RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data on outbreaks of infectious gastroenteritis in care homes have been collected using an internet-based surveillance system in North West England since 2012. We analysed the burden and characteristics of care home outbreaks to inform future public health decision-making. METHODS: We described characteristics of care homes and summary measures of the outbreaks such as attack rate, duration and pathogen identified. The primary analysis outcome was duration of closure following an outbreak. We used negative binomial regression to estimate Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) and confidence intervals (CI) for each explanatory variable. RESULTS: We recorded 795 outbreaks from 379 care homes (37.1 outbreaks per 100 care homes per year). In total 11,568 cases, 75 hospitalisations and 29 deaths were reported. Closure within three days of the first case (IRR = 0.442, 95%CI 0.366-0.534) was significantly associated with reduced duration of closure. The total size of the home (IRR = 1.426, 95%CI = 1.275-1.595) and the total attack rate (IRR = 1.434, 95%CI = 1.257-1.595) were significantly associated with increased duration of closure. CONCLUSIONS: Care homes that closed promptly had outbreaks of shorter duration. Care home providers, and those advising them on infection control, should aim to close homes quickly to prevent lengthy disruption to services.
Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Gastroenterite/prevenção & controle , Fechamento de Instituições de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Instituições Residenciais , Idoso , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Humanos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fatigue, one of the most common symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), severely impairs quality of life and the ability to work or perform activities of daily living. Real-world data on fatigue in MS can help inform healthcare decisions and identify care gaps. We identified fatigue in patients with MS, using existing codes for fatigue and proxies of fatigue in healthcare claims database records and characterized cohorts with and without markers of fatigue who had been prescribed disease-modifying therapies for MS (MS-DMTs). METHODS: In this cohort study, we retrospectively analyzed Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart database from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019. The index date was defined as the first prescription record date for any MS-DMT during the study identification period. Included patient records were from adults (≥18 years) with ≥2 MS diagnosis claims listed within 12 months prior to the index date. Patients had ≥1 claim for any MS-DMT during the identification period (1 January 2016-31 December 2018), continuous enrollment in a health plan with medical and pharmacy benefits for 12 months before the index date (assessment one), and 12 months following the index date or to end of data availability (assessment two). After exploratory analyses, we applied the following definition to sort patient records into two cohorts according to presence or absence of markers of fatigue: ≥1 diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth/Tenth Revisions code) claim for fatigue or ≥2 claims for stimulant drugs or ≥2 procedure claims for a sleep study or ≥2 pharmacy claims for sleep aid drugs; we used the broadest definition of fatigue so meeting any of these criteria qualified patients with MS as having fatigue. To minimize assessment one differences in selected patient characteristics between cohorts, we applied 1:1 propensity score matching with age, sex, US geographic region, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score as covariates. We analyzed demographic data, markers of fatigue, comorbidities at assessment one, and physical disabilities and neurologic impairment at assessment two. RESULTS: Of 4077 patient records that met the eligibility criteria, 1976 had markers of fatigue. The propensity score-matched cohorts included 1519 patients each with and without fatigue. Assessment one comorbidities including anxiety (25.3% vs 10.5%; P<0.0001), arthritis (17.6% vs 12.9%; P = 0.0003), depression (15.0% vs 3.5%; P<0.0001), and gastrointestinal disorders (20.3% vs 14.2%; P<0.0001) were significantly more prevalent in the cohort with markers of fatigue at assessment one compared with those without fatigue. At assessment two, the cohort with baseline fatigue upon initial assessment was more likely to have indication of physical impairments (spasticity [63.5% vs 35.8%; P<0.0001], bladder dysfunction [37.8% vs 24.0%; P<0.0001], cognitive/behavioral dysfunction [27.0% vs 18.6%; P<0.0001]), neurologic impairments (pain [59.1% vs 44.0%; P<0.0001], depression [29.2% vs 9.9%; P<0.0001], and sensory disturbances [54.2% vs 36.7%; P<0.0001]), compared with the cohort without markers of fatigue at assessment one. CONCLUSIONS: In our analysis, patients with MS and fatigue were more likely to have comorbidities at assessment one and to develop physical disabilities and neurologic impairments at assessment two. Appropriate identification of patients with MS and fatigue may facilitate targeted care interventions to a group of patients at higher risk for disease progression and disability.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the United States, most patients with schizophrenia have Medicaid coverage. Antipsychotic treatments are the cornerstone of schizophrenia management; most patients are treated with daily oral antipsychotics but struggle with medication adherence. Evidence suggests that medication adherence is inversely correlated with dosing frequency. Once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP) has been demonstrated to improve adherence compared with oral antipsychotics; transitioning to once-every-3-months PP (PP3M) further improved adherence. In 2021, once-every-6-months PP (PP6M) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to provide even longer between-dose intervals. Public health stakeholders who aim to improve medication adherence are interested in understanding how introducing PP6M to the formulary will impact the budget. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the budget impact of introducing PP6M to the formulary from the perspectives of a hypothetical US multistate health care payer and state Medicaid programs using California, Georgia, and Ohio as examples. METHODS: The budget impact model was developed from a payer perspective, comparing the reference scenario (without PP6M in the market) with a new scenario (with PP6M). The study population included patients with schizophrenia who were eligible to receive PP6M. Market shares were assigned to the reference and new market scenarios. Efficacy was measured by the relative risk of relapse while receiving treatment. Adherence effects were included in the model and affected costs of treatment and relapse rates. A deterministic 1-way sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: Base-case results for a multistate payer with 1 million members demonstrate that adding PP6M to the market results in total incremental plan-level costs ranging from $7,747 in year 1 to $11,501 in year 5. Increased drug costs were offset by administration and relapse cost savings ($105 and $881 in year 5, respectively). The average incremental cost per treated patient per year was stable at $180.06 for each year, and the incremental cost per member per month stayed below $0.01 for each year. The results of the model from the state-level Medicaid scenarios are broadly similar to those of the multistate base-case perspective. The 1-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated the model is most sensitive to the per-package costs of PP6M and PP3M, along with the proportion of patients fully adherent with PP3M. CONCLUSIONS: The budget impact of introducing PP6M as a treatment option is minimal. With the expected cost offsets from reduced administration and relapse costs due to adherence benefits, these results suggest that PP6M can be a viable treatment option from a clinical and a budgetary perspective. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. The study sponsor provided funds to Xcenda and ApotheCom for medical writing, editorial support, and submission of the manuscript. Hilary Phelps was an employee of Janssen Global Services, LLC, at the time of the development and finalization of the manuscript. Alex Keenan is an employee of Janssen Global Services, LLC, and holds stock in Johnson & Johnson, Inc. Dee Lin and Carmela Benson are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, and hold stock in Johnson & Johnson, Inc. Aditya Raju was an employee of Xcenda at the time of the development and finalization of the manuscript, and Danmeng Huang is an employee of Xcenda, a health care consulting firm that was contracted by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Chih-Yuan Cheng is an employee of Janssen NV.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Palmitato de Paliperidona , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Medicaid , Custos de MedicamentosRESUMO
To determine antimicrobial drug resistance patterns, we characterized nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica strains isolated in Liverpool, UK, January 2003 through December 2009. Decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin was found in 103 (20.9%) of 492 isolates. The lower susceptibility was associated with ciprofloxacin treatment failures and with particular serovars and phage types often acquired during foreign travel.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , Ciprofloxacina/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Infecções por Salmonella/microbiologia , Salmonella enterica/efeitos dos fármacos , Viagem , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Ácido Nalidíxico/farmacologia , Salmonella enterica/classificação , Salmonella enteritidis/efeitos dos fármacos , Salmonella typhimurium/efeitos dos fármacos , Reino UnidoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dementia has been described as the greatest global health challenge in the 21st Century on account of longevity gains increasing its incidence, escalating health and social care pressures. These pressures highlight ethical, social, and political challenges about healthcare resource allocation, what health improvements matter to patients, and how they are measured. This study highlights the complexity of the ethical landscape, relating particularly to the balances that need to be struck when allocating resources; when measuring and prioritizing outcomes; and when individual preferences are sought. OBJECTIVE: Health outcome prioritization is the ranking in order of desirability or importance of a set of disease-related objectives and their associated cost or risk. We analyze the complex ethical landscape in which this takes place in the most common dementia, Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: Narrative review of literature published since 2007, incorporating snowball sampling where necessary. We identified, thematized, and discussed key issues of ethical salience. RESULTS: Eight areas of ethical salience for outcome prioritization emerged: 1) Public health and distributive justice, 2) Scarcity of resources, 3) Heterogeneity and changing circumstances, 4) Knowledge of treatment, 5) Values and circumstances, 6) Conflicting priorities, 7) Communication, autonomy and caregiver issues, and 8) Disclosure of risk. CONCLUSION: These areas highlight the difficult balance to be struck when allocating resources, when measuring and prioritizing outcomes, and when individual preferences are sought. We conclude by reflecting on how tools in social sciences and ethics can help address challenges posed by resource allocation, measuring and prioritizing outcomes, and eliciting stakeholder preferences.
Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Doença de Alzheimer/terapia , Atenção à Saúde/ética , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/ética , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: There was a large outbreak of measles in Liverpool, UK, in 2012-2013, despite measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) immunisation uptake rates that were higher than the national average. We estimated measles susceptibility of a cohort of children born in Liverpool between 1995 and 2012 to understand whether there was a change in susceptibility before and after the outbreak and to inform vaccination strategy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The city of Liverpool, North West UK. PARTICIPANTS: All children born in Liverpool (72â 101) between 1995 and 2012 inclusive who were identified using the Child Health Information System (CHIS) and were still resident within Liverpool in 2014. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We estimated cohort age-disaggregated and neighbourhood-disaggregated measles susceptibility according to WHO thresholds before and after the outbreak for children aged 1-17â years. RESULTS: Susceptibility to measles was above WHO elimination thresholds before and after the measles outbreak in the 10+ age group. The proportion of children susceptible before and after outbreak, respectively: age 1-4â years 15.0% before and 14.9% after; age 5-9â years 9.9% before and 7.7% after; age 10+ years 8.6% before and 8.5% after. Despite an intensive MMR immunisation catch-up campaign after the 2012-2013 measles outbreak, the overall proportion of children with no MMR remains high at 6.1% (4390/72â 351). Across all age groups and before and after the outbreak, measles susceptibility was clustered by neighbourhood, with deprived areas having the greatest proportion of susceptible children. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of sustained measles outbreaks remains, especially as large pools of susceptible older children will start leaving secondary education and continue to aggregate in higher education, employment and other community settings and institutions resulting in the potential for a propagated measles outbreak.
Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Distribuição por Idade , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Suscetibilidade a Doenças/epidemiologia , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Masculino , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The UK Department of Health recommends annual influenza vaccination for healthcare workers, but uptake remains low. For staff, there is uncertainty about the rationale for vaccination and evidence underpinning the recommendation. OBJECTIVES: To clarify the rationale, and evidence base, for influenza vaccination of healthcare workers from the occupational health, employer and patient safety perspectives. DESIGN: Systematic appraisal of published systematic reviews. RESULTS: The quality of the 11 included reviews was variable; some included exactly the same trials but made conflicting recommendations. 3 reviews assessed vaccine effects in healthcare workers and found 1 trial reporting a vaccine efficacy (VE) of 88%. 6 reviews assessed vaccine effects in healthy adults, and VE was consistent with a median of 62% (95% CI 56 to 67). 2 reviews assessed effects on working days lost in healthcare workers (3 trials), and 3 reported effects in healthy adults (4 trials). The meta-analyses presented by the most recent reviews do not reach standard levels of statistical significance, but may be misleading as individual trials suggest benefit with wide variation in size of effect. The 2013 Cochrane review reported absolute effects close to 0 for laboratory-confirmed influenza, and hospitalisation for patients, but excluded data on clinically suspected influenza and all-cause mortality, which had shown potentially important effects in previous editions. A more recent systematic review reports these effects as a 42% reduction in clinically suspected influenza (95% CI 27 to 54) and a 29% reduction in all-cause mortality (95% CI 15 to 41). CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for employer and patient safety benefits of influenza vaccination is not straightforward and has been interpreted differently by different systematic review authors. Future uptake of influenza vaccination among healthcare workers may benefit from a fully transparent guideline process by a panel representing all relevant stakeholders, which clearly communicates the underlying rationale, evidence base and judgements made.
Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Segurança do Paciente , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Mortalidade , Saúde Ocupacional , Incerteza , Reino UnidoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Measles is a highly contagious vaccine-preventable infection that caused large outbreaks in England in 2012 and 2013 in areas which failed to achieve herd protection levels (95%) consistently. We sought to quantify the economic costs associated with the 2012-13 Merseyside measles outbreak, relative to the cost of extending preventative vaccination to secure herd protection. METHODS: A costing model based on a critical literature review was developed. A workshop and interviews were held with key stakeholders in the Merseyside outbreak to understand the pathway of a measles case and then quantify healthcare activity and costs for the main NHS providers and public health team incurred during the initial four month period to May 2012. These data were used to model the total costs of the full outbreak to August 2013, comprising those to healthcare providers for patient treatment, public health and societal productivity losses. The modelled total cost of the full outbreak was compared to the cost of extending the preventative vaccination programme to achieve herd protection. FINDINGS: The Merseyside outbreak included 2458 reported cases. The estimated cost of the outbreak was £ 4.4m (sensitivity analysis £ 3.9 m to £ 5.2m) comprising 15% (£ 0.7 m) NHS patient treatment costs, 40% (£ 1.8m) public health costs and 44% (£ 2.0m) for societal productivity losses. In comparison, over the previous five years in Cheshire and Merseyside a further 11,793 MMR vaccinations would have been needed to achieve herd protection at an estimated cost of £ 182,909 (4% of the total cost of the measles outbreak). INTERPRETATION: Failure to consistently reach MMR uptake levels of 95% across all localities and sectors (achieve herd protection) risks comparatively higher economic costs associated with the containment (including healthcare costs) and implementation of effective public health management of outbreaks. FUNDING: Commissioned by the Cheshire and Merseyside Public Health England Centre.
Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Sarampo/economia , Inglaterra , Humanos , Imunidade Coletiva , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Modelos Teóricos , Saúde Pública , Vacinação/economiaRESUMO
Mumps is easily preventable through vaccination. Investigation of a number of recent mumps outbreaks in universities in the North West of England, however, found that affected students were either not vaccinated or only partially vaccinated. An online survey of students (n=2456) attending five universities in the region was undertaken during 2010 to establish MMR vaccination status, knowledge of mumps and willingness to take up vaccination if offered. Regression analysis was undertaken to identify characteristics of unimmunized students to ascertain likely target groups for future vaccination campaigns. Students least likely to be fully vaccinated with MMR included males; those not registered with a GP; first year students; mature students; and those with poor knowledge of mumps. A high proportion of students were willing to accept MMR vaccination if offered at university. Those least likely to take up vaccination included students not registered with a GP; mature students; and those who did not consider mumps to be a serious disease. The survey also highlighted that misconceptions remain about both the MMR vaccine safety and perceptions of risk/benefit of the vaccine. Encouraging registration with a GP and awareness raising should be a key part of campaigns to improve vaccination uptake among university students.
Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/psicologia , Adulto , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Clínicos Gerais/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos/métodos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Caxumba/epidemiologia , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Medição de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Universidades , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Managing an outbreak of gastroenteritis (GI) on board a cruise ship while minimising disruption to passengers' on board and shore visit activities is difficult. For this reason it is important to understand the complex patterns of transmission in a closed community. We describe the epidemiological investigation of an outbreak of norovirus during an international cruise. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using information from lists routinely maintained by the travel company, including the passenger manifest, and organised coach tour lists. Information on air-conditioning (AC) systems was used to assess the possible sources of exposures. FINDINGS: Of the 1194 passengers 191 (16%) and 5 crew (<1%) became ill with GI symptoms. The attack rate was higher amongst passengers whose cabin was on the main deck (RR 3.41, 95% CI 1.47-7.94) that houses both passengers' cabins and leisure facilities including shops. Passengers who went on one of the organised coach tours where there were symptomatic passengers were at an increased risk of infection (RR 2.14, CI 1.51-3.03). Analysis of the 56 AC sections on the ship and did not detect an association with infection. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of transmission of norovirus on a cruise ship are complex. Our study suggests infections are more likely among those passengers staying in areas of the ship that are highly transited or used for communal activities and more difficult to clean. Emphasis on the importance of early reporting of symptoms can help minimise transmission. Internationally agreed guidelines on the management of outbreaks on cruise ships are needed.