Evaluation of a host-protein signature score for differentiating between bacterial and viral infections: real-life evidence from a German tertiary hospital.

PURPOSE: A host-protein signature score, consisting of serum-concentrations of C-reactive protein, tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, and interferon gamma-induced protein 10, was validated for distinguishing between bacterial and viral infections as an antimicrobial stewardship measure for routine clinical practice among adult patients in a German tertiary hospital. METHODS: This single-centre, explorative study prospectively assessed the host-protein signature score, comparing it with serum procalcitonin (PCT) in patients with blood stream infections (BSI) and evaluating its efficacy in patients with viral infections against the standard of care (SOC) to assess the need for antibiotics due to suspected bacterial super/coinfection. Manufacturer-specified threshold scores were used to differentiate viral (< 35) and bacterial (> 65) infections. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients (BSI [n = 56]; viral infections [n = 41]) were included. The score (cut-off score > 65) tended to detect BSI with higher sensitivity than did PCT (cut-off > 0.5 ng/mL) (87.5% vs. 76.6%). Three patients (5.4%) with BSI had a score < 35. One patient with BSI did not receive antibiotic treatment following SOC prior to positive blood culture results. Among patients with viral infections, 29 (70.7%) had scores > 65, indicating bacterial superinfections. Additionally, 11 patients (26.8%) had scores < 35, indicating no bacterial superinfections. In total, the antibiotic treatment discrepancy in the viral group between the SOC and a host-protein signature score guided approach was 2/41 patients (4.9%). CONCLUSION: The score tended towards a higher sensitivity in detecting BSI than that with PCT. However, its impact on reducing antibiotic use in viral infections was minor compared with that of SOC.

Implementation and clinical evaluation of an Mpox virus laboratory-developed test on a fully automated random-access platform.

While Mpox virus (MPXV) diagnostics were performed in specialized laboratories only, the global emergence of Mpox cases in 2022 revealed the need for a more readily available diagnostic. Automated random-access platforms with fast nucleic acid extraction and PCR have become established in many laboratories, providing faster and more accessible testing. In this study, we adapted a previously published generic MPXV-PCR as a lab-developed test (LDT) on a NeuMoDx Molecular System and isolated MPXV clones from patient materials. To reduce the handling of infectious material, we evaluated a viral lysis buffer (VLB) for sample pretreatment. We further compared the MPXV-LDT-PCR to conventional real-time PCR, determined its sensitivity and specificity using positive swabs, and assessed its performance using external quality assessment samples. Pretreatment of samples with 50% VLB reduced MPXV infectivity by approximately 200-fold while maintaining PCR sensitivity. The assay demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 100% with no cross-reactivity in the samples tested and performed with a limit of detection of 262 GE/mL. In summary, the assay had a turnaround time of fewer than 2 h and can easily be transferred to other automated PCR platforms, providing a basis for developing rapid assays for upcoming pandemics.

Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab for COVID-19 Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Hematologic Patients-A Tailored Approach Based on SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Response.

Patients with hematologic malignancies still face a significant risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-neutralizing monoclonal antibody combination tixagevimab/cilgavimab (TIX/CGB) could be administered to immunocompromised patients for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) before the emergence of TIX/CGB-resistant COVID-19 Omicron variants. TIX/CGB application could be carried out regardless of the host's immune response to previous active SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations or infections. Because the efficacy of COVID-19 PrEP remains unclear, especially in SARS-CoV-2-seropositive patients, German national guidelines recommended TIX/CGB PrEP only for SARS-CoV-2-seronegative patients in addition to an intensified active vaccination schedule. Having followed these guidelines, we now report the characteristics and outcomes of 54 recipients of TIX/CGB PrEP in SARS-CoV-2-seronegative patients with hematological disease from a German tertiary medical center and compare them to 125 seropositive patients who did not receive any PrEP. While the number of patients with B-cell lymphomas was significantly higher in the seronegative cohort (33 (61%) vs. 18 (14%) cases, p < 0.01), patients with myeloid diseases were significantly more frequent in the seropositive cohort (51 (41%) vs. 5 (9%) cases, p < 0.01). Strikingly, patients who had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were significantly more likely (forty-nine (39%) vs. six (11%) cases, p < 0.01) to be SARS-CoV-2 seropositive. We observed that prophylactic application of TIX/CGB PrEP to a highly vulnerable group of SARS-CoV-2-seronegative patients resulted in a similar number of COVID-19 breakthrough infections compared to the untreated seropositive control group (16 (32%) vs. 39 (36%), p = 0.62) and comparable COVID-19-related outcomes like hospitalization and oxygen requirement throughout an extended follow-up period of 12 months. In conclusion, our results support the tailored approach of administering TIX/CGB PrEP only to SARS-CoV-2-seronegative patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and might provide a rationale for similar strategies during future outbreaks/diseases, especially in times of initial limited availability and/or financial constraints.

Clinical and immunological benefits of full primary COVID-19 vaccination in individuals with SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections: A prospective cohort study in non-hospitalized adults.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) may result in breakthrough infections (BTIs) in vaccinated individuals. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of full primary (two-dose) COVID-19 vaccination with wild-type-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines on symptoms and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 VOC BTIs. METHODS: In a longitudinal multicenter controlled cohort study in Bavaria, Germany, COVID-19 vaccinated and unvaccinated non-hospitalized individuals were prospectively enrolled within 14 days of a PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Individuals were visited weekly up to 4 times, performing a structured record of medical data and viral load assessment. SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody response was characterized by anti-spike-(S)- and anti-nucleocapsid-(N)-antibody concentrations, anti-S-IgG avidity and neutralization capacity. RESULTS: A total of 300 individuals (212 BTIs, 88 non-BTIs) were included with VOC Alpha or Delta SARS-CoV-2 infections. Full primary COVID-19 vaccination provided a significant effectiveness against five symptoms (relative risk reduction): fever (33 %), cough (21 %), dysgeusia (22 %), dizziness (52 %) and nausea/vomiting (48 %). Full primary vaccinated individuals showed significantly higher 50 % inhibitory concentration (IC50) values against the infecting VOC compared to unvaccinated individuals at week 1 (269 vs. 56, respectively), and weeks 5-7 (1,917 vs. 932, respectively) with significantly higher relative anti-S-IgG avidity (78% vs. 27 % at week 4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Full primary COVID-19 vaccination reduced symptom frequencies in non-hospitalized individuals with BTIs and elicited a more rapid and longer lasting neutralization capacity against the infecting VOC compared to unvaccinated individuals. These results support the recommendation to offer at least full primary vaccination to all adults to reduce disease severity caused by immune escape-variants.

Improved detection of infection with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants of concern in healthcare workers by a second-generation rapid antigen test.

IMPORTANCE: The results from this study demonstrate the usefulness of a second-generation rapid antigen test for early detection of infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern (VoC) and reveal a higher sensitivity to detect immune escape Omicron VoCs compared to a first-generation rapid antigen test (89.4% vs 83.7%) in the high-risk group of healthcare workers.