Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 63
Filtrar
1.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 209(2): 185-196, 2024 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37812782

RESUMO

Rationale: Benzene has been classified as carcinogenic to humans, but there is limited evidence linking benzene exposure to lung cancer. Objectives: We aimed to examine the relationship between occupational benzene exposure and lung cancer. Methods: Subjects from 14 case-control studies across Europe and Canada were pooled. We used a quantitative job-exposure matrix to estimate benzene exposure. Logistic regression models assessed lung cancer risk across different exposure indices. We adjusted for smoking and five main occupational lung carcinogens and stratified analyses by smoking status and lung cancer subtypes. Measurements and Main Results: Analyses included 28,048 subjects (12,329 cases, 15,719 control subjects). Lung cancer odds ratios ranged from 1.12 (95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.22) to 1.32 (95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.48) (Ptrend = 0.002) for groups with the lowest and highest cumulative occupational exposures, respectively, compared with unexposed subjects. We observed an increasing trend of lung cancer with longer duration of exposure (Ptrend < 0.001) and a decreasing trend with longer time since last exposure (Ptrend = 0.02). These effects were seen for all lung cancer subtypes, regardless of smoking status, and were not influenced by specific occupational groups, exposures, or studies. Conclusions: We found consistent and robust associations between different dimensions of occupational benzene exposure and lung cancer after adjusting for smoking and main occupational lung carcinogens. These associations were observed across different subgroups, including nonsmokers. Our findings support the hypothesis that occupational benzene exposure increases the risk of developing lung cancer. Consequently, there is a need to revisit published epidemiological and molecular data on the pulmonary carcinogenicity of benzene.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Benzeno/toxicidade , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Carcinógenos , Pulmão , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia
2.
Int J Cancer ; 152(4): 645-660, 2023 02 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36054442

RESUMO

There is limited evidence regarding the exposure-effect relationship between lung-cancer risk and hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) or nickel. We estimated lung-cancer risks in relation to quantitative indices of occupational exposure to Cr(VI) and nickel and their interaction with smoking habits. We pooled 14 case-control studies from Europe and Canada, including 16 901 lung-cancer cases and 20 965 control subjects. A measurement-based job-exposure-matrix estimated job-year-region specific exposure levels to Cr(VI) and nickel, which were linked to the subjects' occupational histories. Odds ratios (OR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by unconditional logistic regression, adjusting for study, age group, smoking habits and exposure to other occupational lung carcinogens. Due to their high correlation, we refrained from mutually adjusting for Cr(VI) and nickel independently. In men, ORs for the highest quartile of cumulative exposure to CR(VI) were 1.32 (95% CI 1.19-1.47) and 1.29 (95% CI 1.15-1.45) in relation to nickel. Analogous results among women were: 1.04 (95% CI 0.48-2.24) and 1.29 (95% CI 0.60-2.86), respectively. In men, excess lung-cancer risks due to occupational Cr(VI) and nickel exposure were also observed in each stratum of never, former and current smokers. Joint effects of Cr(VI) and nickel with smoking were in general greater than additive, but not different from multiplicative. In summary, relatively low cumulative levels of occupational exposure to Cr(VI) and nickel were associated with increased ORs for lung cancer, particularly in men. However, we cannot rule out a combined classical measurement and Berkson-type of error structure, which may cause differential bias of risk estimates.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Exposição Ocupacional , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Níquel/toxicidade , Níquel/análise , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Neoplasias Pulmonares/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Cromo/toxicidade , Cromo/análise , Estudos de Casos e Controles
3.
Am J Epidemiol ; 191(10): 1753-1765, 2022 09 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35872594

