Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
J Med Virol ; 96(6): e29709, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38828947

RESUMO

This study evaluated the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of human metapneumovirus (hMPV) infection among hospitalized patients with acute respiratory infections during 2015-2021 and assessed the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on hMPV infection. A single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed, including pediatric and adult patients with laboratory-confirmed hMPV. Of a total of 990 patients, 253 (25.6%), 105 (10.6%), 121 (12.2%), and 511 (51.6%) belonged to age groups 0-2, 3-17, 18-59, and ≥60 years, respectively. The highest percentage (23.0%) of patients were hospitalized during 2019 and the lowest (4.7%) during 2020. Patients < 18 years experienced high rates of comorbidities (immunodeficiencies: 14.4% and malignancies: 29.9%). Here, 37/39 (94.9%) of all bronchiolitis cases were diagnosed in patients < 2 years, whereas more patients in older age groups were diagnosed with pneumonia. A greater proportion of hMPV patients diagnosed with viral coinfection (mostly respiratory syncytial virus and adenovirus) were <18 years. The highest percentages of intensive care unit admissions were recorded among patients < 18 years. Our findings demonstrate that hMPV is an important cause of morbidity in young children and a possibly underestimated cause of morbidity among older adults.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Coinfecção , Hospitalização , Metapneumovirus , Infecções por Paramyxoviridae , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Metapneumovirus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Paramyxoviridae/epidemiologia , Infecções por Paramyxoviridae/virologia , Israel/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Criança , Masculino , Adulto , Feminino , Lactente , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/virologia , Idoso , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Coinfecção/virologia , Recém-Nascido , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Comorbidade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , SARS-CoV-2
2.
J Med Virol ; 95(2): e28498, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36653733

RESUMO

Community surveillance found the 2019-2020 A(H1N1)pdm09 predominant influenza season in Israel to be a high-intensity season with an early and steep morbidity peak. To further characterize disease severity in the 2019-2020 season, we analyzed a cohort of hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed influenza from this season (n = 636). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed on clinical samples to detect the presence of influenza. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were retrieved via electronic health records and MDClone. Electronic health records were accessed to obtain data on intensive care unit patients, missing data and for data verification purposes. Univariate analysis was performed to compare demographic, comorbidity, and clinical characteristics across the three influenza strains. The A(H1N1)pdm09 predominant 2019-2020 influenza season in Israel was characterized by an early and steep morbidity peak, vaccine delays and shortages, and with the A(H3N2) and B/Victoria strains disproportionately targeting children and young adults, most probably due to reduced immunity to these strains. A greater proportion of children <5 years infected with A(H3N2) and B/Victoria developed severe influenza compared with those infected with A(H1N1)pdm09. Our study emphasizes the vulnerability of infants and young children in the face of rapidly evolving influenza strains and underscores the importance of influenza prevention measures in this population.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Criança , Lactente , Adulto Jovem , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2 , Estações do Ano , Israel , Morbidade , Vírus da Influenza B
3.
Pediatr Neurol ; 153: 68-76, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38335916

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease-associated central nervous system complications (CNS-C) in hospitalized children, especially during the Omicron wave, and in comparison with influenza associated CNS-C, are not well understood. METHODS: The study population included 755 children aged <18 years hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at Sheba Medical Center, during March 2020 to July 2022. A comparative cohort consisted of 314 pediatric patients with influenza during the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 influenza seasons. RESULTS: Overall, 5.8% (n = 44) of patients exhibited CNS-C. Seizures at presentation occurred in 33 patients with COVID-19 (4.4%), with 2.6% (n = 20) experiencing nonfebrile seizures, 1.1% (n = 8) febrile seizures, and 0.7% (n = 5) status epilepticus. More patients with CNS-C experienced seizures during the Omicron wave versus the pre-Omicron period (77.8% vs 41.2%, P = 0.03). Fewer patients were admitted to the intensive care unit in the Omicron wave (7.4%) versus prior waves (7.4% vs 41.2%, P = 0.02). Fewer patients with SARS-CoV-2 experienced CNS-C (5.8%) versus patients with influenza (9.9%), P = 0.03. More patients with SARS-CoV-2 experienced nonfebrile seizures (2.6% vs 0.6%, P = 0.06), whereas more patients with influenza experienced febrile seizures (7.3% vs 1.1%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The Omicron wave was characterized by more seizures and fewer intensive-care-unit admissions than previous waves. Pediatric patients with SARS-CoV-2 experienced fewer CNS-C and more nonfebrile seizures compared with patients with influenza.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Central , Influenza Humana , Convulsões Febris , Humanos , Criança , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Israel/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/complicações , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Sistema Nervoso Central
4.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 43(7): 1188-1192, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522765

