RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The real-world consequences of a Philips/Respironics recall for positive airway pressure (PAP) devices distributed between 2009 and 2021 are unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-based study using health administrative databases (Ontario, Canada) on all new adult PAP users identified through the provincial funding system, free of cancer at baseline, who initiated (claimed) PAP treatment between 2012 and 2018. Everyone was followed from the PAP claim date to the earliest of incident cancer diagnosis, death, or the end of the follow-up (March 2022). We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance baseline characteristics between individuals on recalled devices and those on devices from other manufacturers. Weighted hazard ratios of incident cancer were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of 231 692 individuals identified, 58 204 (25.1%) claimed recalled devices, and 173 488 (74.9%) from other manufacturers. A meaningful baseline difference between groups (standardised difference≥0.10) was noted only by location-relevant covariates; other variables were mostly equally distributed (standardised differences≤0.06). Over a median follow-up of 6.3â years (IQR: 4.9-8.0), 11 166 (4.8%) developed cancer: unadjusted rates per 10 000 Person-Year (95 CI%) of 78.8 (76.0-81.7) in the recall group versus74.0 (72.4-75.6) in others (p=0.0034). Propensity score weighting achieved excellent balance in baseline characteristics between groups (standardised differences≤0.07). On a weighted sample, there was no statistical difference in the hazard of incident cancer between groups: cause-specific hazard ratio (recalled versus others) of 0.97, 95% CI: 0.89-1.06. CONCLUSION: In our real-world population study, compared to other manufacturers and adjusting for confounders, recalled devices do not appear to be independently associated with developing cancer.
RESUMO
We assessed the relation between air pollution, weather, and adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy in a retrospective community-based repeated-measures study of adults with obstructive sleep apnea who purchased PAP devices from a registered provider between 2013 and 2017 (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) and had at least one day of data. Daily PAP-derived data, air pollution, and weather databases were linked using postal code. The exposures were mean nocturnal (8:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m.) (i) residential concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2 ), fine particulate matter <=2.5 µm (PM2.5 ), ozone (O3 ), and Air Quality Health Index (AQHI), and (ii) temperature, relative humidity, and barometric pressure. Covariates in the main model were demographics, season, exposure year, and PAP therapy mode. We analysed 8148 adults (median age of 54 years and 61% men) and 2,071,588 days of data. Based on daily data, the median (interquartile range) daily PAP usage was 416 (323-487) min. Using mixed-effect regression analyses to incorporate daily data and clustering by individuals, we found a statistically significant decrease in adherence for increased levels of NO2 , PM2.5 , and AQHI. The largest effect was for NO2 : a decrease in daily PAP use while comparing the highest versus lowest quartiles (Qs) was 3.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8-3.9) min. Decreased PAP adherence was also associated with increased temperature (Q4 versus Q1: 2.6 [95% CI: 1.5-3.7] min) and decreased barometric pressure (Q1 versus Q4: 2.0 [95% CI 1.5-2.5] min). We observed modest but statistically significant acute effects of air pollution and weather on daily PAP adherence.
RESUMO
RATIONALE/OBJECTIVES: Despite plausible pathophysiological mechanisms, more research is needed to confirm the relationship between obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and the risk of COVID-19 infection or COVID-19-related serious complications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study using provincial health administrative data (Ontario, Canada). Adults with physician-diagnosed OSA who received positive airway pressure therapy in the 5 years prepandemic (OSA group) were propensity score matched by baseline characteristics to individuals in the general population at low risk of OSA (non-OSA group) using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Weighted HRs of (1) a positive COVID-19 test and (2) COVID-19-related emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalisations, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and mortality, within 12 months of pandemic onset, were compared between groups. We also evaluated the impact of comorbid cardiometabolic or chronic airways disease. RESULTS: We identified and matched 324 029 individuals in the OSA group to 4 588 200 individuals in the non-OSA group. Compared with the non-OSA group, those in the OSA group were at a greater hazard of testing positive for COVID-19 (HR=1.17, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.21), having a COVID-19-related ED visit (HR=1.62, 95% CI 1.51 to 1.73), hospitalisation (HR=1.50, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.65) or ICU admission (HR=1.53, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.84). COVID-19-related 30-day mortality was not different (HR=0.98, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.16).We found that for the OSA group, comorbid airways disease but not cardiometabolic conditions increased the hazards of COVID-19-related outcomes, including mortality. CONCLUSION: In this large population-based study, we demonstrated that a recent diagnosis of OSA requiring treatment was associated with an increased hazard of testing positive for COVID-19 and serious COVID-19-related complications, particularly in those with co-existing chronic airways disease.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono , Adulto , Humanos , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/complicações , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/epidemiologia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Dados de Saúde Coletados Rotineiramente , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Ontário/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicaçõesRESUMO
Morningness-eveningness preference, also known as chronotype, is the tendency for a person to sleep during certain hours of the day and is broadly categorised into morning and evening types. In-laboratory polysomnography (iPSG) is the gold-standard to assess sleep, however, an individual's chronotype is not accounted for in current protocols, which may confound collected sleep data. The objective of our study was to assess if chronotype had an association with sleep physiology. Patients who completed the diagnostic iPSG and the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), which categorises patients into morning type, neither or evening type, were assessed. Multivariable linear regression models were used to assess if chronotype was associated with sleep quality, duration, and physiology during iPSG. The study sample included 2612 patients (mean age of 53.6 years, 48% male) recruited during 2010-2015. Morning type, compared with neither type, was significantly associated with an increase in total sleep time and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and a decrease in sleep onset latency and the arousal index. Evening type, compared with neither type, was significantly associated with a decrease in total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and REM sleep, and an increase in sleep onset latency and wake after sleep onset. Additionally, iPSG lights out time was significantly different between the different chronotypes. Overall, a morningness chronotype was associated with favourable sleep quality and duration while an eveningness chronotype was associated with reduced sleep quality. Our study quantifies the association of chronotype with iPSG metrics and suggests that laboratory protocols should consider chronotype in their evaluations.
Assuntos
Cronotipo , Ritmo Circadiano , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Polissonografia , Ritmo Circadiano/fisiologia , Sono/fisiologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbances and their potential association with stroke remains understudied at a population level. We sought to determine the prevalence of sleep disturbances among people who have effects of stroke compared with the general population. METHODS: We used data from people aged 18 years or older who responded to the sleep and chronic disease modules of the 2017-2018 cycle of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS). We measured sleep disturbances by self-reports of having trouble staying awake most or all of the time; either short (< 5 h) or long (> 9 h) nightly sleep duration; having trouble going to or staying asleep most or all of the time; and never, rarely or sometimes having refreshing sleep. We used log-binomial and multinomial regression to investigate prevalence of sleep disturbances among respondents who reported effects of stroke compared with others, adjusting for confounding factors. RESULTS: We included 46 404 CCHS respondents, 682 of whom reported effects of stroke. The prevalence of sleep disturbances for those with effects of stroke was higher than among others in the sample with regard to trouble staying awake (13.0% v. 6.1%; adjusted relative risk [RR] 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.59-2.94), short or long duration sleep (28.9% v. 10.0%; adjusted RR 1.93, 95% CI 1.57-2.38), trouble going to or staying asleep, (28.1% v. 17.6%; adjusted RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.28-1.83) and lack of refreshing sleep (41.1% v. 37.1%; adjusted RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.14-1.49). The prevalence of at least 1 reported measure of sleep disturbance was 61.6% among those with effects of stroke, compared with 48.2% among others (adjusted RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.18-1.40). INTERPRETATION: Self-report of having effects of stroke was associated with increased prevalence of sleep disturbances compared with the general population. Sleep disturbances were reported by a high proportion of respondents with effects of stroke, indicating the importance of screening for related disorders.