RESUMO

We investigated the association between exposure to welding fumes and the risk of biliary tract, male breast, bone, and thymus cancer, as well as cancer of the small intestine, eye melanoma, and mycosis fungoides, among men in a European, multicenter case-control study. From 1995-1997, 644 cases and 1,959 control subjects from 7 countries were studied with respect to information on welding and potential confounders. We linked the welding histories of the participants with a measurement-based exposure matrix to calculate lifetime exposure to welding fumes. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic regression models, conditional on country and 5-year age groups, and adjusted for education and relevant confounders. Regular welding was associated with an increased risk of cancer of the small intestine (OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.17, 4.50). Lifetime exposure to welding fumes above the median of exposed controls was associated with an increased risk of cancer of the small intestine (OR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.07, 3.72) and male breast (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.14, 3.77), and some elevation in risk was apparent for bone cancer (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 0.85, 4.34) with increasing lifetime exposure to welding fumes. Welding fumes could contribute to an increased risk of some rare cancers.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar , Neoplasias , Exposição Ocupacional , Soldagem , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Razão de Chances
4.
BMC Pulm Med ; 22(1): 233, 2022 Jun 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35710385

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most threshold limit values are based on animal experiments. Often, the question remains whether these data reflect the situation in humans. As part of a series of investigations in our exposure lab, this study investigates whether the results on the inflammatory effects of particles that have been demonstrated in animal models can be confirmed in acute inhalation studies in humans. Such studies have not been conducted so far for barium sulfate particles (BaSO4), a substance with very low solubility and without known substance-specific toxicity. Previous inhalation studies with zinc oxide (ZnO), which has a substance-specific toxicity, have shown local and systemic inflammatory respones. The design of these human ZnO inhalation studies was adopted for BaSO4 to compare the effects of particles with known inflammatory activity and supposedly inert particles. For further comparison, in vitro investigations on inflammatory processes were carried out. METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers were exposed to filtered air and BaSO4 particles (4.0 mg/m3) for two hours including one hour of ergometric cycling at moderate workload. Effect parameters were clinical signs, body temperature, and inflammatory markers in blood and induced sputum. In addition, particle-induced in vitro-chemotaxis of BaSO4 was investigated with regard to mode of action and differences between in vivo and in vitro effects. RESULTS: No local or systemic clinical signs were observed after acute BaSO4 inhalation and, in contrast to our previous human exposure studies with ZnO, no elevated values of biomarkers of inflammation were measured after the challenge. The in vitro chemotaxis induced by BaSO4 particles was minimal and 15-fold lower compared to ZnO. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that BaSO4 as a representative of granular biopersistent particles without specific toxicity does not induce inflammatory effects in humans after acute inhalation. Moreover, the in vitro data fit in with these in vivo results. Despite the careful and complex investigations, limitations must be admitted because the number of local effect parameters were limited and chronic toxicity could not be studied.


Assuntos
Nanopartículas , Óxido de Zinco , Animais , Sulfato de Bário/toxicidade , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Exposição por Inalação/efeitos adversos , Tamanho da Partícula , Óxido de Zinco/toxicidade
5.
BMC Public Health ; 22(1): 302, 2022 02 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35164711

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Smoking intensity, which is generally based on self-reported average cigarettes per day (CPD), is a major behavioural risk factor and strongly related to socioeconomic status (SES). To assess the validity of the CPD measure, correlations with objective markers of tobacco smoke exposure - such as urinary nicotine metabolites - were examined. Yet, it remains unclear, whether this correlation is affected by SES, which may indicate imprecise or biased self-reports of smoking intensity. METHODS: We investigated the role of SES in the association between CPD and nicotine metabolites in current smokers among the participants of the population-based, prospective Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. We determined urinary cotinine and additionally trans-3'-hydroxy-cotinine. SES was assessed by the International Socio-Economic Index of occupational status, and education. We calculated correlations (Pearson's r) between logarithmised CPD and cotinine in subgroups of SES and analysed SES and further predictors of cotinine in multiple linear regression models separately by gender. RESULTS: Median reported smoking intensity was 20 CPD in male and 19 CPD in female smokers. Men showed higher cotinine concentrations (median 3652 µg/L, interquartile range (IQR) 2279-5422 µg/L) than women (3127 µg/L, IQR 1692-4920 µg/L). Logarithmised CPD correlated moderately with cotinine in both, men and women (Pearson's r 0.4), but correlations were weaker in smokers with lower SES: Pearson's r for low, intermediate, and high occupational SES was 0.35, 0.39, and 0.48 in men, and 0.28, 0.43, and 0.47 in women, respectively. Logarithmised CPD and urinary creatinine were main predictors of cotinine in multiple regression models, whereas SES showed a weak negative association in women. Results were similar for trans-3'-hydroxy-cotinine. CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing precision of self-reported CPD was indicated for low SES in men and women. We found no strong evidence for biased self-reports of smoking intensity by SES.


