RESUMO
Beginning in the first trimester, fetally derived extravillous trophoblasts (EVTs) invade the uterus and remodel its spiral arteries, transforming them into large, dilated blood vessels. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain how EVTs coordinate with the maternal decidua to promote a tissue microenvironment conducive to spiral artery remodelling (SAR)1-3. However, it remains a matter of debate regarding which immune and stromal cells participate in these interactions and how this evolves with respect to gestational age. Here we used a multiomics approach, combining the strengths of spatial proteomics and transcriptomics, to construct a spatiotemporal atlas of the human maternal-fetal interface in the first half of pregnancy. We used multiplexed ion beam imaging by time-of-flight and a 37-plex antibody panel to analyse around 500,000 cells and 588 arteries within intact decidua from 66 individuals between 6 and 20 weeks of gestation, integrating this dataset with co-registered transcriptomics profiles. Gestational age substantially influenced the frequency of maternal immune and stromal cells, with tolerogenic subsets expressing CD206, CD163, TIM-3, galectin-9 and IDO-1 becoming increasingly enriched and colocalized at later time points. By contrast, SAR progression preferentially correlated with EVT invasion and was transcriptionally defined by 78 gene ontology pathways exhibiting distinct monotonic and biphasic trends. Last, we developed an integrated model of SAR whereby invasion is accompanied by the upregulation of pro-angiogenic, immunoregulatory EVT programmes that promote interactions with the vascular endothelium while avoiding the activation of maternal immune cells.
Assuntos
Troca Materno-Fetal , Trofoblastos , Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Artérias/fisiologia , Decídua/irrigação sanguínea , Decídua/citologia , Decídua/imunologia , Decídua/fisiologia , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez/genética , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez/metabolismo , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez/fisiologia , Trofoblastos/citologia , Trofoblastos/imunologia , Trofoblastos/fisiologia , Útero/irrigação sanguínea , Útero/citologia , Útero/imunologia , Útero/fisiologia , Troca Materno-Fetal/genética , Troca Materno-Fetal/imunologia , Troca Materno-Fetal/fisiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Proteômica , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto , Idade GestacionalRESUMO
PURPOSE: To (1) prospectively characterize the incidence of decision regret among women considering planned oocyte cryopreservation (planned OC), comparing those who pursued treatment vs those who did not freeze eggs, and (2) to identify baseline predictors for future decision regret. METHODS: A total of 173 women seen in consultation for planned OC were followed prospectively. Surveys were administered at (1) baseline (< 1 week after initial consultation) and (2) follow-up, 6 months after planned OC among participants who froze eggs or 6 months following consultation in the absence of further communication to pursue treatment. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe decision regret, indicated by a Decision Regret Scale score > 25. We also examined predictors of regret. RESULTS: The incidence of moderate-to-severe regret over the decision to freeze eggs was 9% compared to 51% over the decision not to pursue treatment. Among women who froze eggs, adequacy of information at baseline to decide about treatment (aOR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03, 0.87) and emphasis on future parenthood (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66, 0.99) were associated with reduced odds of regret. Forty-six percent of women who froze eggs regretted not doing so earlier. Among women who did not freeze eggs, the primary reasons were financial and time constraints, correlating with increased odds of decision regret in an exploratory analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Among women undergoing planned OC, the incidence of decision regret is low compared to the regret confronting women seen in consultation for planned OC but who do not pursue treatment. Provider counseling is key to offset the regret risk.
Assuntos
Preservação da Fertilidade , Feminino , Animais , Preservação da Fertilidade/psicologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Criopreservação , Emoções , OócitosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common reproductive disorder associated with an adverse cardiometabolic profile early in life. Increasing evidence links cardiovascular risk factors, such as diabetes and hypertension, to accelerated cognitive aging. However, less is known about PCOS and its relationship to brain health, particularly at midlife. Our goal was to investigate possible associations between PCOS and midlife cognitive function and brain MRI findings in an ongoing prospective study. METHODS: We used data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, a geographically diverse prospective cohort study of individuals who were 18-30 years at baseline (1985-1986) and followed for 30 years. We identified women with PCOS from an ancillary study (CARDIA Women's study (CWS); n = 1,163) as those with elevated androgen levels and/or hirsutism in conjunction with symptoms of oligomenorrhea. At year 30, participants completed cognitive testing, including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) (verbal learning and memory), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (processing speed and executive function), Stroop test (attention and cognitive control), and category and letter fluency tests (semantics and attention). A subset completed brain MRI to assess brain structure and white matter integrity. Multivariable linear regression models estimated the association between PCOS and outcomes, adjusting for age, race, education, and study center. RESULTS: Of the 1163 women in CWS, 907 completed cognitive testing, and of these, 66 (7.1%) met criteria for PCOS (age 54.7 years). Women with and without PCOS were similar for age, BMI, smoking/drinking status, and income. At year 30, participants with PCOS performed lower (mean z score; 95% CI) on Stroop (-0.323 (-0.69 to -7.37); p = 0.008), RAVLT (-0.254 (-0.473 to -0.034); p = 0.002), and category fluency (-0.267 (-0.480 to -0.040); p = 0.02) tests. Of the 291 participants with MRI, 25 (8.5%) met PCOS criteria and demonstrated lower total white matter fractional anisotropy, a measure of white matter integrity (coefficient (95% CI) -0.013 (-0.021 to -0.005); p = 0.002), though not abnormal white matter. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that women with PCOS have lower cognitive performance and lower white matter integrity at midlife. Additional research is needed to confirm these findings and to determine potential mechanistic pathways including potential modifiable factors.