Assuntos
Transtornos do Sono-Vigília , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Autorrelato , Estudos Transversais , Canadá/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/complicações , Sono , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a population-based study using Ontario health administrative data to describe trends in healthcare utilization and mortality in adults with epilepsy during the first pandemic year (March 2020-March 2021) compared to historical data (2016-2019). We also investigated if changes in outpatient visits and diagnostic testing during the first pandemic year were associated with increased risk for hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, or death. METHODS: Projected monthly visit rates (per 100,000 people) for outpatient visits, electroencephalography, magnetic resonance, computed tomography, all-cause ED visits, hospitalizations, and mortality were calculated based on historical data by fitting monthly time series autoregressive integrated moving-average models. Two-way interactions were calculated using Quasi-Poisson models. RESULTS: In adults with epilepsy during the first quarter of the pandemic, we demonstrated a reduction in all-cause outpatient visits, diagnostic testing, ED visits and hospitalizations, and a temporary increase in mortality (observed rates of 355.8 vs projected 308.8, 95% CI: 276.3-345.1). By the end of the year, outpatient visits increased (85,535.4 vs 76,620.6, 95% CI: 71,546.9-82,059.4), and most of the diagnostic test rates returned to the projected. The increase in the rate of all-cause mortality during the pandemic, compared to pre-pandemic, was greater during months with the lower frequency of diagnostic tests than months with higher frequency (interaction p-values <.0001). CONCLUSION: We described the impact of the pandemic on healthcare utilization and mortality in adults with epilepsy during the first year. We demonstrated that access to relevant diagnostic testing is likely important for this population while planning restrictions on non-urgent health services.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of patients who are discharged from hospital for an acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) are readmitted within 30 days. To reduce this, it is important both to identify all individuals admitted with AECOPD and to predict those who are at higher risk for readmission. OBJECTIVES: To develop two clinical prediction models using data available in electronic medical records: 1) identifying patients admitted with AECOPD and 2) predicting 30-day readmission in patients discharged after AECOPD. METHODS: Two datasets were created using all admissions to General Internal Medicine from 2012 to 2018 at two hospitals: one cohort to identify AECOPD and a second cohort to predict 30-day readmissions. We fit and internally validated models with four algorithms. RESULTS: Of the 64,609 admissions, 3,620 (5.6%) were diagnosed with an AECOPD. Of those discharged, 518 (15.4%) had a readmission to hospital within 30 days. For identification of patients with a diagnosis of an AECOPD, the top-performing models were LASSO and a four-variable regression model that consisted of specific medications ordered within the first 72 hours of admission. For 30-day readmission prediction, a two-variable regression model was the top performing model consisting of number of COPD admissions in the previous year and the number of non-COPD admissions in the previous year. CONCLUSION: We generated clinical prediction models to identify AECOPDs during hospitalization and to predict 30-day readmissions after an acute exacerbation from a dataset derived from available EMR data. Further work is needed to improve and externally validate these models.
Assuntos
Readmissão do Paciente , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Humanos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Hospitalização , Hospitais , Progressão da DoençaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Many people with asthma and COPD remain undiagnosed. We developed and validated a new case-finding questionnaire to identify symptomatic adults with undiagnosed obstructive lung disease. METHODS: Adults in the community with no prior history of physician-diagnosed lung disease who self-reported respiratory symptoms were contacted via random-digit dialling. Pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry was used to confirm asthma or COPD. Predictive questions were selected using multinomial logistic regression with backward elimination. Questionnaire performance was assessed using sensitivity, predictive values and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The questionnaire was assessed for test-retest reliability, acceptability and readability. External validation was prospectively conducted in an independent sample and predictive performance re-evaluated. RESULTS: A 13-item Undiagnosed COPD and Asthma Population Questionnaire (UCAP-Q) case-finding questionnaire to predict undiagnosed asthma or COPD was developed. The most appropriate risk cut-off was determined to be 6% for either disease. Applied to the derivation sample (n=1615), the questionnaire yielded a sensitivity of 92% for asthma and 97% for COPD; specificity of 17%; and an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI 0.64-0.74) for asthma and 0.82 (95% CI 0.78-0.86) for COPD. Prospective validation using an independent sample (n=471) showed sensitivities of 93% and 92% for asthma and COPD, respectively; specificity of 19%; with AUCs of 0.70 (95% CI 0.62-0.79) for asthma and 0.81 (95% CI 0.74-0.87) for COPD. AUCs for UCAP-Q were higher compared to AUCs for currently recommended case-finding questionnaires for asthma or COPD. CONCLUSIONS: The UCAP-Q demonstrated high sensitivities and AUCs for identifying undiagnosed asthma or COPD. A web-based calculator allows for easy calculation of risk probabilities for each disease.
