Reality of treatment for severely injured patients: are there age-specific differences?

BACKGROUND: Major trauma and its consequences are one of the leading causes of death worldwide across all age groups. Few studies have conducted comparative age-specific investigations. It is well known that children respond differently to major trauma than elderly patients due to physiological differences. The aim of this study was to analyze the actual reality of treatment and outcomes by using a matched triplet analysis of severely injured patients of different age groups. METHODS: Data from the TraumaRegister DGU® were analyzed. A total of 56,115 patients met the following inclusion criteria: individuals with Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale > 2 and < 6, primary admission, from German-speaking countries, and treated from 2011-2020. Furthermore, three age groups were defined (child: 3-15 years; adult: 20-50 years; and elderly: 70-90 years). The matched triplets were defined based on the following criteria: 1. exact injury severity of the body regions according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (head, thorax, abdomen, extremities [including pelvis], and spine) and 2. level of the receiving hospital. RESULTS: A total of 2,590 matched triplets could be defined. Traffic accidents were the main cause of severe injury in younger patients (child: 59.2%; adult: 57.9%). In contrast, low falls (from < 3 m) were the most frequent cause of accidents in the elderly group (47.2%). Elderly patients were least likely to be resuscitated at the scene. Both children and elderly patients received fewer therapeutic interventions on average than adults. More elderly patients died during the clinical course, and their outcome was worse overall, whereas the children had the lowest mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, a large patient population was used to demonstrate that both elderly patients and children may have received less invasive treatment compared with adults who were injured with exactly the same severity (with the outcomes of these two groups being opposite to each other). Future studies and recommendations should urgently consider the different age groups.

Is prehospital intubation of severely injured children in accordance with guidelines?

BACKGROUND: The current German S3 guideline for polytrauma lists five criteria for prehospital intubation: apnea, severe traumatic brain injury (GCS ≤8), severe chest trauma with respiratory failure, hypoxia, and persistent hemodynamic instability. These guideline criteria, used in adults in daily practice, have not been previously studied in a collection of severely injured children. The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which the criteria are implemented in clinical practice using a multivariate risk analysis of severely injured children. METHODS: Data of 289,698 patients from the TraumaRegister DGU® were analyzed. Children meeting the following criteria were included: Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale 3+, primary admission, German-speaking countries, years 2008-2017, and declaration of intubation. Since children show age-dependent deviating physiology, four age groups were defined (years old: 0-2; 3-6; 7-11; 12-15). An adult collective served as a control group (age: 20-50). After a descriptive analysis in the first step, factors leading to prehospital intubation in severely injured children were analyzed with a multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 4489 children met the inclusion criteria. In this cohort, young children up to 2 years old had the significantly highest injury severity (Injury Severity Score: 21; p ≤ 0.001). Falls from both high (> 3 m) and low heights (< 3 m) were more common in children than in adults. The same finding applied to the occurrence of severe traumatic brain injury. When at least one intubation criterion was formally present, the group up to 6 years old was least likely to actually be intubated (61.4%; p ≤ 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8 in particular had the greatest influence on intubation (odds ratio: 26.9; p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The data presented here show for the first time that the existing criteria in the guideline for prehospital intubation are applied in clinical practice (approximately 70% of cases), compared to adults, in the vast majority of injured children. Although severely injured children still represent a minority of all injured patients, future guidelines should focus more on them and address them in a specialized manner.

Doctor, when can I drive? - Range of functional ankle motion during driving.

