Factors associated with changes in posterior corneal surface following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: To identify factors associated with changes in the posterior corneal curvature following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: This retrospective study included myopic astigmatic eyes that underwent LASIK between January and December 2013 at Care-Vision Laser Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel. The average posterior keratometry was measured with the Sirius device at a radius of 3 mm from the center. The correlations between the surgically induced change in average posterior keratometry and preoperative parameters such as preoperative sphere, cylinder, spherical equivalent, central corneal thickness (CCT), refraction, Baiocchi Calossi Versaci (BCV) index, ablation depth, percent of tissue altered (PTA), and residual stromal bed (RSB) are reported. RESULTS: A total of 115 eyes with a mean age of 32.5 ± 8.3 years (range 22-56 years) were included. Central corneal thickness (p < 0.005), preoperative sphere (p < 0.001), spherical equivalent (p < 0.005), and preoperative posterior inferior/superior ratio (p < 0.05) were all significantly correlated with the percentage of change in the mean posterior K. According to ranked stepwise multiple regression analysis, 22% of the variance of change in posterior K could be explained by the examined factors. The factors that remained significant were the percentage of change in posterior inferior/superior ratio, preoperative subjective sphere, and preoperative mean posterior K (for all, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of change in posterior inferior/superior ratio, subjective sphere, and preoperative mean posterior K are all correlated with change in the mean posterior K after LASIK. Understanding of the variables that can influence posterior corneal changes following refractive surgery may play a role in the prevention of iatrogenic keratectasia.

Factors associated with changes in posterior corneal surface following photorefractive keratectomy.

PURPOSE: To identify factors associated with changes in the posterior cornea curvature following laser refractive surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included myopic astigmatic eyes that underwent PRK between January 2013 and December 2013 at Care-Vision Laser Centers, Tel-Aviv, Israel. The average posterior K was measured with the Sirius device at a radius of 3 mm from the center. The correlations between the surgical induced change in average posterior k and preoperative parameters such as central corneal thickness (CCT), refraction, Baiocchi Calossi Versaci index (BCV), ablation depth, percent tissue altered (PTA), and residual stroma bed (RSB) were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 280 eyes with a mean age of 24.9 ± 6.1 years (range, 18-47 years were included in this study. The mean PTA was 14.8 ± 6.0%. A greater change in posterior K was found in females (p = 0.01), smaller treatment zones of 6.0 mm (p = 0.02) and PTA > 20% (p < 0.001). A lower CCT (r = - 0.24, p < 0.001), higher myopia (r = - 0.34, p < 0.001), higher astigmatism (r = - 0.17, p < 0.001), higher total BCV (r = 0.13, p = 0.03), lower back BCV (r = - 0.12, p = 0.05), higher front BCV (r = 0.16, p = 0.01), higher posterior I-S ratio (r = 0.16, p = 0.01), and a lower RSB (r = - 0.42, p < 0.001) were all significantly correlated with percentage of change in mean posterior K. In ranked stepwise multiple regression analysis, 26.2% of the variance of change in posterior K could be explained by the examined factors. The factors that remained significant were PTA (p < 0.001), CCT (p = 0.001), and posterior I-S ratio (p = 0.001). PTA alone accounted for 15% of the variance in posterior K changes in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding of factors affecting a change in posterior cornea after refractive surgery may have an important practical value for the prevention of iatrogenic keratectasia. Preoperative CCT, posterior I-S ratio, and PTA were significantly associated with changes in posterior K after PRK. PTA was the strongest predictor of posterior corneal changes (p < 0.001).

Centration of myopic refractive ablation: should we center treatment on the pupil or the visual axis?

