The Effect of Hydrostatic Pressure on Coronary Flow and Pressure-Based Indices of Coronary Stenosis Severity.

Background: To assess whether hydrostatic pressure gradients caused by coronary height differences in supine versus prone positioning during invasive physiological stenosis assessment affect resting and hyperaemic pressure-based indices or coronary flow. Methods: Twenty-three coronary stenoses were assessed in twenty-one patients with stable coronary artery disease. All patients had a stenosis of at least 50% visually defined on previous coronary angiography. Pd/Pa, iFR, FFR, and coronary flow velocity (APV) measured using a Doppler were recorded across the same stenosis, with the patient in the prone position, followed by repeat measurements in the standard supine position. Results: When comparing prone to supine measurements in the same stenosis, in the LAD, there was a significant change in mean Pd/Pa of 0.08 ± 0.04 (p = 0.0006), in the iFR of 0.06 ± 0.07 (p = 0.02), and in the FFR of 0.09 ± 0.07 (p = 0.003). In the Cx, there was a change in mean Pd/Pa of 0.05 ± 0.04 (p = 0.009), iFR of 0.07 ± 0.04 (p = 0.01), and FFR of 0.05 ± 0.03 (p = 0.006). In the RCA, there was a change in Pd/Pa of 0.05 ± 0.04 (p = 0.032), iFR of 0.04 ± 0.05 (p = 0.19), and FFR of 0.04+-0.03 (p = 0.004). Resting and hyperaemic coronary flow did not change significantly (resting delta APV = 1.6 cm/s, p = 0.31; hyperaemic delta APV = 0.9 cm/s, p = 0.85). Finally, 36% of iFR measurements and 26% of FFR measurements were re-classified across an ischaemic threshold when prone and supine measurements were compared across the same stenosis. Conclusions: Pd/Pa, iFR, and FFR were affected by hydrostatic pressure variations caused by coronary height differences in prone versus supine positioning. Coronary flow did not change signifying a purely pressure-based phenomenon.

Coronary artery height differences and their effect on fractional flow reserve.

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) uses pressure-based measurements to assess the severity of a coronary stenosis. Distal pressure (Pd) is often at a different vertical height to that of the proximal aortic pressure (Pa). The difference in pressure between Pd and Pa due to hydrostatic pressure, may impact FFR calculation. METHODS: One hundred computed tomography coronary angiographies were used to measure height differences between the coronary ostia and points in the coronary tree. Mean heights were used to calculate the hydrostatic pressure effect in each artery, using a correction factor of 0.8 mmHg/cm. This was tested in a simulation of intermediate coronary stenosis to give the "corrected FFR" (cFFR) and percentage of values, which crossed a threshold of 0.8. RESULTS: The mean height from coronary ostium to distal left anterior descending (LAD) was +5.26 cm, distal circumflex (Cx) -3.35 cm, distal right coronary artery-posterior left ventricular artery (RCA-PLV) -5.74 cm and distal RCA-posterior descending artery (PDA) +1.83 cm. For LAD, correction resulted in a mean change in FFR of +0.042, -0.027 in the Cx, -0.046 in the PLV and +0.015 in the PDA. Using 200 random FFR values between 0.75 and 0.85, the resulting cFFR crossed the clinical treatment threshold of 0.8 in 43% of LAD, 27% of Cx, 47% of PLV and 15% of PDA cases. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant vertical height differences between the distal artery (Pd) and its point of normalization (Pa). This is likely to have a modest effect on FFR, and correcting for this results in a proportion of values crossing treatment thresholds. Operators should be mindful of this phenomenon when interpreting FFR values.

Absolute microvascular resistance by continuous thermodilution predicts microvascular dysfunction after ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

AIMS: Continuous thermodilution using intracoronary saline infusion is a novel technique able to provide accurate measurements of absolute coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance (Rmicro). The aim of this study was to assess the ability of Rmicro, measured by continuous thermodilution, to predict microvascular dysfunction in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective observational study, continuous thermodilution was used to measure Rmicro in the culprit coronary artery of 32 patients with STEMI (mean age ± SD, 66 ± 10 years; 78% male) immediately post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Concomitant measurements of the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) were obtained by bolus thermodilution. Microvascular dysfunction was defined as an IMR > 40 or a CFR < 2. Rmicro was higher in patients with microvascular dysfunction based on the predefined thresholds; for IMR: 863 (IQR, 521-1079) vs 474 (IQR, 337-616) Wood units, p = .004 and for CFR: 633 (IQR, 455-1039) vs 474 (IQR, 271-579) Wood units, p = .02. Receiver-operator characteristic analysis demonstrated that Rmicro was predictive of microvascular dysfunction; area under curve (AUC) 0.800 (95% CI: 0.637-0.963, p = .005) for IMR-defined microvascular dysfunction and AUC 0.758 (95% CI: 0.593-0.924, p = .02) for CFR-defined microvascular dysfunction. An Rmicro threshold of greater than 552 Wood units was optimal for predicting microvascular dysfunction defined by IMR > 40. CONCLUSIONS: Rmicro is able to identify STEMI patients in whom IMR and CFR measurements suggest significant microvascular dysfunction at the end of primary PCI.