Assuntos
Cotinina , Nicotina , Cotinina/urina , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Nicotina/metabolismo , Estudos Prospectivos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fumar/urina , Classe Social
6.
Occup Environ Med ; 78(4): 269-278, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33115922

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the risk of lung cancer associated with ever working as a painter, duration of employment and type of painter by histological subtype as well as joint effects with smoking, within the SYNERGY project. METHODS: Data were pooled from 16 participating case-control studies conducted internationally. Detailed individual occupational and smoking histories were available for 19 369 lung cancer cases (684 ever employed as painters) and 23 674 age-matched and sex-matched controls (532 painters). Multivariable unconditional logistic regression models were adjusted for age, sex, centre, cigarette pack-years, time-since-smoking cessation and lifetime work in other jobs that entailed exposure to lung carcinogens. RESULTS: Ever having worked as a painter was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer in men (OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.50). The association was strongest for construction and repair painters and the risk was elevated for all histological subtypes, although more evident for small cell and squamous cell lung cancer than for adenocarcinoma and large cell carcinoma. There was evidence of interaction on the additive scale between smoking and employment as a painter (relative excess risk due to interaction >0). CONCLUSIONS: Our results by type/industry of painter may aid future identification of causative agents or exposure scenarios to develop evidence-based practices for reducing harmful exposures in painters.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Pintura/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Sexuais , Fumar/epidemiologia
7.
Arch Toxicol ; 95(1): 53-65, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33001223

RESUMO

Inhalation of ZnO particles can cause inflammation of the airways and metal fume fever. It is unclear if different sizes of the particles alter these effects. However, various studies report higher biological activity of other nano-sized particles compared to microparticles. No effects at all were observed after inhalation of micro- and nano-sized zinc oxide (ZnO) particle concentrations of 0.5 mg/m3. Studies with different particle sizes of ZnO at higher exposures are not available. Accordingly, we hypothesized that inhalation of nano-sized ZnO particles induces stronger health effects than the inhalation of the same airborne mass concentration of micro-sized ZnO particles. 16 healthy volunteers (eight men, eight women) were exposed to filtered air and ZnO particles (2.0 mg/m3) for 2 h (one session with nano- and one with micro-sized ZnO) including 1 h of cycling at moderate workload. Effect parameters were symptoms, body temperature, inflammatory markers in blood and in induced sputum. Induced sputum was obtained at baseline examination, 22 h after exposure and at the end of the final test. The effects were assessed before, immediately after, about 22 h after, as well as two and three days after each exposure. Neutrophils, monocytes and acute-phase proteins in blood increased 22 h after micro- and nano-sized ZnO exposure. Effects were generally stronger with micro-sized ZnO particles. Parameters in induced sputum showed partial increases on the next day, but the effect strengths were not clearly attributable to particle sizes. The hypothesis that nano-sized ZnO particles induce stronger health effects than micro-sized ZnO particles was not supported by our data. The stronger systemic inflammatory responses after inhalation of micro-sized ZnO particles can be explained by the higher deposition efficiency of micro-sized ZnO particles in the respiratory tract and a substance-specific mode of action, most likely caused by the formation of zinc ions.


Assuntos
Mediadores da Inflamação/sangue , Nanopartículas Metálicas/administração & dosagem , Sistema Respiratório/efeitos dos fármacos , Óxido de Zinco/administração & dosagem , Proteínas de Fase Aguda/metabolismo , Administração por Inalação , Adulto , Ciclismo , Biomarcadores/sangue , Regulação da Temperatura Corporal/efeitos dos fármacos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Nanopartículas Metálicas/efeitos adversos , Monócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Monócitos/metabolismo , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Neutrófilos/efeitos dos fármacos , Neutrófilos/metabolismo , Tamanho da Partícula , Distribuição Aleatória , Sistema Respiratório/metabolismo , Escarro/metabolismo , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem , Óxido de Zinco/efeitos adversos , Óxido de Zinco/metabolismo
8.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 202(3): 412-421, 2020 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32330394