BACKGROUND: Driving a motor vehicle needs a specific joint mobility and yet only limited knowledge exists regarding the necessary ankle range of motion. The goal of this study is to characterize the sequence and range of ankle motion. METHODS: The arc of plantarflexion/dorsiflexion and supination/pronation was recorded in the right and left ankle using electrogoniometers while thirty laps were driven by fifteen healthy participants around a course in a manual transmission car with a left sided steering wheel. The driver was required to perform the following maneuvers during each lap: (I) Vehicle acceleration and gear change, (II) Sudden evasion, (III) Routine turning, (IV) Rapid turning, (V) Vehicle acceleration followed by emergency braking. RESULTS: Driving required the right ankle to plantarflex 13±9 and dorsiflex 22±7 while supinating 15±7 degrees and pronating minimally. The left ankle plantarflexed 19±10and dorsiflexed 17±10 while supinating 15±7 degrees and pronating minimally. The right ankle dorsiflexed significantly more (p=0.00), and yet the left ankle had a significantly higher maximum plantarflexion and range of plantarflexion/dorsiflexion (p=0.00). Emergency braking resulted in a significantly higher maximum plantarflexion as well as plantarflexion/dorsiflexion range when compared to other maneuvers. CONCLUSION: This study describes the range of ankle motion identified to drive a car with a manual transmission and a left-sided steering wheel. The right and left ankle exhibit different arcs of motion during driving. This knowledge may assist when evaluating a patient's driving capability. Further studies are needed to investigate whether movement restrictions impair driving. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic science study.

Doctor, when can I drive?-the range of elbow motion while driving a car.

BACKGROUND: Immobilization of the upper extremity after an acute injury or postoperatively affects an individual's ability to safely operate a motor vehicle. The elbow is particularly sensitive to immobilization, with subsequent stiffness leading to functional limitations. Most activities of daily living are successfully achieved within a "functional arc" of elbow motion between 30° and 130° of flexion. No objective guidelines exist regarding the range of motion needed to safely operate a vehicle. In this study, we measured the range of motion of right and left elbows while driving a manual-transmission car. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using electro-goniometers, we measured the flexion and extension, as well as pronation and supination, of the right and left elbows in 20 healthy, right hand-dominant subjects while driving a car. These measurements were recorded on (1) city streets, (2) country roads, and (3) highways. RESULTS: For city streets, the range of motion in terms of flexion and pronation/supination was 15°-105° and 0°-45°/0°-35°, respectively, for the right elbow and 20°-95° and 0°-45°/0°-40°, respectively, for the left. For country roads, it was 10°-100° and 0°-40°/0°-35°, respectively, for the right elbow and 20°-95° and 0°-30°/0°-30°, respectively, for the left. For highways, it was 5°-100° and 0°-40°/0°-35°, respectively, for the right elbow and 20°-90° and 0°-30°/0°-25°, respectively, for the left. Mean pronation was significantly higher for the right elbow (P < .01). CONCLUSION: This study describes the range of elbow motion identified to drive a car with a manual transmission and a left-sided steering wheel. Mean pronation of the right elbow is significantly higher than that of the left. Further studies are needed to investigate the relevance of movement restrictions as they relate to handedness, steering-wheel side, and driving impairment.

Enhanced prehospital volume therapy does not lead to improved outcomes in severely injured patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Whether enhanced prehospital volume therapy leads to outcome improvements in severely injured patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of prehospital volume therapy on the clinical course of severely injured patients with severe TBI. METHODS: Data for 122,672 patients from TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) was analyzed. Inclusion criteria were defined as follows: Injury Severety Score (ISS) ≥ 16, primary admission, age ≥ 16 years, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) head ≥3, administration of at least one unit of packed red blood cells (pRBCs), and available volume and blood pressure data. Stratification based on the following matched-pair criteria was performed: group 1: prehospital volumes of 0-1000 ml; group 2: prehospital volumes of ≥1501 ml; AIS head (3, 4, 5 + 6 and higher than for other body regions); age (16-54, 55-69, ≥ 70 years); gender; prehospital intubation (yes/no); emergency treatment time +/- 30 min.; rescue resources (rescue helicopter, emergency ambulance); blood pressure (20-60, 61-90, ≥ 91 mmHg); year of accident (2002-2005, 2006-2009, 2010-2012); AIS thorax, abdomen, and extremities plus pelvis. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients per group fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Increasing volume administration was associated with reduced coagulation capability and reduced hemoglobin (Hb) levels (prothrombin ratio: group 1: 68%, group 2: 63.7%; p ≤ 0.04; Hb: group 1: 11.2 mg/dl, group 2: 10.2 mg/dl; p ≤ 0.001). It was not possible to show a significant reduction in the mortality rate with increasing volumes (group 1: 45.6, group 2: 45.6; p = 1). CONCLUSIONS: The data presented in this study demonstrates that prehospital volume administration of more than 1500 ml does not improve severely injured patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Spinal posture and pelvic position during pregnancy: a prospective rasterstereographic pilot study.

