Real-world pharmacogenetics of statin intolerance: effects of SLCO1B1, ABCG2 , and CYP2C9 variants.

OBJECTIVE: The association of SLCO1B1 c.521T>C with simvastatin-induced muscle toxicity is well characterized. However, different statins are subject to metabolism and transport also by other proteins exhibiting clinically meaningful genetic variation. Our aim was to investigate associations of SLCO1B1 c.521T>C with intolerance to atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, or simvastatin, those of ABCG2 c.421C>A with intolerance to atorvastatin, fluvastatin, or rosuvastatin, and that of CYP2C9*2 and *3 alleles with intolerance to fluvastatin. METHODS: We studied the associations of these variants with statin intolerance in 2042 patients initiating statin therapy by combining genetic data from samples from the Helsinki Biobank to clinical chemistry and statin purchase data. RESULTS: We confirmed the association of SLCO1B1 c.521C/C genotype with simvastatin intolerance both by using phenotype of switching initial statin to another as a marker of statin intolerance [hazard ratio (HR) 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-3.25, P  = 0.025] and statin switching along with creatine kinase measurement (HR 5.44, 95% CI 1.49-19.9, P  = 0.011). No significant association was observed with atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. The sample sizes for fluvastatin and pravastatin were relatively small, but SLCO1B1 c.521T>C carriers had an increased risk of pravastatin intolerance defined by statin switching when compared to homozygous reference T/T genotype (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.01-4.39, P  = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The current results can inform pharmacogenetic statin prescribing guidelines and show feasibility for the methodology to be used in larger future studies.

Febuxostat, But Not Allopurinol, Markedly Raises the Plasma Concentrations of the Breast Cancer Resistance Protein Substrate Rosuvastatin.

Xanthine oxidase inhibitors febuxostat and allopurinol are commonly used in the treatment of gout. Febuxostat inhibits the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) in vitro. Rosuvastatin is a BCRP substrate and genetic variability in BCRP markedly affects rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics. In this study, we investigated possible effects of febuxostat and allopurinol on rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics. In a randomized crossover study with 3 phases, 10 healthy volunteers ingested once daily placebo for 7 days, 300 mg allopurinol for 7 days, or placebo for 3 days, followed by 120 mg febuxostat for 4 days, and a single 10 mg dose of rosuvastatin on day 6. Febuxostat increased the peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of rosuvastatin 2.1-fold (90% confidence interval 1.8-2.6; P = 5 × 10-5 ) and 1.9-fold (1.5-2.5; P = 0.001), but had no effect on rosuvastatin half-life or renal clearance. Allopurinol, on the other hand, did not affect rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics. In vitro, febuxostat inhibited the ATP-dependent uptake of rosuvastatin into BCRP-overexpressing membrane vesicles with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration of 0.35 µM, whereas allopurinol showed no inhibition with concentrations up to 200 µM. Taken together, the results suggest that febuxostat increases rosuvastatin exposure by inhibiting its BCRP-mediated efflux in the small intestine. Febuxostat may, therefore, serve as a useful index inhibitor of BCRP in drug-drug interaction studies in humans. Moreover, concomitant use of febuxostat may increase the exposure to BCRP substrate drugs and, thus, the risk of dose-dependent adverse effects.

No significant effect of ABCB1 haplotypes on the pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and rosuvastatin.

AIMS: This study aimed to investigate possible effects of ABCB1 genotype on fluvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics. METHODS: In a fixed-order crossover study, 10 healthy volunteers with the ABCB1 c.1236C/C-c.2677G/G-c.3435C/C (CGC/CGC) genotype and 10 with the c.1236T/T-c.2677T/T-c.3435T/T (TTT/TTT) genotype ingested a single 20-mg dose of fluvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and rosuvastatin. Plasma fluvastatin, pravastatin, and lovastatin concentrations were measured up to 12 h and plasma and urine rosuvastatin concentrations up to 48 and 24 h, respectively. RESULTS: The ABCB1 genotype had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of any of the investigated statins. The geometric mean ratio (95% confidence interval) of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) in participants with the TTT/TTT genotype to that in those with the CGC/CGC genotype was 0.96 (0.77, 1.20; P= 0.737) for fluvastatin, 0.92 (0.53, 1.62; P= 0.772) for pravastatin, 0.83 (0.36, 1.90; P= 0.644) for lovastatin, 1.25 (0.72, 2.17; P= 0.400) for lovastatin acid, and 1.10 (0.73, 1.65; P= 0.626) for rosuvastatin. The AUC(0-infinity) of lovastatin acid correlated significantly with that of rosuvastatin (r= 0.570, P= 0.009), but none of the other AUC(0-infinity) pairs showed a significant correlation. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the ABCB1 c.1236C-c.2677G-c.3435C and c.1236T-c.2677T-c.3435T haplotypes play no significant role in the interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and rosuvastatin.

Different effects of the ABCG2 c.421C>A SNP on the pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin.

AIMS: This study aimed to investigate possible effects of the ABCG2 c.421C>A (p.Gln141Lys; rs2231142) genotype on fluvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin pharmacokinetics. MATERIALS & METHODS: In a crossover study, five healthy volunteers with the ABCG2 c.421A/A genotype, four with the c.421C/A genotype and 23 with the c.421C/C genotype ingested a single 40-mg dose of fluvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin, with a washout period of 1 week. Plasma statin concentrations were measured up to 12 h. RESULTS: The estimated marginal mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) of fluvastatin was 97% (p = 0.015) or 72% (p = 0.009) larger in participants with the A/A genotype than in those with the C/A or C/C genotype. The AUC(0-infinity) of simvastatin lactone was 111% (p = 0.005) larger in participants with the A/A genotype than in participants with the C/C genotype. The simvastatin acid:lactone AUC(0-infinity) ratio was 46% (p = 0.017) smaller in individuals with the A/A genotype than in those with the C/C genotype. The ABCG2 genotype had no significant effect on simvastatin acid or pravastatin pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic variability in ABCG2 markedly affects the pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin and simvastatin lactone, but has no significant effect on pravastatin or active simvastatin acid. Genotyping for ABCG2 in addition to SLCO1B1 and ABCB1 polymorphisms could help in predicting statin pharmacokinetics when selecting a statin and its dose for an individual patient.