RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether there is an association between ß-globin (HBB) pathogenic variants and fetal fraction (FF), and whether the association has a clinically relevant impact on non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS). METHOD: A whole-genome sequencing NIPS laboratory database was retrospectively queried for women who underwent NIPS and carrier screening of both HBB and the α-globin genes (HBA1/HBA2). Women affected with either condition were excluded from the study, yielding a cohort size of 15,853. A "corrected FF" was obtained via multivariable linear regression adjusted for the systematic impacts of maternal age, gestational age and BMI. Corrected FF distributions of HBB and HBA1/HBA2 carriers were each compared to non-carriers using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. RESULTS: In this cohort, 291 women were carriers for HBB alone, and 1016 were carriers for HBA1/HBA2 alone. The HBB carriers had a lower corrected FF when compared to non-carriers (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in corrected FF among carriers and non-carriers of HBA1/HBA2. CONCLUSION: Carriers of pathogenic variants in the HBB gene, but not the HBA1/HBA2 genes, are more likely to have lower FF when compared to women with structurally normal hemoglobin. This decrease in FF could result in an elevated test-failure rate if FF thresholds were used.
Assuntos
Hemoglobinopatias , Teste Pré-Natal não Invasivo , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/genética , Hemoglobinopatias/diagnóstico , Hemoglobinopatias/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of three different carrier screening workflows designed to identify couples at risk for having offspring with autosomal recessive conditions. METHODS: Partner testing compliance, unnecessary testing, turnaround time, and ability to identify at-risk couples (ARCs) were measured across all three screening strategies (sequential, tandem, or tandem reflex). RESULTS: A total of 314,100 individuals who underwent carrier screening were analyzed. Sequential, tandem, and tandem reflex screening yielded compliance frequencies of 25.8%, 100%, and 95.9%, respectively. Among 14,595 couples tested in tandem, 42.2% of females were screen-negative, resulting in unnecessary testing of the male partner. In contrast, less than 1% of tandem reflex couples included unnecessary male testing. The median turnaround times were 29.2 days (sequential), 8 days (tandem), and 13.3 days (tandem reflex). The proportion of ARCs detected per total number of individual screens were 0.5% for sequential testing and 1.3% for both tandem and tandem reflex testing. CONCLUSION: The tandem reflex strategy simplifies a potentially complex clinical scenario by providing a mechanism by which providers can maximize partner compliance and the detection of at-risk couples while minimizing workflow burden and unnecessary testing and is more efficacious than both sequential and tandem screening strategies.
Assuntos
Triagem de Portadores Genéticos/métodos , Heterozigoto , Pais/psicologia , Feminino , Triagem de Portadores Genéticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Humanos , Cuidado Pré-Concepcional/métodos , Cuidado Pré-Concepcional/normas , Cuidado Pré-Concepcional/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fluxo de TrabalhoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fragile X syndrome (FXS, OMIM #300624) is an X-linked condition caused by trinucleotide repeat expansions in the 5' UTR (untranslated region) of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene. FXS testing is commonly performed in expanded carrier screening and has been proposed for inclusion in newborn screening. However, because pathogenic alleles are long and have low complexity (>200 CGG repeats), FXS is currently tested by a single-plex electrophoresis-resolved PCR assay rather than multiplexed approaches like next-generation sequencing or mass spectrometry. In this work, we sought an experimental design based on nonadaptive group testing that could accurately and reliably identify the size of abnormally expanded FMR1 alleles of males and females. METHODS: We developed a new group testing scheme named StairCase (SC) that was designed to the constraints of the FXS testing problem, and compared its performance to existing group testing schemes by simulation. We experimentally evaluated SC's performance on 210 samples from the Coriell Institute biorepositories using pooled PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis on 3 replicates of each of 3 pooling layouts differing by the mapping of samples to pools. RESULTS: The SC pooled PCR approach demonstrated perfect classification of samples by clinical category (normal, intermediate, premutation, or full mutation) for 90 positives and 1800 negatives, with a batch of 210 samples requiring only 21 assays. CONCLUSIONS: Group testing based on SC is an implementable approach to trinucleotide repeat expansion disorder testing that offers ≥10-fold reduction in assay costs over current single-plex methods.
Assuntos
Síndrome do Cromossomo X Frágil/genética , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Expansão das Repetições de Trinucleotídeos/genética , Feminino , Testes Genéticos/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Reação em Cadeia da PolimeraseRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) of common aneuploidies using cell-free DNA from maternal plasma is part of routine prenatal care and is widely used in both high-risk and low-risk patient populations. High specificity is needed for clinically acceptable positive predictive values. Maternal copy-number variants (mCNVs) have been reported as a source of false-positive aneuploidy results that compromises specificity. METHODS: We surveyed the mCNV landscape in 87,255 patients undergoing NIPS. We evaluated both previously reported and novel algorithmic strategies for mitigating the effects of mCNVs on the screen's specificity. Further, we analyzed the frequency, length, and positional distribution of CNVs in our large dataset to investigate the curation of novel fetal microdeletions, which can be identified by NIPS but are challenging to interpret clinically. RESULTS: mCNVs are common, with 65% of expecting mothers harboring an autosomal CNV spanning more than 200 kb, underscoring the need for robust NIPS analysis strategies. By analyzing empirical and simulated data, we found that general, outlier-robust strategies reduce the rate of mCNV-caused false positives but not as appreciably as algorithms specifically designed to account for mCNVs. We demonstrate that large-scale tabulation of CNVs identified via routine NIPS could be clinically useful: together with the gene density of a putative microdeletion region, we show that the region's relative tolerance to duplications versus deletions may aid the interpretation of microdeletion pathogenicity. CONCLUSIONS: Our study thoroughly investigates a common source of NIPS false positives and demonstrates how to bypass its corrupting effects. Our findings offer insight into the interpretation of NIPS results and inform the design of NIPS algorithms suitable for use in screening in the general obstetric population.