RESUMO
Objectives Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major cause of blindness and its prevalence is increasing. Fibrate, specifically fenofibrate, has been shown to be efficacious in reducing the progression of DR. This study aims to determine the five-year trend of and factors associated with the prescription of fibrate among patients with DR in Perak. Methods Data on all patients with DR in 76 government health clinics in Perak who were audited between 2018 and 2022 were extracted from the National Diabetes Registry (NDR), excluding those who were lost to follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the prescription of fibrates. Results Data from 4028 patients were analysed. Commonly prescribed medications were statins (n = 3466, 86.0%), metformin (n = 3212, 79.7%), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (n = 2318, 57.5%). Only 63 (1.6%) patients were prescribed fibrate. Factors associated with the prescription of fibrates were patients from the clinics in northern (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.12-0.65) and southern clusters (aOR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.08-0.655), triglycerides > 1.7 mmol/L (aOR = 4.85, 95% CI: 1.85-12.70), and prescription of insulin (aOR = 2.77, 95% CI: 1.07-7.18) and statin (aOR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.04-0.27). Conclusion The prescription of fibrate among patients with DR was low, highlighting a missed opportunity for early treatment and improved outcomes in primary care. The prescription of fibrates to reduce the progression of DR should be expanded to primary care. Clinicians should consider the factors associated with the non-prescription of fibrate identified when prescribing to these patients. Policies, including those at the ministry level, to enhance the availability of these medicines, including financial resources for procurement, are necessary to guarantee easy access for patients in different areas. It is crucial for healthcare providers to be knowledgeable about and follow guidelines. Moreover, improving the overall management of DR in patients with multiple comorbidities can be achieved by addressing worries about the side effects of combination therapies through educational campaigns and providing clear directives. Nevertheless, the study's findings should be interpreted in light of the limitations discussed.
RESUMO
Introduction: Prescription of secondary prevention medications (SPMs) and effective control of cardiovascular risk factors (RFs) are crucial to reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events, particularly in high-risk individuals including those with diabetes mellitus (DM). This study aimed to analyse the trends in SPM prescription and identify the factors associated with RF control among patients with DM and cardiovascular diseases in Perak health clinics. Methods: Data of patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and cerebrovascular diseases (CeVDs) audited from 2018 to 2022, excluding those lost to follow-up, were extracted from the National Diabetes Registry. Descriptive and trend analyses were conducted. Multivariable logistic regression was utilised to identify the factors associated with RF control. Results: Most patients (76.7%) were aged ≥60 years and were Malays (62.3%). The majority had IHD (60.8%) and CeVDs (54.7%) for ≥5 years. SPM prescription increased significantly over the past 5 years. However, blood pressure (BP) and lipid control remained static. Good BP control was associated with a DM duration of ≥10 years and poor control with Malay ethnicity and prescription of two or three antihypertensives. Good DM control was associated with an age of ≥60 years and age at DM diagnosis of ≥60 years and poor control with Malay and Indian ethnicities, DM duration of ≥10 years and prescription of two or three and more glucose-lowering drugs. Poor lipid control was associated only with Malay and Indian ethnicities. Conclusion: SPM prescription has increased over time, but the achievement of treatment targets, particularly for lipid control, has remained poor and unchanged. Statin use is not associated with lipid control. The accessibility and availability of alternative lipid-lowering drugs must be improved to enhance overall RF control, especially lipid control, in patients with DM and cardiovascular diseases.
RESUMO
Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is a common skin condition in primary care. The frequent cause of ICD includes hair dye, nail polish, paints, cleaners, soap, and detergent. We present a case of ICD caused by topical garlic medicament, successfully identified and managed in primary care. A 20-year-old woman presented with a sudden onset of multiple painful localized blisters on the right antecubital fossa. She reported applying raw garlic paste to the area one day before the clinic visit to treat mild itchiness. She had no known allergies or medical illnesses. Otherwise, there were no rashes elsewhere or oral and genital ulcers. She was not on any regular medication or taking traditional medication. Examination revealed multiple bullae on the antecubital fossa with perilesional erythema. The lesion was sharply bordered within the contact areas, was asymmetric, and did not spread elsewhere. The clinical history of immediate bullae formation after direct contact with garlic was consistent with ICD due to garlic medicament. The lesions were managed with regular dressings. At one week follow-up, the lesions had healed well. She was advised to avoid further application of topical garlic medicines. Although Allium sativum (garlic) has been used either topical or orally as a medicinal treatment worldwide for thousands of years to treat various conditions, it still has the potential to cause irritant dermatitis when applied to skin and mucosa. Patients and healthcare providers should be cautious of the potential side effects, such as ICD, when using garlic for medicinal purposes.
RESUMO
We describe the case of a 72-year-old housewife who presented to a primary care specialist clinic for reassessment following multiple hospitalisations for heart failure within the past 9 months. She presented with decreased effort tolerance and tiredness for the past 1 year. Her symptoms had remained the same despite current treatment. During the initial history-taking, she did not report any medical illnesses or surgeries. She had been well and had not undergone any screening for almost 30 years before the first hospitalisation for heart failure. There was neither cough, constipation, dyspepsia, abdominal pain, stool changes, haematuria, per vaginal bleeding nor hoarse voice. The physical examination findings were remarkable for slow movement and speech. Her skin was dry with a markedly increased serum lipid profile. Further investigation and management confirmed the suspected diagnosis.
