Tacrolimus ointment in the treatment of occupationally induced chronic hand dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Occupational hand dermatitis (OHD) is a common and often chronic condition. Usage of topical corticosteroids is limited in long-term therapy because of potential side-effects. New treatment options are highly appreciated. OBJECTIVE: To study efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients suffering from OHD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective, open, multicentre study, 29 patients with OHD of predominantly mild-to-moderate severity were treated with tacrolimus ointment (Protopic 0.1%) during a 4-week active treatment period with twice daily application followed by a 2-month optional treatment period. Efficacy was evaluated by the use of a standardized hand eczema score and by clinical severity rating, conducted on all study visits (screening, baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6, and 12). Adverse events were recorded for safety evaluation. RESULTS: The hand eczema score declined significantly after 2 weeks of treatment compared with baseline and further declined until the end of the study. Finally, 12 (44%) patients were clear of hand eczema. Worsening of the dermatitis occurred in 2 patients (7%). Clinical grading indicated improvement too. Overall tolerability was good. CONCLUSION: Topical tacrolimus might be an efficacious treatment option for chronic OHD. Blinded and randomized controlled studies are necessary to confirm the results of this pilot study.

Skin protection in bakers' apprentices.

Skin protection measures - barrier creams, protective gloves - and skin care are widely recommended for the prevention of occupational hand dermatitis (HD) in skin risk professions, but there is hardly anything known about uptake levels of the measures. The objective of this controlled intervention study was to quantify the uptake and maintenance of skin protection and skin care measures in first-year bakers' apprentices. A total of 94 first-year bakers' apprentices were included in the study in September 2000. The apprentices were assigned to the skin protection and control group class-wise to reduce contamination. The skin protection group comprised 39 apprentices who were trained in skin protection measures at the beginning and after 4 weeks of training. 55 apprentices were assigned to the control group representing no skin protection intervention. Standardized interviews took place at the beginning of the training and at 4 monthly follow-ups (FU). The uptake of skin protection measures differed significantly between the groups (barrier cream p < 0.0001, protective gloves p = 0.046, skin care p = 0.025). Barrier cream use in the skin protection group was incorporated in the daily routine very well from the start and reached 100% at the end of the examination period (4th FU). At this time, only 3.2% of the controls used barrier creams. The level of acceptance of protective gloves (4th FU: skin protection group 43.3%; controls 32.3%) was considerably lower than that of barrier creams. The initial level of regular skin care was high in both groups (skin protection group 67.6%, controls 61.7%). After the intervention the acceptance of skin care rose to 88.9% in the skin protection group compared to 68.1% in the controls (4th FU). The present study has shown that skin protection and skin care measures can be introduced successfully in the daily routine of a skin risk occupation and high uptake and maintenance rates can be achieved.

Prevention of hand dermatitis in bakers' apprentices: different efficacy of skin protection measures and UVB hardening.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this controlled intervention study was to quantify the efficacy of skin protection (SP) measures and ultraviolet B (UVB) hardening in the prevention of hand dermatitis in bakers' apprentices. METHOD: SP measures were compared against UVB hardening in a controlled clinical trial of 94 apprentices. The apprentices were assigned to the intervention arms class-wise. Bakers' apprentices involved in a previous follow-up study served as additional controls representing no intervention. The apprentices were interviewed and examined in a standardised way at the beginning of the training and at 4 monthly follow-ups. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) was measured at the back of the hands. RESULTS: Demographic profile and atopy criteria were equally distributed in the two intervention arms and the control group. Point prevalence of hand dermatitis after 6 months was highest in the controls (29.1%) followed by the UVB (19.4%) and the SP group (13.3%). UVB hardening and SP measures reduced hand dermatitis prevalence by 9.7% (95%CI: -8.5 to 28.1) and 15.7% (95%CI: -2.4 to 33.9), respectively. Application of SP measures reduced the odds ratios (ORs) for hand dermatitis 0.8-fold (95%CI: 0.17-3.70) and 0.33-fold (95%CI: 0.09-1.23) compared with the UVB group and the controls, respectively. These clinical trends were confirmed by statistically significant differences in TEWL values. TEWL values were consistently higher in the UVB group than in the SP group ( P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This study provided evidence, based on significant differences in TEWL levels, that general SP measures may be more effective than UV light hardening of the skin, which in turn was more effective than no intervention. This trend was supported by the frequency of development of clinical hand dermatitis, although differences did not reach statistical significance. A multi-centre trial is recommended to confirm the efficacy of SP measures in a larger randomised study.