RESUMO
There has been an increased ability to investigate the human microbiota through next-generation sequencing and functional assessment. This advancement has rapidly expanded our ability to study and manipulate the gastrointestinal microbiome to mitigate disease. Fecal microbiota transplantation, a therapy that broadly transfers the entire intestinal ecosystem, has been explored as a potential therapeutic in a variety of gastrointestinal, hepatic, and extraintestinal conditions. The field, however, continues to evolve, with a movement toward precision microbiome therapeutics, individualizing care for various disorders. This review will describe the use of fecal microbiota transplantation, microbiota restoration, and precision microbiome therapeutics, focusing on gastrointestinal and hepatic diseases.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Bile acid sequestrants (BAS) are an option for microscopic colitis (MC) refractory or intolerant to budesonide. There are inconsistent data on the prevalence of bile acid malabsorption (BAM) and utility of bile acid testing in MC. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate these outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of randomized control trials and observational studies of adults with MC treated with BAS was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus from inception to January 22, 2024. Data were extracted on (i) prevalence of BAM, (ii) clinical response and adverse events, and (iii) recurrence after BAS discontinuation. Data were pooled using random-effects models to determine weighted pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We included 23 studies (1 randomized control trial, 22 observational), with 1,011 patients with MC assessed for BAM and 771 treated with BAS. The pooled prevalence of BAM was 34% (95% CI 0.26-0.42, I2 = 81%). The pooled response rate with BAS induction for all patients with MC, irrespective of BAM, was 62% (95% CI 0.55-0.70, I2 = 71%). There was a higher pooled response rate in patients with BAM compared with those without BAM ( P < 0.0001). The pooled rate of BAS-related adverse effects was 9% (95% CI 0.05-0.14, I2 = 58%). DISCUSSION: One-third of patients with MC had BAM, and almost two-thirds of all patients responded to BAS with limited side effects. Patients with MC and BAM were more likely to respond to therapy, supporting the value of bile acid testing.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome is frequent in the intensive care unit (ICU), potentially leading to a heightened risk of nosocomial infections. Enhancing the gut microbiome has been proposed as a strategic approach to mitigate potential adverse outcomes. While prior research on select probiotic supplements has not successfully shown to improve gut microbial diversity, fermented foods offer a promising alternative. In this open-label phase I safety and feasibility study, we examined the safety and feasibility of kefir as an initial step towards utilizing fermented foods to mitigate gut dysbiosis in critically ill patients. METHODS: We administered kefir in escalating doses (60 mL, followed by 120 mL after 12 h, then 240 mL daily) to 54 critically ill patients with an intact gastrointestinal tract. To evaluate kefir's safety, we monitored for gastrointestinal symptoms. Feasibility was determined by whether patients received a minimum of 75% of their assigned kefir doses. To assess changes in the gut microbiome composition following kefir administration, we collected two stool samples from 13 patients: one within 72 h of admission to the ICU and another at least 72 h after the first stool sample. RESULTS: After administering kefir, none of the 54 critically ill patients exhibited signs of kefir-related bacteremia. No side effects like bloating, vomiting, or aspiration were noted, except for diarrhea in two patients concurrently on laxatives. Out of the 393 kefir doses prescribed for all participants, 359 (91%) were successfully administered. We were able to collect an initial stool sample from 29 (54%) patients and a follow-up sample from 13 (24%) patients. Analysis of the 26 paired samples revealed no increase in gut microbial α-diversity between the two timepoints. However, there was a significant improvement in the Gut Microbiome Wellness Index (GMWI) by the second timepoint (P = 0.034, one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test); this finding supports our hypothesis that kefir administration can improve gut health in critically ill patients. Additionally, the known microbial species in kefir were found to exhibit varying levels of engraftment in patients' guts. CONCLUSIONS: Providing kefir to critically ill individuals is safe and feasible. Our findings warrant a larger evaluation of kefir's safety, tolerability, and impact on gut microbiome dysbiosis in patients admitted to the ICU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05416814; trial registered on June 13, 2022.
