Relationship between political partisanship and COVID-19 deaths: future implications for public health.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has impacted more than 200 countries. However in the USA, the response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been politically polarized. The objective of this study is to investigate the association between political partisanship and COVID-19 deaths rates in the USA. METHODS: This study used longitudinal county-level panel data, segmented into 10 30-day time periods, consisting of all counties in the USA, from 22 January 2020 to 5 December 2020. The outcome measure is the total number of COVID-19 deaths per 30-day period. The key explanatory variable is county political partisanship, dichotomized as Democratic or Republican. The analysis used a ZINB regression. RESULTS: When compared with Republican counties, COVID-19 death rates in Democratic counties were significantly higher (IRRs ranged from 2.0 to 18.3, P < 0.001) in Time 1-Time 5, but in Time 9-Time10, were significantly lower (IRRs ranged from 0.43 to 0.69, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The reversed trend in COVID-19 death rates between Democratic and Republican counties was influenced by the political polarized response to the pandemic. The findings support the necessity of evidence-based public health leadership and management in maneuvering the USA out of the current COVID-19 pandemic and prepare for future public health crises.

Analysis of Injuries in Competitive Equestrian Events.

OBJECTIVE: Current equestrian sport-related acute injury research is sparse. The goal of this study is to explore equestrian injury types stratified by population and equestrian discipline. DESIGN: Injury reports from the US Equestrian Federation (USEF) were compiled from 2015 through 2019, and the prevalence of different injury types within the main equestrian disciplines was calculated. SETTING: Retrospective cohort study from USEF accident report data. PARTICIPANTS: Athletes competing at USEF sanctioned equestrian events. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Equestrian participant's age group, sex, and equestrian event type are the independent variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of types of injuries in equestrian events stratified by equestrian discipline, age (junior vs senior), and sex. RESULTS: Three thousand four hundred thirty equestrian athletes injured from 441 816 total athlete exposures during 2015 to 2019 were analyzed showing an injury rate between 0.06% and 1.18% for each discipline with an overall injury rate of 780 per 100 000 athlete exposures. Hunter-jumper and 3-day eventing had the highest injury rates. Head injuries and bone injuries were the most common types. No clinically significant differences in injury rates were observed between males and females or junior and senior equestrian athletes. CONCLUSIONS: Equestrian sports have an overall injury rate of 780 per 100 000 athlete exposures in the certified competition setting. Hunter-jumper and 3-day eventing have an increased injury rate compared with nonjumping disciplines. These data should help equestrian event clinicians to anticipate the types of injuries and help outpatient clinicians make preparticipation medical eligibility and assist in counseling for equestrian sports.

Association of Insurance Status With Treatment and Outcomes in Pediatric Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a health insurance disparity exists among pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury using the National Trauma Data Bank. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: National Trauma Data Bank, a dataset containing more than 800 trauma centers in the United States. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients (< 18 yr old) with a severe isolated traumatic brain injury were identified in the National Trauma Database (years 2007-2016). Isolated traumatic brain injury was defined as patients with a head Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3+ and excluded those with another regional Abbreviated Injury Scale of 3+. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Procedure codes were used to identify four primary treatment approaches combined into two classifications: craniotomy/craniectomy and external ventricular draining/intracranial pressure monitoring. Diagnostic criteria and procedure codes were used to identify condition at admission, including hypotension, Glasgow Coma Scale, mechanism and intent of injury, and Injury Severity Score. Children were propensity score matched using condition at admission and other characteristics to estimate multivariable logistic regression models to assess the associations among insurance status, treatment, and outcomes. Among the 12,449 identified patients, 91.0% (n = 11,326) had insurance and 9.0% (n = 1,123) were uninsured. Uninsured patients had worse condition at admission with higher rates of hypotension and higher Injury Severity Score, when compared with publicly and privately insured patients. After propensity score matching, having insurance was associated with a 32% (p = 0.001) and 54% (p < 0.001) increase in the odds of cranial procedures and monitor placement, respectively. Insurance coverage was associated with 25% lower odds of inpatient mortality (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with insured pediatric patients with a traumatic brain injury, uninsured patients were in worse condition at admission and received fewer interventional procedures with a greater odds of inpatient mortality. Equalizing outcomes for uninsured children following traumatic brain injury requires a greater understanding of the factors that lead to worse condition at admission and policies to address treatment disparities if causality can be identified.

