Updated guidance regarding the risk of allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines and recommended evaluation and management: A GRADE assessment and international consensus approach.

This guidance updates 2021 GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) recommendations regarding immediate allergic reactions following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines and addresses revaccinating individuals with first-dose allergic reactions and allergy testing to determine revaccination outcomes. Recent meta-analyses assessed the incidence of severe allergic reactions to initial COVID-19 vaccination, risk of mRNA-COVID-19 revaccination after an initial reaction, and diagnostic accuracy of COVID-19 vaccine and vaccine excipient testing in predicting reactions. GRADE methods informed rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations. A modified Delphi panel consisting of experts in allergy, anaphylaxis, vaccinology, infectious diseases, emergency medicine, and primary care from Australia, Canada, Europe, Japan, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States formed the recommendations. We recommend vaccination for persons without COVID-19 vaccine excipient allergy and revaccination after a prior immediate allergic reaction. We suggest against >15-minute postvaccination observation. We recommend against mRNA vaccine or excipient skin testing to predict outcomes. We suggest revaccination of persons with an immediate allergic reaction to the mRNA vaccine or excipients be performed by a person with vaccine allergy expertise in a properly equipped setting. We suggest against premedication, split-dosing, or special precautions because of a comorbid allergic history.

Failure of a single day metronidazole desensitization protocol, and success of a modified two-day protocol in an outpatient setting.

BACKGROUND: True allergy to metronidazole, a common anti-infective in clinical practice, is rarely reported in the literature. In the case of Trichomonas, there are few alternatives to the nitrimidazole class of drugs, and the alternatives that do exist are associated with worse clinical outcomes. Accordingly, for the rare patients with Type 1 hypersensitivity reactions to metronidazole but compelling need, desensitization protocols have been adapted previously. Reactions during these protocols appear common. Patients in previous regimens have required higher level care for observation, which is costly and resource-intensive. CASE PRESENTATION: We report here on a successful outpatient two-day regimen for metronidazole desensitization. Our patient had compelling indication for metronidazole, but reacted after receiving the very first dose of a previously described desensitization protocol. Accordingly, the protocol was adapted further. Despite this, she went on to develop objective hives prior to reaching the full intended dose. With appropriate symptom management and pre-medication on the second day in clinic, she was successfully desensitized and able to complete a week of full-dose metronidazole. No acute care resources were needed. CONCLUSION: We propose this two-day desensitization regimen for patients who react during the previously described desensitization protocols. This regimen was effective and safe, and did not necessitate the use of acute-care resources. Two-day desensitization protocols while relatively uncommon, can be successful.

Impact of lanadelumab in hereditary angioedema: a case series of 12 patients in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare autosomal dominant disease resulting in recurring episodes of swelling, leading to considerable patient morbidity and mortality. Lanadelumab is a plasma kallikrein inhibitor that is approved as 1st line therapy in Canada for long term prophylaxis of HAE attacks. OBJECTIVE: To describe our clinical findings from a case series of adult patients with HAE type 1/2 who have been initiated on lanadelumab. METHODS: A chart review of HAE type 1/2 patients at three academic centers in Canada was undertaken with demographic and clinical data extracted. Patients were included if they had been receiving lanadelumab for at least 6 months. Patients with other causes of angioedema were excluded. RESULTS: 12 patients meeting enrollment criteria were identified. Compared to pre-lanadelumab, patients had mean reductions of 72% and 62% in attack rate and treated attack rate respectively. 3 patients reported complete remission from attacks after starting lanadelumab. Most patients had significant improvements in HAE impact on social outings. CONCLUSION: Our case series findings support the 2019 International/Canadian HAE guideline that lanadelumab is an effective therapy for long term prophylaxis. In our patient population, initiation of lanadelumab improved disease control, minimized the burden of treatment and improved HAE impact on social outings.

Natural history, prognostic factors and patient perceived response to treatment in chronic spontaneous urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Although the diagnosis and management of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is well documented in the literature, some aspects of the disease remain unclear. We aimed to further describe the natural history, prognostic factors, humanistic burden and uptake of traditional and alternative therapies in patients with CSU. METHODS: This was a prospective, cross-sectional analysis at a single centre. We reviewed patient medical records and conducted a survey in patients with CSU. RESULTS: 72 patients participated in the study with a median duration of CSU of 48 months. 30% of patients had symptoms that resolved in under 2 years with these patients trending towards an older age of onset of CSU (48 ± 17 years). 16% of patients had symptoms lasting 10 years or longer with these patients trending towards a younger age of onset (22 ± 16 years). Patients with a relapsing/remitting disease course (31%) and those with co-existing angioedema (57%) trended towards a longer median duration of CSU (96 and 50 months respectively) and were observed to have a higher proportion of patients reporting CSU duration of 10 years or longer (33% and 25%, p = 0.033 and p = 0.036 respectively). Patients with co-existing autoimmune/thyroid disease (19%) trended towards a shorter median duration of CSU (37 months). 54 patients (75%) reported sleep disturbance and 29 patients (43%) required emergency room visit(s) for symptomatic control. 84% of patients who trialed second generation antihistamines reported a response to treatment, while 73% of patients who trialed omalizumab reported a response to treatment. Patients using alternative medicine such as acupuncture, traditional Chinese medicine and naturopathic medicine had lower reported response rates (20-29%) to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The natural history of CSU may be longer than previously reported with our study finding a median duration of symptoms of nearly 4 years with one-third of patients reporting a relapsing/remitting disease course. Younger age of onset, a relapsing/remitting disease course and angioedema may predict a longer duration of CSU, whereas older age of onset and co-existing autoimmune/thyroid disease may predict a shorter duration of CSU. Reported symptomatic benefit was higher from guidelines based pharmacologic therapy versus various alternative medicines.

Colorectal and anal cancer in HIV/AIDS patients: a comprehensive review.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has significantly altered the epidemiology of cancer that is diagnosed in individuals who are infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Studies have shown a dramatic decrease in the incidence of and mortality from AIDS-related malignancies (primarily Kaposi sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma), while the incidence of and mortality from non-AIDS defining malignancies is on the rise. While the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in HIV-infected individuals is controversial and has received limited study, there has been accumulating evidence that suggests an increased risk of developing anal cancer (AC) during the HAART era. This article reviews the current literature reporting on CRC and AC in the HIV-infected population, with a specific on cancer: incidence, screening, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes.

Colon and rectal cancer after renal transplantation.

Increased cancer risk after renal transplantation is believed to be a consequence of continuous immunosuppression. However, the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) after renal transplantation is controversial and has received limited study. Accumulating evidence suggests that colon and rectal cancers have different characteristics in the post-renal transplant patient (PRTP) and should be evaluated separately in transplant registries. This article reviews the current literature evaluating CRC diagnosed in PRTPs, focusing on clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes.