Analysis of stress-only imaging, comparing upright and supine CZT camera acquisition to conventional gamma camera images with and without attenuation correction, with coronary angiography as a reference.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic performance of stress-only imaging using a Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride (CZT) camera has not been directly compared in the same patients to stress-only attenuation-corrected conventional Anger camera images. METHODS: 112 subjects with correlative coronary angiographic data and 40 subjects with <5% pre-test likelihood of coronary disease completed attenuation-corrected stress-only images on a conventional Anger camera and uncorrected upright and supine stress images on a CZT camera. Two readers provided independent, blinded interpretations of stress-only images. RESULTS: Upright and supine stress-only CZT images and attenuation-corrected Anger camera images provided similar positive (reader 1/reader 2, 50.0%/44.1% vs 46.4%/51.9%) and negative (66.7%/64.0% vs 67.9%/67.7%) predictive values (all P = NS) for obstructive coronary artery disease; however, the sensitivity was higher (81.3% vs 58.3%, P = .05), specificity lower (29.7% vs 50.0%, P = .005), and normalcy rate lower (87.5% vs 100%, P = .025) with attenuation-corrected Anger camera images for the first reader with no significant differences between cameras for the second reader. CONCLUSIONS: Stress-only upright and supine CZT imaging was non-inferior statistically to attenuation-corrected stress-only Anger camera imaging. Nevertheless, stress-only CZT imaging may be associated with reduced diagnostic sensitivity for some readers compared to attenuation-corrected Anger camera images, which may be less acceptable clinically compared to stress plus rest images.

Computer derived transient ischemic dilation ratio for identifying extensive coronary artery disease using a CZT camera and imaging in the upright position.

BACKGROUND: Transient ischemic dilation (TID) of the left ventricle (LV) has not been validated as a marker of extensive coronary artery disease (CAD) for studies using a cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) camera with upright imaging. METHODS: TID ratios were obtained from upright stress and rest images on a CZT camera. Separate cut-off values were determined for exercise and for regadenoson stress. The cutoffs were then applied to 28 patients with extensive CAD and 101 patients without extensive CAD. RESULTS: With treadmill exercise, an upright TID ratio ≥1.16 provided a positive predictive value of 50% and a negative predictive value of 85.4% for the identification of extensive CAD. In the regadenoson group, an upright TID ratio of 1.29 provided a positive predictive value of 20% and a negative predictive value of 75.9%. Although not an independent predictor of extensive CAD in all subjects, in subjects with a normal upright LVEF, it provided a predictive value by receiver operating characteristics comparable to the SSS. CONCLUSIONS: Increased upright TID measurements on a CZT camera are associated with extensive CAD. The upright TID measurements can serve in an adjunctive role to SSS, and may be most effective in patients with a normal upright exercise LVEF.

Characterization of Lead Adherence Using Intravascular Ultrasound to Assess Difficulty of Transvenous Lead Extraction.

BACKGROUND: Clinical factors associated with development of intravascular lead adherence (ILA) are unreliable predictors. Because vascular injury in the superior vena cava-right atrium during transvenous lead extraction is more likely to occur in segments with higher degrees of ILA, reliable and accurate assessment of ILA is warranted. We hypothesized that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) could accurately visualize and quantify ILA and degree of ILA correlates with transvenous lead extraction difficulty. METHODS: Serial imaging of leads occurred before transvenous lead extraction using IVUS. ILA areas were classified as high or low grade. Degree of extraction difficulty was assessed using 2 metrics and correlated with ILA grade. Lead extraction difficulty was calculated for each patient and compared with IVUS findings. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-eight vascular segments in 60 patients were analyzed: 141 (89%) low grade versus 17 (11%) high grade. Median extraction time (low=0 versus high grade=97 seconds, P<0.001) and median laser pulsations delivered (low=0 versus high grade=5852, P<0.001) were significantly higher in high-grade segments. Most patients with low lead extraction difficulty score had low ILA grades. Eighty-six percentage of patients with high lead extraction difficulty score had low IVUS grade, and the degree of transvenous lead extraction difficulty was similar to patients with low IVUS grades and lead extraction difficulty scores. CONCLUSIONS: IVUS is a feasible imaging modality that may be useful in characterizing ILA in the superior vena cava-right atrium region. An ILA grading system using imaging correlates with extraction difficulty. Most patients with clinical factors associated with higher extraction difficulty may exhibit lower ILA and extraction difficulty based on IVUS imaging. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.