Trends and Factors Associated With Peripheral Vascular Interventions for the Treatment of Claudication From 2011 to 2022: A National Medicare Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous cross-sectional studies have identified wide practice pattern variations in the use of peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) for the treatment of claudication. However, there are limited data on longitudinal practice patterns. We aimed to describe the temporal trends and charges associated with PVI use for claudication over the past 12 years in the United States. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data to identify all patients who underwent a PVI for claudication between January 2011 and December 2022. We evaluated the trends in utilization and Medicare-allowed charges of PVI according to anatomic level, procedure type, and intervention settings using generalized linear models. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to evaluate factors associated with different levels and types of PVI. We identified 599 197 PVIs performed for claudication. The proportional use of tibial PVI increased 1.0% per year, and atherectomy increased by 1.6% per year over the study period. The proportion of PVIs performed in ambulatory surgical centers/office-based laboratories grew at 4% per year from 12.4% in 2011 to 55.7% in 2022. Total Medicare-allowed charges increased by $11 980 035 USD/year. Multinomial logistic regression identified significant associations between race and ethnicity and treatment setting with use of both atherectomy and tibial PVI. CONCLUSIONS: The use of tibial PVI and atherectomy for the treatment of claudication has increased dramatically in in ambulatory surgical center/office-based laboratory settings, non-White patients, and resulting in a significant increase in health care charges. There is a critical need to improve the delivery of value-based care for the treatment of claudication.

Corrigendum: Implementation of a patient-centered remote wound monitoring system for management of diabetic foot ulcers.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1157518.].

Implementation of a patient-centered remote wound monitoring system for management of diabetic foot ulcers.

Background: Regular clinical assessment is critical to optimize lower extremity wound healing. However, family and work obligations, socioeconomic, transportation, and time barriers often limit patient follow-up. We assessed the feasibility of a novel, patient-centered, remote wound management system (Healthy.io Minuteful for Wound Digital Management System) for the surveillance of lower extremity wounds. Methods: We enrolled 25 patients from our outpatient multidisciplinary limb preservation clinic with a diabetic foot ulcer, who had undergone revascularization and podiatric interventions prior to enrollment. Patients and their caregivers were instructed on how to use the digital management system and asked to perform one at-home wound scan per week for a total of 8 weeks using a smartphone application. We collected prospective data on patient engagement, smartphone app useability, and patient satisfaction. Results: Twenty-five patients (mean age 65.5 ± 13.7 years, 60.0% male, 52.0% Black) were enrolled over 3 months. Mean baseline wound area was 18.0 ± 15.2 cm2, 24.0% of patients were recovering from osteomyelitis, and post-surgical WiFi stage was 1 in 24.0%, 2 in 40.0%, 3 in 28.0%, and 4 in 8.00% of patients. We provided a smartphone to 28.0% of patients who did not have access to one that was compatible with the technology. Wound scans were obtained by patients (40.0%) and caregivers (60.0%). Overall, 179 wound scans were submitted through the app. The mean number of wound scans acquired per patient was 0.72 ± 0.63 per week, for a total mean of 5.80 ± 5.30 scans over the course of 8 weeks. Use of the digital wound management system triggered an early change in wound management for 36.0% of patients. Patient satisfaction was high; 94.0% of patients reported the system was useful. Conclusion: The Healthy.io Minuteful for Wound Digital Management System is a feasible means of remote wound monitoring for use by patients and/or their caregivers.

Post-Operative Day Zero Discharge after Laparoscopic Appendectomy Does Not Worsen High-Yield Outcomes: A NSQIP Database Observational Study.

Background: Post-operative day zero (POD-0) discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis has been studied primarily in single-center or pediatric studies. A larger study from a national sample addressing high-yield outcomes can update and supplement current literature and evaluate early discharge rates.Methods: This is a retrospective, observational National Surgical Quality Improvement (NSQIP) database study of laparoscopic appendectomies for uncomplicated appendicitis performed 2016-2019, with discharge POD-0 or post-operative day one (POD-1). Study outcomes included any or serious complication, unplanned readmission, and unplanned return to operating room (OR). Unadjusted outcomes comparisons were estimated via chi-square tests. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to adjust for potential confounders (sex, ethnicity, frailty, ASA score, tobacco use and diabetes).Results: A total of 25,629 patients were included in this analysis. More patients were discharged POD-1 (n = 15,229) than POD-0 (n = 10,440). Rate of any or serious complication was lower in patients discharged POD-0 than POD-1 (any complication: 2.0 vs. 2.8, p = 0.0002, serious complication: 1.4 vs. 2.1, p < 0.0001). Unplanned return to OR and unplanned readmission rates were not different between POD-0 and POD-1 discharged groups (p = 0.9 and p = 0.6, respectively). These findings were robust to adjustment for covariates in logistic regression modeling.Conclusions: This study found that unplanned readmission and other outcomes do not appear to be adversely affected by early discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis, confirming prior evidence on the topic in a large, national sample. It also found that early discharge does not appear to be used in most of these patients.

Post-operative day 0 discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis does not increase readmission or return to OR ­ but is it happening in practice?