Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pediatr Res ; 93(5): 1141-1148, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34743180

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of infant mortality worldwide with non-specific and varied presentation. We aimed to catalogue the current definitions of neonatal sepsis in published randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHOD: A systematic search of the Embase and Cochrane databases was performed for RCTs which explicitly stated a definition for neonatal sepsis. Definitions were sub-divided into five primary criteria for infection (culture, laboratory findings, clinical signs, radiological evidence and risk factors) and stratified by qualifiers (early/late-onset and likelihood of sepsis). RESULTS: Of 668 papers screened, 80 RCTs were included and 128 individual definitions identified. The single most common definition was neonatal sepsis defined by blood culture alone (n = 35), followed by culture and clinical signs (n = 29), and then laboratory tests/clinical signs (n = 25). Blood culture featured in 83 definitions, laboratory testing featured in 48 definitions while clinical signs and radiology featured in 80 and 8 definitions, respectively. DISCUSSION: A diverse range of definitions of neonatal sepsis are used and based on microbiological culture, laboratory tests and clinical signs in contrast to adult and paediatric sepsis which use organ dysfunction. An international consensus-based definition of neonatal sepsis could allow meta-analysis and translate results to improve outcomes.


Assuntos
Sepse Neonatal , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Mortalidade Infantil , Sepse Neonatal/diagnóstico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/terapia
2.
Med Humanit ; 42(2): 109-14, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26944516

RESUMO

To clinicians there are a number of striking features of the ever-evolving field of the medical humanities. The first is a perception of a predominantly unidirectional relationship between medicine and the humanities, generally in terms of what the arts and humanities have to offer medicine. The second is the portrayal of medical practice in terms of problems and negativities for which the medical humanities are seen to pose the solution rather than viewing medicine as an active and positive contributor to an interdisciplinary project. Paradigms that fail to recognise the contributions of medicine and its practitioners (including students) to the medical humanities, this paper argues, will continue to struggle with definition and acceptance. This paper explores the possibilities for advancing the medical humanities through recognition of the contribution of medicine to the humanities and the importance of engaging with the arts, culture and leisure pursuits of doctors and medical students. Our research shows the richness of cultural engagement of medical students, their broad range of cultural interests and their ability to contribute to research and scholarship in the medical humanities. Mutual recognition of strengths, weaknesses and differences of scholarly approach is critical to successful development of the enterprise. Recognising and building on the interests, sympathies and contributions of medicine and its practitioners to the medical humanities is a fundamental component of this task. Future directions might include introductory courses for humanities scholars in aspects of healthcare and medicine.


Assuntos
Ciências Humanas , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Medicina , Cultura , Currículo , Ciências Humanas/educação , Humanos , Médicos , Estudantes de Medicina , Pensamento
3.
Midwifery ; 97: 102950, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33684613

RESUMO

Trauma to the labia occurs in up to 49% of vaginal births1. Trauma to the perineal body resulting from childbirth is well defined using widely used categories, and recommended management of perineal body trauma is based on high level evidence. Currently no similar evidence exists to inform the classification or management of labial trauma. This is reflected in variation in clinical practice with some practitioners favouring suturing of labial trauma, whilst others favour healing by secondary intention. A survey of practice was undertaken in three NHS organisations, over a five-week period in 2019 with data collected on 332 vaginal births. Overall, 47.3% (n=157) of women sustained labial trauma, of whom 29.3% (n=46) sustained trauma described as involving skin and underlying tissues. Of the labial trauma which involved skin and underlying tissues 76.0% (n=35) was sutured and the remainder unsutured. The survey confirmed a lack of consistency in practice and the need for further research to inform care for women.


Assuntos
Complicações do Trabalho de Parto , Parto Obstétrico , Episiotomia , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/terapia , Parto , Períneo/cirurgia , Gravidez , Reino Unido
4.
Midwifery ; 71: 49-55, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30677636

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Primary objectives were to establish consensus of opinion for classification of post birth labial trauma and which types of post birth labial trauma require suturing. Secondary objectives were to establish optimal method, material and anaesthetic for suturing labial trauma. DESIGN: Delphi study consisting of 3 rounds. SETTING: UK and Europe PARTICIPANTS: 8 midwives, 4 obstetricians, 7 specialist perineal midwives, 1 consultant midwife and 2 midwifery lecturers all with relevant expertise and or recent, regular clinical experience of assessing and suturing labial trauma from 2 United Kingdom (UK) universities, 12 UK healthcare trusts and 1 European healthcare organisation. METHODS: A Delphi study consisting of an initial round of 6 professional medical illustrations of labial trauma with 6 open questions attached to each sent to panel members. 2 further rounds developed from the first round with between 2 and 10 opt-in statements for the 6 questions for each illustration to 20 and 22 panel members respectively. Consensus was set at 70% opt-in for each statement. FINDINGS: Consensus was reached that unilateral or bilateral vertical skin separation with minimal trauma to underlying tissues was described as a graze and does not require suturing. Consensus was reached that unilateral or bilateral deeper vertical trauma with involvement of the underlying tissue and horizontal trauma across the labia does require suturing with interrupted technique, injected local anaesthetic and using Vicryl Rapide 3.0 or equivalent. CONCLUSION: A pilot study and definitive randomised controlled trial are required to establish in vivo whether labial tears including those which are transverse, are less painful and heal better with interrupted suturing compared to continuous or subcuticular sutures.


Assuntos
Episiotomia/classificação , Períneo/lesões , Período Pós-Parto , Suturas/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/normas , Técnica Delphi , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/cirurgia , Períneo/cirurgia , Projetos Piloto , Gravidez , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa