A Comparison of Variable- and Person-Oriented Approaches in Evaluating a Universal Preventive Intervention.

Evaluations of prevention programs, such as the PAX Good Behavior Game (PAX), often have multiple outcome variables (e.g., emotional, behavioral, and relationship problems). These are often reported for multiple time points (e.g., pre- and post-intervention) where data are multilevel (e.g., students nested in schools). In this paper, we present both variable-oriented and person-oriented statistical approaches, to evaluate an intervention program with multilevel, longitudinal multivariate outcomes. Using data from the Manitoba PAX Study, we show how these two approaches provide us with different information that can be complementary. Data analyses with the variable-oriented approach (multilevel linear regression model) provided us with overall PAX program effects for each outcome variable; the person-oriented approach (latent transition analysis) allowed us to explore the transition of multiple outcomes across multiple time points and how the intervention program affects this transition differently for students with different risk profiles. We also used both approaches to examine how gender and socio-economic status related to the program effects. The implications of these results and the use of both types of approaches for program evaluation are discussed.

Internalizing symptoms and dating violence perpetration in adolescence.

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests an association between internalizing symptoms and violence against others. It remains unknown whether this link exists in the context of romantic relationships. In the current study, we tested whether anxiety and depression were associated over time with adolescent dating violence perpetration. METHODS: The sample included 238 Canadian adolescents (42% boys). Using a longitudinal design, their anxiety, depressive symptoms, and dating violence perpetration were annually assessed from age 14 to 15 years. RESULTS: Cross-lagged analyses revealed effects from anxiety and depressive symptoms to dating violence one year later (ß = 0.27, p < .001; and ß = 0.14, p = .04, respectively). No reversed cross-lagged paths were found from dating violence to subsequent anxiety or depression. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the predictive value of internalizing symptoms on dating violence perpetration. Reducing internalizing symptoms and improving coping strategies are important targets for the prevention of dating violence.

Bullying: a stepping stone to dating aggression?

Bullying is the use of power and aggression to control and distress another. In this paper, we review research to explore whether the lessons learned in bullying provide a stepping stone to aggressive behavior in dating relationships. We start by considering definitions and a relationship framework with which to understand both bullying and dating aggression. We consider bullying from a developmental-contextual perspective and consider risk factors associated with the typical developmental patterns for bullying and dating aggression, including developmental and sociodemographic, individual attributes, and family, peer group, community, and societal relationship contexts that might lead some children and youths to follow developmental pathways that lead to bullying and dating aggression. We conclude by discussing implications for intervention with a review of evidence-based interventions.

Violence in young adolescents' relationships: a path model.

A structural equation model based on social cognitive theory was used to predict relationship violence from young adolescents' knowledge, self-efficacy, attitudes, and alternative conflict strategies (n = 143 male and 147 female grade 7-9 students). A direct causal effect was supported for violence-tolerant attitudes and psychologically aggressive (escalation/blame) strategies on physical violence against dating partners and friends. Knowledge and self-efficacy contributed to using reasoning-based strategies, but this reduced violence only in boys' friendships. Knowledge reduced violence-tolerant attitudes, thus reducing escalation/ blame and physical violence. Attitudes toward male and female dating violence (ATMDV and ATFDV) were indicators of general attitudes toward violence among non-dating students but ATFDV affected physical violence and ATMDV affected psychological aggression for both dating boys and girls.