RESUMO

Rationale: Millions of workers around the world are exposed to respirable crystalline silica. Although silica is a confirmed human lung carcinogen, little is known regarding the cancer risks associated with low levels of exposure and risks by cancer subtype. However, little is known regarding the disease risks associated with low levels of exposure and risks by cancer subtype.Objectives: We aimed to address current knowledge gaps in lung cancer risks associated with low levels of occupational silica exposure and the joint effects of smoking and silica exposure on lung cancer risks.Methods: Subjects from 14 case-control studies from Europe and Canada with detailed smoking and occupational histories were pooled. A quantitative job-exposure matrix was used to estimate silica exposure by occupation, time period, and geographical region. Logistic regression models were used to estimate exposure-disease associations and the joint effects of silica exposure and smoking on risk of lung cancer. Stratified analyses by smoking history and cancer subtypes were also performed.Measurements and Main Results: Our study included 16,901 cases and 20,965 control subjects. Lung cancer odds ratios ranged from 1.15 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.27) to 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.60) for groups with the lowest and highest cumulative exposure, respectively. Increasing cumulative silica exposure was associated (P trend < 0.01) with increasing lung cancer risks in nonsilicotics and in current, former, and never-smokers. Increasing exposure was also associated (P trend ≤ 0.01) with increasing risks of lung adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma. Supermultiplicative interaction of silica exposure and smoking was observed on overall lung cancer risks; superadditive effects were observed in risks of lung cancer and all three included subtypes.Conclusions: Silica exposure is associated with lung cancer at low exposure levels. An exposure-response relationship was robust and present regardless of smoking, silicosis status, and cancer subtype.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Dióxido de Silício , Silicose/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Canadá/epidemiologia , Fumar Cigarros , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Exposição por Inalação , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
9.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1271: 69-81, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31925750

RESUMO

Inhalation of high concentrations of zinc oxide (ZnO) particles may cause metal fume fever. A useful tool to characterize the reactivity of innate immune cells of an individual, e.g., after in vivo exposure, is the whole blood assay (WBA). The measurable outcome of WBA is the release of cytokines, especially pro-inflammatory and pyrogenic cytokines induced by stimulation in vitro. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether inhalation of nano-sized zinc oxide particles modifies the results of WBA from healthy blood donors. Sixteen healthy subjects were exposed to filtered air and ZnO particles (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/m3) for 4 h on four different days. Blood was collected before and 24 h after exposure, and ex vivo stimulation of the whole blood was performed using different endotoxin concentrations. The release of interleukin (IL)-1ß and IL-8 after 22-h incubation was quantified with specific immunoassays. The dose-response relationship of ex vivo stimulation with different endotoxin concentrations was not affected by previous ZnO exposure. However, based on the previously established calculation models, changes due to ZnO exposure could be described. The range of cytokine release in WBA was calculated for the whole group of blood donors, for the subgroups of low and high responders (each n = 8), and on the individual level. Most changes were observed after 0.5 mg/m3 ZnO exposure. Higher ZnO exposure did not yield higher effects. We conclude that the effects of inhalation of nano-sized ZnO particles in blood of healthy donors using the WBA could be determined. However, it should be noted that cytokine release as outcome of WBA is not a marker of disease.


Assuntos
Análise Química do Sangue , Imunidade Inata/efeitos dos fármacos , Imunidade Inata/imunologia , Óxido de Zinco/efeitos adversos , Citocinas/sangue , Citocinas/imunologia , Endotoxinas/sangue , Humanos , Óxido de Zinco/administração & dosagem
10.
Am J Epidemiol ; 188(11): 1984-1993, 2019 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31504103