PURPOSE: Despite the high prevalence of low back pain during pregnancy there is still a lack in the understanding of its aetiology. Changes of the spinal posture due to the anatomical changes of the pregnant body seem to be in part responsible for the back pain. In this pilot study we assessed the potential to accurately measure the spinal posture and pelvic position during pregnancy without any harmful radiation using a spine and surface topography system. METHODS: Thirteen pregnant women were examined during the second and third trimester of their pregnancy, and postpartum. Twenty female, non-pregnant volunteers comprised the control group. The spinal posture and pelvic position were measured with a radiation-free spine and surface topography system. RESULTS: We found a significant increase in thoracic kyphosis during the course of pregnancy, but no increased lumbar lordosis. The lateral deviation of the spine also decreased significantly. However, we did not measure significant changes of the pelvic position during or after pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that pregnancy has an effect on the spinal posture, and that spine and surface topography can be used to measure these changes three-dimensionally and without any harmful radiation. In future studies this technique could allow to further evaluate the relationship between posture and low back pain during pregnancy, helping to understand the aetiology of low back pain in pregnancy as well as to identify methods for its prevention and treatment.

Does age affect the response of pelvis and spine to simulated leg length discrepancies? A rasterstereographic pilot study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate age differences in the response of the spine and pelvis to simulated leg length inequalities (LLIs). METHODS: A total of 107 subjects, separated into three age groups (group 1: 20-39 years, group 2: 40-59 years, group 3: >60 years), were used to evaluate for any age effects in the response to LLIs. LLIs of +10, +20, and +30 mm were simulated with a simulation platform on both sides, and the respective changes of pelvic position (pelvic obliquity, pelvic torsion) and spinal posture (lateral deviation, surface rotation, kyphotic, and lordotic angles) were measured with a rasterstereographic system. RESULTS: In all three age groups an increase in LLI led to significant changes in the pelvic position as measured by the parameters of pelvic obliquity and torsion. No significant differences in the response of the pelvis to the LLIs were found between the age groups. In all age groups an increase in surface rotation and lateral deviation of the spine with increasing LLIs was found. However, none of these parameters responded significantly different between the three age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Under static conditions, LLIs lead to significant changes of the pelvic position and spinal posture. Despite all known age-related changes, no significant differences of the measured pelvic and spinal parameters in elderly patients as a response to the simulated LLIs occurred.

Determination of the amount of leg length inequality that alters spinal posture in healthy subjects using rasterstereography.

PURPOSE: Leg length inequalities (LLIs) can result in an increased energy consumption, abnormal gait or osteoarthritis of the hip. In a previous study we simulated different LLIs of up to 15 mm and evaluated their effects on the pelvic position and spinal posture. We found a correlation between LLIs and resulting changes of the pelvic position. Despite suggestions in the literature we were not able to detect significant changes of the spinal posture. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the amount of LLI that would in fact alter the spinal posture. METHODS: The subjects were placed on a simulation platform, whose height could be precisely controlled by the measuring device, to simulate different LLIs of up to 20 mm. For LLIs >20 mm, additional precision-cut wooden blocks were used under one foot. After an adaptation period the resulting changes of the pelvis and spine were measured with a rasterstereographic device. RESULTS: We found a significant correlation between platform height changes and changes of the pelvic position. The frontal spinal parameters surface rotation and lateral deviation changed significantly when simulating differences greater than 20 mm. No changes of the sagittal spinal curvature were measured, however, a trend to decreasing kyphotic angles was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has shown for the first time that LLIs >20 mm will lead to significant changes in the spinal posture of healthy test subjects. However, these changes were only found in frontal (surface rotation and lateral flexion) spinal parameters, but not in sagittal parameters. Here for the kyphotic angle only a tendency to decreasing angles was noted. We have also found a significant correlation between different leg lengths and changes of the pelvic position. Further, females and males seem to react in the same way to LLIs.

