Mutational analysis of splicing machinery genes SF3B1, U2AF1 and SRSF2 in myelodysplasia and other common tumors.

Recurrent somatic mutations in splicing machinery components, including SF3B1, U2AF1 and SRSF2 genes have recently been reported in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Such a recurrent nature strongly suggests that these mutations play important roles in tumor development. To see whether SF3B1, U2AF1 and SRSF2 mutations occur in other human tumors besides MDS, we analyzed the hotspot mutation regions of these genes in 2,345 tumor tissues from various origins (61 MDS, other 616 hematologic tumors, 1,421 epithelial tumors and 247 non-epithelial stromal tumors) by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. We found SF3B1, U2AF1 and SRSF2 mutations in 5 (8.2%), 12 (19.7%) and 8 (13.1%) of 61 MDS, respectively. We also confirmed these mutations in other myeloid neoplasia, including de novo acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and MDS/myeloproliferative disorder. In addition, we discovered that the SRSF2 gene was mutated in two childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemias (childhood ALL) (1.5%). In solid tumors, we found SF3B1 mutations in gastric and prostate cancers, and U2AF1 mutation in a borderline mucinous tumor of ovary, but the overall incidences of the hotspot mutation regions were very low (0.2%). Our data suggest that SF3B1, U2AF1 and SRSF2 mutations occur not only in myeloid lineage tumors but also in lymphoid lineage tumors. The data suggest that the splicing gene mutations play important roles in the pathogenesis of hematologic tumors, but rarely in solid tumors.

Mutational analysis of MED12 exon 2 in uterine leiomyoma and other common tumors.

Recurrent somatic mutations in MED12 exon 2 have recently been reported in uterine leiomyomas. The recurrent nature of the mutations strongly suggests that the mutations may play important roles in the pathogenesis of uterine leiomyomas. The aim of our study was to see whether MED12 exon 2 mutations occur in other human tumors besides uterine leiomyomas. We also attempted to confirm occurrence of the MED12 mutations in uterine leiomyomas of Korean patients. For this, we analyzed 1,862 tumor tissues, including a variety of carcinomas, leukemias and stromal tumors by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. We found MED12 mutations in 35 uterine leiomyomas (35/67; 52.2%) and one colon carcinoma (0.3%), but none in other tumors. The MED12 mutations consisted of missense (77%) and inframe insertion-deletion (23%) mutations, the pattern of which was similar to the earlier report. Our data indicate that MED12 exon 2 mutations may be tissue-specific to uterine leiomyoma and rare in other tumors. Our study suggests that the MED12 mutations play unique roles in the pathogenesis of uterine leiomyomas and mutated MED12 could be therapeutically targeted in uterine leiomyomas.

Frameshift mutation of WISP3 gene and its regional heterogeneity in gastric and colorectal cancers.

WISP3 is involved in many cancer-related processes including epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cell death, invasion, and metastasis and is considered a tumor suppressor. The aim of our study was to find whether WISP3 gene was mutated and expressionally altered in gastric (GC) and colorectal cancers (CRCs). WISP3 gene possesses a mononucleotide repeat in the coding sequence that could be mutated in cancers with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). We analyzed 79 GCs and 156 CRCs, and found that GCs (8.8%) and CRCs (10.5%) with MSI-H, but not those with microsatellite stable/low MSI, harbored a frameshift mutation. We also analyzed intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) of the frameshift mutation in 16 CRCs and found that the WISP3 mutation exhibited regional ITH in 25% of the CRCs. In immunohistochemistry, loss of WISP3 expression was identified in 24% of GCs and 21% of CRCs. The loss of expression was more common in those with WISP3 mutation than with wild-type WISP3 and those with MSI-H than with microsatellite stable/low MSI. Our data indicate that WISP3 harbored not only frameshift mutation but also mutational ITH and loss of expression, which together might play a role in tumorigenesis of GC and CRC with MSI-H by inhibiting tumor suppressor functions of WISP3. Our data also suggest that mutation analysis in multiregions is needed for a proper evaluation of mutation status in GC and CRC with MSI-H.

Frameshift mutations of cadherin genes DCHS2, CDH10 and CDH24 genes in gastric and colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability.

Cadherins (CDHs) are important in maintenance of cell adhesion and polarity, alterations of which contribute to tumorigenesis. Alterations of E-cadherin, a prototype CDH, have been reported in many cancers. However, alterations of unconventional CDHs, including CDH10, CDH24 and DCHS2 are largely unknown in cancers. Aim of this study was to explore whether CDH10, CDH24 and DCHS2 genes are mutated in gastric (GC) and colorectal cancers (CRC). In a public database, we found that CDH10, CDH24 and DCHS2 genes had mononucleotide repeats in the coding sequences that might be mutation targets in the cancers with microsatellite instability (MSI). We analyzed the mutations in 89 GC and 131 CRC (high MSI (MSI-H) or stable MSI/low MSI (MSS/MSI-L)) by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and DNA sequencing. We found six DCHS2, one CDH10 and one CDH24 frameshift mutations in them. All of the mutations were detected in cancers with MSI-H and there was a statistical difference in the frameshift mutation frequencies between the cancers with MSI-H (8/105) and MSS/MSI-L (0/115). The DCHS2 frameshift mutations were found in 8.8% and 4.2% of GC and CRC with MSI-H respectively. Our results show that unconventional CDH10, CDH24 and DCHS2 genes harbored frameshift mutations. These mutations might inactivate the cell adhesion-related functions and could be a feature of GC and CRC with MSI-H.

Mutational and expressional analysis of SMC2 gene in gastric and colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability.

Structural maintenance of chromosomes 2 (SMC2) gene encodes condensin complexes that are required for proper chromosome segregation and maintenance of chromosomal stability. Although cells with defective chromosome segregation become aneuploid and are prone to harbor chromosome instability, pathologic implications of SMC2 gene alterations are largely unknown. In a public database, we found that SMC2 gene had mononucleotide repeats that could be mutated in cancers with microsatellite instability (MSI). In this study, we analyzed these repeats in 32 gastric cancers (GC) with high MSI (MSI-H), 59 GC with low MSI (MSI-L)/stable MSI (MSS), 43 colorectal cancers (CRC) with MSI-H and 60 CRC with MSI-L/MSS by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and DNA sequencing. We also analyzed SMC2 protein expression in GC and CRC tissues using immunohistochemistry. We found SMC2 frameshift mutations in two GC and two CRC that would result in truncation of SMC2. The mutations were detected exclusively in MSI-H cancers, but not in MSI-L/MSS cancers. Loss of SMC2 expression was observed in 22% of GC and 25% of CRC. Of note, all of the cancers with SMC2 frameshift mutations displayed loss of SMC2 expression. Also, both GC and CRC with MSI-H had significantly higher incidences in SMC2 frameshift mutations and loss of SMC2 expression than those with MSI-L/MSS. Our data indicate that SMC2 gene is altered by both frameshift mutation and loss of expression in GC and CRC with MSI-H, and suggest that SMC2 gene alterations might be involved in pathogenesis of these cancers.

Somatic mutation of PARK2 tumor suppressor gene is not common in common solid cancers.

Recent studies identified that PARK2 gene was a candidate tumor suppressor gene in colorectal cancers and glioblastomas. The aim of this study was identify whether PARK2 somatic mutation is present in other solid tumor as well. In this study, we analyzed the entire coding sequences of human PARK2 gene in gastric, colorectal, breast, lung and prostate carcinoma by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and subsequent direct DNA sequencing. We found two missense mutations (p.Ser9Thr and p.Gly450Val) in colon carcinomas (4.3 %), which were not overlapped with the known PARK2 mutations. Our data suggest that somatic mutational events in PARK2 gene may be rare in colorectal, gastric, prostate, breast and lung carcinomas and may not play an important role in the development of these cancers.

Frameshift mutations of axon guidance genes ROBO1 and ROBO2 in gastric and colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability.

