Perioperative Right Ventricular Pressure Monitoring in Cardiac Surgery.

Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is a cause of increased morbidity and mortality in both cardiac surgery and noncardiac surgery and in the intensive care unit. Early diagnosis of this condition still poses a challenge. The diagnosis of RV dysfunction traditionally is based on a combination of echocardiography, hemodynamic measurements, and clinical symptoms. This review describes the method of using RV pressure waveform analysis to diagnose and grade the severity of RV dysfunction. The authors describe the technique, optimal use, and pitfalls of this method, which has been used at the Montreal Heart Institute since 2002, and review the current literature on this method. The RV pressure waveform is obtained using a pulmonary artery catheter with the capability of measuring RV pressure by connecting a pressure transducer to the pacemaker port. The authors describe how RV pressure waveform analysis can facilitate the diagnosis of systolic and diastolic RV dysfunction, the evaluation of RV-arterial coupling, and help diagnose RV outflow tract obstruction. RV pressure waveform analysis also can be used to guide pharmacologic treatment and fluid resuscitation strategies for RV dysfunction.

Evaluation of the analgesia nociception index (ANI) in healthy awake volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Analgesia might be evaluated with simple changes in vital signs, a non-specific and non-sensitive method. Heart rate variability (HRV) correlates with autonomous nervous system activity and can be used to evaluate painful stimuli. Heart rate variability is then transformed into a numeric scale called the analgesia nociception index (ANI), where higher values represent predominant parasympathetic tone, thus low nociception. Under general anesthesia, the ANI decreases following painful stimuli and increases after administration of analgesia, but significant interindividual variability is present. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the ANI as a pain index in healthy awake volunteers. METHODS: Following research ethics board approval, participants were positioned supine in a calm operating room. The participants' vital signs and ANI were monitored. After evaluation of all parameters without any stimulation, 23 volunteers received a 2 Hz electrical stimulus at the wrist with increasing current intensity from 0-30 mA (5 mA increments). The current was kept constant for three minutes at each level, and the volunteers rated their pain on a numeric rating scale (NRS) every minute. The Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression were used to analyze the relationship between the ANI and the NRS score. The ANI absolute values and the variations from baseline were both analyzed. RESULTS: There was a very weak negative correlation between the NRS score and ANImean (Pearson, -0.089; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.192 to -0.014; P = 0.045) and between the NRS score and ∆ANImean (Pearson, -0.174; 95% CI, -0.272 to -0.072; P < 0.001; regression slope, -0.586; 95% CI, -0.930 to -0.243; P < 0.001). Heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate did not vary significantly throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide little evidence to support use of the ANI in awake subjects or in awake patients such as those in the emergency room or in the intensive care unit. Nevertheless, based on an important difference between the expected correlation and the real correlation between the ANI and the NRS scores found in our results, the present study might be underpowered. Studies with a larger sample size would be required to enable firm conclusions about the clinical utility of the ANI in this population of awake volunteers as well as in awake patients. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02589093).

Potential strategies for preventing chronic postoperative pain: a practical approach: Continuing Professional Development.

PURPOSE: This manuscript proposes pharmacological strategies that might decrease persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP). These recommendations are based on a review of current publications available in the literature. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Persistent postsurgical pain has been defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain as clinical discomfort that lasts more than two months after surgery. Recent reviews reported that 10-50% of patients develop chronic pain after surgery, 2-10% with disabling chronic pain at six months. Preventive interventions should target all types of surgery, but specific attention should be placed on surgical insults that carry a high risk of pain chronicization. Regional anesthesia (RA) should be used whenever feasible, and a continuous perineural/epidural local anesthetic infusion is preferred over a single-shot technique. The RA should be initiated prior to the surgical incision and then continued for at least 24-72 hr after the surgery. Perioperative opioids should be used for nociceptive stimuli not managed by the RA. An intravenous infusion of ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA) antagonist, might be added for a further decrease in neuronal sensitization, especially when the procedure is extensive or when RA is not feasible or contraindicated. A multimodal approach is always suggested. The literature still does not strongly support the use of gabapentinoids for PPSP prevention; however, they might be maintained in patients who use them preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: A winning strategy to reduce the incidence of PPSP may well involve performing minimally invasive surgery, providing adequate perioperative analgesia based on RA, and using a multimodal approach with NMDA antagonists.

Validation of the PMD100 and its NOL Index to detect nociception at different infusion regimen of remifentanil in patients under general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The NOL index is based on multiparametric analysis of heart rate (HR), skin conductance, wave plethysmography, and their time derivative. The aim of this study was to evaluate the NOL to detect standardized nociceptive stimuli with various remifentanil dosages under general anesthesia. METHODS: A prospective, observational study at a single center (NCT02602379) included 40 ASA I to III patients undergoing laparotomy under remifentanil-desflurane anesthesia with epidural analgesia. A tetanic stimulation was applied (forearm) at remifentanil intravenous (IV) infusion of 0.005, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.15 µg/kg/min. NOL and its variations were compared with other parameters namely heart rate, mean arterial pressure, Bispectral Index, and Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to assess the response to both intubation and standardized stimulus under remifentanil infusion of 0.005 µg/kg/min. RESULTS: The post-stimulation NOL values at remifentanil doses of 0.005, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15 µg/kg/min (39 [23-55], 15 [7-30], 8 [4-14] and 8.5 [4-15]) were significantly higher than pre-stimulation counterparts (P<0.0001). For all other parameters, there was also significant difference between pre- and post-stimulation values at all remifentanil dosages (P<0.0001). Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the NOL during standardized stimulation was larger than for all other parameters at the exception of ANI (P=0.94). The AUC of NOL for nociception during tracheal intubation was greater (0.93 vs. 0.84 and 0.64 for ANI and HR, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: NOL monitoring is a promising index to assess the level of nociception in patients under general anesthesia.