The purpose of this study is to compare pupil versus corneal vertex-centered ablation for myopic laser refractive surgery. This study is a retrospective case series of right eyes of consecutive myopic patients undergoing either photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with pupil or corneal vertex-centered ablation from January 2018 to April 2018. Overall 258 eyes of 258 patients were included. Of the 104 that underwent LASIK, 52 were treated centered on the corneal vertex (50%), and of the 154 that underwent PRK, 77 were treated centered on the corneal vertex (50%). There were no significant differences in baseline age, gender, spherical equivalence, sphere, cylinder, or angle kappa between both groups in either LASIK or PRK. There were no significant differences between the corneal vertex-centered and pupil-centered groups in terms of efficacy index (LASIK: 1.02 ± 0.14 vs 1.01 ± 0.13, p = 0.86; PRK: 1.00 ± 0.13 vs 0.99 ± 0.15, p = 0.61), safety index (LASIK: 1.02 ± 0.12 vs 1.01 ± 0.13, p = 0.70; PRK:1.02 ± 0.12 vs 1.02 ± 0.09, p = 0.97), and residual astigmatism (LASIK: 0.26 ± 0.25 vs 0.23 ± 0.28, p = 0.65; PRK:0.37 ± 0.41 vs 0.39 ± 0.31, p = 0.78). In mixed effect models, there were no significant differences between the corneal vertex-centered and pupil-centered groups when accounting for angle kappa (p > 0.05). Patients with large angle kappa (> 300 µm) eyes yielded similar results (p > 0.05). For conclusion, in myopic refractive surgery, performing ablation centered on the corneal vertex or on the pupil leads to similar outcomes regardless of the amount of angle kappa.

LASIK versus PRK for high astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To compare the refractive outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopic astigmatism of 3 diopters (D) or more. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective matched comparative study. METHODS: This study include consecutive myopic patients (SE 0 to -10 D) undergoing LASIK or PRK between 2007 and 2016 with astigmatism of 3 to 6 D, and postoperative follow-up of at least 30 days for LASIK and 60 days for PRK, compared outcomes of LASIK and PRK eyes. RESULTS: The LASIK and PRK groups comprised 175 eyes of 175 patients each, with median follow-up of 39 and 139 days, respectively (P < 0.001). Mean preoperative manifest astigmatism was -3.35 ± 0.46 and -3.42 ± 0.51 D (P = 0.92), postoperative SE was -0.43 ± 0.55 and -0.16 ± 0.64 D (P < 0.001), and arithmetic astigmatism was -0.59 ± 0.46 and -0.88 ± 0.60 D (P < 0.001), for the LASIK and PRK groups, respectively. Fifty-seven and 64.0% eyes had postoperative SE within ± 0.5 D of emmetropia (P = 0.19), and 57.7 and 38.8% eyes were within 0.5 D of attempted astigmatic correction (P < 0.001) for the LASIK and PRK groups, respectively. More PRK eyes were overtreated regarding both SE and astigmatism than LASIK eyes (P < 0.001). The efficacy and safety indices were close to 1.0 in both groups. The surgically induced astigmatism, magnitude of error, index of success, correction index and flattening index were all better in the LASIK group. CONCLUSION: Both LASIK and PRK achieve good outcomes in high astigmatism. LASIK achieved mild superiority over PRK.

Hyperopic laser keratorefractive surgery: Do steep corneas have worse outcomes?

PURPOSE: To report the visual and refractive outcomes of hyperopic patients undergoing laser keratorefractive surgery in preoperatively steep corneas versus a matched control group. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. All patients underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) at Care-Vision Laser Centers, Tel-Aviv, Israel, between 1/2000 and 11/2016. Patients were divided into two groups: steep corneas (mean keratometry ≥ 44.00 D) and control group (mean keratometry < 44.00 D). The two study groups were matched by age, gender, sphere and cylinder. Only the right eye of each patient was included. Outcomes included postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), safety and efficacy indexes, refractive outcomes and retreatment rates. RESULTS: Five hundred and two patients were included. Both groups were similar in demographic data, visual acuity and refraction. Postoperatively, the steep corneas group had a significantly higher mean keratometry as compared to the control group (46.52 ± 1.43 D vs 44.58 ± 1.68 D, p < 0.001), Kmin (46.04 ± 1.50 D vs 44.12 ± 1.76 D, p < 0.001) and Kmax (46.99 ± 1.51 D vs 45.03 ± 1.77 D, p < 0.001). Both groups had similar postoperative UDVA and CDVA and achieved a similar final sphere (0.64 ± 0.19 vs 0.54 ± 1.19, p = 0.44) and cylinder (- 0.89 ± 0.59 vs - 0.86 ± 0.72, p = 0.67). Both groups had a similar efficacy index (0.92 ± 0.22 vs 0.90 ± 0.25, p = 0.33) and similar retreatment rates (4.2% vs 3.5%, p = 0.74). None of the patients in either group underwent more than one retreatment throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperopic patients with steep corneas undergoing laser keratorefractive surgery can achieve adequate visual and refractive outcomes, similar to control group.

