Anatomical Substrates of Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Rebound in a Rodent Model of Post-sevoflurane Sleep Disruption.

BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that sevoflurane anesthesia may prevent the brain from accessing rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. If true, then patterns of neural activity observed in REM-on and REM-off neuronal populations during recovery from sevoflurane should resemble those seen after REM sleep deprivation. In this study, the authors hypothesized that, relative to controls, animals exposed to sevoflurane present with a distinct expression pattern of c-Fos, a marker of neuronal activation, in a cluster of nuclei classically associated with REM sleep, and that such expression in sevoflurane-exposed and REM sleep-deprived animals is largely similar. METHODS: Adult rats and Targeted Recombination in Active Populations mice were implanted with electroencephalographic electrodes for sleep-wake recording and randomized to sevoflurane, REM deprivation, or control conditions. Conventional c-Fos immunohistochemistry and genetically tagged c-Fos labeling were used to quantify activated neurons in a group of REM-associated nuclei in the midbrain and basal forebrain. RESULTS: REM sleep duration increased during recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia relative to controls (157.0 ± 24.8 min vs. 124.2 ± 27.8 min; P = 0.003) and temporally correlated with increased c-Fos expression in the sublaterodorsal nucleus, a region active during REM sleep (176.0 ± 36.6 cells vs. 58.8 ± 8.7; P = 0.014), and decreased c-Fos expression in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray, a region that is inactive during REM sleep (34.8 ± 5.3 cells vs. 136.2 ± 19.6; P = 0.001). Fos changes similar to those seen in sevoflurane-exposed mice were observed in REM-deprived animals relative to controls (sublaterodorsal nucleus: 85.0 ± 15.5 cells vs. 23.0 ± 1.2, P = 0.004; ventrolateral periaqueductal gray: 652.8 ± 71.7 cells vs. 889.3 ± 66.8, P = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: In rodents recovering from sevoflurane, REM-on and REM-off neuronal activity maps closely resemble those of REM sleep-deprived animals. These findings provide new evidence in support of the idea that sevoflurane does not substitute for endogenous REM sleep.

Sleep Fragmentation, Electroencephalographic Slowing, and Circadian Disarray in a Mouse Model for Intensive Care Unit Delirium.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to further validate our previously published animal model for delirium by testing the hypothesis that in aged mice, Anesthesia, Surgery and simulated ICU conditions (ASI) induce sleep fragmentation, electroencephalographic (EEG) slowing, and circadian disarray consistent with intensive care unit (ICU) patients with delirium. METHODS: A total of 41 mice were used. Mice were implanted with EEG electrodes and randomized to ASI or control groups. ASI mice received laparotomy, anesthesia, and simulated ICU conditions. Controls did not receive ASI. Sleep was recorded at the end of ICU conditions, and hippocampal tissue was collected on EEG recording. Arousals, EEG dynamics, and circadian gene expression were compared with t tests. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (RM ANOVA) was used to assess sleep according to light. RESULTS: ASI mice experienced frequent arousals (36.6 ± 3.2 vs 26.5 ± 3.4; P = .044; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-19.79; difference in mean ± SEM, 10.04 ± 4.62) and EEG slowing (frontal theta ratio, 0.223 ± 0.010 vs 0.272 ± 0.019; P = .026; 95% CI, -0.091 to -0.007; difference in mean ± SEM, -0.05 ± 0.02) relative to controls. In ASI mice with low theta ratio, EEG slowing was associated with a higher percentage of quiet wakefulness (38.2 ± 3.6 vs 13.4 ± 3.8; P = .0002; 95% CI, -35.87 to -13.84; difference in mean ± SEM, -24.86 ± 5.19). ASI mice slept longer during the dark phases of the circadian cycle (nonrapid eye movement [NREM], dark phase 1 [D1]: 138.9 ± 8.1 minutes vs 79.6 ± 9.6 minutes, P = .0003, 95% CI, -95.87 to -22.69, predicted mean difference ± SE: -59.28 ± 13.89; NREM, dark phase 2 (D2): 159.3 ± 7.3 minutes vs 112.6 ± 15.5 minutes, P = .006, 95% CI, -83.25 to -10.07, mean difference ± SE, -46.66 ± 13.89; rapid eye movement (REM), D1: 20.5 ± 2.1 minutes vs 5.8 ± 0.8 minutes, P = .001, 95% CI, -24.60 to -4.71, mean difference ± SE, -14. 65 ± 3.77; REM, D2: 21.0 ± 2.2 minutes vs 10.3 ± 1.4 minutes, P = .029, 95% CI, -20.64 to -0.76, mean difference ± SE, -10.70 ± 3.77). The expression of essential circadian genes was also lower in ASI mice (basic helix-loop-helix ARNT like [BMAL1] : -1.3 fold change; circadian locomotor output cycles protein kaput [CLOCK] : -1.2). CONCLUSIONS: ASI mice experienced EEG and circadian changes mimicking those of delirious ICU patients. These findings support further exploration of this mouse approach to characterize the neurobiology of delirium.