresponding to a relative risk of 0.34 (95% CI, 0.16-0.75) and number needed to treat of 13.6 (95% CI, 8.1-42.7) to avoid persistent contamination. Technical success using the disposable cap scope was noninferior to that of the standard scope (94.6% vs 90.7%, P = .13). There were no differences between study groups in adverse events and other secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, disposable elevator cap duodenoscopes exhibited reduced contamination following high-level disinfection compared with standard scope designs, without affecting the technical performance and safety of ERCP. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04040504.
Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Duodenoscópios , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Duodenoscópios/efeitos adversos , Duodenoscópios/microbiologia , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/instrumentação , Elevadores e Escadas Rolantes , Desinfecção , Coleta de DadosRESUMO
We report a case of an undifferentiated pancreatic carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells with focal osteochondroid differentiation in a 66-year-old man, who presented with painless jaundice, pruritus, and weight loss. Imaging studies revealed an inhomogeneous mass in the head of the pancreas. A pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. The resection specimen revealed a 9.5 x 4.2 x 3.2 cm(3) solid neoplasm in the pancreatic head with direct extension into duodenum and common bile duct. Microscopy showed a cellular neoplasm composed of pleomorphic mononuclear cells (pancytokeratin, and EMA-positive; LCA, and CD68 negative) and osteoclast-like multinucleated giant cells (vimentin, LCA, and CD68-positive; pancytokeratin, and EMA-negative) consistent with OGTP. The tumor contained a focal area of osteochondroid differentiation. Evidence supports that the tumor giant cells are non-neoplastic and of histiocytic origin. Osteochondroid differentiation within undifferentiated carcinoma is unusual; its presence might suggest a sarcoma diagnosis on biopsy material.