Comparison of compositional MRI techniques to quantify the regenerative potential of articular cartilage: a preclinical minipig model after osteochondral defect treatments with autologous mesenchymal stromal cells and unseeded scaffolds.

Background: The field of orthopedics seeks effective, safer methods for evaluating articular cartilage regeneration. Despite various treatment innovations, non-invasive, contrast-free full quantitative assessments of hyaline articular cartilage's regenerative potential using compositional magnetic resonance (MR) sequences remain challenging. In this context, our aim was to investigate the effectiveness of different MR sequences for quantitative assessment of cartilage and to compare them with the current gold standard delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) measurements. Methods: We employed ex vivo imaging in a preclinical minipig model to assess knee cartilage regeneration. Standardized osteochondral defects were drilled in the proximal femur of the specimens (n=14), which were divided into four groups. Porcine collagen scaffolds seeded with autologous adipose-derived stromal cells (ASC), autologous bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC), and unseeded scaffolds (US) were implanted in femoral defects. Furthermore, there was a defect group which received no treatment. After 6 months, the specimens were examined using different compositional MR methods, including the gold standard dGEMRIC as well as T1, T2, T2*, and T1ρ techniques. The statistical evaluation involved comparing the defect region with the uninjured tibia and femur cartilage layers and all measurements were performed on a clinical 3T MR Scanner. Results: In the untreated defect group, we observed significant differences in the defect region, with dGEMRIC values significantly lower (404.86±64.2 ms, P=0.018) and T2 times significantly higher (44.24±2.75 ms, P<0.001). Contrastingly, in all three treatment groups (ASC, BMSC, US), there were no significant differences among the three regions in the dGEMRIC sequence, suggesting successful cartilage regeneration. However, T1, T2*, and T1ρ sequences failed to detect such differences, highlighting their lower sensitivity for cartilage regeneration. Conclusions: As expected, dGEMRIC is well suited for monitoring cartilage regeneration. Interestingly, T2 imaging also proved to be a reliable cartilage imaging technique and thus offers a contrast agent-free alternative to the former gold standard for subsequent in vivo studies investigating the cartilage regeneration potential of different treatment modalities.

Quantitative assessment of bone defect healing by multidetector CT in a pig model.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate multidetector CT volumetry in the assessment of bone defect healing in comparison to histopathological findings in an animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 16 mini-pigs, a circumscribed tibial bone defect was created. Multidetector CT (MDCT) of the tibia was performed on a 64-row scanner 42 days after the operation. The extent of bone healing was estimated quantitatively by MDCT volumetry using a commercially available software programme (syngo Volume, Siemens, Germany).The volume of the entire defect (including all pixels from -100 to 3,000 HU), the nonconsolidated areas (-100 to 500 HU), and areas of osseous consolidation (500 to 3,000 HU) were assessed and the extent of consolidation was calculated. Histomorphometry served as the reference standard. RESULTS: The extent of osseous consolidation in MDCT volumetry ranged from 19 to 92% (mean 65.4 ± 18.5%). There was a significant correlation between histologically visible newly formed bone and the extent of osseous consolidation on MDCT volumetry (r = 0.82, P < 0.0001). A significant negative correlation was detected between osseous consolidation on MDCT and histological areas of persisting defect (r = -0.9, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: MDCT volumetry is a promising tool for noninvasive monitoring of bone healing, showing excellent correlation with histomorphometry.

[Do concomitant urological injuries in severely injured patients lead to poorer outcomes? : A multivariate risk analysis]. / Führt eine urologische Begleitverletzung beim Schwerstverletzten zu einer Outcomeverschlechterung? : Eine multivariate Risikoanalyse.

BACKGROUND: Severely injured patients with associated genitourinary (GU) injuries have only rarely been investigated in the current literature. If at all, analyses are commonly focussed on renal injuries, marginalising other GU traumas such as ureteral injuries. In this study, we would like to characterise patients with GU injuries and analyse the impact of such injuries on mortality and length of stay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The inclusion criteria for this retrospective analysis of TraumaRegister DGU® data were: Injury Severity Score ≥ 16 within the period between 2009 and 2016 with available data on age and length of stay. A descriptive analysis was used to compare patients with and without GU injuries. The impact of GU injuries on mortality and length of hospital stay was evaluated by means of multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: In all, 90,962 patients met the inclusion criteria; 5.9% of them had suffered GU injuries (n = 5345). The prevalence in patients with pelvic fractures was up to 19%. On average, patients with GU trauma were 10 years younger (42.9 vs. 52.2 years) and more severely injured (ISS: 31.8 vs. 26.4). The multivariate analyses demonstrated that GU injuries in severely injured patients are no independent risk factor for mortality. However, particularly bladder and genital injuries result in longer hospitalisation. CONCLUSION: GU injuries do not represent an additional risk factor for mortality. However, after adjusting for established prognosis factors, they can cause prolonged periods of hospitalisation of severely injured patients.

Do locked compression intramedullary nails improve the biomechanical stability of distal femoral fractures?

BACKGROUND: A distal femur nail with fixed-angle locking screws intends to combine the advantages of angular stability and intramedullary stabilization in extraarticular distal femur fractures. The goal of this study was to analyze whether the locked compression distal femur nail (LCN) was biomechanically more stable than a conventional standard distal femur nail (CN). METHODS: Both nails were compared on a series of 10 matched pairs of human femora. After setting a distal femur defect fracture, the intramedullary stabilized femur was axially loaded starting from 100 N, increasing in steps of 100 N after every 200 cycles with a triangular frequency of 1 Hz, until a predefined point of failure was reached. RESULTS: The two types of nails showed no significant difference in terms of maximum tolerated load, maximum number of cycles repeated, or axial deformation of the bone-implant construct. The mean load at failure was 2,954 N for the CN and 2,483 N for the LCN. The mean axial deformation for the conventional (14.8 mm) and locked compression nail (15.3 mm) did not differ significantly. Mode of failure was a bony fracture in all specimens predominantly involving the proximal femur. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in stability between the two compared implants could be demonstrated. The LCN showed comparable characteristics under cyclic axial loading as the conventional distal femur nail. No migration into the articular space or implant failure was observed.

Spinal Injury Without Neurological Symptoms in Severely Injured Patients: Impact on the Length of Stay? / Wirbelsäulenverletzungen ohne Neurologie beim Schwerverletzten: Einfluss auf die Verweildauer?

BACKGROUND: The impact of spinal injuries on clinical outcome in most severely injured patients is currently being controversially discussed. At the same time, most of the studies examine patients with post-traumatic neurological disorders. The aim of this study was therefore to analyse severely injured patients with spinal injuries but without neurological symptoms with regard to their clinical outcome. Here the focus was then on the question, whether spinal injury is an independent risk factor increasing length of stay in the intensive care unit and in the hospital in total. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data of the TraumaRegister DGU® were retrospectively analysed. Inclusion criteria were: Injury Severity Score ≥ 16, primary admission, age ≥ 16 years, time interval 2009 - 2016, and a full data set on length of stay in the hospital and the intensive care unit, respectively. Following a univariate analysis in the first step, independent risk factors for the length of stay in the intensive care unit and in the hospital in total were investigated using a multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: 98,240 patients met the inclusion criteria. In this population, patients with Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2 and 3 spinal injuries were significantly younger (up to 60 years), and injuries were significantly more commonly caused by falls from a great height and traffic accidents (age ≤ 60 years: AISSpine 0: 58.4%, AISSpine 3: 65%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that spinal injury without neurological symptoms is an independent risk factor for increased length of stay in the intensive care unit (odds ratio: + 1.1 d) and in the hospital in total (AIS 3 odds ratio: + 3.4 d). CONCLUSION: It has been shown for the first time that spinal injury without initial neurological symptoms has a negative impact on the length of stay of most severely injured patients in the intensive care unit and in the hospital in total and thus represents an independent risk factor in this group of patients.

CCD angle & hip fractures - Predictor of fracture symmetry?

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture caused by fall is a common injury of the elderly. The risk of sustaining a contralateral hip fracture has been reported to be 5-10%. Aging society heightens the need of efficient prevention tools. To be able to cope with this demand, understanding of biomechanics of hip fractures are mandatory. Previous studies suggest that geometry of the proximal femur could play an important role for fracture probability and fracture type. Thus, analysis of hip geometry could play an important role in the prediction and prevention of bilateral hip fractures. Aim of this study was to elucidate the influence of caput collum diaphyseal angle on the fracture type of proximal femur. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, data of patients with an acute hip fracture who underwent surgical treatment within five years were included. Data was separated into two groups: (I) intra capsular femur fracture (femoral neck fractures) and (II) extra capsular femur fracture (inter- and subtrochanteric femur fractures). Occurrence of a bilateral fracture, age, gender, weight, height and caput collum diaphyseal angle (standardized measurement of the opposite joint on preoperative digital x-rays) of each group were further analyzed. RESULTS: Data of 448 patients were included ((I): 250 vs. (II): 198 patients). Group (I) showed a significant higher mean caput collum diaphyseal angle of 133.9 ± 7.0° (mean ± standard deviation) compared to group (II) with 127.6 ± 6.1° (F (1, 451) = 106.5, p = 0.00). In group (I) 0 patients had a caput collum diaphyseal angle <120° (varus), 214 patients (86%) 120°-140° and 35 patients (14%) angle>140° (valgus). In contrast, in group (II) 21 patients (10%) had a caput collum diaphyseal angle <120° (varus), 175 patients (86%) 120°-140° and 7 patients (4%) >140° (valgus). 52 patients had a bilateral hip fracture. 36 patients (69%) sustained a bilateral hip fracture of the same fracture type. CONCLUSION: Patients with an intra capsular proximal femur fracture showed a significantly higher caput collum diaphyseal angle compared to patients with an extra capsular proximal femur fracture. Moreover, intra capsular femur fractures are correlated with an indifferent (120-140°) or valgus (>140°) femoral neck configuration. Extra capsular femur fractures correlate with an indifferent (120-140°) or varian femoral neck configuration (<120°). The results support the assumption that the caput collum diaphyseal angle has an influence on fracture type of the proximal femur. This could possibly be a predictor for the fracture type of the contralateral hip (second fracture). Based on this, present data may benefit prosthetists in developing new and more efficient hip protectors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. Retrospective comparative study.

The rasterstereographic-dynamic analysis of posture in adolescents using a modified Matthiass test.

The Matthiass posture test is a clinical test to detect posture changes in children and adolescents. Aim of this study was to objectify this test using a dynamic rasterstereographic measuring device. We examined 31 healthy athletes during a modified Matthiass test with a dynamic rasterstereographic measuring system. Hereby the trunk inclination, kyphosis and lordosis angle were measured. The trunk inclination decreased by about 50% of the basic value just by raising the arms. Additional weight loads of only 5% body weight (bw) resulted in significant changes of the posture (lordosis and kyphosis angle) during this test. With this rasterstereographic measuring device it seems to be possible to determine spinal posture changes under dynamic conditions. The results suggest that additional weights of 5% bw during the Matthias-test are enough to create significant deviations in posture parameters, even in healthy subjects.

