Which type of soft tissue augmentation at dental implant sites is best supported by evidence?

Data sources PubMed, the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register and Embase. Additionally, issues of the following journals between 2000 and April 2019 were hand-searched: Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Journal of Periodontology, International Journal of Periodontology and Restorative Dentistry, European Journal of Oral Implantology, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, and Clinical Oral Implants Research.Study selection Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving soft tissue augmentation at dental implant sites were considered for inclusion. The selection was restricted to RCTs published in English language with at least ten patients per group and a minimum follow-up period of three months. A PICO method was used to organise the inclusion criteria and soft tissue augmentations were clustered into three groups; that is, before prosthetic treatment, after prosthetic treatment and at immediate implant placement.Data extraction and synthesis The screening of titles and abstracts was carried out by two reviewers and disagreements were moderated by a third reviewer. Eligibility was determined using full texts and data were extracted using purposefully designed forms. The Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions toolkit was used to assess the risk of bias. The studies were grouped according to the type of intervention and subjected to quantitative data synthesis. Continuous outcome measures were assessed using random-effects meta-analyses and pooled estimates were expressed as weighted mean differences (MDs) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results Following initial electronic and hand-searches, 2,119 studies were screened for title and abstract, and 32 studies were considered for full-text screening. Only 14 RCTs met the inclusion criteria and the remaining 18 studies were excluded from the systematic review. The included studies described soft tissue augmentation for 538 implants placed in 475 patients. Three studies (68 patients; 78 implants) reported improved soft tissue thickness with xenogenic collagen matrix (XCM) augmentation compared to no augmentation at the implant sites before prosthetic treatment (high/unclear risk of bias). One study (28 patients; 41 implants) reported improved height of keratinised tissue (KT) and marginal bone levels (MBLs) with free gingival graft (FGG) compared to no augmentation at the implant sites after prosthetic treatment (unclear risk of bias). Three RCTs (126 patients; 126 implants) focused on connective tissue grafting (CTG) and bone grafting versus no grafting in conjunction with immediate implant placement after tooth extraction (unclear risk of bias). There was no difference in MBLs in any of the studies, while one study showed superior soft tissue thickness (STT). Four RCTs (129 patients; 133 implants) compared different augmentation techniques before prosthetic treatment. Only one study showed improved STT with CTG compared to XCM (low risk of bias). Finally, three RCTs (124 patients; 160 implants) compared different augmentation techniques after prosthetic treatment (high/unclear risk of bias). FGG was observed to be superior to acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and vestibuloplasty to improve KT. Meta-analyses did not favour CTG to improve MBLs at extraction sites but CTG was superior to XCM to improve STT before prosthetic treatment.Conclusions Notwithstanding the limitations of the systematic review, soft tissue augmentation significantly enhances the amount of soft tissue at the implant site. CTG at the extraction site also improves subsequent bone level of the implants. Moreover, CTG before prosthetic treatment is superior to XCM to improve thickness of peri-implant soft tissues. However, these findings are based on short-term follow-up and future studies with improved methodology are required to establish the long-term benefits of soft tissue augmentation at the dental implant sites.

Body mass index and dental caries in young people: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Obesity and caries in young people are issues of public health concern. Even though research into the relationship between the two conditions has been conducted for many years, to date the results remain equivocal. The aim of this paper was to determine the nature of the relationship between Body Mass Index (BMI) and caries in children and adolescents, by conducting a systematic review of the published literature. METHODS: A systematic search of studies examining the association between BMI and caries in individuals younger than 18 years old was conducted. The electronic bibliographic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL and Google Scholar were searched. References of included studies were checked to identify further potential studies. Internal and external validity as well as reporting quality were assessed using the validated Methodological Evaluation of Observational Research checklist. Results were stratified based on the risk of flaws in 14 domains 10 of which were considered major and four minor. RESULTS: Of the 4208 initially identified studies, 84 papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review; conclusions were mainly drawn from 7 studies at lower risk of flaws. Three main types of association between BMI and caries were found: 26 studies showed a positive relationship, 19 showed a negative association, and 43 found no association between the variables of interest. Some studies showed more than one pattern of association. Assessment of confounders was the domain most commonly found to be flawed, followed by sampling and research specific bias. Among the seven studies which were found to be at lower risk of being flawed, five found no association between BMI and caries and two showed a positive association between these two variables. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of an association between BMI and caries was inconsistent. Based on the studies with a low risk lower risk of being flawed, a positive association between the variables of interest was found mainly in older children. In younger children, the evidence was equivocal. Longitudinal studies examining the association between different indicators of obesity and caries over the life course will help shed light in their complex relationship.

