An Unexpected Reaction to Topical Garlic Medicament - A Case Report of Irritant Contact Dermatitis Successfully Managed in Primary Care.

Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is a common skin condition in primary care. The frequent cause of ICD includes hair dye, nail polish, paints, cleaners, soap, and detergent. We present a case of ICD caused by topical garlic medicament, successfully identified and managed in primary care. A 20-year-old woman presented with a sudden onset of multiple painful localized blisters on the right antecubital fossa. She reported applying raw garlic paste to the area one day before the clinic visit to treat mild itchiness. She had no known allergies or medical illnesses. Otherwise, there were no rashes elsewhere or oral and genital ulcers. She was not on any regular medication or taking traditional medication. Examination revealed multiple bullae on the antecubital fossa with perilesional erythema. The lesion was sharply bordered within the contact areas, was asymmetric, and did not spread elsewhere. The clinical history of immediate bullae formation after direct contact with garlic was consistent with ICD due to garlic medicament. The lesions were managed with regular dressings. At one week follow-up, the lesions had healed well. She was advised to avoid further application of topical garlic medicines. Although Allium sativum (garlic) has been used either topical or orally as a medicinal treatment worldwide for thousands of years to treat various conditions, it still has the potential to cause irritant dermatitis when applied to skin and mucosa. Patients and healthcare providers should be cautious of the potential side effects, such as ICD, when using garlic for medicinal purposes.

A masquerade in a symptomatic patient with heart failure.

We describe the case of a 72-year-old housewife who presented to a primary care specialist clinic for reassessment following multiple hospitalisations for heart failure within the past 9 months. She presented with decreased effort tolerance and tiredness for the past 1 year. Her symptoms had remained the same despite current treatment. During the initial history-taking, she did not report any medical illnesses or surgeries. She had been well and had not undergone any screening for almost 30 years before the first hospitalisation for heart failure. There was neither cough, constipation, dyspepsia, abdominal pain, stool changes, haematuria, per vaginal bleeding nor hoarse voice. The physical examination findings were remarkable for slow movement and speech. Her skin was dry with a markedly increased serum lipid profile. Further investigation and management confirmed the suspected diagnosis.

Frequency and predictors of inappropriate medication dosages for cardiovascular disease prevention in chronic kidney disease patients: A retrospective cross-sectional study in a Malaysian primary care clinic.

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of cardiovascular events. This study aimed to assess the frequency of inappropriate medication dosages (IMD) for cardiovascular disease prevention among patients with CKD and its predictors in an urban academic primary care clinic in Selangor, Malaysia. All patients who attended the clinic from April to June 2019 and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in this cross-sectional study, except for those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of more than 90 ml/min, diagnosed with urinary tract infection, pregnant or were on dialysis for end stage renal disease. Their prescriptions on the electronic medical record (EMR) system were evaluated for appropriateness using the dose adjustment recommendations based on the 2018 Malaysian Clinical Practice Guidelines on management of CKD. A total of 362 medical records were included in this study. 16.6% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 12.9-20.8) or 60 out of 362 of the patient records analysed contained medications prescribed with inappropriate dosages. Patients with higher stages of CKD were associated with higher odds of IMD, namely CKD stage G3b (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 10.41; 95% CI: 2.31-46.88) and CKD stage 4-5 (aOR 15.76; 95% CI: 3.22-77.28). Other predictors of IMD were diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (aOR 6.40; 95% CI: 2.15-19.01), number of prescribed medications of 5 or more (aOR 4.69; 95% CI: 1.55-14.20), and eGFR reduction of more than 25% over one year (aOR 2.82; 95% CI: 1.41-5.65). Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that the occurrence of IMD for CVD prevention was low in CKD patients in this primary care clinic. Medications with inappropriate dosages identified in this study include simvastatin, fenofibrate, hydrochlorothiazide, spironolactone, metformin, gliclazide, sitagliptin, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin. Clinicians should consider the predictors of inappropriate medication dosages listed above when prescribing to patients with CKD to reduce the risk of medications-related toxicities and adverse effects. Limitations of this study should be considered when interpreting the findings presented.

A clinical audit of the diagnosis and management of chronic kidney disease in a primary care clinic.

INTRODUCTION: This audit was performed to monitor the diagnosis and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) according to the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) of CKD 2018 in a primary care clinic. METHODS: Patients who attended the clinic from April to June 2019 and fulfilled the diagnosis of CKD were included in this study, except for those diagnosed with a urinary tract infection, pregnant women and those on dialysis. These criteria were set based on the CPGs. The standards were set following discussions with the clinic team members with reference to local guidelines, the 2017 United Kingdom National CKD audit and other relevant studies. RESULTS: A total of 384 medical records were included in this audit. Overall, 5 out of 20 criteria for processes and 3 of 8 clinical outcomes for CKD care did not meet the set standards. These included the following: documentation of CKD classification based on albumin category (43.8%); CKD advice (19.0%); dietitian referral (9.1%); nephrologist referral (45.5%); haemoglobin level monitoring (65.7%); overall blood pressure (BP) control (45.3%); BP readings for diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and non-DKD with > 1 g/day of proteinuria (< 130/80 mmHg, 37.0%); eGFR reduction of < 25% over the past year (77.2%). Identified problems included the absence of a CKD registry, eGFR and albuminuria reports, and a dedicated team, among other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 8 out of 28 criteria did not meet the standards of CKD care set for this audit. The problems identified in this audit have been addressed. Moreover, strategies have also been formulated to improve the diagnosis and management of CKD in this clinic.