Assuntos
Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Adulto Jovem , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/complicações , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/epidemiologia , Vasos Coronários , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Função Executiva , CogniçãoRESUMO
Importance: Uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant individuals was hampered by safety concerns around potential risks to unborn children. Data clarifying early neurodevelopmental outcomes of offspring exposed to COVID-19 vaccination in utero are lacking. Objective: To determine whether in utero exposure to maternal COVID-19 vaccination was associated with differences in scores on the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, third edition (ASQ-3), at 12 and 18 months of age. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study, Assessing the Safety of Pregnancy During the Coronavirus Pandemic (ASPIRE), enrolled pregnant participants from May 2020 to August 2021; follow-up of children from these pregnancies is ongoing. Participants, which included pregnant individuals and their offspring from all 50 states, self-enrolled online. Study activities were performed remotely. Exposure: In utero exposure of the fetus to maternal COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was compared with those unexposed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Neurodevelopmental scores on validated ASQ-3, completed by birth mothers at 12 and 18 months. A score below the established cutoff in any of 5 subdomains (communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem solving, social skills) constituted an abnormal screen for developmental delay. Results: A total of 2487 pregnant individuals (mean [SD] age, 33.3 [4.2] years) enrolled at less than 10 weeks' gestation and completed research activities, yielding a total of 2261 and 1940 infants aged 12 and 18 months, respectively, with neurodevelopmental assessments. In crude analyses, 471 of 1541 exposed infants (30.6%) screened abnormally for developmental delay at 12 months vs 203 of 720 unexposed infants (28.2%; χ2 = 1.32; P = .25); the corresponding prevalences at 18 months were 262 of 1301 (20.1%) vs 148 of 639 (23.2%), respectively (χ2 = 2.35; P = .13). In multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models adjusting for maternal age, race, ethnicity, education, income, maternal depression, and anxiety, no difference in risk for abnormal ASQ-3 screens was observed at either time point (12 months: adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.14; 95% CI, 0.97-1.33; 18 months: aRR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.72-1.07). Further adjustment for preterm birth and infant sex did not affect results (12 months: aRR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.98-1.36; 18 months: aRR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.07). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that COVID-19 vaccination was safe during pregnancy from the perspective of infant neurodevelopment to 18 months of age. Additional longer-term research should be conducted to corroborate these findings and buttress clinical guidance with a strong evidence base.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Nascimento Prematuro , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Estudos de Coortes , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Objective: To characterize cognitive performance in relation to hormonal and metabolic factors in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Tertiary university center. Patients: A total of 48 individuals, aged 21-46 years, with PCOS according to the Rotterdam criteria. Interventions: Complete history and physical examinations, endovaginal ultrasounds, dermatologic assessments, neuropsychological assessments, and metabolic and hormonal serum tests. Main Outcome Measures: Sample-based z-scores on a comprehensive cognitive test battery. Results: Subjects were defined as having an androgenic (n = 31) or a nonandrogenic (n = 17) PCOS phenotype. Compared with their nonandrogenized counterparts, subjects with hyperandrogenism demonstrated lower relative performance on the tests of executive function (ß-coefficient for the executive function composite z-score, -0.44; 95% confidence interval, -0.79 to -0.09), despite similar performance on the tests of memory, verbal reasoning, and perceptual reasoning. These differences were independent of age, years of education, and obesity. In an exploratory analysis in which subjects were stratified by the presence of insulin resistance (IR), subjects with PCOS with both IR and hyperandrogenism showed the lowest performance on a composite score of executive function, followed by those with hyperandrogenism alone. Conclusions: In this small study, subjects with hyperandrogenic PCOS demonstrated lower performance on the tests of executive function than subjects with nonandrogenic PCOS. Additional research is needed to confirm these findings in larger cohorts and investigate the role of modifiable factors, including IR, on cognitive outcomes.