Assuntos
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Kefir , Adulto , Humanos , Estado Terminal/terapia , Disbiose , Estudos de Viabilidade , Kefir/análiseRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although fecal microbiota transplant has been used to prevent recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI), documented pathogen transmissions highlight inherent safety risks of minimally processed stool. We describe manufacturing processes for fecal microbiota spores, live (VOWST; VOS, formerly SER-109), a microbiota-based oral therapeutic of Firmicutes spores. METHODS: Bacterial inactivation kill curves were obtained after ethanol exposure for 4 model organisms spiked into process intermediates. RESULTS: Bacterial log reduction factors ranged from 6.5 log10 to 7.4 log10 and lysis of spiked organisms occurred rapidly within 30 seconds. CONCLUSIONS: These experiments demonstrate substantial and rapid inactivation of representative organisms, supporting the potential benefit of VOS manufacturing processes to mitigate risk.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Microbiota , Humanos , Fezes/microbiologia , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Infecções por Clostridium/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , RecidivaRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Bile acid sequestrants (BAS) may be a treatment in microscopic colitis (MC), but efficacy data are limited. We evaluated the effectiveness of BAS in MC and assessed the utility of bile acid testing to predict response. METHODS: Adults with MC treated with BAS (2010-2020) at Mayo Clinic were identified. Bile acid malabsorption was defined by elevated serum 7âº-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one or by fecal testing using previously validated cutoffs. Response was defined at 12 ± 4 weeks after BAS initiation as: complete (resolution of diarrhea), partial (≥50% improvement in diarrhea), nonresponse (<50% improvement), and intolerance (discontinuation due to side effects). Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of response to BAS. RESULTS: We identified 282 patients (median age, 59 years [range, 20-87 years]; 88.3% women) with median follow-up of 4.5 years (range, 0.4-9.1 years). Patients were treated with the following BAS: 64.9% cholestyramine, 21.6% colesevelam, and 13.5% colestipol. Clinical outcomes were: 49.3% complete response, 16.3% partial response, 24.8% nonresponse, and 9.6% intolerance. There were no differences in outcomes between those on BAS alone or BAS combined with other medications (P = .98). The dose of BAS was not associated with response (P = .51). Bile acid testing was done in 31.9% of patients, and 56.7% were positive. No predictors of response to BAS were identified. After BAS discontinuation, 41.6% had recurrence at a median of 21 weeks (range, 1-172 weeks). CONCLUSION: In one of the largest cohorts evaluating BAS treatment in MC, nearly two-thirds had a partial or complete response. Additional research is needed to determine the role of BAS and bile acid malabsorption in MC.
Assuntos
Ácidos e Sais Biliares , Colite Microscópica , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Resina de Colestiramina/uso terapêutico , Diarreia/tratamento farmacológico , Colite Microscópica/diagnóstico , Colite Microscópica/tratamento farmacológico , Colestipol/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
We performed an updated study to investigate the rates of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in patients with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) who received fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for CDI. We found a significant reduction in number of UTIs after FMT compared to patients who received antibiotics for CDI treatment. After FMT, we also observed a trend towards reduction of antibiotic resistance in organisms causing UTI.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Infecções Urinárias , Humanos , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Recidiva , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Infecções Urinárias/terapia , Infecções Urinárias/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a safe and effective therapy for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Data on FMT for CDI in patients with underlying inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are emerging but conflicting. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to describe the efficacy and safety of FMT for CDI in IBD and its impact on IBD outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of multiple databases including Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed. Our primary analysis focused on pooled rate of CDI resolution after single and multiple FMTs in IBD patients. Additional analyses included rates of IBD-associated outcomes (flare, surgery, symptom improvement) after FMT. The random-effects model was used to calculate pooled rates. RESULTS: Among 457 adult patients, 363 had CDI resolution after first FMT with a pooled cure rate of 78% [95% confidence interval (CI): 73%-83%; I2 =39%]. Overall pooled rate cure rate with single and multiple FMTs was 88% (95% CI: 81%-94%; I2 =73%). The pooled rate of an IBD flare after FMT was 26.8% (95% CI: 22.5%-31.6%; I2 =9%) and of colectomy was 7.3% (95% CI: 4.7%-10.5%; I2 =56%). Among 141 pediatric patients, 106 had CDI resolution after first FMT with pooled cure rate of 78% (95% CI: 58%-93%; I2 =59%). Overall pooled cure rate with single and multiple FMTs was 77% (95% CI: 50%-96%; I2 =63%). The pooled rate of an IBD flare after FMT was 10.8% (95% CI: 5.7%-18.5% I2 =43%), and of colectomy was 10.3% (95% CI: 2.1%-30.2% I2 =23%). CONCLUSIONS: FMT appears to be a highly effective therapy for preventing recurrent CDI in patients with IBD. Patients who fail a single FMT may benefit from multiple FMTs.