Visual acuity in patients with keratoconus: a comparison with matched regular myopic astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To compare uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) between patients with keratoconus (KC) and matched patients with regular myopic astigmatism. METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive patients diagnosed with KC between 2008 and 2013 at Care-Vision Laser Centers, Tel-Aviv, Israel, and matched patients with regular myopic astigmatism. Data included were central corneal thickness (CCT), spherical equivalent (SE), cylinder (CYL), mean keratometric power, maximum keratometric power (Kmax), UDVA, CDVA, and defocus equivalent (DEQ). RESULTS: The KC group included 734 patients with a mean age of 33.8 ± 9.5 years. The matched, control group included 1462 patients with a mean age of 33.2 ± 9.7 years (p = 0.14). The mean SE and CYL of the KC group were - 3.34 ± 3.29D and - 3.01 ± 1.99D, respectively, compared to - 3.34 ± 2.92D (p = 0.98) and - 2.97 ± 1.35 (p = 0.58). Mean K (46.8 ± 3.3D versus 44.0 ± 1.8D, p < 0.0001) and Kmax (48.4 ± 4.0D versus 45.3 ± 2.0D, p < 0.0001) were statically significant higher in the KC group. CCT was significantly thinner in the KC group (444 ± 49 versus 527 ± 40 µm, p < 0.0001). The KC group had a better UDVA than the non-KC group (1.10 ± 0.68 versus 1.22 ± 0.64 logMAR, p < 0.0001). CDVA was significantly lower in the KC group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For defocus equivalents above 6D, the KC group had better UDVA than the non-KC group in spite of worse CDVA.

Myopia and myopic astigmatism photorefractive keratectomy: applying an advanced multiple regression-derived nomogram.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a multiple regression-derived nomogram for myopia and myopic astigmatism photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: Regression modeling derived a formula for spherocylindrical correction in wavefront-optimized PRK (nomogram II). Treatment outcomes between eyes with myopia and myopic astigmatism using the manufacturer's nomogram (nomogram I) in the years 2010-2013 were retrospectively compared with eyes treated using nomogram II in the years 2014-2015. RESULTS: Overall 1100 eyes (of 561 patients) were operated using nomogram I and 791 eyes (of 406 patients) using nomogram II. Nomogram II achieved correction within ± 0.5 D of the attempted in 90% (95% CI 86.8-92.3%) of eyes with a spherical equivalent (SE) < |- 6|D, compared to 84% (95% CI 81.8-86.9%) in nomogram I. Overcorrection was reached in 14% (95% CI 10.1-18.3%) of eyes with SE ≥ |-6|D in nomogram II, compared to 22.6% (95% CI 18.1-27.2%) in nomogram I. Nomogram II achieved correction within ± 0.5 D of the attempted in 88.7% (95% CI 85.7-91.6%) of patients aged 18-23 years compared to 81.2% (95% CI 77.9-84.5%) in nomogram I; however, in 77% (95% CI 69.5-84.4%) versus 87.4% (95% CI 82.7-92.0%), respectively, among patients aged ≥ 30 years. In eyes with astigmatism ≥ 2 D, a postoperative astigmatism < 0.5 D was achieved in 89.4% (95% CI 83.0-95.7%) versus 72.9% (95% CI 64.3-81.5%), and a treatment efficacy index ≥ 0.9 was achieved in 100% versus 92.6% (95% CI 87.6-97.6%) with nomogram II versus nomogram I, respectively. CONCLUSION: There were several clinically significant benefits of the advanced nomogram in wavefront-optimized myopia PRK. On the other hand, there was a trend of lower accuracy in the older age group, warranting a second iteration.

