Is there more to BARD1 than BRCA1?

It has been over a decade since mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were found to be associated with a small number of familial breast cancer cases. BRCA1 is a large protein that interacts with many other proteins that have diverse functions, so it has been a challenge to determine how defects in its function could lead to cancer. One particular protein, BARD1, seems to be an important regulator of the tumour-suppressor function of BRCA1, as well as acting as a tumour suppressor itself. BARD1 is indispensable for cell viability, so loss-of-function mutations are rare, but mutations and truncations that alter its function might be involved in the pathogenesis of breast cancer.

BARD1 induces apoptosis by catalysing phosphorylation of p53 by DNA-damage response kinase.

The BRCA1-associated RING domain protein BARD1 acts with BRCA1 in double-strand break repair and ubiquitination. BARD1 plays a role as mediator of apoptosis by binding to and stabilizing p53, and BARD1-repressed cells are resistant to apoptosis. We therefore investigated the mechanism by which BARD1 induces p53 stability and apoptosis. The apoptotic activity of p53 is regulated by phosphorylation. We demonstrate that BARD1 binds to unphosphorylated and serine-15 phosphorylated forms of p53 in several cell types and that the region required for binding comprises the region sufficient for apoptosis induction. In addition, BARD1 binds to Ku-70, the regulatory subunit of DNA-PK, suggesting that the mechanism of p53-induced apoptosis requires BARD1 for the phosphorylation of p53. Upregulation of BARD1 alone is sufficient for stabilization of p53 and phosphorylation on serine-15, as shown in nonmalignant epithelial cells and ovarian cancer cells, NuTu-19, which are defective in apoptosis induction and express aberrant splice variants of BARD1. Stabilization and phosphorylation of p53 in NuTu-19 cells, as well as apoptosis, can be induced by the exogenous expression of wild-type BARD1, suggesting that BARD1, by binding to the kinase and its substrate, catalyses p53 phosphorylation.

Mechanisms of chromosome instability in cancers.

Most tumours arise through clonal selection and waves of expansion of a somatic cell that has acquired genetic alterations in essential genes either controlling cell death or cell proliferation. Furthermore, stability of the genome in cancer cells becomes precarious and compromised because several cancer-predisposing mutations affect genes that are responsible for maintaining the integrity and number of chromosomes during cell division. Consequently, the archetypical transformation in tumour cells results in aneuploidy. Indeed, almost all tumour cells display a host of karyotype alterations, showing translocations, gains or losses of entire or large parts of chromosomes. Cancers do not necessarily have a higher mutation rate than normal tissue at the nucleotide level, unless they have gained a mutator phenotype through exposure to environmental stress, but rather exhibit gross chromosomal changes. Therefore, it appears that the main mechanism of tumour progression stems from chromosome instability. Chromosomal instability prevailing in tumour cells arises through several different pathways and is probably controlled by hundreds of genes. Therefore, this review describes the main factors that control chromosome stability through telomere maintenance, mechanisms of cell division, and the mitotic checkpoints that govern centrosome duplication and correct chromosome segregation.

Nuclear-cytoplasmic translocation of BARD1 is linked to its apoptotic activity.

The tumor suppressor protein BARD1 plays a dual role in response to genotoxic stress: DNA repair as a BARD1-BRCA1 heterodimer and induction of apoptosis in a BRCA1-independent manner. We have constructed a series of BARD1 deletion mutants and analysed their cellular distribution and capacity to induce apoptosis. As opposed to previous studies suggesting an exclusively nuclear localization of BARD1, we found, both in tissues and cell cultures, nuclear and cytoplasmic localization of BARD1. Enhanced cytoplasmic localization of BARD1, as well as appearance of a 67 kDa C-terminal proteolytic cleavage product, coincided with apoptosis. BARD1 translocates to the nucleus independently of BRCA1. For recruitment to nuclear dots, however, the BRCA1-interacting RING finger domain is required but not sufficient. Protein levels of N-terminal RING finger deletion mutants were much higher than those of full-length BARD1, despite comparable mRNA levels, suggesting that the N-terminal region comprising the RING finger is important for BARD1 degradation. Sequences required for apoptosis induction were mapped between the ankyrin repeats and the BRCT domains coinciding with two known cancer-associated missense mutations. We suggest that nuclear and cytoplasmic localization of BARD1 reflect its dual function and that the increased cytoplasmic localization of BARD1 is associated with apoptosis.

Distinct roles of BARD1 isoforms in mitosis: full-length BARD1 mediates Aurora B degradation, cancer-associated BARD1beta scaffolds Aurora B and BRCA2.

The BRCA1-associated ring domain protein 1 (BARD1) interacts with BRCA1 via its RING finger domain. The BARD1-BRCA1 complex participates in DNA repair, cell cycle control, genomic stability, and mitotic spindle formation through its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. Cancer cells express several BARD1 protein isoforms, including the RING finger-deficient variant BARD1beta. Here, we show that BARD1 has BRCA1-dependent and BRCA1-independent functions in mitosis. BARD1, but not BRCA1, localizes to the midbody at telophase and cytokinesis, where it colocalizes with Aurora B. The 97-kDa full-length (FL) BARD1 coimmunoprecipates with BRCA1, but the 82-kDa BARD1beta coimmunoprecipitates with Aurora B and BRCA2. We used selective small interfering RNAs to distinguish the functions of FL BARD1 and BARD1beta. Depletion of FL BARD1 had only minor effects on cell growth and did not abolish midbody localization of BARD1 staining, but resulted in massive up-regulation of Aurora B. In contrast, suppression of FL BARD1 and BARD1beta led to growth arrest and correlated with various mitotic defects and disappearance of midbody localization of BARD1 staining. Our data suggest a novel function of FL BARD1 in Aurora B ubiquitination and degradation, opposing a proproliferative function of BARD1beta in scaffolding Aurora B and BRCA2. Thus, loss of FL BARD1 and up-regulation of Aurora B, as observed in cancer cells, can be explained by an imbalance of FL BARD1 and BARD1beta.