ROTEM as a Predictor of Mortality in Patients With Severe Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage, especially when complicated by coagulopathy, is the most preventable cause of death in trauma patients. We hypothesized that assessing hemostatic function using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) or conventional coagulation tests can predict the risk of mortality in patients with severe trauma indicated by an injury severity score greater than 15. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed trauma patients with an injury severity score >15 who were admitted to the emergency department between November 2015 and August 2017 in a single level I trauma center. Patients with available ROTEM and conventional coagulation data (partial thromboplastin time [PTT], prothrombin time [PT], and international normalized ratio) were included in the study cohort. Logistic regression was performed to assess the relationship between coagulation status and mortality. RESULTS: The study cohort included 301 patients with an average age of 47 y, and 75% of the patients were males. Mortality was 23% (n = 68). Significant predictors of mortality included abnormal APTEM (thromboelastometry (TEM) assay in which fibrinolysis is inhibited by aprotinin (AP) in the reagent) parameters, specifically a low APTEM alpha angle, a high APTEM clot formation time, and a high APTEM clotting time. In addition, an abnormal international normalized ratio significantly predicted mortality, whereas abnormal PT and PTT did not. CONCLUSIONS: A low APTEM alpha angle, an elevated APTEM clot formation time, and a high APTEM clotting time significantly predicted mortality, whereas abnormal PT and PTT did not appear to be associated with increased mortality in this patient population. Viscoelastic testing such as ROTEM appears to have indications in the management and stabilization of trauma patients.

Is It Safe to Fly Patients with Penetrating Trauma in a Rural State?

BACKGROUND: There is limited data pertaining to the triage and transportation of patients with penetrating trauma in rural states. Large urban trauma centers have found rapid transport to be beneficial even when done by nonemergency medical staff. However, there is limited application to a rural state with only a single level 1 trauma center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This a retrospective observational study of 854 trauma patients transported by helicopter emergency services between 2009 and 2015 to the state's only level 1 trauma center. RESULTS: After excluding patients with other injuries or lack of data, 854 patients underwent final analysis. Compared with penetrating trauma, blunt trauma had a significantly different chance of survival (92.0% versus 81.2%, P = 0.002) and a significantly different injury severity score (17 ± 12 versus 12 ± 9, P = 0.002). After controlling for blunt injuries, age, gender, injury severity score, tachycardia, tachypnea, hypotension, glasgow coma scale, and dispatch to hospital arrival time in multivariate analysis, blunt trauma had higher odds of survival than penetrating trauma (OR, 5.97; 95% CI, 2.52-14.12; P = <0.001 = 1). Gender, tachycardia, tachypnea, and dispatch to arrival time did not impact a patient's likelihood of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Penetrating trauma has a higher mortality when compared with blunt trauma in Helicopter Emergency Services transported patients in a rural state. Perhaps a new algorithm in the management of penetrating trauma would include hemorrhage control at a locoregional hospital before definitive care. Further study is required to understand the exact variables that lead to a higher mortality in penetrating trauma in a rural state.

Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Vascular Patient Amputation Rates in Arkansas.

BACKGROUND: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed into law in 2010 and enacted in 2013 which improved insurance coverage across America due to increasing Medicaid eligibility as well as changes to individual insurance markets. In Arkansas, this was implemented by a Medicaid expansion waiver which allowed patients to purchase insurance with funds provided by the government to subsidize premiums through the marketplace. The goal of this study was to determine the effects of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on Arkansas patients with peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: A pre-post research design using the Arkansas Hospital Discharge Dataset was used to study the impact of the ACA on limb amputation, distal bypass, discharge disposition, and total costs for patients diagnosed with peripheral arterial disease/atherosclerosis. The data were obtained for the years 2007 through 2009 (pre-ACA), 2011 through 2013 (post-ACA), and 2014 through 2015 (post-Arkansas expansion). Bivariate analysis, analysis of variance, and regression analyses were performed to analyze the data. RESULTS: A total of 10,923 patients were identified. Uninsured patients ("self-pay") decreased from 7% pre-ACA to 3.4% post-Arkansas expansion (P < 0.0001). There was a decrease in adjusted health-care costs after the Arkansas expansion (P < 0.0001). There was no change in mortality or transfer to rehabilitation facilities, but there was an increase in discharge to skilled nursing facilities along with a decrease in patients being discharged home (P < 0.0001). Regression analysis showed private insurance to be associated with a 49% reduction in the odds of an amputation (P < 0.0001). The Arkansas expansion was associated with a 26% reduction in the odds of an amputation when compared with that before the ACA implementation (P < 0.005). Having private insurance was associated with a 26% increase in the odds of having a bypass when compared with uninsured patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with private insurance have a decreased chance of amputation and increased odds of having a bypass when compared with patients who were of the self-pay category. The increase in private insurance coverage in our patient population could improve the rate of amputation in the vascular population in Arkansas by increasing early interventions for peripheral vascular disease.