Position of the acromioclavicular joint and relation to the critical shoulder angle in shoulders with rotator cuff tears.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the position of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) and relation to the critical shoulder angle (CSA) in shoulders with rotator cuff tears (RCT). METHODS: In a matched pair study including 75 shoulders with arthroscopically validated RCT and 75 controls (mean age 59.4 ± 7.9 years) the position of the ACJ in relation to the glenoid and the CSA were measured on true ap radiographs. RESULTS: The CSA is larger (p = 0.0018) and the position of the ACJ is more lateral (p = 0.0016) in shoulders with RCT in comparison to matched controls. CONCLUSION: The more lateral position of the ACJ in shoulders with a large CSA might be an additional component in the multifactorial pathogenesis of RCT.

Is CT-based cinematic rendering superior to volume rendering technique in the preoperative evaluation of multifragmentary intraarticular lower extremity fractures?

PURPOSE: Cinematic rendering (CR), a recently launched, FDA-approved rendering technique converts CT image datasets into nearly photorealistic 3D reconstructions by using a unique lighting model. The purpose of this study was to compare CR to volume rendering technique (VRT) images in the preoperative visualization of multifragmentary intraarticular lower extremity fractures. METHOD: In this retrospective study, CT datasets of 41 consecutive patients (female: n = 13; male: n = 28; mean age: 52.3 ± 17.9y) with multifragmentary intraarticular lower extremity fractures (calcaneus: n = 16; tibial pilon: n = 19; acetabulum: n = 6) were included. All datasets were acquired using a 128-row dual-source CT. A dedicated workstation was used to reconstruct CR and VRT images which were reviewed independently by two experienced board-certified traumatologists trained in special trauma surgery. Image quality, anatomical accuracy and fracture visualization were assessed on a 6-point-Likert-scale (1 = non-diagnostic; 6=excellent). The regular CT image reconstructions served as reverence standard. For each score, median values between both readers were calculated. Scores of both reconstruction methods were compared using a Wilcoxon-Ranksum test with p < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Inter-reader agreement was calculated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Compared to VRT, CR demonstrated a higher image quality (VRT:2.5; CR:6.0; p < 0.001), a higher anatomical accuracy (VRT:3.5; CR:5.5; p < 0.001) and provided a more detailed visualization of the fracture (VRT:2.5; CR:6.0; p < 0.001). An additional benefit of CR reconstructions compared to VRT reconstructions was reported by both readers in 65.9 % (27/41) of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: CR reconstructions are superior to VRT due to higher image quality and higher anatomical accuracy. Traumatologists find CR reconstructions to improve visualization of lower extremity fractures which should thus be used for fracture demonstration during interdisciplinary conferences.

Is Prehospital Time Important for the Treatment of Severely Injured Patients? A Matched-Triplet Analysis of 13,851 Patients from the TraumaRegister DGU®.

BACKGROUND: The impact of time (the golden period of trauma) on the outcome of severely injured patients has been well known for a long time. While the duration of the prehospital phase has changed only slightly (average time: ~66 min) since the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU®) was implemented, mortality rates have decreased within the last 20 years. This study analyzed the influence of prehospital time on the outcome of trauma patients in a matched-triplet analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 93,024 patients from the TraumaRegister DGU® were selected based on the following inclusion criteria: ISS ≥ 16, primary admission, age ≥ 16 years, and data were available for the following variables: prehospital intubation, blood pressure, mode of transportation, and age. The patients were assigned to one of three groups: group 1: 10-50 min (short emergency treatment time); group 2: 51-75 min (intermediate emergency treatment time); group 3: >75 min (long emergency treatment time). A matched-triplet analysis was conducted; matching was based on the following criteria: intubation at the accident site, rescue resources, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of the body regions, systolic blood pressure, year of the accident, and age. RESULTS: A total of 4,617 patients per group could be matched. The number of patients with a GCS score ≤8 was significantly higher in the first group (group 1: 36.6%, group 2: 33.5%, group 3: 30.3%; p < 0.001). Moreover, the number of patients who had to be resuscitated during the prehospital phase and/or upon arrival at the hospital was higher in group 1 (p = 0.010); these patients also had a significantly higher mortality (group 1: 20.4%, group 2: 18.1%, group 3: 15.9%; p ≤ 0.001). The number of measures performed during the prehospital phase (e.g., chest tube insertion) increased with treatment time. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that survival after severe trauma is not only a matter of short rescue time but more a matter of well-used rescue time including performance of vital measures already in the prehospital setting. This also includes that rescue teams identify the severity of injuries more rapidly in the most-severely injured patients in critical condition than in less-severely injured patients and plan their interventions accordingly.