Refractive surgery in the late adulthood and adolescent age groups.

PURPOSE: Most refractive surgeries are performed in the young-adult age group, and less is known about the clinical outcomes of patients in late adulthood and of adolescents. The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes of refractive surgery in patients over the age of 60 years and under the age of 18 years compared with a control group of patients aged 20-40 years. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis consisted of 64,970 consecutive cases of 32,074 patients who underwent laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy during a 10-year period in a single center. The populations were characterized, and a comparison of safety, efficacy, and retreatment rates was performed following propensity score matching, separately for hyperopic and myopic treatments. RESULTS: Included in the analysis after matching were 143 patients above the age of 60, 608 patients aged < 18, and 2313 patients aged 20-40. Older patients undergoing hyperopic treatments had worse safety (0.95 ± 0.1 versus 0.99 ± 0.2, P = 0.023) and efficacy indices (0.89 ± 0.2 versus 0.97 ± 0.2, P = 0.004) compared with young adults. Lower efficacy was also seen in myopic treatments (0.88 ± 0.3 versus 0.97 ± 0.2, P = 0.001). Higher retreatment rates were also seen among older adults (6.2% versus 2.5%, P = 0.044 in hyperopic treatments, 11% versus 1.1%, P < 0.001 in myopic treatments). In adolescents, the safety and efficacy outcomes were slightly better compared with patients aged 20-40, with lower retreatment rates (1% versus 2.7%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Refractive surgery in the late adulthood population of our cohort was a relatively safe procedure, yet manifesting lower efficacy and requiring more retreatments. In adolescents, results were comparable to those achieved in young adults.

Correlation between central corneal thickness and myopia.

PURPOSE: To analyze the correlation between central corneal thickness (CCT) and myopia in refractive surgery candidates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients that underwent myopic laser refractive surgery between January 2000 and December 2014 were included. Preoperative CCT was measured by ultrasonic pachymetry, and refractive status determined by manifest and cycloplegic refraction. RESULTS: A total of 30,245 individuals were included. Mean age was 28.2 ± 8.6 years, and 45.9% were female. Mean refractive error was 4.02 ± 2.17 D (range 0.25-19.5), and the mean CCT measurement was 533.5 ± 35.5 µm (range 404-794). Younger individuals showed higher degree of myopia (p = 0.006). No difference in CCT was found between women and men (533.0 ± 35.1 and 533.6 ± 35.9 µm, respectively, p = 0.19). Though CCT showed no correlation with age (p = 0.226) participants above age 40 expressed higher CCT values (p < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between the CCT and cylinder (p > 0.05). An increase in mean keratometry was associated with a decrease in CCT (p < 0.001). There was a direct correlation between the degree of myopia and CCT (r = 0.94, p < 0.001). The result remained the same after adjusting for age group and gender in stepwise backward regression analysis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Central corneal thickness is correlated with the degree of myopia among adults undergoing refractive surgery.

Risk factors for keratoconus in Israel: a case-control study.

