Effective doses and risks from medical diagnostic x-ray examinations for male and female patients from childhood to old age.

The consideration of risks from medical diagnostic x-ray examinations and their justification commonly relies on estimates of effective dose, although the quantity is actually a health-detriment-weighted summation of organ/tissue-absorbed doses rather than a measure of risk. In its 2007 Recommendations, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) defines effective dose in relation to a nominal value of stochastic detriment following low-level exposure of 5.7 × 10-2Sv-1, as an average over both sexes, all ages, and two fixed composite populations (Asian and Euro-American). Effective dose represents the overall (whole-body) dose received by a person from a particular exposure, which can be used for the purposes of radiological protection as set out by ICRP, but it does not provide a measure that is specific to the characteristics of the exposed individual. However, the cancer incidence risk models used by ICRP can be used to provide estimates of risk separately for males and females, as a function of age-at-exposure, and for the two composite populations. Here, these organ/tissue-specific risk models are applied to estimates of organ/tissue-specific absorbed doses from a range of diagnostic procedures to derive lifetime excess cancer incidence risk estimates; the degree of heterogeneity in the distribution of absorbed doses between organs/tissues will depend on the procedure. Depending on the organs/tissues exposed, risks are generally higher in females and notably higher for younger ages-at-exposure. Comparing lifetime cancer incidence risks per Sv effective dose from the different procedures shows that overall risks are higher by about a factor of two to three for the youngest age-at-exposure group, 0-9 yr, than for 30-39 yr adults, and lower by a similar factor for an age-at-exposure of 60-69 yr. Taking into account these differences in risk per Sv, and noting the substantial uncertainties associated with risk estimates, effective dose as currently formulated provides a reasonable basis for assessing the potential risks from medical diagnostic examinations.

Selection of bone dosimetry models for application in Monte Carlo simulations to provide CT scanner-specific organ dose coefficients.

This is the second paper arising from a project concerning the application of Monte Carlo simulations to provide scanner-specific organ dose coefficients for modern CT scanners. The present focus is centred on the bone dosimetry models that have been developed. Simulations have been performed in photon only transport mode, with the assumption of electron equilibrium. This approximation breaks down for doses to active marrow and endosteum since the target cells are localised within tens of micrometre from bone tissue and dose enhancement functions are necessary to correct for the additional dose from photoelectric electrons created in adjacent material. The dose enhancement models used previously in publications NRPB-SR250 (Jones and Shrimpton 1993 Software Report NRPB-SR250, National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, UK) and ORNL-TM8381 (Cristy and Eckerman 1987 Technical Report Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN) have been implemented and compared with the contemporary approaches of Johnson et al (2011 Phys. Med. Biol. 56 2347-65) and ICRP Publication 116 (ICRP 2010 Ann. ICRP 40 1-257) that are being adopted in the present project. In addition, the calculation of dose to endosteum in the medullary cavity is reviewed and updated using electron mode simulations. For the purposes of quality assurance and comparison, the various dose enhancement functions have been applied in relation to the NRPB18+DJ and HPA18+ stylised hermaphrodite phantoms and also the adult male and female voxel phantoms recommended in ICRP Publication 110 (ICRP 2009 Ann. ICRP 39 1-165), for exposure from three CT scanners modelled previously. Contemporary results for standard examinations on the head and trunk calculated for these latter phantoms demonstrate moderate increases (modal value +18%) in active marrow dose coefficients relative to values derived from data published in NRPB-SR250. A similar analysis in relation to endosteum dose coefficients shows larger reductions (modal value -46%), owing at least in part to changes in assumed location of the target cells. Even larger changes are apparent for both of these dose coefficients in relation to examination of the upper legs (-39% and -94%, respectively). However, resultant changes in any values of effective dose will be less owing to the low weighting factors applied for these tissues.

Development of Monte Carlo simulations to provide scanner-specific organ dose coefficients for contemporary CT.

The ImPACT (imaging performance assessment of CT scanners) CT patient dosimetry calculator is still used world-wide to estimate organ and effective doses (E) for computed tomography (CT) examinations, although the tool is based on Monte Carlo calculations reflecting practice in the early 1990's. Subsequent developments in CT scanners, definitions of E, anthropomorphic phantoms, computers and radiation transport codes, have all fuelled an urgent need for updated organ dose conversion factors for contemporary CT. A new system for such simulations has been developed and satisfactorily tested. Benchmark comparisons of normalised organ doses presently derived for three old scanners (General Electric 9800, Philips Tomoscan LX and Siemens Somatom DRH) are within 5% of published values. Moreover, calculated normalised values of CT Dose Index for these scanners are in reasonable agreement (within measurement and computational uncertainties of ±6% and ±1%, respectively) with reported standard measurements. Organ dose coefficients calculated for a contemporary CT scanner (Siemens Somatom Sensation 16) demonstrate potential deviations by up to around 30% from the surrogate values presently assumed (through a scanner matching process) when using the ImPACT CT Dosimetry tool for newer scanners. Also, illustrative estimates of E for some typical examinations and a range of anthropomorphic phantoms demonstrate the significant differences (by some 10's of percent) that can arise when changing from the previously adopted stylised mathematical phantom to the voxel phantoms presently recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), and when following the 2007 ICRP recommendations (updated from 1990) concerning tissue weighting factors. Further simulations with the validated dosimetry system will provide updated series of dose coefficients for a wide range of contemporary scanners.

Updated estimates of typical effective doses for common CT examinations in the UK following the 2011 national review.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of evolving International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommendations concerning calculation of effective dose (E) and compare updated typical UK values for common CT examinations with previous data. METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations have provided normalized organ doses relating to 15 CT scanner models and 5 virtual reference adults. Series of representative E/dose-length product (DLP) coefficients were derived for common examinations on the separate bases of not only older stylized mathematical phantoms and voxel phantoms presently recommended by ICRP, but also the 1977, 1990 and 2007 formulations for E. Updated E/DLP coefficients were applied to typical values of DLP from the 2011 UK survey. RESULTS: Changes in ICRP recommendations that have arisen from improving evidence on stochastic risk, influence values of E by up to a factor two for CT examinations of the head and neck, although differences for the trunk typically amount to ±10%. Adoption of the voxel rather than the mathematical phantoms used previously can lead to further changes in E by a few tens of percent. Updated typical values of E for UK CT examinations range from 2 to 20 mSv. Increases by 20-400% since 2003 arise not only from increases by 30-160% in typical values of DLP, but also increases by 30-90% in relation to E/DLP coefficients for examinations of the trunk. CONCLUSION: Values of E, including updated typical data for UK CT, should be compared with caution in relation to their purpose and underlying factors concerning their calculation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Updated E/DLP coefficients and typical values of E for UK CT, and an appreciation of factors influencing these data.