Quantitative susceptibility mapping identifies hippocampal and other subcortical grey matter tissue composition changes in temporal lobe epilepsy.

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is associated with widespread brain alterations. Using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) alongside transverse relaxation rate ( R 2 * ), we investigated regional brain susceptibility changes in 36 patients with left-sided (LTLE) or right-sided TLE (RTLE) secondary to hippocampal sclerosis, and 27 healthy controls (HC). We compared three susceptibility calculation methods to ensure image quality. Correlations of susceptibility and R 2 * with age of epilepsy onset, frequency of focal-to-bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), and neuropsychological test scores were examined. Weak-harmonic QSM (WH-QSM) successfully reduced noise and removed residual background field artefacts. Significant susceptibility increases were identified in the left putamen in the RTLE group compared to the LTLE group, the right putamen and right thalamus in the RTLE group compared to HC, and a significant susceptibility decrease in the left hippocampus in LTLE versus HC. LTLE patients who underwent epilepsy surgery showed significantly lower left-versus-right hippocampal susceptibility. Significant R 2 * changes were found between TLE and HC groups in the amygdala, putamen, thalamus, and in the hippocampus. Specifically, decreased R2 * was found in the left and right hippocampus in LTLE and RTLE, respectively, compared to HC. Susceptibility and R 2 * were significantly correlated with cognitive test scores in the hippocampus, globus pallidus, and thalamus. FBTCS frequency correlated positively with ipsilateral thalamic and contralateral putamen susceptibility and with R 2 * in bilateral globi pallidi. Age of onset was correlated with susceptibility in the hippocampus and putamen, and with R 2 * in the caudate. Susceptibility and R 2 * changes observed in TLE groups suggest selective loss of low-myelinated neurons alongside iron redistribution in the hippocampi, predominantly ipsilaterally, indicating QSM's sensitivity to local pathology. Increased susceptibility and R 2 * in the thalamus and putamen suggest increased iron content and reflect disease severity.

Investigating the effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of QSM and a robust tilt correction method.

PURPOSE: Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is used increasingly for clinical research where oblique image acquisition is commonplace, but its effects on QSM accuracy are not well understood. THEORY AND METHODS: The QSM processing pipeline involves defining the unit magnetic dipole kernel, which requires knowledge of the direction of the main magnetic field B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ with respect to the acquired image volume axes. The direction of B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ is dependent on the axis and angle of rotation in oblique acquisition. Using both a numerical brain phantom and in vivo acquisitions in 5 healthy volunteers, we analyzed the effects of oblique acquisition on magnetic susceptibility maps. We compared three tilt-correction schemes at each step in the QSM pipeline: phase unwrapping, background field removal and susceptibility calculation, using the RMS error and QSM-tuned structural similarity index. RESULTS: Rotation of wrapped phase images gave severe artifacts. Background field removal with projection onto dipole fields gave the most accurate susceptibilities when the field map was first rotated into alignment with B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ . Laplacian boundary value and variable-kernel sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data background field removal methods gave accurate results without tilt correction. For susceptibility calculation, thresholded k-space division, iterative Tikhonov regularization, and weighted linear total variation regularization, all performed most accurately when local field maps were rotated into alignment with B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ before susceptibility calculation. CONCLUSION: For accurate QSM, oblique acquisition must be taken into account. Rotation of images into alignment with B ^ 0 $$ {\hat{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ should be carried out after phase unwrapping and before background-field removal. We provide open-source tilt-correction code to incorporate easily into existing pipelines: https://github.com/o-snow/QSM_TiltCorrection.git.