RESUMO
Introduction: Primary care service plays a vital role in early clinical assessment of patients with COVID-19 in Malaysia. This study aimed to evaluate the potential risk factors of COVID-19 severity at presentation to primary care facilities in the post-vaccination period. Method: Clinical records from the Selangkah system of all patients with COVID-19 aged above 18 years seen at COVID-19 assessment centres located in 10 government health clinics in Gombak district, Selangor, from 1 October to 31 December 2021 with complete documentation and outcomes were retrieved. Demographics, comorbidities, clinical features and vaccination statuses and types were retrospectively evaluated. The variables were compared between mild and severe diseases. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify the factors affecting disease severity. Results: A total of 4406 patients (median age=37 years, men=51.2%) were analysed. Approximately 97.1% of the cases were mild, while 2.9% were severe. Fever, difficulty breathing, lethargy, throat irritation/runny nose, oxygen saturation of <95%, respiratory rate of >20 breaths per minute, CoronaVac vaccination and hypertension were the determinants of severity (P<0.05). Conclusion: The high proportion (97.1%) of mild cases in this study compared with an earlier report (81.8%) during the pre-vaccination period may suggest the impact of vaccine, as 84.9% of this cohort was fully vaccinated. Our study also demonstrated a significant difference in COVID-19 severity between the vaccine types. The identified clinical features and comorbidities could assist primary care doctors in stratifying patients with COVID-19 judiciously in terms of hospital referral or home quarantine.
RESUMO
Hyperthyroidism is commonly seen in primary care settings. However, the management of hyperthyroidism might be unclear to primary care doctors. Various guidelines have been published to assist clinicians in the management of thyroid disorders at various levels of care. The extensive coverage of these guidelines may not appeal to busy clinicians, and the guidelines do not focus on often resource-limited primary care settings. In this article, we aim to describe a practical guide for managing hyperthyroidism in primary care settings using an ABC approach.
RESUMO
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of cardiovascular events. This study aimed to assess the frequency of inappropriate medication dosages (IMD) for cardiovascular disease prevention among patients with CKD and its predictors in an urban academic primary care clinic in Selangor, Malaysia. All patients who attended the clinic from April to June 2019 and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in this cross-sectional study, except for those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of more than 90 ml/min, diagnosed with urinary tract infection, pregnant or were on dialysis for end stage renal disease. Their prescriptions on the electronic medical record (EMR) system were evaluated for appropriateness using the dose adjustment recommendations based on the 2018 Malaysian Clinical Practice Guidelines on management of CKD. A total of 362 medical records were included in this study. 16.6% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 12.9-20.8) or 60 out of 362 of the patient records analysed contained medications prescribed with inappropriate dosages. Patients with higher stages of CKD were associated with higher odds of IMD, namely CKD stage G3b (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 10.41; 95% CI: 2.31-46.88) and CKD stage 4-5 (aOR 15.76; 95% CI: 3.22-77.28). Other predictors of IMD were diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (aOR 6.40; 95% CI: 2.15-19.01), number of prescribed medications of 5 or more (aOR 4.69; 95% CI: 1.55-14.20), and eGFR reduction of more than 25% over one year (aOR 2.82; 95% CI: 1.41-5.65). Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that the occurrence of IMD for CVD prevention was low in CKD patients in this primary care clinic. Medications with inappropriate dosages identified in this study include simvastatin, fenofibrate, hydrochlorothiazide, spironolactone, metformin, gliclazide, sitagliptin, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin. Clinicians should consider the predictors of inappropriate medication dosages listed above when prescribing to patients with CKD to reduce the risk of medications-related toxicities and adverse effects. Limitations of this study should be considered when interpreting the findings presented.
RESUMO
We described the case of a 42-year-old man who presented with left index finger mass persisting for 6 months. The mass was small and, painless and had gradually increased in size with limited finger flexion. Physical examination showed a firm mass over the volar surface of the left index finger. There was no tenderness, redness, warmth or punctum. The overlying skin was normal, and the mass did not transilluminate. Further examination of the head and neck, chest, upper limbs and neurovascular system revealed normal findings. No similar masses were found elsewhere in the body. Bedside ultrasound with further investigation and management confirmed the suspected diagnosis.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This audit was performed to monitor the diagnosis and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) according to the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) of CKD 2018 in a primary care clinic. METHODS: Patients who attended the clinic from April to June 2019 and fulfilled the diagnosis of CKD were included in this study, except for those diagnosed with a urinary tract infection, pregnant women and those on dialysis. These criteria were set based on the CPGs. The standards were set following discussions with the clinic team members with reference to local guidelines, the 2017 United Kingdom National CKD audit and other relevant studies. RESULTS: A total of 384 medical records were included in this audit. Overall, 5 out of 20 criteria for processes and 3 of 8 clinical outcomes for CKD care did not meet the set standards. These included the following: documentation of CKD classification based on albumin category (43.8%); CKD advice (19.0%); dietitian referral (9.1%); nephrologist referral (45.5%); haemoglobin level monitoring (65.7%); overall blood pressure (BP) control (45.3%); BP readings for diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and non-DKD with > 1 g/day of proteinuria (< 130/80 mmHg, 37.0%); eGFR reduction of < 25% over the past year (77.2%). Identified problems included the absence of a CKD registry, eGFR and albuminuria reports, and a dedicated team, among other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 8 out of 28 criteria did not meet the standards of CKD care set for this audit. The problems identified in this audit have been addressed. Moreover, strategies have also been formulated to improve the diagnosis and management of CKD in this clinic.