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/terapia , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , RecidivaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although fidaxomicin is an effective first-line treatment for Clostridioides difficile infection, it has not been well studied in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of fidaxomicin for the treatment of C. difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study of adults with inflammatory bowel disease and C. difficile infection treated with fidaxomicin with at least 3 months of follow up. The primary outcomes were treatment response, defined as resolution of C. difficile infection-attributed diarrhea and/or negative C. difficile infection stool test, and time to C. difficile infection recurrence after fidaxomicin. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (median age 42 years; 60.6% female) were included. Most patients had ulcerative colitis (26, 78.8%), were receiving treatment with a biologic or small molecule medication (19, 57.6%), and had a prior episode of C. difficile infection (26, 78.8%, median 2 episodes, range 0-15). Fidaxomicin led to resolution of C. difficile infection in 20 (60.6%) patients, with 6/20 (30.0%) developing a recurrence at a median of 55 days. Most patients who failed to respond to fidaxomicin underwent fecal microbiota transplantation (10/13, 76.9%) with resolution. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease and C. difficile infection, 60.6% responded to treatment with fidaxomicin. Of those who did not respond, fecal microbiota transplantation was an effective therapy.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Fidaxomicina , Antibacterianos , Vancomicina , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções por Clostridium/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Importance: The effect of rationally defined nonpathogenic, nontoxigenic, commensal strains of Clostridia on prevention of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is unknown. Objective: To determine the efficacy of VE303, a defined bacterial consortium of 8 strains of commensal Clostridia, in adults at high risk for CDI recurrence. The primary objective was to determine the recommended VE303 dosing for a phase 3 trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study conducted from February 2019 to September 2021 at 27 sites in the US and Canada. The study included 79 participants aged 18 years or older who were diagnosed with laboratory-confirmed CDI with 1 or more prior CDI episodes in the last 6 months and those with primary CDI at high risk for recurrence (defined as aged ≥75 years or ≥65 years with ≥1 risk factors: creatinine clearance <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, proton pump inhibitor use, remote [>6 months earlier] CDI history). Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to high-dose VE303 (8.0 × 109 colony-forming units [CFUs]) (n = 30), low-dose VE303 (1.6 × 109 CFUs) (n = 27), or placebo capsules (n = 22) orally once daily for 14 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of participants with CDI recurrence at 8 weeks using a combined clinical and laboratory definition. The primary efficacy end point was analyzed in 3 prespecified analyses, using successively broader definitions for an on-study CDI recurrence: (1) diarrhea consistent with CDI plus a toxin-positive stool sample; (2) diarrhea consistent with CDI plus a toxin-positive, polymerase chain reaction-positive, or toxigenic culture-positive stool sample; and (3) diarrhea consistent with CDI plus laboratory confirmation or (in the absence of a stool sample) treatment with a CDI-targeted antibiotic. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar across the high-dose VE303 (n = 29; 1 additional participant excluded from efficacy analysis), low-dose VE303 (n = 27), and placebo (n = 22) groups. The participants' median age was 63.5 years (range, 24-96); 70.5% were female; and 1.3% were Asian, 1.3% Black, 2.6% Hispanic, and 96.2% White. CDI recurrence rates through week 8 (using the efficacy analysis 3 definition) were 13.8% (4/29) for high-dose VE303, 37.0% (10/27) for low-dose VE303, and 45.5% (10/22) for placebo (P = .006, high-dose VE303 vs placebo). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with laboratory-confirmed CDI with 1 or more prior CDI episodes in the last 6 months and those with primary CDI at high risk for recurrence, high-dose VE303 prevented recurrent CDI compared with placebo. A larger, phase 3 study is needed to confirm these findings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03788434.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Probióticos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Clostridium/complicações , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Diarreia/etiologia , Diarreia/microbiologia , Diarreia/prevenção & controle , Diarreia/terapia , Fezes/química , Fezes/microbiologia , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Probióticos/administração & dosagem , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Recidiva , Reinfecção/prevenção & controle , Simbiose , Resultado do Tratamento , Método Duplo-Cego , Toxinas Bacterianas/análise , Adulto Jovem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common comorbidity and has wide ranging extrahepatic manifestations, including through cardiometabolic pathways. As such, there is growing interest in the impact of NAFLD on cerebrovascular disease and brain health more broadly. In this review, we assess recent research into understanding the association between NAFLD and brain health while highlighting potential clinical implications. RECENT FINDINGS: Mechanistically, NAFLD is characterized by both a proinflammatory and proatherogenic state, which results in vascular inflammation and neurodegeneration, potentially leading to clinical and subclinical cerebrovascular disease. Mounting epidemiological evidence suggests an association between NAFLD and an increased risk and severity of stroke, independent of other vascular risk factors. Studies also implicate NAFLD in subclinical cerebrovascular disease, such as carotid atherosclerosis and microvascular disease. In contrast, there does not appear to be an independent association between NAFLD and cognitive impairment. SUMMARY: The current literature supports the formulation of NAFLD as a multisystem disease that may also have implications for cerebrovascular disease and brain health. Further prospective studies are needed to better assess a temporal relationship between the two diseases, confirm these early findings, and decipher mechanistic links.
Assuntos
Doenças das Artérias Carótidas , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica , Encéfalo , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/complicações , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/complicações , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is highly effective for treating recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), with emerging data on intermediate and long-term safety. METHODS: A prospective survey-based study was conducted (September 2012-June 2018) in patients undergoing FMT for recurrent CDI. Data on demographics and comorbidities were abstracted from medical records. Patients were contacted at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year (short-term), and ≥2 years post-FMT (long-term). Symptoms and new medical diagnoses were recorded at each time point. Data were weighted to account for survey nonresponse bias. Multivariate logistic regression models for adverse events were built using age (per 10-year increment), sex, time of survey, and comorbidities. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Overall, 609 patients underwent FMT; median age was 56 years (range, 18-94), 64.8% were women, 22.8% had inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). At short-term follow-up (n = 609), >60% of patients had diarrhea and 19%-33% had constipation. At 1 year, 9.5% reported additional CDI episodes. On multivariable analysis, patients with IBD, dialysis-dependent kidney disease, and multiple FMTs had higher risk of diarrhea; risk of constipation was higher in women and lower in IBD (all P < .05). For long-term follow-up (n = 447), median time of follow-up was 3.7 years (range, 2.0-6.8). Overall, 73 new diagnoses were reported: 13% gastrointestinal, 10% weight gain, 11.8% new infections (all deemed unrelated to FMT). Median time to infections was 29 months (range, 0-73) post-FMT. CONCLUSION: FMT appears safe with low risk of transmission of infections. Several new diagnoses were reported, which should be explored in future studies.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Constipação Intestinal/etiologia , Diarreia/etiologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/terapia , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Dislipidemias/epidemiologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/complicações , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Sepse/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Aumento de Peso , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Epidemiologic studies from Europe and North America have reported an increasing incidence of microscopic colitis (MC) in the late 20th century, followed by a plateau. This population-based study assessed recent incidence trends and the overall prevalence of MC over the past decade. METHODS: Residents of Olmsted County, MN, diagnosed with collagenous colitis (CC) or lymphocytic colitis (LC) between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019 were identified using the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Clinical variables were abstracted by chart review. Incidence rates were age- and sex-adjusted to the 2010 US population. Associations between incidence and age, sex, and calendar periods were evaluated using Poisson regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 268 incident cases of MC were identified with a median age at diagnosis of 64 years (range, 19-90 y); 207 (77%) were women. The age- and sex-adjusted incidence of MC was 25.8 (95% CI, 22.7-28.9) cases per 100,000 person-years. The incidence of LC was 15.8 (95% CI, 13.4-18.2) and CC was 9.9 (95% CI, 8.1-11.9) per 100,000 person-years. A higher MC incidence was associated with increasing age and female sex (P < .01). There was no significant trend in age- and sex-adjusted incidence rate over the study period (P = .92). On December 31, 2019, the prevalence of MC, LC, and CC (including cases diagnosed before 2011) was 246.2, 146.1, and 100.1 per 100,000 persons, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of MC and its subtypes was stable between 2011 and 2019, but its prevalence was higher than in previous periods. The incidence of MC continues to be associated with increasing age and female sex.
