Application of Deep Learning-Based Denoising Technique for Radiation Dose Reduction in Dynamic Abdominal CT: Comparison with Standard-Dose CT Using Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction Method.

The purpose is to evaluate whether deep learning-based denoising (DLD) algorithm provides sufficient image quality for abdominal computed tomography (CT) with a 30% reduction in radiation dose, compared to standard-dose CT reconstructed with conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR). The subjects consisted of 50 patients who underwent abdominal CT with standard dose and reconstructed with hybrid IR (ASiR-V50%) and another 50 patients who underwent abdominal CT with approximately 30% less dose and reconstructed with ASiR-V50% and DLD at low-, medium- and high-strength (DLD-L, DLD-M and DLD-H, respectively). The standard deviation of attenuation in liver parenchyma was measured as image noise. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for portal vein on portal venous phase was calculated. Lesion conspicuity in 23 abdominal solid mass on the reduced-dose CT was rated on a 5-point scale: 0 (best) to -4 (markedly inferior). Compared with hybrid IR of standard-dose CT, DLD-H of reduced-dose CT provided significantly lower image noise (portal phase: 9.0 (interquartile range, 8.7-9.4) HU vs 12.0 (11.4-12.7) HU, P < 0.0001) and significantly higher CNR (median, 5.8 (4.4-7.4) vs 4.3 (3.3-5.3), P = 0.0019). As for DLD-M of reduced-dose CT, no significant difference was found in image noise and CNR compared to hybrid IR of standard-dose CT (P > 0.99). Lesion conspicuity scores for DLD-H and DLD-M were significantly better than hybrid IR (P < 0.05). Dynamic contrast-enhanced abdominal CT acquired with approximately 30% lower radiation dose and generated with the DLD algorithm exhibit lower image noise and higher CNR compared to standard-dose CT with hybrid IR.

Deep learning image reconstruction for improving image quality of contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT in abdomen.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the usefulness of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) to improve the image quality of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) of the abdomen, compared to hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR). METHODS: This study included 40 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced DECT of the abdomen. Virtual monochromatic 40-, 50-, and 70-keV and iodine density images were reconstructed using three reconstruction algorithms, including hybrid IR (ASiR-V50%) and DLIR (TrueFidelity) at medium- and high-strength level (DLIR-M and DLIR-H, respectively). The standard deviation of attenuation in liver parenchyma was measured as image noise. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for the portal vein on portal venous phase CT was calculated. The vessel conspicuity and overall image quality were graded on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). The comparative scale of lesion conspicuity in 47 abdominal solid lesions was evaluated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (best) to -4 (markedly inferior). RESULTS: The image noise of virtual monochromatic 40-, 50 -, and 70-keV and iodine density images was significantly decreased by DLIR compared to hybrid IR (p < 0.0001). The CNR was significantly higher in DLIR-H and DLIR-M than in hybrid IR (p < 0.0001). The vessel conspicuity and overall image quality scores were also significantly greater in DLIR-H and DLIR-M than in hybrid IR (p < 0.05). The lesion conspicuity scores for DLIR-M and DLIR-H were significantly higher than those for hybrid IR in the virtual monochromatic image of all energy levels (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DLIR improves vessel conspicuity, CNR, and lesion conspicuity of virtual monochromatic and iodine density images in abdominal contrast-enhanced DECT, compared to hybrid IR. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) is useful for reducing image noise and improving the CNR of visual monochromatic 40-, 50-, and 70-keV images in dual-energy CT. • DLIR can improve lesion conspicuity of abdominal solid lesions on virtual monochromatic images compared to hybrid iterative reconstruction. • DLIR can also be applied to iodine density maps and significantly improves their image quality.

Disruption of the glomerular basement membrane associated with nutcracker syndrome and double inferior vena cava in Noonan syndrome: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Nutcracker syndrome (NCS) is characterized by compression of the left renal vein (LRV) between the aorta and the superior mesenteric artery. While rare, NCS was reported to be accompanied by double inferior vena cava (IVC). We herein report a case of Noonan syndrome (NS) with double IVC who presented with macrohematuria and proteinuria. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 23-year-old man, who had been diagnosed with NS due to RIT1 mutation, after showing foamy macrohematuria 3 weeks previously. A physical examination revealed low-set ears and a webbed neck. A urinalysis showed hematuria and proteinuria, and urinary sediments showed more than 100 isomorphic red blood cells per high-power field. His proteinuria and albuminuria concentrations were 7.1 and 4.5 g/g⋅Cr, respectively. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed double IVC and narrowing of the LRV after interflow of the left IVC. The aortomesenteric angle on a sagittal reconstruction of the CT image was 14.7°. Cystoscopy revealed a flow of macrohematuria from the left ureteral opening. On Doppler ultrasonography, there was scant evidence to raise the suspicion of the nutcracker phenomenon. Since severe albuminuria continued, a left kidney biopsy was performed. Light microscopy showed red blood cells in Bowman's space and the tubular lumen. Electron microscopy revealed disruption of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM). Vulnerability of the GBM was suspected and a genetic analysis revealed a heterozygous mutation at c.4793 T > G (p.L1598R) in the COL4A3 gene. Screening for coagulation disorders revealed the factor VIII and von Willebrand factor (vWF) values were low, at 47.6 and 23%, respectively. A multimer analysis of vWF showed a normal multimer pattern and he was diagnosed with von Willebrand disease type 1. As the bleeding tendency was mild, replacement of factor VIII was not performed. His macrohematuria and proteinuria improved gradually without treatment, and his urinalysis results have been normal for more than 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The present case showed macrohematuria and proteinuria due to NCS in NS with double IVC and von Willebrand disease type 1. The macrohematuria and proteinuria originated from glomerular hemorrhage because of vulnerability of the GBM due to COL4A3 mutation.

The Usefulness of Low-Kiloelectron Volt Virtual Monochromatic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Technique in Improving the Delineation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

To evaluate the usefulness of low-keV multiphasic computed tomography (CT) with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in improving the delineation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) compared to conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR). Thirty-five patients with PDAC who underwent multiphasic CT were retrospectively evaluated. Raw data were reconstructed with two energy levels (40 keV and 70 keV) of virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) using HIR (ASiR-V50%) and DLIR (TrueFidelity-H). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNRtumor) was calculated from the CT values within regions of interest in tumor and normal pancreas in the pancreatic parenchymal phase images. Lesion conspicuity of PDAC in pancreatic parenchymal phase on 40-keV HIR, 40-keV DLIR, and 70-keV DLIR images was qualitatively rated on a 5-point scale, using 70-keV HIR images as reference (score 1 = poor; score 3 = equivalent to reference; score 5 = excellent) by two radiologists. CNRtumor of 40-keV DLIR images (median 10.4, interquartile range (IQR) 7.8-14.9) was significantly higher than that of the other VMIs (40 keV HIR, median 6.2, IQR 4.4-8.5, P < 0.0001; 70-keV DLIR, median 6.3, IQR 5.1-9.9, P = 0.0002; 70-keV HIR, median 4.2, IQR 3.1-6.1, P < 0.0001). CNRtumor of 40-keV DLIR images were significantly better than those of the 40-keV HIR and 70-keV HIR images by 72 ± 22% and 211 ± 340%, respectively. Lesion conspicuity scores on 40-keV DLIR images (observer 1, 4.5 ± 0.7; observer 2, 3.4 ± 0.5) were significantly higher than on 40-keV HIR (observer 1, 3.3 ± 0.9, P < 0.0001; observer 2, 3.1 ± 0.4, P = 0.013). DLIR is a promising reconstruction method to improve PDAC delineation in 40-keV VMI at the pancreatic parenchymal phase compared to conventional HIR.

Deep learning image reconstruction for improvement of image quality of abdominal computed tomography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) to enhance the image quality of abdominal CT, compared to iterative reconstruction technique. METHOD: Pre and post-contrast abdominal CT images in 50 patients were reconstructed with 2 different algorithms: hybrid iterative reconstruction (hybrid IR: ASiR-V 50%) and DLIR (TrueFidelity). Standard deviation of attenuation in normal liver parenchyma was measured as the image noise on pre and post-contrast CT. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for the aorta, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver were calculated on post-contrast CT. The overall image quality was graded on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). RESULTS: The image noise was significantly decreased by DLIR compared to hybrid-IR [hybrid IR, median 8.3 Hounsfield unit (HU) (interquartile range (IQR) 7.6-9.2 HU); DLIR, median 5.2 HU (IQR 4.6-5.8), P < 0.0001 for post-contrast CT]. The CNR and SNR were significantly improved by DLIR [CNR, median 4.5 (IQR 3.8-5.6) vs 7.3 (IQR 6.2-8.8), P < 0.0001; SNR, median 9.4 (IQR 8.3-10.1) vs 15.0 (IQR 13.2-16.4), P < 0.0001]. The overall image quality score was also higher for DLIR compared to hybrid-IR (hybrid IR 3.1 ± 0.6 vs DLIR 4.6 ± 0.5, P < 0.0001 for post-contrast CT). CONCLUSIONS: Image noise, overall image quality, CNR and SNR for abdominal CT images are improved with DLIR compared to hybrid IR.

Usefulness of dictionary learning-based processing for improving image quality of sub-millisievert low-dose chest CT: initial experience.

PURPOSE: To develop a dictionary learning (DL)-based processing technique for improving the image quality of sub-millisievert chest computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standard-dose and sub-millisievert chest CT were acquired in 12 patients. Dictionaries including standard- and low-dose image patches were generated from the CT datasets. For each patient, DL-based processing was performed for low-dose CT using the dictionaries generated from the remaining 11 patients. This procedure was repeated for all 12 patients. Image quality of normal thoracic structures on the processed sub-millisievert CT images was assessed with a 5-point scale (5 = excellent, 1 = very poor). Lung lesion conspicuity was also assessed on a 5-point scale. RESULTS: Image noise on sub-millisievert CT was significantly decreased with DL-based image processing (48.5 ± 13.7 HU vs 20.4 ± 7.9 HU, p = 0.0005). Image quality of lung structures was significantly improved with DL-based method (middle level of lung, 2.25 ± 0.75 vs 2.92 ± 0.79, p = 0.0078). Lung lesion conspicuity was also significantly improved with DL-based technique (solid nodules, 3.4 ± 0.6 vs 2.7 ± 0.6, p = 0.0273). CONCLUSION: Image quality and lesion conspicuity on sub-millisievert chest CT images may be improved by DL-based post-processing.