Interaction of tinnitus suppression and hearing ability after cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVES: To study the postoperative impact of cochlear implants (CIs) on tinnitus, as well as the impact of tinnitus on speech recognition with CI switched on. METHODS: Fifty-two postlingual deafened CI recipients (21 males and 31 females) were assessed using an established Tinnitus Characteristics Questionnaire and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) before and after cochlear implantation. The tinnitus loudness was investigated when CI was switched on and off in CI recipients with persistent tinnitus. The relation between tinnitus loudness and recipients' satisfaction of cochlear implantation was analyzed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) score. RESULTS: With CI 'OFF', 42 CI recipients experienced tinnitus postimplant ipsilaterally and 44 contralaterally. Tinnitus was totally suppressed ipsilateral to the CI with CI 'ON' in 42.9%, partially suppressed in 42.9%, unchanged in 11.9% and aggravated in 2.4%. Tinnitus was totally suppressed contralaterally with CI 'ON' in 31.8% of CI recipients, partially suppressed in 47.7%, unchanged in 20.5%. Pearson correlation analysis showed that tinnitus loudness and the results of cochlear implant patients satisfaction was negatively correlated (r = .674, p < .001). CONCLUSION: The study suggests six-month CI activation can be effective for suppressing tinnitus. The tinnitus loudness may affect patients' satisfaction with the use of CI.

One-stage coclear implantation via a facial recess approach in children with otitis media with effusion.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate surgical indications, operative techniques, complications and auditory and speech rehabilitation for cochlear implant (CI) in children with otitis media with effusion (OME). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of records of 24children with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss and OME who were implanted during January 2011 to November 2014 in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery at the PLA Hospital, using one-stage implantation via the facial recess approach and round window insertion. The incus was removed in 8 cases during the implantation procedure. Local infiltration of dexamethasone and adrenaline in the middle ear was also performed. Postoperative complications were examined. Preoperative and postoperative questionnaires including Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR), and the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) were collected. RESULTS: All electrodes were implanted successfully without any immediate or delayed complications. Inflammatory changes of middle ear mucosa with effusion were noted in all implanted ears. The scores of post-implant CAP and SIR increased significantly in all 24 cases (t = -25.95 and -14.09, respectively for CAP and SIR, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: One-stage CI via the facial recess approach with round window insertion is safe and effective in cochlear implant candidates with OME, as seen in the 24 children in our study who achieved improved auditory performance and speech intelligibility after CI.

Vibrant Soundbridge implantation via the third window in two Chinese patients with severe bilateral congenital aural atresia.

CONCLUSION: In patients with undeveloped vestibular/oval windows and inaccessible round windows, Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) implantation performed by placing the transducer into a reconstructed window on the inner tympanum wall demonstrated significant improvement in hearing and verbal communication ability. OBJECTIVE: To report our surgical experience with new placement of the VSB in pediatric patients with undeveloped vestibular windows, inaccessible round windows, and severe bilateral congenital aural atresia (CAA). METHODS: In two patients with bilateral CAA selected for middle ear implantation, CT scans revealed severe middle ear malformation including inaccessible round windows, absence of vestibular/oval windows, and abnormal facial nerve anatomy. The transducer of the VSB was implanted into a 'window' drilled at the inner tympanum wall in both patients. RESULTS: The surgery was successful. Pure-tone air conduction thresholds across the frequencies of 0.25-8 Hz were improved by 35 dB (preoperation, 69.2 dB; postactivation, 34 dB) in patient 1 and 46.6 dB (preoperation, 75.8 dB; postactivation, 24.2 dB) in patient 2. Normal hearing thresholds were achieved in the range of 1-8 kHz in both patients. A sentence recognition rate of up to 100% (65 dB SPL in a quiet room) was attained by both patients after surgery and VSB activation at 3 months postoperatively.

NRT test in auditory neuropathy patients with cochlear implants.

CONCLUSION: In patients with auditory neuropathy (AN), waveforms of neural response telemetry (NRT) could be present, showing characteristics of low incidence, low differentiation, and large variation. OBJECTIVE: To study the characteristics of NRT in AN patients who had received cochlear implants (CIs). METHODS: NRT data for seven AN patients who had received Nucleus CIs were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-one CI implantees with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) were included as the control group. The incidence of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs), threshold of wave N1, and amplitude of N1-P2 in the AN group were analyzed and compared between groups. RESULTS: The intraoperative incidence of valid ECAPs in the AN group was 42.9%, and the postoperative incidence was 66.7%, both of which were lower than those in the SNHL group, which were 95.2% and 100%, respectively. NRT in the AN group showed larger variation and lower differentiation than in the SNHL group. Wilcoxon's non-parametric test results indicated no significant difference between AN and SNHL groups in either the threshold of ECAP or N1-P2 amplitude.