Assuntos
Asma , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Adulto , Asma/diagnóstico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Espirometria , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Frailty is associated with poor postoperative outcomes, but existing data do not describe frailty's interaction with tumour characteristics at the time of cancer surgery. Our objective was to estimate the association between frailty and long-term survival, and to explore any interaction with tumour stage and grade. METHODS: This was a population-based cohort study conducted using linked provincial health administrative data in Ontario, Canada (2009-20). Using a cancer registry, we identified adults having elective cancer surgery. Frailty was measured using a validated index (range 0-1; higher score=greater frailty). Associations between frailty and long-term postoperative survival (primary outcome) were estimated using proportional hazards regression. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, discharge destination, days alive at home, and healthcare costs. RESULTS: We identified and included 52 012 patients. Mean frailty score was 0.13 (standard deviation 0.07). During follow-up, 19 378 (37.3%) patients died. After adjustment for risk factors, each 10% increase in frailty was associated with a 1.60-fold relative decrease in survival (95% confidence interval: 1.56-1.64). The frailty-survival association was strongest for patients with lower stage and grade cancers. Increased frailty was associated with longer hospital stays (3 days), fewer days alive and at home (42 days yr-1), more frequent discharge to a nursing facility (2.38-fold), and increased healthcare costs ($6048). CONCLUSIONS: Patient frailty is associated with decreased long-term survival after cancer surgery. The association is stronger for early-stage and -grade cancers, which would otherwise have a better survival prognosis.
Assuntos
Fragilidade/complicações , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Feminino , Idoso Fragilizado , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Alta do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Global health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, confront healthcare workers (HCW) with increased exposure to potentially morally distressing events. The pandemic has provided an opportunity to explore the links between moral distress, moral resilience, and emergence of mental health symptoms in HCWs. METHODS: A total of 962 Canadian healthcare workers (88.4% female, 44.6 + 12.8 years old) completed an online survey during the first COVID-19 wave in Canada (between April 3rd and September 3rd, 2020). Respondents completed a series of validated scales assessing moral distress, perceived stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms, and moral resilience. Respondents were grouped based on exposure to patients who tested positive for COVID-19. In addition to descriptive statistics and analyses of covariance, multiple linear regression was used to evaluate if moral resilience moderates the association between exposure to morally distressing events and moral distress. Factors associated with moral resilience were also assessed. FINDINGS: Respondents working with patients with COVID-19 showed significantly more severe moral distress, anxiety, and depression symptoms (F > 5.5, p < .020), and a higher proportion screened positive for mental disorders (Chi-squared > 9.1, p = .002), compared to healthcare workers who were not. Moral resilience moderated the relationship between exposure to potentially morally distressing events and moral distress (p < .001); compared to those with higher moral resilience, the subgroup with the lowest moral resilience had a steeper cross-sectional worsening in moral distress as the frequency of potentially morally distressing events increased. Moral resilience also correlated with lower stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms (r > .27, p < .001). Factors independently associated with stronger moral resilience included: being male, older age, no mental disorder diagnosis, sleeping more, and higher support from employers and colleagues (B [0.02, |-0.26|]. INTERPRETATION: Elevated moral distress and mental health symptoms in healthcare workers facing a global crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic call for the development of interventions promoting moral resilience as a protective measure against moral adversities.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Adulto , Idoso , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Canadá , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/epidemiologia , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Princípios Morais , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Triple therapy with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), a long-acting ß2-agonist bronchodilator (LABA) and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) is recommended as step-up therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients who continue to have persistent symptoms and increased risk of exacerbation despite treatment with dual therapy. We sought to evaluate different treatment pathways through which COPD patients were escalated to triple therapy. METHODS: We used population health databases from Ontario, Canada to identify individuals aged 66 or older with COPD who started triple therapy between 2014 and 2017. Median time from diagnosis to triple therapy was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We classified treatment pathways based on treatments received prior to triple therapy and evaluated whether pathways differed by exacerbation history, blood eosinophil counts or time period. RESULTS: Among 4108 COPD patients initiating triple therapy, only 41.2% had a COPD exacerbation in the year prior. The three most common pathways were triple therapy as initial treatment (32.5%), LAMA to triple therapy (29.8%), and ICS + LABA to triple therapy (15.4%). Median time from diagnosis to triple therapy was 362 days (95% confidence interval:331-393 days) overall, but 14 days (95% CI 12-17 days) in the triple therapy as initial treatment pathway. This pathway was least likely to contain patients with frequent or severe exacerbations (22.0% vs. 31.5%, p < 0.001) or with blood eosinophil counts ≥300 cells/µL (18.9% vs. 22.0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Real-world prescription of triple therapy often does not follow COPD guidelines in terms of disease severity and prior treatments attempted.
Assuntos
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Administração por Inalação , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Progressão da Doença , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapêutico , Ontário , Prescrições , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
This study aimed to evaluate changes in sleep during the COVID-19 outbreak, and used data-driven approaches to identify distinct profiles of changes in sleep-related behaviours. Demographic, behavioural and psychological factors associated with sleep changes were also investigated. An online population survey assessing sleep and mental health was distributed between 3 April and 24 June 2020. Retrospective questions were used to estimate temporal changes from before to during the outbreak. In 5,525 Canadian respondents (67.1% females, 16-95 years old: Mean ± SDâ =â 55.6 ± 16.3 years), wake-up times were significantly delayed relative to pre-outbreak estimates (p < .001, ηp2 = 0.04). Occurrences of clinically meaningful sleep difficulties significantly increased from 36.0% before the outbreak to 50.5% during the outbreak (all p < .001, g ≥ 0.27). Three subgroups with distinct profiles of changes in sleep behaviours were identified: "Reduced Time in Bed", "Delayed Sleep" and "Extended Time in Bed". The "Reduced Time in Bed" and "Delayed Sleep" subgroups had more adverse sleep outcomes and psychological changes during the outbreak. The emergence of new sleep difficulties was independently associated with female sex, chronic illnesses, being employed, family responsibilities, earlier wake-up times, higher stress levels, as well as heavier alcohol use and television exposure. The heterogeneity of sleep changes in response to the pandemic highlights the need for tailored interventions to address sleep problems.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Demografia , Dissonias/epidemiologia , Dissonias/psicologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Sono/fisiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/psicologia , Canadá/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Privação do Sono/epidemiologia , Privação do Sono/psicologia , Transtornos do Sono do Ritmo Circadiano/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Sono do Ritmo Circadiano/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Televisão/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused global disruptions with serious psychological impacts. This study investigated the emergence of new psychiatric symptoms and the worsening of pre-existing mental disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic, identified factors associated with psychological worsening, and assessed changes in mental health service use. METHODS: An online survey was circulated between April 3 and June 23, 2020. Respondents were asked to complete mental health questionnaires based on 2 time referents: currently (i.e., during the outbreak) and in the month preceding the outbreak. A total of 4,294 Canadians between 16 and 99 years of age were subdivided based on the presence of self-reported psychiatric diagnoses. RESULTS: The proportion of respondents without prior psychiatric history who screened positive for generalized anxiety disorder and depression increased by 12% and 29%, respectively, during the outbreak. Occurrences of clinically important worsening in anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation symptoms relative to pre-outbreak estimates were significantly higher in those with psychiatric diagnoses. Furthermore, 15% to 19% of respondents reported increased alcohol or cannabis use. Worse psychological changes relative to pre-outbreak estimate were associated with female sex, younger age, lower income, poorer coping skills, multiple psychiatric comorbidities, previous trauma exposure, deteriorating physical health, poorer family relationships, and lower exercising. Reductions in mental health care were associated with increased suicidal ideation. CONCLUSION: The worsening in mental health symptoms and the decline in access to care call for the urgent development of adapted interventions targeting both new mental disorders and pre-existing psychiatric conditions affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtornos Mentais , Canadá/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: It is not well-known if diagnosing and treating sleep breathing disorders among individuals with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) improves health outcomes. We evaluated the association between receipt of laboratory-based polysomnography (which is the first step in the diagnosis and treatment of sleep breathing disorders in Ontario, Canada) and respiratory-related hospitalization and all-cause mortality among individuals with IPF. METHODS: We used a retrospective, population-based, cohort study design, analyzing health administrative data from Ontario, Canada, from 2007 to 2019. Individuals with IPF were identified using an algorithm based on health administrative codes previously developed by IPF experts. Propensity score matching was used to account for potential differences in 41 relevant covariates between individuals that underwent polysomnography (exposed) and individuals that did not undergo polysomnography (controls), in order minimize potential confounding. Respiratory-related hospitalization and all-cause mortality were evaluated up to 12 months after the index date. RESULTS: Out of 5044 individuals with IPF identified, 201 (4.0%) received polysomnography, and 189 (94.0%) were matched to an equal number of controls. Compared to controls, exposed individuals had significantly reduced rates of respiratory-related hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.75), p = 0.003) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.80), p = 0.004). Significantly reduced rate of respiratory-related hospitalization (but not all-cause mortality) was also observed among those with > = 1 respiratory-related hospitalization (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-0.99) and systemic corticosteroid receipt (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19-0.94) in the year prior to the index date, which reflect sicker subgroups of persons. CONCLUSIONS: Undergoing polysomnography was associated with significantly improved clinically-important health outcomes among individuals with IPF, highlighting the potential importance of incorporating this testing in IPF disease management.