What are the long-term survival and complication rates of complete-arch fixed implant rehabilitation in edentulous patients?

Cohort selection The study cohort was selected through screening of electronic records of all patients rehabilitated with interforaminal implants and implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses (IFCDPs) over an 11-year period at the Tufts University School of Dental Medicine. Evaluation was based on medical and dental history; clinical oral examination of hard and soft tissues; and radiographic examination during a single visit.Data analysis Survival and failure rates of implants and prostheses were recorded based on predefined criteria. Along with descriptive statistics, the observed annual incidence, and the estimated five- and ten-year biologic and technical complications were computed with 95% confidence intervals.Results The study cohort included 41 patients with an average age of 65.8 years (range = 39 to 88 years) and comprised 19 females and 22 males. A total of 359 moderately rough surface dental implants (Nobel Biocare, Straumann, Biomet 3i) were used to rehabilitate 36 cement-retained and 19 screw-retained metal-ceramic IFCDPs in maxilla (N = 32) mandible (N = 23). The mean observation times for implants and prostheses were 5 and 7.5 years, respectively. Two implant failures in a single patient were recorded 11 years post-insertion, yielding an implant survival rate of 99.4%. The cumulative prostheses survival rate was 98.2% (100% at five years and 92.9% at ten years). Biologic and/or technical complications were associated with all 55 prostheses. Among major complications, the most frequent biologic complication was peri-implantitis while porcelain fractures were the most common technical complication. The cumulative rates of 'prostheses free of biologic complications' were 50.4% (95% CI: 36.4% to 63.0%) at five years and 10.1% (95% CI: 3.5% to 20.8%) at ten years. The cumulative rates for 'prosthesis free of technical complications' were 56.4% (95% CI: 41.7% to 68.8%) at five years and 9.8% (95% CI: 3.2% to 21.0%) at ten years.Conclusions Metal-ceramic implant-supported fixed full arch dental prostheses show high survival rates at five-year follow-up, including an implant survival rate of 99.4% and prosthesis survival rate of 98.2%. However biological and technical complications were observed in 47.1% and 42%, respectively.

Is there an association between past dental visits and the incidence of cancers of the head and neck (HN), upper aerodigestive tract (UADT), and oral cavity?

Data sources PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases.Study selection Papers reporting a primary study with any population, one or both genders specified, participants of any age, incidence of any cancer subsite of HN, and UADT reported as the health outcome, frequency of dental visits/check-ups prior to the diagnosis of one of these cancers (assessed as the exposure), and availability of sufficient data to estimate the measure of association, ie, unadjusted odds ratio (OR) along with its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).Data extraction and synthesis Two reviewers independently screened the title and abstract of the identified citations. Full texts of citations judged as potentially eligible were acquired by at least one of the two reviewers. Thereafter, both the reviewers used a standardised and pilot-tested form to independently screen every full text for eligibility. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the quality assessment tool for quantitative studies developed by the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP)Results After initial search of 1377 studies, thirty-eight articles were included in the analysis for systemic review including 32 case-control and six other design studies not limited to cross-sectional, observational, case-series, and screening. Finally, twenty-six case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses of studies in meta-analysis showed the overall pooled estimate risk was (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.76 to 2.30, P <0.001). The test for heterogeneity produced Tau square of 0.00, Q = 36.33, I2 = 31.76%, test for overall effect z = 9.24, (P <0.001). No publication bias was observed in the meta analysis. Conclusions Individuals with never/irregular/not frequent dental visits are more likely to be incident cases of HNCs/UADT cancers. Targeted education to alert those at risk about OCs and other HNCs, and the warning signs, and better training coupled with opportunistic oral cavity examinations by dentists could reduce the burden of this disease.