Assuntos
Colite Colagenosa , Colite Linfocítica , Colite Microscópica , Colite Colagenosa/epidemiologia , Colite Linfocítica/epidemiologia , Colite Microscópica/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Minnesota/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Microscopic colitis (MC) is a common cause of chronic watery diarrhea, with the highest incidence in women over age 50.1 Cross-sectional studies have suggested that patients with MC have a lower incidence of adenomatous colon polyps compared with those without MC.2-4 The existing literature is limited by cross-sectional design, small sample sizes, lack of longitudinal follow-up, and the use of average-risk patients, rather than those with chronic diarrhea, as controls. We aimed to explore the association between MC and colon adenomas.
Assuntos
Adenoma , Colite Microscópica , Adenoma/complicações , Adenoma/epidemiologia , Colite Microscópica/complicações , Colite Microscópica/epidemiologia , Colo , Estudos Transversais , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Diarreia/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is used commonly for treatment of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs), although prospective safety data are limited and real-world FMT practice and outcomes are not well described. The FMT National Registry was designed to assess FMT methods and both safety and effectiveness outcomes from North American FMT providers. METHODS: Patients undergoing FMT in clinical practices across North America were eligible. Participating investigators enter de-identified data into an online platform, including FMT protocol, baseline patient characteristics, CDI cure and recurrence, and short and long-term safety outcomes. RESULTS: Of the first 259 participants enrolled at 20 sites, 222 had completed short-term follow-up at 1 month and 123 had follow-up to 6 months; 171 (66%) were female. All FMTs were done for CDI and 249 (96%) used an unknown donor (eg, stool bank). One-month cure occurred in 200 patients (90%); of these, 197 (98%) received only 1 FMT. Among 112 patients with initial cure who were followed to 6 months, 4 (4%) had CDI recurrence. Severe symptoms reported within 1-month of FMT included diarrhea (n = 5 [2%]) and abdominal pain (n = 4 [2%]); 3 patients (1%) had hospitalizations possibly related to FMT. At 6 months, new diagnoses of irritable bowel syndrome were made in 2 patients (1%) and inflammatory bowel disease in 2 patients (1%). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective real-world study demonstrated high effectiveness of FMT for CDI with a good safety profile. Assessment of new conditions at long-term follow-up is planned as this registry grows and will be important for determining the full safety profile of FMT.
Assuntos
Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/terapia , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Clostridioides difficile , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Outcomes and safety of budesonide maintenance therapy in microscopic colitis (MC) are not well known. METHODS: Adult residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, diagnosed with MC (2002-2019) and treated with budesonide were identified using the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Response was assessed at 12 ± 4 weeks after initiation of therapy and defined as complete (resolution of diarrhea), partial (≥50% improvement in the number of bowel movements), nonresponse (<50% improvement), and intolerance (discontinued because of side effects). For safety outcomes, cases (budesonide maintenance) and MC controls (no budesonide therapy) were matched by sex and age at diagnosis (±2 years). RESULTS: A total of 450 patients were identified, of whom 162 (36.0%) were treated with budesonide for induction of clinical remission (median age 67 [23-91] years and 126 women [77.8%] ). Clinical outcomes for induction were as follows: 130 (80.2%) complete response, 22 (13.6%) partial response, 8 (4.9%) no response, and 2 (1.2%) intolerance. After induction, 96 (63.2%) had recurrence after discontinuation, of whom 27 (28.1%) required further budesonide induction treatment without maintenance, 56 (58.3%) required long-term budesonide maintenance, and 13 (13.5%) were treated with other therapies. Of those receiving budesonide maintenance, all responded (55 [98.2%] complete and 1 [1.8%] partial). No patient stopped maintenance from adverse events. The median duration of follow-up was 5.6 years (0.3-18.9). There was no significant difference between cases and controls in the incidence of osteopenia/osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, glaucoma, or cataracts. DISCUSSION: The long-term use of budesonide in MC seems to be effective and generally well tolerated with limited adverse effects.