RESUMO

To investigate the risk of lung cancer after exposure to welding fumes, hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)), and nickel, we analyzed 3,418 lung cancer cases and 3,488 controls among men from 2 German case-control studies (1988-1996). We developed a welding-process exposure matrix from measurements of these agents, and this was linked with welding histories from a job-specific questionnaire to calculate cumulative exposure variables. Logistic regression models were fitted to estimate odds ratios with confidence intervals conditional on study, and they adjusted for age, smoking, and working in other at-risk occupations. Additionally, we mutually adjusted for the other exposure variables under study. Overall, 800 cases and 645 controls ever worked as regular or occasional welders. Odds ratios for lung cancer with high exposure were 1.55 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17, 2.05; median, 1.8 mg/m3 × years) for welding fumes, 1.85 (95% CI: 1.35, 2.54; median, 1.4 µg/m3 × years) for Cr(VI), and 1.60 (95% CI: 1.21, 2.12; median, 9 µg/m3 × years) for nickel. Risk estimates increased with increasing cumulative exposure to welding fumes and with increasing exposure duration for Cr(VI) and nickel. Our results showed that welding fumes, Cr(VI), and nickel might contribute independently to the excess lung cancer risk associated with welding. However, quantitative exposure assessment remains challenging.


Assuntos
Cromo/toxicidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Níquel/toxicidade , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Soldagem , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/induzido quimicamente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente
11.
BMC Pulm Med ; 19(1): 266, 2019 Dec 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31888596

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Workers in the zinc production and processing of galvanized sheet steel are exposed to a complex mixture of particles and gases, including zinc oxide (ZnO) that can affect human health. We aimed to study the effects of short-term controlled exposure to nano-sized ZnO on airway inflammatory markers in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Sixteen subjects (8 females, 8 men; age 19-42, non-smokers) were exposed to filtered air and ZnO nanoparticles (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/m3) for 4 h, including 2 h of cycling with a low workload. Induced sputum samples were collected during a medical baseline and a final examination and also about 24 h after each exposure. A number of inflammatory cellular and soluble markers were analyzed. RESULTS: Frequency and intensity of symptoms of airway irritation (throat irritation and cough) were increased in some subjects 24 h after ZnO exposures when compared to filtered air. The group comparison between filtered air and ZnO exposures showed statistically significant increases of neutrophils and interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-6 (IL-6), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-9) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP-1) in sputum starting at the lowest ZnO concentration of 0.5 mg/m3. However, a concentration-response relationship was absent. Effects were reversible. Strong correlations were found between neutrophil numbers and concentrations of total protein, IL-8, MMP-9, and TIMP-1. CONCLUSIONS: Controlled exposures of healthy subjects to ZnO nanoparticles induce reversible airway inflammation which was observed at a concentration of 0.5 mg/m3 and higher. The lack of a concentration-response relationship warrants further studies.


Assuntos
Tosse/induzido quimicamente , Nanopartículas/efeitos adversos , Faringite/induzido quimicamente , Óxido de Zinco/efeitos adversos , Administração por Inalação , Adulto , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Nanopartículas/administração & dosagem , Tamanho da Partícula , Escarro/química , Adulto Jovem , Óxido de Zinco/administração & dosagem
12.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 16(6): 400-409, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30625071

RESUMO

The International Agency for Research on Cancer classified welding fumes as carcinogenic to humans, and occupational exposure limits should be established to protect welders. The aim of this study is to estimate exposure levels to inhalable and respirable welding fumes by welding process to use them for exposure assessment in epidemiological studies and to derive occupational exposure limits. In total, 15,473 mass concentrations of inhalable and 9,161 concentrations of respirable welding fumes could be analyzed along with welding-related and sampling information, which were compiled in the German database MEGA between 1983 and 2016. In both particle-size fractions, model-based geometric means of the concentrations were estimated by welding process and material for frequently used welding processes adjusted for sampling time and median-centered for calendar years. The inhalable concentrations were approximately twice the respirable concentrations, with medians of 3 mg/m3 (inter-quartile range: 1.2-7.0 mg/m3) and 1.5 mg/m3 (inter-quartile range: < limit of detection -3.8 mg/m3), respectively. The adjusted geometric means of flux-cored arc welding, metal inert and active gas welding, shielded metal arc welding and torch cutting ranged from 0.9 to 2.2 mg/m3 for respirable welding fumes and from 2.3 to 4.7 mg/m3 for inhalable fumes. In both particle-size fractions, geometric means were between 0.1 and 0.9 mg/m3 when performing tungsten inert gas, autogeneous, resistance, laser, and plasma welding or spraying. Results derived from this large dataset are useful for a quantitative exposure assessment to estimate health risks of welders.