RESUMO

Continued circulation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has driven the selection of variants with improved ability to escape preexisting vaccine-induced responses, posing a persistent threat to heart transplant recipients (HTRs). The immunogenicity and safety of the updated XBB.1.5-containing monovalent vaccines are unknown. We prospectively enrolled 52 HTRs who had previously received a 5-dose ancestral-derived monovalent and bivalent messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination schedule to receive the monovalent XBB.1.5 vaccine. Immunogenicity was evaluated using live virus microneutralization assays. The XBB.1.5 monovalent vaccine elicited potent and diverse neutralizing responses and broadened the reactivity spectrum to encompass newer strains, with the highest increase in neutralization activity being more pronounced against XBB.1.5 (15.8-fold) and JN.1 (13.3-fold) than against BA.5 (6.7-fold) and wild-type (4-fold). Notably, XBB.1.5 and JN.1 were resistant to neutralization by prevaccination sera. There were no safety concerns. Our findings support the updating of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines to match antigenically divergent variants and exclude ancestral spike-antigen to protect HTRs.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Transplante de Coração , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Transplantados , Imunogenicidade da Vacina
5.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(10)2023 Oct 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37897026

RESUMO

Vaccination against COVID-19 and influenza provides the best defense against morbidity and mortality. Administering both vaccines concurrently may increase vaccination rates and reduce the burden on the healthcare system. This study evaluated the immunogenicity of healthcare workers in Israel who were co-administered with the Omicron BA.4/BA.5 bivalent COVID-19 vaccine and the 2022-2023 quadrivalent influenza vaccine. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers were measured via microneutralization while influenza antibody titers were measured via hemagglutination inhibition. No immunogenic interference was observed by either vaccine when co-administered. Antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 variants increased significantly in the cohort receiving the COVID-19 vaccine alone and in combination with the influenza vaccine. Antibody titers against the A/H1N1 influenza strain increased significantly in the cohort receiving the influenza vaccine alone and in combination with the COVID-19 vaccine. Antibody titers against B/Victoria increased significantly in the cohort that received both vaccines. This study has important public health implications for the 2023-2024 winter season, and supports co-administration of both vaccines as a viable immunization strategy.

6.
Front Microbiol ; 14: 1296179, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38322758

RESUMO

Introduction: Following the significant decrease in SARS-CoV-2 cases worldwide, Israel, as well as other countries, have again been faced with a rise in seasonal influenza. This study compared circulating influenza A and B in hospitalized patients in Israel with the influenza strains in the vaccine following the 2021-2022 winter season which was dominated by the omicron variant. Methods: Nasopharyngeal samples of 16,325 patients were examined for the detection of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and influenza B. Phylogenetic trees of hemagglutinin were then prepared using sanger sequencing. Vaccine immunogenicity was also performed using the hemagglutination inhibition test. Results: Of the 16,325 nasopharyngeal samples collected from hospitalized patients between September 2021 (Week 40) and April 2023 (Week 15), 7.5% were found to be positive for influenza. Phylogenetic analyses show that in the 2021-2022 winter season, the leading virus subtype was influenza A(H3N2), belonging to clade 3C.2a1b.2a.2. However, the following winter season was dominated by influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, which belongs to clade 6B.aA.5a.2. The circulating influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 strain showed a shift from the vaccine strain, while the co-circulating influenza A(H3N2) and influenza B strains were similar to those of the vaccine. Antigenic analysis coincided with the sequence analysis. Discussion: Influenza prevalence during 2022-2023 returned to typical levels as seen prior to the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, which may suggest a gradual viral adaptation to SARS-CoV-2 variants. Domination of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 was observed uniquely in Israel compared to Europe and USA and phylogenetic and antigenic analysis showed lower recognition of the vaccine with the circulating influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in Israel compared to the vaccine.