Assuntos
Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas , Colite Microscópica , Osteoporose , Adulto , Idoso , Budesonida/efeitos adversos , Colite Microscópica/tratamento farmacológico , Colite Microscópica/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Indução de RemissãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Postinfection irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) affects ~14% patients after acute bacterial enterocolitis. AIM: The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to find the prevalence of PI-IBS following Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). METHODS: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science from inception through January 20, 2020 for cohort studies assessing PI-IBS following CDI. Primary outcome was pooled prevalence calculated using inverse variance heterogeneity model [MetaXL (v. 5.3)]. A priori subgroup analyses were done [by irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) diagnostic criteria-Rome vs. others, time of IBS diagnosis-<6 or >6 mo, exclusion or inclusion of pre-existing IBS and CDI treatment-antibiotic with fecal microbiota transplantation vs. antibiotic only]. Heterogeneity was considered substantial if I2>50%. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2019, 15 studies were included (10 prospective, 5 retrospective; 9 full-text, 6 abstracts). Data from 1218 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. Risk of bias was low in 7, medium in 4 and high in 4 studies. Pooled prevalence of PI-IBS was 21.1% (95% confidence interval, 8.2%-35.7%), I2=96%. Common PI-IBS subtypes were diarrhea-predominant in 46.3% (50) patients, and mixed in 33.3% (36) patients. Subgroup analyses by IBS diagnostic criteria, time of IBS diagnosis or CDI treatment did not significantly change the primary outcome (all P>0.05), nor decrease heterogeneity. Funnel plot analysis revealed publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Over 20% of patients develop PI-IBS after CDI. Factors such as diagnostic criteria for IBS and CDI treatment did not affect prevalence, though small numbers limit the confidence in these conclusions. Larger, well conducted studies are needed to study PI-IBS in CDI.
Assuntos
Infecções por Clostridium , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Diarreia/etiologia , Diarreia/microbiologia , Humanos , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/diagnóstico , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/epidemiologia , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Effective treatment options for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) are limited, with high recurrence rates associated with the current standard of care. Herein we report results from an open-label Phase 2 trial to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and durability of RBX2660-a standardized microbiota-based investigational live biotherapeutic-and a closely-matched historical control cohort. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, open-label Phase 2 study enrolled patients who had experienced either ≥ 2 recurrences of CDI, treated by standard-of-care antibiotic therapy, after a primary CDI episode, or ≥ 2 episodes of severe CDI requiring hospitalization. Participants received up to 2 doses of RBX2660 rectally administered with doses 7 days apart. Treatment success was defined as the absence of CDI diarrhea without the need for retreatment for 8 weeks after completing study treatment. A historical control group with matched inclusion and exclusion criteria was identified from a retrospective chart review of participants treated with standard-of-care antibiotics for recurrent CDI who matched key criteria for the study. The primary objective was to compare treatment success of RBX2660 to the historical control group. A key secondary outcome was the safety profile of RBX2660, including adverse events and CDI occurrence through 24 months after treatment. In addition, fecal samples from RBX2660-treated participants were sequenced to evaluate microbiome composition and functional changes from before to after treatment. RESULTS: In this Phase 2 open-label clinical trial, RBX2660 demonstrated a 78.9% (112/142) treatment success rate compared to a 30.7% (23/75) for the historical control group (p < 0.0001; Chi-square test). Post-hoc analysis indicated that 91% (88/97) of evaluable RBX2660 responders remained CDI occurrence-free to 24 months after treatment demonstrating durability. RBX2660 was well-tolerated with mostly mild to moderate adverse events. The composition and diversity of RBX2660 responders' fecal microbiome significantly changed from before to after treatment to become more similar to RBX2660, and these changes were durable to 24 months after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this Phase 2 trial, RBX2660 was safe and effective for reducing rCDI recurrence as compared to a historical control group. Microbiome changes are consistent with restorative changes implicated in resisting C. difficile recurrence. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02589847 (10/28/2015).
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Microbiota , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of FMT for reduction in CDI recurrences (rCDI), but this treatment and its reporting in the literature has significant heterogeneity. Recent publications (e.g., Ramai et al. in Dig Dis Sci 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06185-7 ) present the clinical outcomes for different FMT methodologies. However, to understand, compare, and contextualize outcomes, this heterogeneity in methods and reporting must be understood. METHODS: We performed a literature review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of FMT for rCDI to evaluate heterogeneity among trials. A methodical search between January 2010 and May 2019 of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane was conducted for studies investigating FMT in adults with rCDI. RCTs were evaluated for a variety of methodological and reporting criteria. RESULTS: Eight RCTs were identified, wherein 14 different FMT preparations were considered (each with distinct protocols for processing, storage, administration, and dosing). Sample sizes were generally small, with only two studies performing FMT in more than 100 patients. Three studies used non-FMT controls (vancomycin), while the remaining compared FMT with differing routes of administration or formulations. Across the identified studies, there was no standardized manner for reporting the timing of the FMT procedure. All studies tracked adverse events; however, follow-up periods were limited. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variability exists among RCTs, with marked differences in study design, control groups, and outcome assessment. Lack of a standard-of-care control in many trials may impact reproducibility of FMT trial outcomes in patients with rCDI. Widespread use of FMT for rCDI is still investigational; therefore, these foundational studies provide opportunities to optimize future trials.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Adulto , Infecções por Clostridium/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Recidiva , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is highly effective for preventing recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Durability (no recurrence despite additional risk factor exposure) of FMT protection is largely unknown. We studied the durability of FMT in patients with recurrent CDI. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of adults undergoing FMT for recurrent CDI. Data collected included demographics, CDI risk factors (comorbidities, healthcare exposure, non-CDI antibiotic use, acid suppressant medications), and future CDI episodes. Durable response to FMT was defined as lack of CDI episodes within 1 year post-FMT despite risk factor exposure. RESULTS: Overall, 460 patients were included (median age, 57 years [18-94]; 65.2% female). Comorbidities included chronic liver disease, 12.8% (nâ =â 59); cancer, 11.7% (nâ =â 54); chronic kidney disease, 3.9% (nâ =â 18); and inflammatory bowel disease, 21.9% (nâ =â 101). Overall, 31.3% (nâ =â 144) received antibiotics, 21.7% (nâ =â 100) received acid suppressants, and 76.8% (nâ =â 350) had healthcare exposure after FMT. Of 374 patients with risk factor exposure, 78.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.7%-84.0%) had durable response to FMT at 1 year. On multivariable analysis, antibiotic use was independently associated with decreased durability of FMT (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, .15-.49; Pâ <â .001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients had a durable response to FMT despite exposure to CDI risk factors. Antibiotic exposure after FMT independently predicted loss of durability of FMT. Larger studies are needed to define predictors of durable response in patients with and without exposure to antibiotics.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Neoplasias , Adulto , Clostridioides , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (rCDI) are a global public health threat. To reduce rCDI, microbiota-restoring therapies are needed, particularly standardized, easy-to-administer formulations. METHODS: This phase I open-label trial assessed the safety, efficacy in preventing rCDI recurrence, and intestinal microbiome effects of RBX7455, a room temperature-stable, orally administered investigational live biotherapeutic. Adult participants with 1 or more prior episodes of rCDI received: 4 RBX7455 capsules twice daily for 4 days (group 1); 4 RBX7455 capsules twice daily for 2 days (group 2); or 2 RBX7455 capsules twice daily for 2 days (group 3). For all groups, the first dose was administered in clinic, with remaining doses self-administered at home. Adverse events were monitored during and for 6 months after treatment. Treatment success was defined as rCDI prevention through 8 weeks after treatment. Participants' microbiome composition was assessed prior to and for 6 months after treatment. RESULTS: Nine of 10 group 1 patients (90%), 8 of 10 group 2 patients (80%), and 10 of 10 group 3 patients (100%) were recurrence-free at the 8-week endpoint with durability to 6 months. Seventy-five treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 27 participants with no serious investigational product-related events. Prior to treatment, participants' microbiomes were dissimilar from the RBX7455 composition with decreased Bacteroidia- and Clostridia-class bacteria, whereas after treatment, responders' microbiomes showed increased Bacteroidia and Clostridia. CONCLUSIONS: Three dosing regimens of RBX7455 were safe and effective at preventing rCDI. Responders' microbiomes converged toward the composition of RBX7455. These results support its continued clinical evaluation. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02981316.