PURPOSE: Keratoconus (KC) is a progressive corneal thinning disorder with an uncertain aetiology. Environmental and genetic factors, including consanguinity, eye rubbing and possibly sun exposure, play a role in the aetiology of KC. Here we test for risk factors for KC in an Israeli population with particular emphasis on sun exposure. METHODS: This case-control study included KC patients who were diagnosed at Care Laser Medical Group, a refractive surgery clinic with branches throughout Israel. The control group included age, sex and ethnicity matched individuals who were randomly selected from patients presenting at the clinic for refractive surgery, but without KC. Study subjects were asked to fill out a self-administered questionnaire that included demographic and geographic details, questions on ocular and general health and sun exposure. Conditional logistic regression was used to analyse univariable and multivariable data to identify risk factors for KC. RESULTS: Seventy-three KC patients and 146 controls participated in the study. Univariable analyses demonstrated that eye rubbing [odds ratio (OR) = 3.76], positive family history of KC (OR = 6.10) and parents' education (<12 years, OR = 0.27, 0.23 for father's and mother's education respectively) were significant risk factors for KC. Univariable analyses of sun exposure behaviour during teenage years proved equivocal with some behaviours emerging as protective for KC (wearing a hat outdoors, OR = 3.13) or as risk factors (spending time in the shade, OR = 0.45), while others showed no association [limiting time in the sun (p = 0.51), and wearing sunglasses (p = 0.20)]. Most of the factors that were significant in the univariable analyses, also emerged as statistically significant in the multivariable model (OR = 3.37, 9.68, 0.35, 5.51 for eye rubbing, family history, parental education, wearing a hat outdoors, with the exception of spending time in the shade (p = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Eye rubbing, parents' education (as a measure of socio-economic status) and having family members with KC emerged as significant risk factors for KC. The role of sun exposure in KC remains equivocal and warrants further research.

Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery in the absence of clinical history.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To identify the most accurate combination of Pentacam's equivalent keratometry readings (EKR) and intraocular lens power formula when the clinical history is unavailable. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 18 patients underwent cataract surgery after refractive surgery. The Pentacam 4.5- and 3.0-mm EKR were combined with the SRK II, SRK/T, Hoffer-Q, and Holladay I and II formulas. RESULTS: The smallest deviation from the predicted value was achieved by combining the 4.5 EKR with the Holladay II formula (mean arithmetic deviation, -0.2 ± 0.4 dpt). CONCLUSION: The 4.5-mm EKR + Holladay II formula can accurately calculate intraocular lens power in patients with previous refractive surgery.

Tomographic Predictors of Ectasia Development After Keratorefractive Surgery.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for postkeratorefractive surgery ectasia in unsuspicious tomographies and to report a new index coined diameter of peak locations (DPLs). METHODS: All patients who underwent keratorefractive surgery between 2011 and 2018 at Care-Vision Laser Centers, Israel, and later developed ectasia were included. For each ectasia case, 3 matched controls were selected. Demographic and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the interdependence of the variables. RESULTS: The retrospective study included 19 ectasia and 58 control eyes. There were no significant differences between the groups in ablation depth ( P = 0.73), preoperative spherical equivalent ( P = 0.12), percent tissue altered ( P = 0.71), residual stromal bed ( P = 0.73), and Ectasia Risk Score System ( P = 0.60). The anterior and the posterior symmetry index were significantly higher ( P < 0.001), and DPL was significantly tighter in the ectasia group ( P = 0.01). Binary multiple logistic regression found the symmetry index of the posterior cornea and DPL to be better predictors than age, percent tissue altered, Ectasia Risk Score System, residual stromal bed, and ablation depth. CONCLUSIONS: A higher posterior symmetry index and a tighter DPL are predictors of ectasia in patients with otherwise normal tomographies. A tight DPL implies a weak area in the cornea, which is thin and slightly bulging, increasing the risk of this area becoming ectatic.