Unusually stable abnormal karyotype in a highly aggressive melanoma negative for telomerase activity.

Malignant melanomas are characterized by increased karyotypic complexity, extended aneuploidy and heteroploidy. We report a melanoma metastasis to the peritoneal cavity with an exceptionally stable, abnormal pseudodiploid karyotype as verified by G-Banding, subtelomeric, centromeric and quantitative Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH). Interestingly this tumor had no detectable telomerase activity as indicated by the Telomere Repeat Amplification Protocol. Telomeric Flow-FISH and quantitative telomeric FISH on mitotic preparations showed that malignant cells had relatively short telomeres. Microsatellite instability was ruled out by the allelic pattern of two major mononucleotide repeats. Our data suggest that a combination of melanoma specific genomic imbalances were sufficient and enough for this fatal tumor progression, that was not accompanied by genomic instability, telomerase activity, or the engagement of the alternative recombinatorial telomere lengthening pathway.

Pericentromeric instability and spontaneous emergence of human neoacrocentric and minute chromosomes in the alternative pathway of telomere lengthening.

In the alternative pathway of telomere lengthening (ALT), neoplastic cell growth is prolonged by telomere recombination. We show that ALT is unexpectedly characterized by high rates of ongoing pericentromeric chromosomal instability. Combined with telomeric recombination, ALT pericentromeric instability generates neoacrocentric chromosomes. In the present studies, we describe a subgroup of ALT neoacrocentric minute chromosomes, composed of DNA entities two to five times smaller in size than human chromosome 21. The frequencies of ALT minute chromosomes were increased by gamma-irradiation and suppressed by telomerase. Continuous growth after telomerase inhibition/depletion was followed by increased rates of telomeric sister chromatid recombination and the emergence of minute chromosomes. We show that ALT minute chromosomes were derived from true centromeric fissions and/or chromosomal breakage/fusion/bridge cycles. They exhibit a two-chromatid structure, carry genomic DNA, centromeric and telomeric repeats, and display regular mitotic functionality. These observations are important in understanding the global genomic instability that characterizes most human advanced malignancies.

Oncogenic BARD1 isoforms expressed in gynecological cancers.

BARD1 is required for protein stability and tumor suppressor functions of BRCA1, which depend on the ubiquitin ligase activity of the BRCA1-BARD1 heterodimer. The NH(2)-terminal RING domains of both proteins act as interaction modules and form a ubiquitin ligase, which has functions in DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoint regulation, and mitosis. Interestingly, up-regulated expression of truncated BARD1 isoforms was found to be associated with poor prognosis in breast and ovarian cancers and, in a hormonally regulated fashion, in the human cytotrophoblast, a cell type with properties reminiscent of cancer cells. We therefore performed reverse transcription-PCR to determine the structure of BARD1 isoforms in cell lines derived from hormone-dependent and hormone-independent cancers. We found a specific combination of isoforms, generated by differential splicing and alternative transcription initiation, mostly lacking the BRCA1 interaction domain, in gynecologic but not hematologic cancer cell lines. To investigate the prevalence of BARD1 isoforms in tumors, we applied immunohistochemistry to ovarian cancers, using antibodies distinguishing full-length BARD1 and isoforms. Expression of NH(2) terminally truncated BARD1 was correlated with advanced stage of cancer, and expression of spliced isoforms was typical for clear cell carcinoma, the ovarian cancer with worst prognosis, suggesting a role of BARD1 isoforms in cancer progression. To challenge this hypothesis, we silenced BARD1 isoforms in ovarian cancer cells that lacked wild-type BARD1 by siRNA interference, which led to a complete proliferation arrest. Thus, BARD1 isoform expression is required for cancer cell proliferation, which is compatible with the notion that BARD1 isoforms act as cancer maintenance genes.

BARD1 expression during spermatogenesis is associated with apoptosis and hormonally regulated.

The BRCA1-binding RING-finger domain protein BARD1 may act conjointly with BRCA1 in DNA repair and in ubiquitination, but it may also induce apoptosis in a BRCA1-independent manner. In this study, we have investigated BARD1 expression during spermatogenesis. In contrast with BRCA1, which is expressed only in meiotic spermatocytes and early round spermatids, BARD1 is expressed during all stages of spermatogenesis. However, while spermatogonia expressed full-length BARD1 mRNA, later stages of spermatocyte precursors express predominantly a novel, shorter splice form BARD1beta. BARD1beta lacks the BRCA1-interacting RING finger but maintains its proapoptotic activity. Consistently, BRCA1 can counteract the proapoptotic activity of full-length BARD1 but not of BARD1beta. Several lines of evidence suggest that BARD1 is involved in proapoptotic signaling in testis: i) both BARD1 isoforms are mostly found in cells that stain positive for TUNEL, Bax, and activated caspase 3; ii) BARD1beta, capable of inducing apoptosis even in the presence of BRCA1, is specifically expressed in BRCA1-positive later stages of spermatogenesis; iii) antiapoptotic hormonal stimulation leads to BARD1 downregulation; and iv) BARD1 expression is associated with human pathologies causing sterility due to increased germ cell death. Our data suggest that full-length BARD1 might be involved in apoptotic control in spermatogonia and primary spermatocytes, while a switch to the BRCA1-independent BARD1beta might be necessary to induce apoptosis in BRCA1-expressing meiotic spermatocytes and early round spermatids.