Influence of Wrist Position on the Metacarpophalangeal Joint Motion of the Index Through Small Finger.

BACKGROUND: The metacarpophalangeal joints exhibit range of motion that is influenced by wrist position. Synergistic motion occurs between the wrist and the metacarpophalangeal joints with different static wrist positions affecting joints' motion capability. The aim of this study was to determine how different wrist positions influence the active range of motion of the index through small finger metacarpophalangeal joints. METHODS: The active range of motion of the index through small finger metacarpophalangeal joints of 31 healthy subjects was measured in flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation in 5 different flexion/extension wrist positions, using biaxial electrogoniometers. RESULTS: There was a difference in range of motion of all fingers depending on the wrist position. The minimum metacarpophalangeal joint range of motion was found in 80° wrist extension, the maximum in neutral wrist position. For the index finger, flexion/extension was 84.7° (±8.6°) to 25.9° (±10.2°) and radial/ulnar deviation was 32.1° (±11.3°) to 22.6° (±12.8°). For the middle finger, flexion/extension was 84.8° (±8.5°) to 25.9° (±10.1°) and radial/ulnar deviation 28.8° (±11.1°) to 22.1° (±8.9). The fourth finger showed a range of motion for flexion/extension of 87.2° (±11.5°) to 22.8° (±11.6°) and radial/ulnar deviation of 8.1° (±5.8°) to 32.3° (±12.4°). The highest range of motion was measured at the fifth finger with flexion/extension of 84.0° (±8.6°) to 32.1°(±16.8°) and radial/ulnar deviation of 15.1° (±12.9°) up to 54.6° (±18.7°). CONCLUSIONS: The range of motion of the index through small finger metacarpophalangeal joints was significantly influenced by wrist position. The highest metacarpophalangeal joint range of motion of all fingers was conducted in neutral wrist positions. Apart from ergonomic implications, we conclude that metacarpophalangeal joint motion should be assessed under standardized wrist positions.

Fractures in German elite male soccer players.

BACKGROUND: Aim of this retrospective cohort study was to identify fracture epidemiology and off times after different types of fractures in German male elite soccer players from the first division Bundesliga based on information from the public media. METHODS: Exposure and fracture data over 7.5 consecutive seasons (2009/10 until the first half of 2016/17) were collected from two media-based register (transfermarkt.de® and kicker.de®). RESULTS: Overall, 357 fractures from 290 different players were recorded with an incidence of 0.19/1000 hours of exposure (95% CI: 0.14-0.24). Most fractures in German elite soccer players involved the lower extremities (35.3%), the head/face (30.3%) and the upper extremities (24.9%). The median off time after a fracture in German elite male professional soccer in 7.5 Season was 51.1 days (range 0-144). The number of fractures per 100 players per season decreased between 2009 and 2016. There was no significant difference in overall fracture incidence when comparing players at different position (P=0.11). Goalkeepers have a significantly (P<0.02) higher likelihood of suffering hand and finger fractures and they are significantly (P<0.03) less prone of suffering foot fractures, cranial and maxillofacial fractures (P<0.04). compared to outfield players. CONCLUSIONS: This study can confirm that male professional soccer teams experience 1-2 fractures per season in German elite soccer. The incidence of fractures in elite German soccer players decreased between 2009 and 2016. The most fractures occur in the lower extremities and there is no difference in overall fracture risk for players at different playing positions. The information from our study might be of a great importance to medical practitioners, soccer coaches and soccer manager.