Tel-Aviv Protocol for Postrefractive Surgery Corneal Ectasia: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the safety and efficacy of the Tel-Aviv Protocol (epithelial photorefractive keratectomy and corneal cross-linking) as a treatment for postrefractive surgery corneal ectasia. METHODS: This study includes 8 eyes from 7 patients, each diagnosed with postrefractive surgery ectasia years after refractive surgery and treated with the Tel-Aviv Protocol. The procedure included transepithelial PRK using the EX500 excimer laser, a 50-µm laser ablation of the epithelium and anterior stroma, delivered on the visual axis with cyclotorsion correction, treating up to 50% of refractive astigmatism. After the epithelial photorefractive keratectomy, all patients underwent corneal cross-linking. RESULTS: The mean keratometry (K) and maximal K both decreased [from 43.37 ± 2.23 to 41.84 ± 2.01 ( P = 0.03) and from 44.95 ± 3.08 to 42.78 ± 2.19 ( P = 0.03), respectively]. Astigmatism was significantly reduced (from 3.53 ± 2.36 to 0.88 ± 0.89 diopter; P = 0.02). Uncorrected visual acuity improved significantly in all patients from a mean of 0.56 ± 0.32 to 0.15 ± 0.14 logMAR ( P = 0.01). Best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.22 ± 0.24 to 0.06 ± 0.06 logMAR ( P = 0.07; 1-tail P = 0.04). All patients maintained visual acuity during the follow-up period, up to 25 months, mean = 329 days. The Tel-Aviv Protocol was found to be safe [mean safety index: 1.63 ± 1.03 (range: 1.00-4)] and effective [mean efficacy index: 1.29 ± 0.66 (range: 0.71-2.1)]. CONCLUSIONS: The Tel-Aviv Protocol, developed initially for keratoconus treatment, is a safe and promising procedure to stop postrefractive surgery ectasia progression while significantly improving vision, thereby avoiding keratoplasty.

Factors Predicting Loss of Best-Corrected Visual Acuity After Hyperopic Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for the loss of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) after uncomplicated hyperopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: A retrospective study including hyperopic patients who underwent microkeratome-assisted LASIK between January 2000 and December 2019 at Care-Vision Laser Centers, Tel-Aviv, Israel. Loss of CDVA was defined as ≥ 2 lines (0.20 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] increase). Excluded were patients who had loss of CDVA because of intraoperative or postoperative complications or developed cataract at their final visit. RESULTS: Overall, 1998 eyes of 1998 patients were included in the study, of which 35 eyes (1.75%) had CDVA loss at final follow-up (mean 387 days). The vision-loss group had a significantly greater spherical treatment (3.4 vs. 2.8 D, P = 0.02), ablation depth (69.4 vs. 53.8 µm, P = 0.01), a higher proportion of treatments with a smaller optic zone (6.0 mm) (31.4% vs. 13.4%, P = 0.002), treatment with the EX200 (Alcon) excimer rather than the EX500 (Alcon) (74.3% vs. 39.0%, P < 0.001), and treatment with the Moria M2-90 microkeratome rather than the Moria Sub-Bowman's keratomileusis (SBK) microkeratome (65.7% vs. 29.6%, P < 0.001). In multivariate binary logistic regression, factors that remained significant predictors of CDVA loss were a greater spherical treatment (per 1 D treatment, odds ratio = 1.42, 95% CI, 1.11-1.81, P = 0.004) and the use of the Moria M2-90 microkeratome (odds ratio = 4.66, 95% CI, 2.30-9.45, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing uncomplicated hyperopic LASIK, a greater spherical hyperopic treatment is associated with a higher risk for vision loss. Transition to a newer microkeratome model significantly reduced vision loss rate.

Factors Predicting the Need for Re-treatment After Laser Refractive Surgery in Patients With Mixed Astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors that increase the likelihood of re-treatment following refractive surgery in patients with mixed astigmatism. METHODS: This was a retrospective study including patients who underwent either laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) between 2000 and 2019 and had mixed astigmatism (spherical error of +0.50 D or greater and spherical equivalent of less than 0.00 diopters [D]). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they underwent re-treatments during the study period. RESULTS: Overall, 785 eyes (785 patients) were included. In total, 5.2% of the eyes (n = 41) underwent re-treatment. The re-treatment group was more likely to have preoperative high astigmatism (80.5% vs 48.3%, P < .001), moderate to high hyperopia (36.6% vs 22.3%, P = .035), and to have undergone surgery earlier during the study period (P < .001). They were also more likely to have undergone surgery using the Wave-Light EX200 rather than the EX500 laser platform (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) (P < .001), have a treated optical zone of 6 mm rather than 6.5 mm (P < .001 for both), and their maximum ablation depth was greater (P < .001). There was no difference between the re-treatment and control groups regarding procedure type (PRK vs LASIK). Binary logistic regression found preoperative high astigmatism (odds ratio = 3.97, P < .001) and the type of laser platform used (EX200, odds ratio = 7.78, P < .001) as the only independent factors associated with re-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Re-treatment rates following correction of mixed astigmatism were 5.2% over 20 years. Use of a sixth-generation laser platform significantly reduced the risk of re-treatment. Presence of high astigmatism is a significant risk factor for re-treatment. There was no difference in retreatment risk between PRK and LASIK. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(2):e73-e78.].

