[Can medical files be used to audit hospital health care? Results of a regional audit of hospital file quality]. / Peut-on utiliser le dossier médical pour des audits de pratique à l'hôpital? Résultats d'un audit régional de la qualité de la tenue du dossier médical hospitalier.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical audit method based on a retrospective analysis of medical files can be used to assess hospital health care. The reliability of the results obtained depends on the validity of the data in the file and its completeness. The aim of this work was to assess the quality of this information source. METHODS: The simplified ANDEM/ANAES from was proposed to 47 medical information departments of public and private hospitals participating in the public health care service in the Provence-Alples-Côte d'Azur region. The audit was conducted on a sample of hospital stays during a regular 6-month quality control assessment of hospital health care activity. RESULTS: Analysis of the 467 forms returned by 39 hospitals, showed that the quality of medical file recordings should be improved as a large amount of data or important documents were missing: reason for hospitalization (recorded on 74.1% of files), operation report (found in 83.2% of files) and discharge summary (found in 66.6% of files). CONCLUSION: Clinical audits would be compromised in certain hospitals by the use of medical files. Efforts to improve the quality of hospital medical files should be a priority.

[A method for auditing medical records quality: audit of 467 medical records within the framework of the medical information systems project quality control]. / Méthode d'audit de la qualité du dossier médical: audit de 467 dossier médicaux dans le cadre du contrôle de qualité PMSI.

Future hospital accreditation could take into account the quality of medical files. The objectives of this study is to test a method for auditing and evaluating the quality of the handing of medical files. We conducted a retrospective regional audit based on the frame of reference the National Agency for Medical Development and Evaluation, by using a sample of cases, stratified by establishment. In our region, the global budgets of 47 public and private hospitals participating in the public hospital service, are adjusted while keeping in mind the medicalised activity data (PMSI). This audit was proposed to the doctors of the Department of Medical Information on the occasion of the regulatory PMSI quality control. A total of 467 questionnaires were given by 39 of the 47 sollicited hospitals (83%). The methodological aspects (questionnaire, cooperative approach...) are discussed. The make-up of medical files can alos be improved by raising the percentage of the presence of important data or documents such as the reason for admission (74.1%), the surgery report (83.2%), and the hospitalisation report (66.6%). A system for classifying the paraclinical results is shared and systematic throughout the service or hospital in only 73.2% of cases. The quality of the handing of medical files seems problematic in our hospitals and actions for improving the quality should be undertaken as a priority.