Mandated 30-minute Scene Time Interval Correlates With Improved Return of Spontaneous Circulation at Emergency Department Arrival: A Before and After Study.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting ideas exist about whether or not Emergency Medical Service (EMS) personnel should treat a cardiac arrest on scene or transport immediately. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to examine patient outcomes before and after an urban EMS system implemented a protocol change mandating a 30-min scene time interval (STI) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study of OHCA patients before and after an EMS protocol change mandating resuscitation on scene. Data were retrieved from an EMS cardiac arrest database for all adults with non-traumatic OHCA between January 2015 and August 2016. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the study population, and a regression model was used to determine the associations of the protocol with the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). RESULTS: A total of 633 patients were included in the study population, which was primarily male (61.3%) with a mean age of 65 years. After the 30-min STI was implemented, ROSC from OHCA increased to 40.1% of cases compared to 27.3% before the protocol change (p = 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.053-0.203). The STI increased from 19 min 23 s to 29 min 40 s in the pre and post periods, respectively (p < 0.001). Regression indicated that the protocol change was independently associated with an improved chance of ROSC (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.23-2.64). CONCLUSIONS: A protocol change mandating a 30-min STI in OHCA correlated with increased STI and increased ROSC. While increased ROSC may not always equate with positive neurologic outcome, logistic regression indicated that the protocol change was independently associated with improved ROSC at emergency department arrival.

Four Needles in a Haystack: A Systematic Review Assessing Quality of Health Care in Specialty Practice by Practice Type.

Specialists, who represent 60% of physicians in the United States, are consolidating into large group practices, but the degree to which group practice type facilitates the delivery of high quality of care in specialty settings is unknown. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify the impact of group practice type on the quality of care among specialty providers. The search resulted in 913 articles, of which only 4 met inclusion criteria. Studies were of moderate methodological quality. From the limited evidence available, we hypothesize that solo specialists deliver care that is inferior to their peers in group practice, whether measured by patient satisfaction ratings or adherence to guideline-based care. However, solo specialists and multidisciplinary group specialists may be more likely to provide some specialized services compared with their single-specialty group peers. Insufficient research compares quality of care among different practice types in specialty care. Substantial opportunity exists to test the degree to which organizational factors, whether size of practice or the mix of providers within the practice, influence quality of care in specialty settings.

The Effect of the Magnet Recognition Signal on Hospital Financial Performance.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the Magnet Recognition (MR) signal on hospital financial performance. MR is a quality designation granted by the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC). Growing evidence shows that MR hospitals are associated with various interrelated positive outcomes that have been theorized to affect hospital financial performance.In this study, which covered the period from 2000 to 2010, we applied a pre-post research design using a longitudinal, unbalanced panel of MR hospitals and hospitals that had never received MR designation located in urban areas in the United States. We obtained data for this analysis from Medicare's Hospital Cost Report Information System, the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database, the Health Resources & Services Administration's Area Resource File, and the ANCC website. Propensity score matching was used to construct the final study sample. We then applied a difference-in-difference model with hospital fixed effects to the matched hospital sample to test the effect of the MR signal, while controlling for both hospital and market characteristics.According to signaling theory, signals aim to reduce the imbalance of information between two parties, such as patients and providers. The MR signal was found to have a significant positive effect on hospital financial performance. These findings support claims in the literature that the nonfinancial benefits resulting from MR lead to improved financial performance. In the current healthcare environment in which reimbursement is increasingly tied to delivery of quality care, healthcare executives may be encouraged to pursue MR to help hospitals maintain their financial viability while improving quality of care.

Financial Performance of Hospitals in the Mississippi Delta Region Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and Hospital Value-based Purchasing Program.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed that the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) and the Hospital Value-based Purchasing Program (HVBP) disproportionately penalized hospitals caring for the poor. The Mississippi Delta Region (Delta Region) is among the most socioeconomically disadvantaged areas in the United States. The financial performance of hospitals in the Delta Region under both HRRP and HVBP remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare the differences in financial performance under both HRRP and HVBP between hospitals in the Delta Region (Delta hospitals) and others in the nation (non-Delta hospitals). RESEARCH DESIGN: We used a 7-year panel dataset and applied difference-in-difference models to examine operating and total margin between Delta and non-Delta hospitals in 3 time periods: preperiod (2008-2010); postperiod 1 (2011-2012); and postperiod 2 (2013-2014). RESULTS: The Delta hospitals had a 0.89% and 4.24% reduction in operating margin in postperiods 1 and 2, respectively, whereas the non-Delta hospitals had 1.13% and 1% increases in operating margin in postperiods 1 and 2, respectively. The disparity in total margins also widened as Delta hospitals had a 1.98% increase in postperiod 1, but a 0.30% reduction in postperiod 2, whereas non-Delta hospitals had 1.27% and 2.28% increases in postperiods 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The gap in financial performance between Delta and non-Delta hospitals widened following the implementation of HRRP and HVBP. Policy makers should modify these 2 programs to ensure that resources are not moved from the communities that need them most.