Factors Predicting Slow Visual Recovery Following Hyperopic LASIK.

PURPOSE: To identify factors predicting slow visual recovery following hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: The study included consecutive patients who underwent hyperopic LASIK between January 2005 and December 2019 at a single medical center. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they experienced normal recovery of visual acuity (1-week visit) or slow visual recovery (1-month visit). Visual recovery was defined as achieving an efficacy index of 0.9 or greater. Efficacy index was calculated as postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity / preoperative corrected distance visual acuity. A comparison of baseline and intraoperative parameters was performed. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify potential predictors of slow visual recovery. RESULTS: Overall, 861 eyes of 861 patients were included. Mean age was 48.0 ± 9.5 years and 55.9% were women. Two hundred forty-nine patients (28.9%) experienced slow visual recovery. Younger age (P = .01), a larger preoperative spherical equivalence (P = .002), and greater maximum ablation depth (P = .002) were predictors of slow visual recovery. In binary logistic regression, female gender (P = .036) and greater spherical equivalence (P = .007) remained significant predictors of slow visual recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Female gender and greater preoperative spherical equivalence were associated with slow visual recovery. Patients may be advised accordingly. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(1):e42-e47.].

Factors Predicting Slow Visual Recovery Following Hyperopic LASIK.

PURPOSE: To identify factors predicting slow visual recovery following hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: The study included consecutive patients who underwent hyperopic LASIK between January 2005 and December 2019 at a single medical center. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they experienced normal recovery of visual acuity (1-week visit) or slow visual recovery (1-month visit). Visual recovery was defined as achieving an efficacy index of 0.9 or greater. Efficacy index was calculated as postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity / preoperative corrected distance visual acuity. A comparison of baseline and intraoperative parameters was performed. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify potential predictors of slow visual recovery. RESULTS: Overall, 861 eyes of 861 patients were included. Mean age was 48.0 ± 9.5 years and 55.9% were women. Two hundred forty-nine patients (28.9%) experienced slow visual recovery. Younger age (P = .01), a larger preoperative spherical equivalence (P = .002), and greater maximum ablation depth (P = .002) were predictors of slow visual recovery. In binary logistic regression, female gender (P = .036) and greater spherical equivalence (P = .007) remained significant predictors of slow visual recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Female gender and greater preoperative spherical equivalence were associated with slow visual recovery. Patients may be advised accordingly. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(1):e42-e47.].

Hyperopic LASIK and postoperative corneal steepness: revisiting the 49-diopter limit.

PURPOSE: To compare corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) outcomes of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a postoperative corneal steepness above vs below 49 diopters (D). SETTING: Care-Vision Laser Centers, Tel-Aviv, Israel. DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: This study included consecutive patients who underwent hyperopic LASIK between January 2013 and December 2019. Hyperopic patients were divided into 2 groups based on postoperative corneal steepness with steep corneas defined >49.0 D and the control group ≤49.0 D. Adjustments were performed to account for differences in baseline and intraoperative parameters. RESULTS: Overall, 1703 eyes of 1703 patients were included. Mean age was 48.3 ± 10.0 years, and 45.3% were male. Preoperatively, the steep group (2.4%, n = 41/1703) had steeper mean (44.6 D vs 43.1 D, P < .001) and steep (45.1 D vs 43.5 D, P < .001) keratometry, worse logMAR CDVA (0.07 vs 0.04, P = .02), and higher sphere (4.9 D vs 2.9 D, P < .001). Intraoperatively, they had a higher spherical treatment (4.6 D vs 2.8 D, P < .001). After hyperopic LASIK, the steep group had worse logMAR CDVA (0.10 vs 0.06, P = .01). However, after accounting for differences in baseline and spherical treatment, no significant differences were found in postoperative logMAR CDVA (0.06 vs 0.06, P = .99). The factors that remained associated with worse postoperative CDVA were higher spherical treatment (0.01 logMAR per 1 D, P < .001) and preoperative CDVA (0.60 logMAR per 1.00 logMAR, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative corneal steepness greater than 49 D is not associated with worse visual outcomes after hyperopic LASIK. However, lower preoperative visual potential and higher spherical treatment applied are associated with worse outcomes. The 49 D cutoff should be revisited.

