3-month surgical outcomes of Implantable Collamer Lens implantation for myopic regression after laser vision correction surgeries: a retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the surgical outcomes of implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation in eyes with residual myopia after primary laser vision correction (LVC) surgeries. METHODS: This study included patients who underwent ICL implantation and had a history of LVC surgery, including photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Visual acuity and refractive error were assessed pre and 3-months postoperatively and the efficacy and safety indices calculated accordingly. RESULTS: A total of 30 eyes of 17 patients were included in this study. At 3 months, the mean logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and spherical equivalent were - 0.03 ± 0.11 (include logMAR), - 0.04 ± 0.09 (include logMAR), and - 0.06 ± 0.33 diopters (D), respectively. The 3-month Snellen UDVA was better than 20/20 for 83% of eyes, and 97% of eyes showed an unchanged or improved CDVA after surgery. The mean efficacy and safety indices were 1.11 ± 0.22 and 1.13 ± 0.20, respectively. Further, 93 and 100% of eyes were within ±0.5 and ± 1.0 D of the attempted spherical equivalent refraction, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ICL implantation in eyes with myopic regression after previous LVC surgery showed safe, effective, and predictable outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: retrospectively registered.

Effect of corneal curvature on optical zone decentration and its impact on astigmatism and higher-order aberrations in SMILE and LASIK.

PURPOSE: To determine the association between anterior corneal curvature and optical zone centration as well as its impact on aberration profiles in small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: Seventy-eight eyes of 78 patients treated with SMILE (45 eyes) and LASIK (33 eyes) were included. The centration of the optical zone was evaluated on the instantaneous curvature difference map between the preoperative and 3-month postoperative scans using a superimposed set of concentric circles. The correlation between optical zone decentration and anterior keratometry values was evaluated. The effect of optical zone decentration on vector components of astigmatic correction and induction of higher-order aberrations (HOA) was assessed. RESULTS: The mean decentration distance was 0.21 ± 0.11 mm for SMILE and 0.20 ± 0.09 mm for LASIK (p = 0.808). There was a significant correlation between anterior keratometric astigmatism and decentration distance (r = 0.653, p < 0.001) for SMILE but not for LASIK (r = - 0.264, p = 0.138). Astigmatic correction was performed in 67 eyes. Optical zone decentration and the vector components of astigmatic correction were not correlated (p ≥ 0.420). Significant correlation was demonstrated between the decentration distance and the induced total coma (SMILE: r = 0.384, p = 0.009; LASIK: r = 0.553, p = 0.001) as well as the induced total HOA (SMILE: r = 0.498, p = 0.001; LASIK: r = 0.555, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Anterior cornea astigmatism affected the treatment centration in SMILE but not LASIK. Subclinical decentration was associated with the induction of total coma and total HOA, but it did not affect the lower-order astigmatic correction.

Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes of V4c Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation: Longitudinal Analysis of Visual Acuity, Endothelial Cell Density, and Vault Dynamics.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of V4c Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation for myopia correction over a 10-year period. DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series METHODS: This retrospective interventional study involved 103 myopic eyes from 54 patients. Visual outcomes, including visual acuity and manifest refraction were assessed. Annual measurements of endothelial cell density (ECD), vault, anterior chamber depth, and intraocular pressure were analyzed using mixed-effects models. RESULTS: At the 10-year follow-up, the mean Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were -0.037 ± 0.052 and -0.041 ± 0.046, respectively. The mean efficacy and safety indices were 1.11 ± 0.13 and 1.12 ± 0.12. A loss of one line of CDVA occurred in 2% of cases, while 59% gained one or more lines. Postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was within ±0.5 diopters (D) and ±1.0 D in 74% and 99% of cases, respectively, with a mean MRSE of -0.19 ± 0.41 D. Data for ECD and vault fit an exponential decay model, demonstrating a continuous yet gradually slowing decrease over time. Decay rates were 0.012 ± 0.001 per year for ECD and 0.056 ± 0.003 per year for the vault. Notably, ECD lower outliers had significantly lower preoperative ECD values. There were no instances of cataract formation, angle closure, glaucoma, or ICL removal throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: The 10-year outcomes of V4c ICL implantation demonstrate effective and safe visual results. Both ECD and vault exhibit exponential decay patterns over the decade. Patients with lower preoperative ECD values require careful post-implantation monitoring.

Presbyopia correction using the monocular bi-aspheric ablation profile in myopic eyes.

PURPOSE: To analyze the 6-month outcomes of the treatment combination of the monocular bi-aspheric ablation profile (PresbyMAX) and contralateral aspheric monofocal laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ablation profile for correction of myopia and presbyopia. SETTING: Yonsei University College of Medicine and Eyereum Eye Clinic, Seoul, South Korea. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: This was a retrospective case review of 92 patients (184 eyes) diagnosed with myopia who underwent uneventful simultaneous bi-aspheric ablation in the nondominant eye and aspheric monofocal regular LASIK in the dominant eye to correct myopia and presbyopia between January 2017 and August 2020. Monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and near visual acuity (UNVA), and corrected distance visual acuity and near visual acuity were analyzed postoperatively. RESULTS: At 6 months postoperatively, the mean UDVAs (logMAR) in the dominant and nondominant eyes were 0.01 ± 0.02 and 0.26 ± 0.15, respectively. Furthermore, all treated dominant eyes achieved 20/20 or better monocular UDVA, and 84% achieved 20/16 or better monocular UDVA. In the nondominant treated eyes, 89% achieved 20/50 or better monocular UDVA, 78% achieved 20/40 or better, and 34% achieved 20/32 or better. The binocular cumulative UDVA at 6 months postoperatively was 20/20 or better in all patients. All patients achieved J2 or better in binocular cumulative UNVA, and 83% achieved J1. CONCLUSIONS: Presbyopia correction using the combination of PresbyMAX in the near eye and aspheric monofocal regular LASIK in the distant eye is a safe and effective treatment for presbyopia in patients with myopia.

Customized Wavefront-Optimized Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy for a Retained Lenticule Fragment After Primary SMILE.

PURPOSE: To describe the surgical outcomes after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for a case of retained intrastromal lenticule fragment after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: Transepithelial PRK was performed to minimize corneal irregularity and to correct residual refractive errors in a patient who had undergone failed lenticule extraction, which resulted in a refractive lenticule fragment being retained for 14 months after primary SMILE. RESULTS: At the postoperative 6-month visit, uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity improved to 20/20 and 20/20, respectively, and corneal tomography depicted normalization of the corneal surface. Corneal higher order aberrations, including coma, trefoil, and spherical aberration, were markedly reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Transepithelial PRK is a potential option for the management of a retained lenticule fragment after primary SMILE. [J Refract Surg. 2020;36(6):395-399.].