Assuntos
Exposição por Inalação/análise , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Soldagem/métodos , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Alemanha , Humanos , Metais/análise , Tamanho da Partícula
13.
Part Fibre Toxicol ; 15(1): 8, 2018 02 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29429408

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inhalation of high concentrations of zinc oxide particles (ZnO) may cause metal fume fever. In an earlier human inhalation study, no effects were observed after exposure to ZnO concentrations of 0.5 mg/m3. Further data from experimental studies with pure ZnO in the concentration range between 0.5 and 2.5 mg/m3 are not available. It was the aim of this experimental study to establish the concentration-response relationship of pure nano-sized ZnO particles. METHODS: Sixteen healthy subjects were exposed to filtered air and ZnO particles (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/m3) for 4 h on 4 different days, including 2 h of cycling with a low workload. The effects were assessed before, immediately after, and about 24 h after each exposure. Effect parameters were symptoms, body temperature, inflammatory markers and clotting factors in blood, and lung function. RESULTS: Concentration-dependent increases in symptoms, body temperature, acute phase proteins and neutrophils in blood were detected after ZnO inhalation. Significant effects were detected with ZnO concentrations of 1.0 mg/m3 or higher, with the most sensitive parameters being inflammatory markers in blood. CONCLUSION: A concentration-response relationship with nano-sized ZnO particles in a low concentration range was demonstrated. Systemic inflammatory effects of inhaled nano-sized ZnO particles were observed at concentrations well below the occpational exposure limit for ZnO in many countries. It is recommended to reassess the exposure limit for ZnO at workplaces.


Assuntos
Reação de Fase Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Exposição por Inalação/análise , Nanopartículas/toxicidade , Óxido de Zinco/toxicidade , Reação de Fase Aguda/sangue , Adulto , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Exposição por Inalação/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Nanopartículas/administração & dosagem , Tamanho da Partícula , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem , Óxido de Zinco/administração & dosagem
14.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1108: 25-36, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29931563

RESUMO

The whole-blood assay (WBA) with human fresh blood may provide insight into the features of an individual's innate immunity. To assess this, ex vivo cytokine release is measured after stimulation of whole blood with various stimuli, for instance, endotoxin in vitro. The aim of the present study was to evaluate WBA reproducibility with fresh blood using different calculation models. The blood was collected from 16 healthy volunteers on 6 different days. Ex vivo stimulation was performed in each individual's blood sample for 22 h, using different endotoxin concentrations. Interleukin (IL)-1ß and IL-8 release were quantified using specific immunoassays in the cell-free supernatant. We found that a dose-response relationship between endotoxin and cytokine concentration could be verified for all blood donors in all tests. The median coefficient of variation of the repeated tests was 29% for IL-1ß and 52% for IL-8. Upon stimulation with 40 pg/mL endotoxin, a confidence interval of 60-140% was calculated for IL-1ß and 70-271% for IL-8 regarding test reproducibility. Furthermore, the classification into high or low responder was reproducible. We conclude that repeated blood collection offers an opportunity to evaluate the variability of WBA. Considering a high intragroup variability, an individual range assessment has been suggested to evaluate exposure effects.


Assuntos
Interleucina-1beta/metabolismo , Interleucina-8/metabolismo , Ativação Linfocitária , Bioensaio , Células Cultivadas , Endotoxinas , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
15.
Epidemiology ; 28(2): 288-299, 2017 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28141674

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Evidence is limited regarding risk and the shape of the exposure-response curve at low asbestos exposure levels. We estimated the exposure-response for occupational asbestos exposure and assessed the joint effect of asbestos exposure and smoking by sex and lung cancer subtype in general population studies. METHODS: We pooled 14 case-control studies conducted in 1985-2010 in Europe and Canada, including 17,705 lung cancer cases and 21,813 controls with detailed information on tobacco habits and lifetime occupations. We developed a quantitative job-exposure-matrix to estimate job-, time period-, and region-specific exposure levels. Fiber-years (ff/ml-years) were calculated for each subject by linking the matrix with individual occupational histories. We fit unconditional logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and trends. RESULTS: The fully adjusted OR for ever-exposure to asbestos was 1.24 (95% CI, 1.18, 1.31) in men and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.95, 1.31) in women. In men, increasing lung cancer risk was observed with increasing exposure in all smoking categories and for all three major lung cancer subtypes. In women, lung cancer risk for all subtypes was increased in current smokers (ORs ~two-fold). The joint effect of asbestos exposure and smoking did not deviate from multiplicativity among men, and was more than additive among women. CONCLUSIONS: Our results in men showed an excess risk of lung cancer and its subtypes at low cumulative exposure levels, with a steeper exposure-response slope in this exposure range than at higher, previously studied levels. (See video abstract at, http://links.lww.com/EDE/B161.).


Assuntos
Amianto , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Fumar/epidemiologia
16.
BMC Cancer ; 16: 395, 2016 07 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27388894

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The nature of the association between occupational social prestige, social mobility, and risk of lung cancer remains uncertain. Using data from the international pooled SYNERGY case-control study, we studied the association between lung cancer and the level of time-weighted average occupational social prestige as well as its lifetime trajectory. METHODS: We included 11,433 male cases and 14,147 male control subjects. Each job was translated into an occupational social prestige score by applying Treiman's Standard International Occupational Prestige Scale (SIOPS). SIOPS scores were categorized as low, medium, and high prestige (reference). We calculated odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for study center, age, smoking, ever employment in a job with known lung carcinogen exposure, and education. Trajectories in SIOPS categories from first to last and first to longest job were defined as consistent, downward, or upward. We conducted several subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our results. RESULTS: We observed increased lung cancer risk estimates for men with medium (OR = 1.23; 95 % CI 1.13-1.33) and low occupational prestige (OR = 1.44; 95 % CI 1.32-1.57). Although adjustment for smoking and education reduced the associations between occupational prestige and lung cancer, they did not explain the association entirely. Traditional occupational exposures reduced the associations only slightly. We observed small associations with downward prestige trajectories, with ORs of 1.13, 95 % CI 0.88-1.46 for high to low, and 1.24; 95 % CI 1.08-1.41 for medium to low trajectories. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that occupational prestige is independently associated with lung cancer among men.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Mobilidade Social/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
17.
Ann Occup Hyg ; 60(7): 795-811, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27286764

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The use of measurement data in occupational exposure assessment allows more quantitative analyses of possible exposure-response relations. We describe a quantitative exposure assessment approach for five lung carcinogens (i.e. asbestos, chromium-VI, nickel, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (by its proxy benzo(a)pyrene (BaP)) and respirable crystalline silica). A quantitative job-exposure matrix (JEM) was developed based on statistical modeling of large quantities of personal measurements. METHODS: Empirical linear models were developed using personal occupational exposure measurements (n = 102306) from Europe and Canada, as well as auxiliary information like job (industry), year of sampling, region, an a priori exposure rating of each job (none, low, and high exposed), sampling and analytical methods, and sampling duration. The model outcomes were used to create a JEM with a quantitative estimate of the level of exposure by job, year, and region. RESULTS: Decreasing time trends were observed for all agents between the 1970s and 2009, ranging from -1.2% per year for personal BaP and nickel exposures to -10.7% for asbestos (in the time period before an asbestos ban was implemented). Regional differences in exposure concentrations (adjusted for measured jobs, years of measurement, and sampling method and duration) varied by agent, ranging from a factor 3.3 for chromium-VI up to a factor 10.5 for asbestos. CONCLUSION: We estimated time-, job-, and region-specific exposure levels for four (asbestos, chromium-VI, nickel, and RCS) out of five considered lung carcinogens. Through statistical modeling of large amounts of personal occupational exposure measurement data we were able to derive a quantitative JEM to be used in community-based studies.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Carcinógenos/análise , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Amianto/análise , Canadá , Cromo/análise , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Níquel/análise , Hidrocarbonetos Policíclicos Aromáticos/análise , Dióxido de Silício/análise
18.
Int J Cancer ; 136(2): 360-71, 2015 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24861979