7.
Eur J Cancer ; 168: 51-55, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35439660

RESUMO

AIM: Patients with cancer are at an increased risk for severe coronavirus disease of 2019. We previously reported initial findings from a single centre prospective study evaluating antibody response after BNT162b2 vaccine, showing that adequate antibody response was achieved after two doses, but not after one, in patients with cancer vaccinated during anticancer therapy. Herein, we report a follow-up study, evaluating antibody response six months after the second vaccine dose. METHODS: The study included patients with solid tumours undergoing anticancer treatment, and immunocompetent health-care workers serving as controls. Serum titres of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG and neutralising antibodies (Nabs) were measured approximately six months after the second vaccine dose. Complete blood count values were collected and evaluated as predictors for antibody response. RESULTS: The analysis included 93 patients with cancer (66.7% metastatic). Six months after the second vaccine dose (mean 176 ± 20 days), seropositivity rate among patients and controls was 83.9% versus 96.3% (p = 0.0001), respectively. Median RBD-IgG titre was lower among patients compared with controls (2.3 versus 3.2, p = 0.0002). Among seropositive individuals, median Nabs titre was similar between patients with cancer and controls (p = 0.566). Among patients with cancer, lymphocyte and neutrophil counts were not correlated with either RBD-IgG or Nabs titres. CONCLUSIONS: Seropositivity rates and RBD-IgG titre at six months after second BNT162b2 vaccine dose are lower among patients with cancer compared with healthy controls. However, Nabs titre is similar, suggesting a comparable protection among seropositive individuals. Lymphocyte count is not predictive of antibody response.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Vacinas , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacina BNT162 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
8.
Eur J Cancer ; 157: 124-131, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34508994

RESUMO

AIM: Patients with cancer are at an increased risk for severe coronavirus disease of 2019, thus data on the safety and efficacy of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines are essential. We conducted this prospective study of patients with cancer vaccinated with BNT162b2 and monitored for antibody response and safety. The aim was to evaluate the rate of seropositivity and define predictors for non-reactive immune response. Furthermore, we evaluated the frequency and the severity of adverse events. METHODS: The study included patients with solid tumours undergoing anticancer treatment and immunocompetent health-care workers serving as controls. Serum titres of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralising antibodies were measured 2-4 weeks after each vaccine dose. RESULTS: The analysis included 129 patients, of which 70.5% patients were metastatic. Patients were treated with chemotherapy (55%), immunotherapy (34.1%), biological agents (24.8%), hormonal treatment (8.5%) and radiotherapy (4.6%), that were given either alone or in combinations. The seropositivity rate among patients with cancer and controls was 32.4% versus 59.8% (p < 0.0001) after the first dose and 84.1% versus 98.9% (p < 0.0001) after the second dose, respectively. Median RBD-IgG titre was lower among patients than controls (p < 0.0001). Patients who were seronegative after the second dose had significantly more comorbidities than that with patients with seropositivity (77.8% vs 41.1%, respectively, p = 0.0042). CONCLUSION: Adequate antibody response after BNT162b2 vaccination was achieved after two doses but not after one dose, in patients with cancer vaccinated during anticancer therapy.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Neoplasias/imunologia , Neoplasias/virologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Vacina BNT162 , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/dietoterapia , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Vacinação/métodos
9.
Sci Adv ; 6(40)2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33008904

RESUMO

Proteomic profiling of circulating small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) represents a promising, noninvasive approach for early detection and therapeutic monitoring of breast cancer (BC). We describe a relatively low-cost, fast, and reliable method to isolate sEVs from plasma of BC patients and analyze their protein content by semiquantitative proteomics. sEV-enriched fractions were isolated from plasma of healthy controls and BC patients at different disease stages before and after surgery. Proteomic analysis of sEV-enriched fractions using reverse phase protein array revealed a signature of seven proteins that differentiated BC patients from healthy individuals, of which FAK and fibronectin displayed high diagnostic accuracy. The size of sEVs was significantly reduced in advanced disease stage, concomitant with a stage-specific protein signature. Furthermore, we observed protein-based distinct clusters of healthy controls, chemotherapy-treated and untreated postsurgery samples, as well as a predictor of high risk of cancer relapse, suggesting that the applied methods warrant development for advanced diagnostics.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Vesículas Extracelulares , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Vesículas Extracelulares/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Proteômica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa