How effective and efficient are different exercise patterns in reducing back pain?

BACKGROUND: Exercise is considered an effective intervention to relieve chronic back pain. However, it is still unknown whether specific exercise patterns vary in terms of their efficiency and effectiveness. AIM: To investigate the differential health and economic effects of intensity, specificity and degree of subjective perceived physical exertion across five exercise patterns (endurance, gymnastics, fitness, back gymnastics, multimodal back exercise) in adults with back pain. DESIGN: Longitudinal observational cohort study over a period of 24 months. SETTING: Various non-therapeutic exercise facilities (e.g. outdoor, fitness centers, health insurance programs, sports clubs) across one federal state of Germany (Baden-Wuerttemberg). POPULATION: Adults with back pain (N.=2,542, Mean =46.9 years, 66% females, graded chronic back pain [GCPS] 1=40.5%, GCPS 2=27.3%, GCPS 3=20.7%, GCPS 4=11.5%). METHODS: Self-reported back pain (functional restrictions and pain = back pain function score, [BPFS]) and characteristics of exercising behavior (frequency, duration, type, physical exertion) were assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Direct medical costs for back disorders (international classification of diseases, dorsopathies: M40-M54) were compiled from health insurance records. RESULTS: Moderate- to high-intensity exercise patterns were effective in reducing back pain, particularly at lower levels of subjective perceived physical exertion. At these intensity levels, multimodal back exercise (i.e. exercising the spine-stabilizing muscles specifically, ergonomic training) was 14.5 times more effective than non-back specific fitness exercise in reducing BPFS. The beneficial effects of both exercise types increased with the initial severity of back pain. However, only multimodal back exercise (moderate- to high-intensity/high back specificity) was associated with a significant decrease in direct medical costs for back pain. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted exercise of the spine-stabilizing musculature at moderate to high intensities without maximum perceived exertion is effective and efficient in reducing back pain. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The combination of high-intensity and high-specificity exercises yielded a significant reduction in medical costs. However, the intensities in terms of muscular load in endurance training and gymnastics may not be sufficient to reduce back pain effectively.

Therapeutic and economic effects of multimodal back exercise: A controlled multicentre study.

To compare the cost-effectiveness of a multimodal back exercise programme for non-specific back pain with that of standard treatment. Medical costs were measured in euros (EUR) and effectiveness was measured using Graded Chronic Pain Status (GCPS). A controlled multicentre study (39 sites) with a 6-month intervention phase and follow-up at 6, 12 and 18 months. The study included 1,829 participants in an intervention group and 495 individuals in a control group. The multimodal back exercise programme comprises 36 exercise sessions for optimizing the spine stabilizing muscles and everyday motor func-tions. The patients were given a home training programme at the end of the intervention programme. The back exercise programme resulted in a significant reduction, of 0.4, in back pain grade on the GCPS after 2 years, compared with standard treat-ment, and reduced medical costs by 763 EUR. The exercise programme was therapeutically effective for GCPS back pain grades 1-4 and produced cost savings in the case of grade 4 GCPS. The multimodal back exercise programme was therapeutically effective for back pain (grades 1-2) and pain-related functional impairment (grades 3-4). It resulted in reduced costs for chronic back pain causing high pain-induced functional impairment (grade 4). The therapeutic and economic effects of the programme increase with the grade of back pain.