RESUMO
Background Osteoarthritis of the ankle, which has a prevalence of 3.4% in the general population and affects 70% of candidates post-traumatically, is less common than hip or knee arthritis. Despite the recent progress in ankle arthroplasty surgery, ankle arthrodesis is still considered the gold-standard treatment for severe osteoarthritis of the ankle joint and can achieve impressive improvements in pain and function in the majority of patients. Our objective is to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of ankle arthrodesis, postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction. Methodology This was a descriptive cross-sectional study that took place at Future Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan, from July 2015 to July 2022. Our institute performed 102 ankle fusion surgeries; 14 patients were excluded from the study because they did not show up for their follow-up visit, meaning 88 candidates were included. Two cannulated screws (6.5 mm) were used for ankle fixation in all patients. The outcome was assessed two years after surgery. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was used to assess ankle function before surgery and two years after the procedure. Postoperative complications and patient satisfaction were reported. The primary researcher collected data through direct interviews. Result The mean age of the study participants was 52.2 years, with 36.4% being between 40 and 50 years of age. The study consisted of 43 women and 45 men. The male-to-female ratio was almost 1:1. In 56.8% of candidates, the right ankle was involved. The overall rate of complications was 11.4%. Concerning patient satisfaction, 75% of the patients were fully satisfied. Moreover, significant correlations were found between the mean postoperative AOFAS score and age group, diabetes mellitus, complications, and patient satisfaction. Conclusion Ankle arthrodesis was demonstrated to be an excellent surgical method for reducing pain and enhancing ankle joint function. The most frequent complications were delayed wound healing, infection, and non-union. The functional outcome and patient satisfaction of this procedure were statistically high; patients with a higher functional score had higher levels of satisfaction. In contrast, diabetic and elderly patients had higher rates of complications.
RESUMO
Introduction Accurate and detailed operation notes are of great importance in all surgical specialties not only for patient care but also for providing information for research, audit and medico-legal purposes. In this audit cycle, we assessed the quality of operation notes against the standards set by the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Methodology A sample of 59 operation notes was randomly selected from the orthopaedics department at Ribat University Hospital and retrospectively audited by three reviewers according to the Royal College of Surgeons of England Good Surgical Practice guidelines released in 2014. A memory aid was then placed in the operation theatre, emphasising mainly the points with poor compliance in the audit. A re-audit was then performed for another 59 operation notes. Results During the first audit, 59 elective operation notes were reviewed, and there was good compliance with date documentation (86%), diagnosis (85%), operating surgeon (90%), assistants' names (86%), operative procedure (98%), detailed post-operative instructions (98%) and the signature (75%). In the re-audit phase, another 59 operative notes were reviewed; four of them were emergency operations. An improvement was noted in documenting the information that had been poorly documented in the first audit. In the first audit, 20% of the operation notes were written by the operating surgeon, while only 14% were written by the operating surgeon in the re-audit. Conclusion Our implementation of a memory aid in the operation theatre helped to improve the reporting of some of the criteria; however, some components of the operation notes remained poorly filled in.