Experimental endoscopic submucosal dissection training in a porcine model: learning experience of skilled Western endoscopists.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) demands a new level of endoscopic skill in Europe. A 2-day workshop was set up for trainees to carry out five ESD each in order to obtain the skill level required to perform ESD in the stomach or rectum. This study describes: (i) the workshop setup; (ii) the participant's performance; and (iii) the training effect on post-workshop clinical ESD performance. METHODS: Eighteen very experienced European endoscopists participated in four half-day (4.5 h) training sessions, with everybody rotating daily through six separate training stations (two each with dual, hook, or hybrid knives) with expert tutors. One anesthetized piglet was used per station and session. After 1 year, the clinical ESD performance was surveyed to estimate the training effect of the workshop. RESULTS: Overall, 74 ESD were performed, that is, 4.1 ESD per participant. On average ESD lasted 57 min for 6 cm(2) specimens. We detected a 22% rate of perforation (16 of 74 ESD with perforations), mostly attributable to participants with less experience in ESD. Those who started clinical ESD within 1 year after the workshop performed 144 clinical ESD (median 8 [0-20] per trainee) mostly in the stomach (40%) and large bowel (46%) with an acceptable rate of perforation (9.7%) and surgical repair (3.5%) without mortality or persistent morbidity. CONCLUSION: Intense skill training for ESD is needed to reduce the risk of perforation, as demonstrated by the results of this workshop. We show that experimental ESD training, however, enables skilled European endoscopists to perform ESD in standard locations with moderate risk of perforation during the clinical learning curve.

Combination of water-jet dissection and needle-knife as a hybrid knife simplifies endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is very dependent on an effective injection beneath the submucosal lamina and on a controlled cutting technique. After our study group demonstrated the efficacy of the HydroJet in needleless submucosal injections under various physical conditions to create a submucosal fluid cushion (Selective tissue elevation by pressure = STEP technique), the next step was to develop a new instrument to combine the capabilities of an IT-Knife with a high-pressure water-jet in a single instrument. In this experimental study, we compared this new instrument with a standard ESD technique. METHODS: Twelve gastric ESD were performed in six pigs under endotracheal anesthesia. Square areas measuring 4-cm x 4-cm were marked out on the anterior and posterior wall in the corpus-antrum transition region. The HybridKnife was used as an standard needle knife with insulated tip (i.e., the submucosal injection was performed with an injection needle and only the radiofrequency (RF) part of the HybridKnife was used for cutting (conventional technique)) or the HybridKnife was used in all the individual stages of the ESD, making use of the HybridKnife's combined functions (HybridKnife technique). The size of the resected specimens, the operating time, the frequency with which instruments were changed, the number of bleeding episodes, and the number of injuries to the gastric wall together with the subjective overall assessment of the intervention by the operating physician were recorded. RESULTS: The resected specimens were the same size, with average sizes of 16.96 cm(2) and 15.85 cm(2) resp (p = 0.8125). Bleeding episodes have been less frequent in the HybridKnife group (2.83 vs. 3.5; p = 0.5625). The standard knife caused more injuries to the lamina muscularis propria (0.17 vs. 1.33; p = 0.0313). The operating times had a tendency to be shorter with the HybridKnife technique (47.18 vs. 58.32 minute; p = 0.0313). DISCUSSION: The combination of a needle-knife with high-pressure water-jet dissection improved the results of endoscopic submucosal dissection in this experimental setting. Because the frequency of complications is still high, further improvements to the instrument are necessary.

Preoperative staging of rectal tumors: comparison of endorectal ultrasound, hydro-CT, and high-resolution endorectal MRI.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare transrectal ultra-sound (TRUS), hydro-computed tomography (hydro-CT), and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 23 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma underwent TRUS, hydro-CT, and MRI (1 Tesla) with endorectal coil. The results were correlated with the histopathological findings based on the TNM classification. RESULTS: T staging with TRUS, hydro-CT, and endorectal MRI correlated with the histopa-thological findings in 83% of patients (19/23). Tumors were overestimated by TRUS in 2/23 patients, by CT in 3/23, and by MRI in 3/23 patients. Tumor size was underestimated by TRUS in 2 patients, by CT and MRI in 1 case each. Local lymphatic node involvement was correctly diagnosed with CT and MRI in 87% and 83%, respectively. Using TRUS, false-negative results in the staging of lymph node involvement were seen in 3/23 patients, whereas 1 patient was over-staged. Using hydro-CT as well as endorectal MRI, overstaging of the local lymph nodes took place in 2/23 patients. CONCLUSION: All methods are limited because peritumoral inflammation cannot be precisely distinguished from infiltration by the tumor. Correct lymph node staging is hampered in advanced disease using TRUS. In these patients, further cross-sectional imaging may be required.