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether physicians' choice of ovarian stimulation protocol is associated with laboratory outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single academic center. PATIENT(S): The subjects were 4,458 patients who completed more than one in vitro fertilization ovarian stimulation cycle within 1 year. On second stimulation, 49% repeated the same protocol and 51% underwent a different one. INTERVENTION(S): Estradiol priming antagonist, antagonist +/- oral contraceptive pill priming, long luteal protocol, Lupron (Lupron [AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL]) stop protocol, and flare were compared. Logistic or linear regression with cluster robust standard errors to account for covariates and paired data was used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Oocytes collected (OC), fertilization rate, blastocyst progression (BP), usable embryos (UE), and euploid rate (ER). RESULT(S): First stimulation outcomes were comparable across all protocols for FR, BP, UE, and ER but were different for OC, after adjustment for covariates. For OC, the effect of switching protocols differed according to the type of the second stimulation. There was improvement in OC if the same stimulation was repeated, except for flare. In addition, there were slight, significant improvements in fertilization rate (difference in values or coefficient of 0.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.004, 0.4) and UE (coefficient 1.25; 95% CI, 0.79, 1.72) when the same stimulation was repeated. There were no changes in BP (coefficient 0.03; 95% CI, -0.01, 0.08) or ER (coefficient 0.01; 95% CI, -0.04, 0.06) when protocols were changed. In a low-BP subgroup, greater improvement was seen when the same protocol was repeated (coefficient 0.03; 95% CI 0.01, 0.04). CONCLUSION(S): There was a slight but significant improvement in laboratory outcomes when the same stimulation protocol was repeated, so careful consideration should be made before switching stimulation protocols for the purpose of improving laboratory outcomes.
Assuntos
Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/administração & dosagem , Infertilidade/terapia , Ovário/efeitos dos fármacos , Indução da Ovulação , Ovulação/efeitos dos fármacos , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas , Adulto , Feminino , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Infertilidade/diagnóstico , Infertilidade/fisiopatologia , Ovário/fisiopatologia , Indução da Ovulação/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the pregnancy outcomes of lesbian women undergoing donor sperm intrauterine insemination (IUI) with that of heterosexual women undergoing IUI using partner or donor sperm. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Two academic fertility practices. PATIENTS: All IUI cycles between 2007 and 2016. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included clinical pregnancy (CP) rates and live birth/ongoing pregnancy (LB) rates. The baseline characteristics and cycle characteristics were compared between the two groups using absolute standardized differences (ASDs). To account for the correlation between cycles per patient, a generalized estimating equation method for multivariable logistic regression was used. RESULTS: A total of 11,870 IUI cycles were included, of which 393 were in lesbian women using donor sperm and 11,477 were in heterosexual women with infertility using either partner or donor sperm. The CP rates were similar between the lesbian and heterosexual groups (13.2% vs. 11.1%, respectively, ASD = 0.06). In addition, the LB rates were similar between the two groups (10.4% vs. 8.3%, respectively, ASD = 0.10). After implementing the generalized estimating equation in a multivariable logistic regression, the lesbian group had an overall higher odds of CP (adjusted odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval: [1.04-1.88]) and LB (adjusted odds ratio 1.59, 95% confidence interval [1.15-2.20]) compared with the heterosexual group. The clinical miscarriage rate was higher in the heterosexual group compared with that in the lesbian group (23.8% vs. 15.4%, respectively, ASD = 0.21). CONCLUSION: Although the unadjusted rates were similar between the two groups, the adjusted CP and LB odds were significantly higher for lesbian women undergoing IUI for procreative management than those for heterosexual women undergoing IUI for infertility.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: There are currently various conflicting recommendations for breast cancer screening with mammography in women between ages 40-49. There are no specific guidelines for breast cancer screening in women of this age group prior to assisted reproductive technology (ART) for the treatment of infertility. The purpose of our study was to evaluate outcomes of screening mammography, specifically ordered for the purpose of pre-fertility treatment clearance in women aged 40-49 years old. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an IRB approved retrospective study of women aged 40-49 presenting for screening mammography prior to ART between January 2010 and October 2018. Clinical history, imaging, and pathology results were gathered from the electronic medical record. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: Our study cohort consisted of 118 women with a mean age of 42 years (range 40-49). Sixteen of 118 (14%) women were recalled from screening for additional diagnostic work-up. Five of the 16 (31%) were recommended for biopsy (BI-RADS 4 or 5). One of 5 biopsies yielded a malignant result (PPV 20%). Overall cancer detection rate was 0.85% or 8.5 women per 1000 women screened. The single cancer in this cohort was an ER+ PR+ HER2- invasive ductal carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Screening mammography in women 40-49 performed prior to initiation of ART may identify asymptomatic breast malignancy. In accordance with ACR and SBI guidelines to screen women of this age group, women of this age group should undergo screening mammography prior to ART.