RESUMO

Bricklayers may be exposed to several lung carcinogens, including crystalline silica and asbestos. Previous studies that analyzed lung cancer risk among these workers had several study design limitations. We examined lung cancer risk among bricklayers within SYNERGY, a large international pooled analysis of case-control studies on lung cancer and the joint effects of occupational carcinogens. For men ever employed as bricklayers we estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for study center, age, lifetime smoking history and employment in occupations with exposures to known or suspected lung carcinogens. Among 15,608 cases and 18,531 controls, there were 695 cases and 469 controls who had ever worked as bricklayers (OR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.28-1.68). In studies using population controls the OR was 1.55 (95% CI: 1.32-1.81, 540/349 cases/controls), while it was 1.24 (95% CI: 0.93-1.64, 155/120 cases/controls) in hospital-based studies. There was a clear positive trend with length of employment (p < 0.001). The relative risk was higher for squamous (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.42-1.98, 309 cases) and small cell carcinomas (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.44-2.20, 140 cases), than for adenocarcinoma (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.95-1.43, 150 cases) (p-homogeneity: 0.0007). ORs were still elevated after additional adjustment for education and in analyses using blue collar workers as referents. This study provided robust evidence of increased lung cancer risk in bricklayers. Although non-causal explanations cannot be completely ruled out, the association is plausible in view of the potential for exposure to several carcinogens, notably crystalline silica and to a lesser extent asbestos.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/etiologia , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/etiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/etiologia , Indústria da Construção , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Agências Internacionais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco
19.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 190(5): 549-59, 2014 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25054566

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Previous respiratory diseases have been associated with increased risk of lung cancer. Respiratory conditions often co-occur and few studies have investigated multiple conditions simultaneously. OBJECTIVES: Investigate lung cancer risk associated with chronic bronchitis, emphysema, tuberculosis, pneumonia, and asthma. METHODS: The SYNERGY project pooled information on previous respiratory diseases from 12,739 case subjects and 14,945 control subjects from 7 case-control studies conducted in Europe and Canada. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate the relationship between individual diseases adjusting for co-occurring conditions, and patterns of respiratory disease diagnoses and lung cancer. Analyses were stratified by sex, and adjusted for age, center, ever-employed in a high-risk occupation, education, smoking status, cigarette pack-years, and time since quitting smoking. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Chronic bronchitis and emphysema were positively associated with lung cancer, after accounting for other respiratory diseases and smoking (e.g., in men: odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-1.48 and OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.21-1.87, respectively). A positive relationship was observed between lung cancer and pneumonia diagnosed 2 years or less before lung cancer (OR, 3.31; 95% CI, 2.33-4.70 for men), but not longer. Co-occurrence of chronic bronchitis and emphysema and/or pneumonia had a stronger positive association with lung cancer than chronic bronchitis "only." Asthma had an inverse association with lung cancer, the association being stronger with an asthma diagnosis 5 years or more before lung cancer compared with shorter. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this large international case-control consortium indicate that after accounting for co-occurring respiratory diseases, chronic bronchitis and emphysema continue to have a positive association with lung cancer.


Assuntos
Asma/complicações , Bronquite Crônica/complicações , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Pneumonia/complicações , Enfisema Pulmonar/complicações , Asma/epidemiologia , Bronquite Crônica/epidemiologia , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Enfisema Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
20.
Am J Epidemiol ; 179(3): 290-8, 2014 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24355332

RESUMO

The indiscriminate use of the cumulative exposure metric (the product of intensity and duration of exposure) might bias reported associations between exposure to hazardous agents and cancer risk. To assess the independent effects of duration and intensity of exposure on cancer risk, we explored effect modification of the association of cumulative exposure and cancer risk by intensity of exposure. We applied a flexible excess odds ratio model that is linear in cumulative exposure but potentially nonlinear in intensity of exposure to 15 case-control studies of cigarette smoking and lung cancer (1985-2009). Our model accommodated modification of the excess odds ratio per pack-year of cigarette smoking by time since smoking cessation among former smokers. We observed negative effect modification of the association of pack-years of cigarette smoking and lung cancer by intensity of cigarette smoke for persons who smoked more than 20-30 cigarettes per day. Patterns of effect modification were similar across individual studies and across major lung cancer subtypes. We observed strong negative effect modification by time since smoking cessation. Application of our method in this example of cigarette smoking and lung cancer demonstrated that reducing a complex exposure history to a metric such as cumulative exposure is too restrictive.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Modificador do Efeito Epidemiológico , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/prevenção & controle , Modelos Estatísticos , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/epidemiologia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa