RESUMO
In the present study, we encountered a patient who developed intraabdominal lymphatic leakage after surgery for gastric cancer, underwent lymphangiography and lymphatic mass embolization, and developed severe lymphedema. The patient was a 55-year-old woman with gastric cancer with pancreatic invasion. Total gastrectomy and lymph node dissection were performed as conversion procedures. Six liters of ascites was detected postoperatively. Lymphangiography with Lipiodol injections into the bilateral inguinal lymph nodes was done three times, and Histoacryl embolization of the lymphatic leak was performed. However, edema of the lower extremities rapidly worsened. Lymphatic venous anastomosis was performed under general anesthesia. Anastomosis was performed at seven sites on the right and eight sites on the left. Postoperatively, the patient underwent compression therapy using the multilayer bandage method. The edema continued to improve further, and at 2 weeks postoperatively, the patient's weight had decreased by 21.4 kg from the preoperative weight, which was the same as that before the onset of edema. In this case, the patient's general condition was unstable due to cardiac insufficiency and other factors. Therefore, we aimed for an operation time of less than 3 hours. In addition, two surgeons performed the surgery to ensure an immediate therapeutic effect, and more anastomoses were performed than usual. After lymphatic venous anastomosis, not only the edema of both lower extremities but also the edema of the entire body improved promptly. One of the reasons for the improvement in general edema was thought to be due to increased intravascular protein and enhanced intravascular return of interstitial fluid.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The safety and outcome of breast reconstruction after radiotherapy are controversial, and the aesthetic aspects have not been studied extensively. We compared the results of vascular anastomosis, the incidence of postoperative complications, and aesthetic appearance between patients who had and had not received radiotherapy who then had undergone delayed breast reconstruction with autologous free flaps from the abdomen, thighs, and buttocks. METHODS: In total, 257 flaps in 241 patients were investigated; 194 and 63 flaps implanted in patients who did not receive radiotherapy and who received radiotherapy before breast reconstruction, respectively. Of the 257 flaps, 221, 20, 14, and 2 came from the abdomen, thighs, buttocks, and other anatomic locations, respectively. We evaluated aesthetic outcomes in 105 patients who had not received radiotherapy and 35 who had. RESULTS: We found no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of vascular reanastomosis, the time required for anastomosis, or the incidence of unplanned reoperation. Complications such as flap necrosis were rare in both groups. Aesthetic outcomes were significantly better in the patients who had not received radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Breast reconstruction with autologous free flaps can be performed safely in patients who have received radiotherapy, but the aesthetic result is slightly inferior to that in patients who had not received radiotherapy.