Obesity and caries in four-to-six year old English children: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Obesity and caries are common conditions in childhood and can have significant implications on children's wellbeing. Evidence into their association remains conflicting. Furthermore, studies examining the ssociation between obesity and caries commonly focus on individual-level determinants. The present study aimed to examine the association between obesity and caries in young English children and to determine the impact of deprivation and area-level characteristics on the distribution of the two conditions. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study among children in Plymouth city aged four-to-six years. Anthropometric measurements included weight and height (converted to Body Mass Index centiles and z-scores), and waist circumference. Caries was assessed by using the sum of the number of teeth that were decayed, missing or filled. A questionnaire was used to obtain information on children's demographic characteristics, oral hygiene, and dietary habits. The impact of deprivation on anthropometric variables and caries was determined using Linear and Poisson regression models, respectively. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the association between different anthropometric measures and caries. Logistic regression models were also used to examine the impact of several demographic characteristics and health behaviours on the presence of obesity and caries. RESULTS: The total sample included 347 children aged 5.10 ± 0.31 (mean ± SD). Deprivation had a significant impact on caries and BMI z-scores (p < 0.05). Neither BMI- nor waist circumference z-scores were shown to be significantly associated with dental caries. Among the neighbourhood characteristics examined, the percentage of people dependent on benefits was found to have a significant impact on caries rates (p < 0.05). Household's total annual income was inversely related to caries risk and parental educational level affected children's tooth brushing frequency. CONCLUSIONS: No associations between any measure of obesity and caries were found. However, deprivation affected both obesity and caries, thus highlighting the need to prioritise disadvantaged children in future prevention programmes.

A global approach to assess the economic benefits of increased consumption of sugar-free chewing gum.

PURPOSE: To analyze the influence of increasing the average consumption of sugar-free gum (SFG) in 25 industrialized countries on dental expenditures due to caries by the national health care systems. It was assumed that large cost savings were possible, because the regular consumption of SFG significantly reduces the relative risk of caries and therefore, improves dental health, which reduces expenditures on dental treatments. METHODS: A budget impact analysis (BIA) was performed to model the decrease in the relative risk of caries and the subsequent cost savings for dental care. Annual consumption of SFG, dental expenditures due to caries, chewing frequencies by age groups and the relative risk reduction for caries due to the consumption of SFG were identified and used as model parameters. Three different scenarios for the increase in the number of SFG were calculated. Besides overall results for all countries together, analyses were conducted for countries grouped by regions and the Human Development Index (HDI). RESULTS: For the entity of all 25 analyzed countries together, possible annual cost savings range from US$805.77 M in the scenario with the lowest increase of SFG consumption up to US$18,248 billion in the scenario with the biggest increase of SFG consumption. Europe and the USA show potential cost savings of US$1,061 billion and US$2,071 billion per year, respectively, if all chewers increase their consumption of SFG by 1 piece per day. The analysis showed the potential cost savings in dental expenditures due to caries that can be achieved by only slightly increasing the consumption of SFG. The regular consumption of SFG cannot replace good dental hygiene like tooth brushing, but can have a significant impact on dental health, which can lead to increased cost savings for health care systems worldwide. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Based on the fact that a regular consumption of sugar-free chewing gum has the beneficial effect of reducing caries prevalence, an increased consumption may not only lead to improved dental health but significant cost savings in expenditures for dental treatment worldwide.

Patient-centred care in general dental practice--a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Delivering improvements in quality is a key objective within most healthcare systems, and a view which has been widely embraced within the NHS in the United Kingdom. Within the NHS, quality is evaluated across three key dimensions: clinical effectiveness, safety and patient experience, with the latter modelled on the Picker Principles of Patient-Centred Care (PCC). Quality improvement is an important feature of the current dental contract reforms in England, with "patient experience" likely to have a central role in the evaluation of quality. An understanding and appreciation of the evidence underpinning PCC within dentistry is highly relevant if we are to use this as a measure of quality in general dental practice. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify the features of PCC relevant to dentistry and ascertain the current research evidence base underpinning its use as a measure of quality within general dental practice. RESULTS: Three papers were identified which met the inclusion criteria and demonstrated the use of primary research to provide an understanding of the key features of PCC within dentistry. None of the papers identified were based in general dental practice and none of the three studies sought the views of patients. Some distinct differences were noted between the key features of PCC reported within the dental literature and those developed within the NHS Patient Experience Framework. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review reveals a lack of understanding of PCC within dentistry, and in particular general dental practice. There is currently a poor evidence base to support the use of the current patient reported outcome measures as indicators of patient-centredness. Further research is necessary to understand the important features of PCC in dentistry and patients' views should be central to this research.