Assuntos
Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/complicações , Polissonografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Síndromes da Apneia do Sono/diagnóstico , Síndromes da Apneia do Sono/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Morbidade , Ontário/epidemiologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Síndromes da Apneia do Sono/mortalidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Globally the burden of Obstructive Lung Diseases (OLD) is growing, however its effect on urban poor populations with the high prevalence of tobacco dependence is virtually unknown. The purpose of this project is to estimate the prevalence and burden of OLD in the urban, low-income populations of Ottawa, Canada. METHODS: The study presented in this paper was part of the PROMPT (Management and Point-of-Care for Tobacco Dependence) project; a prospective cohort study in a community-based setting (n = 80) with meaningful Patient Engagement from design to dissemination. Spirometry data, standardized questionnaires and semi-structured interviews from PROMPT were interpreted to understand the lung function, disease burden and social determinants (respectively) in this population. RESULTS: The prevalence of OLD among those who completed spirometry (N = 64) was 45-59%. Generic and disease-specific quality of life was generally poor in all PROMPT participants, even those without OLD, highlighting the higher disease burden this vulnerable population faces. Quality of life was impacted by two major themes, including i) socioeconomic status and stress and ii) social networks and related experiences of trauma. CONCLUSION: The prevalence and disease burden of OLD is significantly higher in Ottawa's urban poor population than what is observed in the general Canadian population who smoke, suggesting an etiological role of the social determinants of health. This urges the need for comprehensive care programs addressing up-stream factors leading to OLDs, including poor access and utilization of preventive healthcare addressing the social determinants of health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrails.gov - NCT03626064 , Retrospective registered: August 2018.
Assuntos
Pneumopatias Obstrutivas , Populações Vulneráveis , Canadá/epidemiologia , Humanos , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , População UrbanaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity, body mass index (BMI), and circulating levels of inflammatory adhesion molecules (intercellular adhesion molecule-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and E-selectin). METHODS: A cross-sectional clinical cohort study on all consecutive adults referred to the University of British Columbia (UBC) Sleep Laboratory for a polysomnogram (PSG) for suspected OSA provided a morning blood sample. Samples were analyzed with multiplex immune assay (MilliporeSigma, CA) to assess the levels of adhesion molecules. RESULTS: 488 patients were studied; the majority were male (68%) with a mean age of 50 yrs, mean AHI of 23 events/hour, and mean BMI of 32 kg/m2. In multivariable linear regression models, all three adhesion molecules were significantly associated with BMI (E-selectin p < 0.0001; ICAM-1 p = 0.0007; VCAM-1 p = 0.0003). However, only E-selectin was independently associated with AHI (p = 0.02); there was no significant interaction between AHI and BMI for E-selectin (p = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Although all three adhesion molecules were associated with BMI, only E-selectin was independently associated with OSA severity. Future studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of the relationship between E-selectin and OSA.
Assuntos
Selectina E/sangue , Molécula 1 de Adesão Intercelular/sangue , Obesidade/complicações , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/sangue , Molécula 1 de Adesão de Célula Vascular/sangue , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/sangue , Polissonografia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/complicaçõesRESUMO
Rationale: Abnormal patterns of sleep and wakefulness exist in mechanically ventilated patients. Objectives: In this study (SLEEWE [Effect of Sleep Disruption on the Outcome of Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation]), we aimed to investigate polysomnographic indexes as well as a continuous index for evaluating sleep depth, the odds ratio product (ORP), to determine whether abnormal sleep or wakefulness is associated with the outcome of spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs). Methods: Mechanically ventilated patients from three sites were enrolled if an SBT was planned the following day. EEG was recorded using a portable sleep diagnostic device 15 hours before the SBT. The ORP was calculated from the power of four EEG frequency bands relative to each other, ranging from full wakefulness (2.5) to deep sleep (0). The correlation between the right and left hemispheres' ORP (R/L ORP) was calculated. Measurements and Main Results: Among 44 patients enrolled, 37 had technically adequate signals: 11 (30%) passed the SBT and were extubated, 8 (21%) passed the SBT but were not deemed to be clinically ready for extubation, and 18 (49%) failed the SBT. Pathological wakefulness or atypical sleep were highly prevalent, but the distribution of classical sleep stages was similar between groups. The mean ORP and the proportion of time in which the ORP was >2.2 were higher in extubated patients compared with the other groups (P < 0.05). R/L ORP was significantly lower in patients who failed the SBT, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of R/L ORP to predict failure was 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.98). Conclusions: Patients who pass an SBT and are extubated reach higher levels of wakefulness as indicated by the ORP, suggesting abnormal wakefulness in others. The hemispheric ORP correlation is much poorer in patients who fail an SBT.
Assuntos
Respiração Artificial , Sono/fisiologia , Desmame do Respirador , Vigília/fisiologia , Eletroencefalografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Polissonografia , Estudos Prospectivos , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversosRESUMO
RATIONALE: The burden of advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is high globally; however, little is known about how often end-of-life strategies are used by this population. OBJECTIVES: To describe trends in the use of end-of-life care strategies by people with advanced COPD in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: A population-based repeated cross-sectional study examining end-of-life care strategies in individuals with advanced COPD was conducted. Annual proportions of individuals who received formal palliative care, long-term oxygen therapy, or opioids from 2004 to 2014 were determined. Results were age and sex standardized and stratified by age, sex, socioeconomic status, urban/rural residence, and immigrant status. Measurement/Main Results: There were 151,912 persons with advanced COPD in Ontario between 2004 and 2014. Use of formal palliative care services increased 1% per year from 5.3% in 2004 to 14.3% in 2014 (P value for trend < 0.001), whereas use of long-term oxygen therapy increased 1.1% per year from 26.4% in 2004 to 35.3% in 2013 (P value for trend < 0.001). The use of opioids was relatively stable (40.0% in 2004 and 41.8% in 2014; P value for trend = 0.08). Younger individuals were less likely to use formal palliative care services and long-term oxygen therapy. Males were less likely than females to receive long-term oxygen therapy and opioids. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of people with advanced COPD using end-of-life strategies, although increasing, remains low. Efforts should focus on increasing access to such strategies and educating patients and providers of their benefits.
Assuntos
Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Assistência Terminal/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Oxigenoterapia/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent in post-stroke patients and observational evidence suggests that untreated it is a harbinger of poorer outcomes in this population. Clinical trials on the impact of treatment of OSA with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) have countered difficulties with patient engagement and adherence to CPAP therapy. Real-world data on continuous positive airway pressure initiation and usage in the post-stroke population with obstructive sleep apnea is limited. METHODS: We performed a clinical retrospective study between January 2006 and June 2015 to describe the short- and long-term CPAP usage in the post-stroke population with OSA, and to assess which patient, disease, and treatment-related factors were associated with CPAP purchase, initiation, and usage in this population. RESULTS: Of 191 post-stroke patients' recommended CPAP therapy, post-prescription usage at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months was 58%, 53%, 48%, 45%, and 39% respectively. OSA severity-related factors, such as AHI or degree of nocturnal hypoxemia, were not significantly associated with CPAP usage. Predictors of CPAP usage at all time points were younger age, male sex, never smokers, and no history of hypertension. There were some differences in predictors of CPAP usage between early and later time periods. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the long-term usage of CPAP therapy is possible with most of the attrition occurring in the first 3 months. Upfront healthcare resource allocation to CPAP initiation and usage in this population may improve longer-term usage.