Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr ; 233: 119-125.e1, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33667506

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the long-term outcomes in pediatric liver transplant recipients after they have transferred to an adult provider and assess for racial disparities in health outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This is a single-center, retrospective review of pediatric patients who underwent liver transplantation between July 1990 and August 2015 at a tertiary healthcare system with a large transplant center. Patient mortality and retransplantation were assessed after transfer to adult care. RESULTS: There were 120 patients who were transferred, of whom 19 did not meet the inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 101 patients, 64 (63%) transferred care to a nearby affiliated tertiary adult facility, 29 (29%) were followed by other healthcare systems, and 8 (8%) were lost to follow-up. Of the patients followed at our affiliated adult center, 18 of the 64 (28%) died. Of those 18 deaths, 4 (22%) occurred within the first 2 years after transfer, and 10 (55%) within 5 years of transfer. Four patients were retransplanted by an adult provider, of whom 2 eventually received a third transplant. African Americans had higher rates of death after transfer than patients of other races (44% mortality vs 16%, representing 67% of all cases of death; P = .032), with nearly 50% mortality at 20 years from time of transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Death is common in pediatric liver transplant recipients after transfer to adult care, with African Americans having disproportionately higher mortality. This period of transition of care is a vulnerable time, and measures must be taken to ensure the safe transfer of young adults with chronic health care needs.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Hepatopatias/mortalidade , Transplante de Fígado , Transição para Assistência do Adulto , Transplantados , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/cirurgia , Humanos , Hepatopatias/cirurgia , Masculino , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 225(3): 335.e1-335.e7, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34052192

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A recent large clinical trial demonstrated an approximately 50% decrease in the rate of postoperative infection in women who were laboring and/or had rupture of membranes for >4 hours and who received azithromycin in addition to standard preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of cesarean delivery. Given these results, our institution made a policy change in May 2017 to add azithromycin to standard preoperative prophylaxis for all cesarean deliveries. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of adding azithromycin to preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a before-and-after cohort study of women delivered via cesarean delivery at our institution. The preimplementation group included women who delivered from March 1, 2016, to February 28, 2017, (before an institutional practice change of adding azithromycin to standard preoperative prophylaxis), and the postimplementation group included women who delivered from September 1, 2017, to August 31, 2018 (allowing a 6-month period for uptake of the practice change). The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative infections (endometritis, wound infection, other maternal infections). Unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using a modified Poisson regression model. RESULTS: In the preimplementation (n=1171) and postimplementation (n=1168) groups, the incidence rates of the composite outcomes were 4.7% and 5.3%, respectively (P=.49). Both unadjusted (relative risk, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.62) and adjusted (adjusted relative risk, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.52) comparisons were not significantly different. In addition, results were statistically nonsignificant, but in the direction of lower rates of infection, in the after cohort for women in labor and/or with rupture of membranes for ≥4 hours (relative risk, 0.88 [95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.39]; adjusted relative risk, 0.82 [95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.30]) and for women with clinical chorioamnionitis (relative risk, 0.37 [95% confidence interval, 0.08-1.67]; data too sparse for adjusted analysis). In the subgroup of women who were not in labor, the after cohort had a statistically nonsignificant increased risk of the composite outcome in both unadjusted (relative risk, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-2.72) and adjusted (adjusted relative risk, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-2.65]) comparisons. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, the addition of azithromycin to standard preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery may have an effect size smaller than seen in the large clinical trial prompting this practice change. Extrapolation of this regimen to women not in labor may be ineffective.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Cesárea , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefazolina/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Controlados Antes e Depois , Quimioterapia Combinada , Endometrite/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
3.
Obstet Gynecol ; 137(4): 750-751, 2021 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33706359
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa