RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To discuss our experience on the diagnosis and treatment of thoracic aorta rupture (TAR) that is one of the main common causes of death in the victims under blunt chest trauma. METHODS: Between July 2001 and March 2006, 9 patients (6 men and 3 women, aged from 20 to 54 years) suffering from acute traumatic aorta rupture after motor vehicle accidents received emergent surgical treatments in our hospital. Based on our experience in the rescue of the first TAR patient we introduced a practical procedure on the diagnosis and treatment of TAR in our department. All the other patients generally followed this procedure. Eight patients received contrast material enhanced helical computerized tomography scan before the operation. The leakage of constrast medium from the aorta isthmus was found, and diagnosis of TAR was confirmed. Seven patients underwent immediate operation within 14 hours after accidents. One patient was treated on the 5th day of the accident because of delayed diagnosis of aortic rupture. All patients received general anesthesia with double lumen endotracheal tube and normothermic femoro-femoral partial cardiopulmonary bypass, with beating heart and aortic clamping. One patient received simple repair, and others received partial replacement of thoracic aorta with artificial vascular graft. RESULTS: Seven TAR patients were successfully salvaged. Three patients combined brain injury as well as extremitiy hemiplegia before operation. After treatments one was fully and two partially recovered without paraplegia. CONCLUSIONS: Proper practical protocol is emphasized for the surgical repair of TAR because it will reduce the mortality of severe blunt chest injury.
Assuntos
Aorta Torácica/lesões , Ruptura Aórtica/cirurgia , Acidentes de Trânsito , Adulto , Ruptura Aórtica/diagnóstico , Emergências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , RupturaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The complex mechanisms of aortic arch aneurysm have not been well studied. An animal model of aortic arch aneurysm would be beneficial to study this fatal disease. In this study, we tried to establish a rat model of aortic arch aneurysm by constricting the aortic isthmus. METHODS: Forty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups. Rats with no aortic isthmus constriction were assigned to group A (control group). The aortic isthmus was constricted to 1.5 mm in group B and to 0.8 mm in group C. The blood pressure of the rats was measured at 0, 1, 3 and 6 months after the operation. The diameter and wall thickness of aortic arch were measured at 3 and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Compared to group A, group B showed no significant increase in blood pressure or aortic diameter after the operation. Compared to the control group, group B showed a marked increase in wall thickness at 3 and 6 months after surgery (p < 0.05). Compared to group A, group C showed significant increases in both blood pressure (p < 0.05) and aortic diameter (p < 0.05) after the operation. Group C also showed a more than 50% increase in wall thickness at 3 and 6 months after surgery (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: By constricting the aortic isthmus to 0.8 mm, a rat model of aortic arch aneurysm could be induced at 3 and 6 months after surgery.
Assuntos
Aneurisma Aórtico/cirurgia , Animais , Aorta Torácica/fisiopatologia , Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Aneurisma Aórtico/fisiopatologia , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Seguimentos , Masculino , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Transthoracic oesophagectomy is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Some oesophageal cancer (OC) patients with serious comorbidities cannot tolerate transthoracic oesophagectomy. Therefore, we have adopted a minimally invasive approach to oesophagectomy for such patients. METHODS: Eighty-five OC patients, who could not tolerate transthoracic oesophagectomy, received mediastinoscopy-assisted oesophagectomy (MAO) from January 2007 to January 2010 in our hospital. Seventy patients were confirmed to be in T1 stage by postoperative pathological diagnosis, and their complications and outcomes were retrospectively analysed in this study. The impact of invasion depth, tumour length and lymph node metastases on the 5-year survival rate of these patients was also analysed. RESULTS: The operation time was 150.0 ± 15.0 min, and the perioperative bleeding volume was 202.0 ± 12.8 ml. Some patients had anastomotic leakage (5 cases), pneumonia (4 cases) and chylothorax (1 case). No patient died during hospitalization. The median postoperative hospital stay was 10 (7-22) days. The number of lymph nodes resected was 13.8 ± 4.4. The overall 5-year survival rate was 71%. Kaplan-Meier estimates revealed that tumour length (<2 vs ≥ 2 cm), lymph node metastasis (N0 vs N1) and depth of invasion (T1a vs T1b) could influence the 5-year survival rate (P <0.05). Multivariate analysis by Cox regression showed that lymph node metastasis and tumour length were independent prognostic factors for the 5-year survival rate (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MAO could be performed for T1 OC patients with serious comorbidities who cannot tolerate transthoracic oesophagectomy. Lymph node metastasis and tumour length were independent prognostic factors for these patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Mediastinoscopia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Comorbidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Esofagectomia/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Tempo de Internação , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Mediastinoscopia/efeitos adversos , Mediastinoscopia/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to detect the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of mediastinoscopic esophagectomy for early esophageal cancer. METHODS: The clinical data of 194 patients who underwent mediastinoscopic esophagectomy for early esophageal cancer in our center from December 2005 to October 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: All the surgery was performed successfully. The average duration of thoracic surgery was 48.2±7.8 min and the average intra-operative blood loss was 128.1±34.5 mL. An average of 3.1±1.6 lymph node stations were dissected, with an average number of dissected lymph nodes being 9.38±6.2, among which 4.2±5.4 were mediastinal lymph nodes. No peri-operative mortality was noted, and the rate of peri-operative morbidity was 13.4%. The median duration of follow-up was 39 [3-108] months, and the overall survival was 72.73%. The overall survival rates significantly differed among different T stages; more specifically, the 5-year survival was 95.23% in patients with stage T1a esophageal cancer, 70.15% for T1b, and 55.56% for T2 (P<0.001). The overall survival was significantly better in patients with negative lymph nodes than those with lymph nodes metastasis (P=0.003); more specifically, the 5-year survival rate was 84.9% for N0, 62.5% for N1, and 50.0% for N2 + N3. CONCLUSIONS: The mediastinoscopic esophagectomy can achieve a similar effectiveness as the conventional thoracoscopic surgery for patients with early stage esophageal cancer.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the indications of radical vedio-assisted mediastinoscopic resection for esophageal cancer. METHODS: The data of 109 patients with T1 esophageal cancer who underwent video-assisted mediastinoscopic resection (VAMS group) in Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Hospital from December 2005 to December 2011 were collected in the study for comparison with the 58 patients with T1 esophageal cancer who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS group) in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. The perioperative safety and survival were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: All operations were successful in both groups. One perioperative death was noted in the VATS group. The incidences of post-operative complications were not significantly different between these two groups, whereas the VAMS group was favorable in terms of operative time (P<0.001) and blood loss (P<0.001), and a significantly larger number of chest lymph nodes were dissected in the VATS group compared with the VAMS group (P<0.001). Long-term follow-up showed that the overall survival was not significantly different between these two groups (P=0.876). CONCLUSIONS: T1N0M0 esophageal cancer can be as the indication of VAMS radical resection. VAMS radical resection can be considered as the preferred option for patients with poor pulmonary and cardiac function or a history of pleural disease.