AIMS: Several lines of evidence indicate that axon guidance genes are involved not only in neural development but also in cancer development. ROBO1 and ROBO2, crucial regulators of axon guidance, are considered potential tumour suppressor genes. The aim of this study was to explore whether ROBO1 and ROBO2 genes are somatically mutated and expressionally altered in gastric (GC) and colorectal cancers (CRC). METHODS: In a public database, we observed that both ROBO1 and ROBO2 had mononucleotide repeats in their coding exons that could be mutation targets in cancers with microsatellite instability (MSI). We analysed mutations of these repeats in 77 GC and 88 CRC either with high MSI (MSI-H) or low MSI/microsatellite stability (MSI-L/MSS) by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and DNA sequencing. We analysed ROBO1 and ROBO2 expressions in GC and CRC by immunohistochemistry as well. RESULTS: Overall, we found five ROBO1 and five ROBO2 frameshift mutations in the repeats. They were detected exclusively in the cancers with MSI-H (10/70, 14.2%), but not in MSI-L/MSS (0/95, 0%) (p=0.018). In the immunohistochemistry, loss of ROBO2 expression was identified in 22 (29%) and 17 (19%) of GC and CRC, respectively, while increased expression of ROBO2 was found in 15 (20%) and 22 (25%) of GC and CRC, respectively. There were co-occurrences of mutation and loss of expression in both ROBO1 (4/5, 80% mutated cases, p<0.001) and ROBO2 (5/5, 100% mutated cases, p<0.05) genes. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of ROBO1 and ROBO2 frameshift mutations in GC and CRC. Frameshift mutations of ROBO1 and ROBO2 genes and alteration of ROBO2 expression in GC and CRC suggest that both genes might play roles in the pathogenesis of GC and CRC.

Mutational and expressional analyses of NRF2 and KEAP1 in sarcomas.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) activates expression of cytoprotective proteins such as GCLC and enhances cancer cell survival, whereas KEAP1 inhibits NRF2 by mediating NRF2 degradation. Somatic mutation of NRF2 and KEAP1 genes and loss of KEAP1 expression are detected in many carcinomas and contribute to cancer development. The aim of this study was to see whether mutational and expressional alterations of NRF2 and KEAP1 genes are features of human sarcomas as well. METHODS: We analyzed somatic mutations of NRF2 and KEAP1 genes in 108 sarcoma tissues from malignant fibrous histiocytomas, rhabdomyosarcomas, osteosarcomas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, leiomyosarcomas, synovial sarcomas, liposarcomas, angiosarcomas, chondrosarcomas and Ewing sarcomas by single-strand conformation polymorphism. Also, we analyzed expressions of NRF2, KEAP1 and GCLC in sarcoma tissues by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Tissue expressions of NRF2 and GCLC were found in 93% and 76% of the sarcomas, respectively, indicating that NRF2 signaling might be activated in most sarcomas. Loss of KEAP1 expression was observed in 24% of the sarcomas, whereas neither NRF2 nor KEAP1 somatic gene mutation was seen in the sarcomas. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest a possible activation of the NRF2/KEAP1 system in sarcomas and a possible contribution to cytopretection of sarcoma cells.

Mutational and expressional analyses of MYD88 gene in common solid cancers.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MYD88) is a protein involved in hematopoietic differentiation and innate immunity. Recent studies revealed MYD88 mutation in hematological malignancies and MYD88 overexpression in some solid cancers. The aim of this study was to see whether alterations of MYD88 protein expression and somatic mutation of MYD88 gene are features of common solid cancers. METHODS: We analyzed MYD88 mutation in 45 gastric, 45 colorectal, 45 breast, 45 hepatocellular, 45 prostate and 45 lung carcinomas by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP). We also analyzed MYD88 protein expression in 60 gastric, 60 coloretal and 107 prostate carcinomas by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In the immunohistochemistry results, MYD88 protein was highly expressed in gastric (75%), colorectal (80%) and prostate (83%) cancers. However, MYD88 expression was significantly different among normal tissues (gastric: 58%, colon: 100%, prostate: 86%). MYD88 expression was significantly increased in gastric cancer cells compared with normal cells, whereas it was decreased in colorectal cancer cells compared with normal cells. There were no somatic mutations of the MYD88 gene in gastric, colorectal, breast, hepatocellular, prostate and lung carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that MYD88 overexpression might be a feature of many solid cancers, but MYD88 expression in normal cells differs depending on the organs. The data suggest that a gain of MYD88 expression in gastric cancers might play a role in cancer pathogenesis by activating oncogenic functions of MYD88.