The prevalence of radiological cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation in patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy.

OBJECTIVES: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) related inflammation (CAA-RI) is an autoimmune inflammatory condition occurring in patients with CAA. We aimed to determine the prevalence of radiological CAA-RI amongst patients with CAA and to describe their presenting clinical features. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of electronic medical records across multiple centers within a single healthcare network. Patients who met radiological modified Boston 2.0 criteria for CAA and had white matter hyperintensity (WMH) were included. Scans were analyzed by a vascular neurologist and confirmed by a neuroradiologist blinded to clinical information for meeting criteria for possible or probable radiographic CAA-RI. RESULTS: Out of 1100 patients reviewed, 511 patients met radiological modified Boston criteria for CAA and 193 patients had WMH on MRI. A total of 55 (28.5 % of those with CAA and WMH, and 10.8 % of all CAA with or without WMH) patients had MRI brain imaging suggestive of possible or probable radiographic CAA-RI. The diagnosis of CAA-RI was reported in only 10 (18.2 %) patients initially while 20 (36.4 %) were diagnosed up to 74 months later (median 0, IQR 0-9 months). At the time of earliest probable CAA-RI findings on imaging, the most common concurrent findings were cognitive impairment (74.5 %), macro-hemorrhages (52.7 %), headache (30.9 %), seizures (14.5 %), and ischemic infarcts (14.5 %). Only 18 (32.7 %) patients were treated with immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of radiographic CAA-RI was high, and most cases were unrecognized and untreated. Further studies are needed to assess if earlier detection and treatment of radiologic CAA-RI may halt disease progression and prevent cognitive decline in these patients.

7T MR of intracranial pathology: Preliminary observations and comparisons to 3T and 1.5T.

PURPOSE: There have been an increasing number of studies involving ultra-high-field 7T of intracranial pathology, however, comprehensive clinical studies of neuropathology at 7T still remain limited. 7T has the advantage of a higher signal-to-noise ratio and a higher contrast-to-noise ratio, compared to current low field clinical MR scanners. We hypothesized 7T applied clinically, may improve detection and characterization of intracranial pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an IRB-approved 7T prospective study of patients with neurological disease who previously had lower field 3T and 1.5T. All patients underwent 7T scans, using comparable clinical imaging protocols, with the aim of qualitatively comparing neurological lesions at 7T with 3T or 1.5T. To qualitatively assess lesion conspicuity at 7T compared with low field, 80-paired images were viewed by 10 experienced neuroradiologists and scored on a 5-point scale. Inter-rater agreement was characterized using a raw percent agreement and mean weighted kappa. RESULTS: One-hundred and four patients with known neurological disease have been scanned to date. Fifty-five patients with epilepsy, 18 patients with mild traumatic brain injury, 11 patients with known or suspected multiple sclerosis, 9 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 4 patients with intracranial neoplasm, 2 patients with orbital melanoma, 2 patients with cortical infarcts, 2 patients with cavernous malformations, and 1 patient with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. From qualitative observations, we found better resolution and improved detection of lesions at 7T compared to 3T. There was a 55% raw inter-rater agreement that lesions were more conspicuous on 7T than 3T/1.5T, compared with a 6% agreement that lesions were more conspicuous on 3T/1.5T than 7T. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that the primary clinical advantages of 7T magnets, which include higher signal-to-noise ratio, higher contrast-to-noise ratio, smaller voxels and stronger susceptibility contrast, may increase lesion conspicuity, detection and characterization compared to low field 1.5T and 3T. However, low field which detects a plethora of intracranial pathology remains the mainstay for diagnostic imaging until limitations at 7T are addressed and further evidence of utility provided.

Predictive Value of Clinical, CSF and Vessel Wall MRI Variables in Diagnosing Primary Angiitis of the CNS.

Background and Objectives: Without brain biopsy, there are limited diagnostic predictors to differentiate primary angiitis of the CNS (PACNS) from intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). We examined the utility of clinical, CSF, and quantitative vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (VWMRI) variables in predicting PACNS from ICAD. Methods: In this cross-sectional design, observational study, we reviewed electronic medical records to identify patients (18 years and older) who presented to our medical center between January 2015 and December 2021 for ischemic stroke due to intracranial vasculopathy. Patients with biopsy-proven PACNS, probable PACNS, or ICAD were included. Patients with secondary CNS vasculitis or no VWMRI data were excluded. On VWMRI, for each patient, a total of 20 vessel wall segments were analyzed for percent concentricity, percent irregularity, and concentricity to eccentricity (C/E) ratios. We also collected several clinical and CSF variables. Using logistic regression models, we assessed the diagnostic value of VWMRI, CSF, and clinical variables in predicting PACNS in patients with biopsy-proven disease. We then performed a sensitivity analysis to assess predictors of biopsy-proven and probable PACNS. Results: Thirty-two patients with ICAD (54.2%) and 27 patients with PACNS (45.8%) were included. Of the patients with PACNS, 21 (77.8%) were not biopsied and considered probable PACNS. Twenty-four patients with ICAD (75%) and 6 biopsy-proven patients with PACNS (22.2%) showed large vessel involvement and were included in the primary analysis. Encephalopathy (odds ratio [OR], 7.60; 95% CI 1.07-54.09) and seizure (OR 23.00; 95% CI 1.77-298.45) were significantly associated with PACNS. All patients were included in the sensitivity analysis, in which headache significantly predicted PACNS (OR 7.60; 95% CI 1.07-54.09). In the primary analysis, for every 1 white blood cell/µL increase in CSF, there was a 47% higher odds of PACNS (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.04-2.07). On VWMRI, a C/E ratio >1 (OR 115.00; 95% CI 6.11-2165.95), percent concentricity ≥50% (OR 55.00; 95% CI 4.13-732.71), and percent irregularity <50% (OR 55.00; 95% CI 4.13-732.71) indicated significantly higher odds of PACNS compared with ICAD. Discussion: Our results suggest that quantitative VWMRI metrics, CSF pleocytosis, and clinical features of encephalopathy, seizure, and headache significantly predict a diagnosis of probable PACNS when compared with ICAD.

Current and future advances in practice: a practical approach to the diagnosis and management of primary central nervous system vasculitis.

Primary CNS vasculitis (CNSV) is a rare, idiopathic autoimmune disease that, if untreated, can cause significant morbidity and mortality. It is a challenging diagnosis due to multiple mimics that can be difficult to differentiate, given that the CNS is an immunologically privileged and structurally isolated space. As such, diagnosis requires comprehensive multimodal investigations. Usually, a brain biopsy is required to confirm the diagnosis. Treatment of CNSV involves aggressive immunosuppression, but relapses and morbidity remain common. This expert review provides the reader with a deeper understanding of presentations of CNSV and the multiple parallel diagnostic pathways that are required to diagnose CNSV (and recognize its mimics), highlights the important knowledge gaps that exist in the disease and also highlights how we might be able to care for these patients better in the future.

Spine Anatomy Imaging: An Update.

Spinal MR imaging is excellent for identifying details of spinal anatomy, including intraspinal contents, neural foramina, joints, ligaments, intervertebral discs, and bone marrow. Cortical bony structures of the spine are better imaged using CT. Conventional and CT myelography is an alternative to MR imaging in those with contraindications to MR imaging or in evaluation of spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Motion- and flow-related artifacts may occur during imaging and should not be mistaken for lesions. With advancements in MR imaging hardware and software, spinal MR imaging can expand its role in the delineation of normal and abnormal spinal anatomy.