Influence of different spectra of NOTCH3 variants on the clinical phenotype of CADASIL - experience from Slovakia.

Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is the most common hereditary vascular disorder causing ischaemic attacks and strokes in middle-aged adults. Though the clinical spectrum includes some typical symptoms, recognition of the disease, especially at an earlier stage, is very difficult because of the highly variable manifestation and incomplete clinical picture. Characteristic brain MRI findings and the presence of pathogenic variants in the NOTCH3 gene are fundamental for CADASIL diagnosis. In this paper, we provide the first comprehensive report on CADASIL patients from Slovakia. Altogether, we identified 23 different pathogenic variants in 35 unrelated families. In our cohort of patients with clinical suspicion of CADASIL, we found a causal genetic defect and confirmed the diagnosis in 10.2% of cases. We present the case reports with up-to-date unpublished NOTCH3 variants and describe their phenotype-genotype correlation: p.(Cys65Phe), p.(Pro86Leu/Ser502Phe), p.(Arg156*), p.(Cys408Arg), p.(Tyr423Cys), p.(Asp1720His), and p.(Asp1893Thrfs*13). The most frequently described location for pathogenic variants was in exon 4, whereas the most common single variant was p.Arg1076Cys in exon 20. Based on the results of our study, we propose a re-evaluation of the criteria for the selection of patients suitable for NOTCH3 gene analysis. We hereby state that the currently used protocol of a high score requirement is not ideal for assessing molecular analysis, and it will be desirable to be less strict in criteria for genetic testing.

A case of novel DYT6 dystonia variant with serious complications after deep brain stimulation therapy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: DYT6 dystonia belongs to a group of isolated, genetically determined, generalized dystonia associated with mutations in the THAP1 gene. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a young patient with DYT6 dystonia associated with a newly discovered c14G>A (p.Cys5Tyr) mutation in the THAP1 gene. We describe the clinical phenotype of this new mutation, effect of pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS), which was accompanied by two rare postimplantation complications: an early intracerebral hemorrhage and delayed epileptic seizures. Among the published case reports of patients with DYT6 dystonia, the mentioned complications have not been described so far. CONCLUSIONS: DBS in the case of DYT6 dystonia is a challenge to thoroughly consider possible therapeutic benefits and potential risks associated with surgery. Genetic heterogeneity of the disease may also play an important role in predicting the development of the clinical phenotype as well as the effect of treatment including DBS. Therefore, it is beneficial to analyze the genetic and clinical relationships of DYT6 dystonia.