The Effect of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction on Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis in Asymptomatic Patients.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the impact of asymptomatic meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) on laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) outcomes and dry eye signs and symptoms. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent LASIK surgery between July 2017 and February 2018 at Care Vision Refractive Clinic, Tel Aviv, Israel, was done. Patients were divided into those who had preoperative asymptomatic significant MGD (MGD group) and those who did not have preoperative significant MGD (control group). Outcomes were the postoperative presence of punctate epithelial erosions, dry eye symptoms, the number of postoperative visits as a measure of adverse events, visual acuity, spherical equivalent, safety index, efficacy index, and the type of refractive error (myopia or hyperopia). RESULTS: A total of 497 eyes were included in this study. Both groups had similar rates of punctate epithelial erosions, 30 (12.9%) patients vs. 39 patients (14.8%) (p = 0.31); postoperative complaints of dryness, 75 patients (32.3%) vs. 90 patients (34.2%) (p = 0.36); and postoperative number of visits, 3.15 ± 0.75 vs. 3.12 ± 0.54 (p = 0.59). Uncorrected visual acuity (logMAR) at 1 month (0.026 ± 0.09 vs. 0.026 ± 0.17, p = 0.99) after surgery was similar in both groups. Mean spherical equivalent was 0.03 ± 0.17 and - 0.03 ± 0.18 (p = 0.99) in both groups. Safety index was 1.024 ± 0.06 in the clinically significant MGD group and 1.029 ± 0.07 in the control group (p = 0.45). Efficacy index was also similar in both groups (0.966 ± 0.155 and 0.979 ± 0.14, respectively, p = 0.31). No differences were found between patients with myopia and hyperopia. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with preoperative asymptomatic MGD have similar LASIK outcomes to patients without preoperative asymptomatic MGD. Accordingly, no preoperative MGD treatment or special caution is needed in these cases.

Accuracy of the Preoperative Predicted Percentage of Tissue Altered Calculation in Refractive Surgery Planning for Myopic LASIK.

PURPOSE: To determine the reliability of the percentage of tissue altered (PTA) calculation as part of the planning strategy for myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) by comparing the estimated PTA provided by preoperative calculation to the postoperative PTA actually achieved in microkeratome-assisted myopic LASIK. METHODS: This retrospective study included 3,624 eyes of 3,624 patients who underwent mechanical microkeratome-assisted LASIK surgery for myopic correction. The calculated preoperative PTA values based on the planned flap thickness and ablation depth were compared with the actual achieved postoperative PTA using the difference of corneal central thickness postoperatively for assessing the achieved ablation depth and the intraoperative ultrasound-assisted flap thickness measurement. Regression analysis was performed to reveal preoperative parameters that might influence PTA calculation accuracy. RESULTS: The mean difference between the estimated and achieved PTA was 0.451 ± 3.45% (P < .001) (95% CI: 0.3708 to 0.5322) with a preoperative and postoperative mean PTA of 31.07 ± 4.07% and 31.52 ± 5.78%, respectively. The differences between the achieved and planned maximum ablation depth and flap thickness were 4.32 ± 13.70 µm (P < .001) and -1.61 ± 13.66 µm (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although a statistically significant difference was found between the preoperative calculated PTA and actually achieved PTA, the difference in PTA value (less than 1%) was clinically non-significant and indicated a highly reliable metric for preoperative refractive surgery planning. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(7):422-427.].